Flowers2 said: MuthaFunka said: Because there are those out there that feel uncomfortable and uneasy with strong-minded people who don't deviate from their beliefs and preferences. I believe that... specifying certain preferences make some people upset.. Especially if that preference excludes them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Flowers2 said: I believe that... specifying certain preferences make some people upset.. Especially if that preference excludes them. If that makes you feel better Erin. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: JustErin said: Especially if that preference excludes them. If that makes you feel better Erin. Why would that make me "feel better"? I'm no different, I don't like to be excluded...but the difference is that I won't say that person is at fault or shallow for not liking what I am. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowers2 said: MuthaFunka said: Because there are those out there that feel uncomfortable and uneasy with strong-minded people who don't deviate from their beliefs and preferences. I believe that... specifying certain preferences make some people upset.. Yep! It's been that way for centuries. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: JustErin said: I don't see it as being anything but having a preference in what they are attracted to and if you end up missing out on someone or an experience from someone you're not attracted to....well, who cares because you're not attracted to them. So really, you may be missing out on something but it's not something you would want to be involved in in the first place.
Sounds good to me. i agree too its called preference NOT prejudice due to the content i suggest you like this... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Flowers2 said: I know what you said, you've said the same thing in other threads... if a person only likes certain things, you feel they're wrong for saying that... No that is not what i said. Let me make it real simple for you as you don't appear to be able to grasp it any other way. This is how i feel. If a person states that they only ever date a person who is (insert colour,religion,hair colour,weight,or any other variable here) then they are demonstrating a prejudice or ism against anyone without said variable. At no point have i said they can't or shouldn't do that or removed their ability to do so, i have simply stated that such ones demonstrate a closed attitude. The problem here is that in some way you CARE if people don't like your choice. mdiver, even when folks said preferences based on having someone with the same cultural background.. you still rejected that lol ... I love chocolate men, if I say I want a chocolate man only cause he can relate and understand me and we have the same experiences ..and you get pissed cause of that.. that's real silly ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Flowers2 said: I believe that... specifying certain preferences make some people upset.. Especially if that preference excludes them. You ain't neva' lied. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweet said: uPtoWnNY said: Sounds good to me. i agree too its called preference NOT prejudice Go 'head, sexiness. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Flowers2 said: I believe that... specifying certain preferences make some people upset.. Especially if that preference excludes them. I love you B I N G O .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: sweet said: i agree too its called preference NOT prejudice Go 'head, sexiness. why thank u now answer the thread topic due to the content i suggest you like this... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweet said: MuthaFunka said: Go 'head, sexiness. why thank u now answer the thread topic Uh oh, here's another one that needs to come to Texas for the potluck. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweet said: MuthaFunka said: Go 'head, sexiness. why thank u now answer the thread topic I already did, fucka! 1st page! Now what? Huh? Thought so! nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: sweet said: why thank u now answer the thread topic Uh oh, here's another one that needs to come to Texas for the potluck. Yes! ORGY-TIME then! Who-hoooo! nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: SCNDLS said: Uh oh, here's another one that needs to come to Texas for the potluck. Yes! ORGY-TIME then! Who-hoooo! SCNDLS, your house is gonna be turned into Mutha's harem lol .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: sweet said: why thank u now answer the thread topic I already did, fucka! 1st page! Now what? Huh? Thought so! u think i read this whole thread? but im sure i wasnt 'prejudiced' out of ur 'preference' due to the content i suggest you like this... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: sweet said: why thank u now answer the thread topic Uh oh, here's another one that needs to come to Texas for the potluck. potluck im there due to the content i suggest you like this... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowers2 said: MuthaFunka said: Yes! ORGY-TIME then! Who-hoooo! SCNDLS, your house is gonna be turned into Mutha's harem lol .. Fuck that! We need some dudes up in the joint. Post-haste! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowers2 said: MuthaFunka said: Yes! ORGY-TIME then! Who-hoooo! SCNDLS, your house is gonna be turned into Mutha's harem lol .. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Flowers2 said: SCNDLS, your house is gonna be turned into Mutha's harem lol .. Fuck that! We need some dudes up in the joint. Post-haste! Adisa said he'd come.. but he said June.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweet said: MuthaFunka said: I already did, fucka! 1st page! Now what? Huh? Thought so! u think i read this whole thread? but im sure i wasnt 'prejudiced' out of ur 'preference' nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowers2 said: SCNDLS said: Fuck that! We need some dudes up in the joint. Post-haste! Adisa said he'd come.. but he said June.. He's gon' be shakin' his moneymaker in Cancun. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sweet said: SCNDLS said: Uh oh, here's another one that needs to come to Texas for the potluck. potluck im there Hold up! But what you brangin'? nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Flowers2 said: SCNDLS, your house is gonna be turned into Mutha's harem lol .. Fuck that! We need some dudes up in the joint. Post-haste! Only to help bring in the food...then they can STEP! nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mdiver said: Flowers2 said: I know what you said, you've said the same thing in other threads... if a person only likes certain things, you feel they're wrong for saying that... No that is not what i said. Let me make it real simple for you as you don't appear to be able to grasp it any other way. This is how i feel. If a person states that they only ever date a person who is (insert colour,religion,hair colour,weight,or any other variable here) then they are demonstrating a prejudice or ism against anyone without said variable. At no point have i said they can't or shouldn't do that or removed their ability to do so, i have simply stated that such ones demonstrate a closed attitude. The problem here is that in some way you CARE if people don't like your choice. "What's 'non-sequitur' mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English dictionary?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tackam said: mdiver said: No that is not what i said. Let me make it real simple for you as you don't appear to be able to grasp it any other way. This is how i feel. If a person states that they only ever date a person who is (insert colour,religion,hair colour,weight,or any other variable here) then they are demonstrating a prejudice or ism against anyone without said variable. At no point have i said they can't or shouldn't do that or removed their ability to do so, i have simply stated that such ones demonstrate a closed attitude. The problem here is that in some way you CARE if people don't like your choice. Some people just don't get it do they? As long as the ism isn't against them they dont give a fuck | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't mind having a closed attitude to ugly, fat chicks. That I can live with. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: I don't mind having a closed attitude to ugly, fat chicks. That I can live with.
Deep | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: I don't mind having a closed attitude to ugly, fat chicks. That I can live with.
No! Wait! Don't do that! You might "miss out" on somebody! nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: uPtoWnNY said: I don't mind having a closed attitude to ugly, fat chicks. That I can live with.
No! Wait! Don't do that! You might "miss out" on somebody! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: kenlacam said: I don't have a type. I look at the face. If the face is there, she could be small, medium or large, I really don't have a preference.
I'm the same. It's all about a face to me. As long as their body is not extreme either way, I'll find them hot if they have a great face. If someone has a face I LOVE I'm willing to forgive nearly any "shortcoming" 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |