At the site I'm moderating I just read a thread about older women and masturbation.

Now I have thoughts in my head about little old ladies getting off

If anyone out there could help by, say, posting pictures of under-40 hotties (female, please), I would REALLY appreciate it


Thank you all so much in advance

i wonder if Ian and Matt have those kinda problems

Nikster said:

What site is that?!

Here you go,no nudity this time moderators I promise





I hope the next one is ok, no nudity but pretty sexy

Oh thankyou thankyou thankyou


The site is www.fallengoddess.com It's a lesbian/bi-chick site

Nikster said:

sounds good i'ma check it out later
i hope you dont get anymore yuckie posts tonight.

Nikster said:

That website is upsetting -

On the front page it says

"If you are not a lesbian / queer / transgendered woman, or if those types of women offend you, please, do everyone a favor and hit you browser “back” button now."

I can understand the latter, but not the former. Isn't it about tolerance?

Natsume said:

I didnt think it was upsetting,it just seems that the people who run and visit that site don't want to hear anyone's shit.It's a DONT FUCK WITH ME message. Good for them I love girls who can kick ass!

Sweeny79 said:

To me it seems like a message of unnecessary exclusion.

If you are straight and respectful, then what's the problem?

This is a Prince site, but a surprising number of people who post here are not a fan of Prince whatsoever.

Their message is "The rules here are simple - respect, compassion, understanding."

They should really practice what they preach.

Natsume said:

I think you may be misreading it. . .notice the 'OR'. . .I agree that it would be better to phrase it simply, "if depictions of female homosexual behavior offend you, do us a favor and go away." But I'm sure they get a lot of hate mail from (Christian) zealots, and they are trying to tell those people to bugger off. Yeah?

Natsume said:

*ugh* I know...we've been trying to talk to the web mistress about that...

She sez she's gonna change it...she just has not gotten to it yet



.
[This message was edited Sat Jun 7 19:22:37 PDT 2003 by Nikster]

tackam said:

"If you are not a lesbian / queer / transgendered woman, or if those types of women offend you, please, do everyone a favor and hit you browser “back” button now."

I don't believe I am misreading it. I understand they are not blatantly calling all heterosexual females homophobic. However, I do not understand why they are saying if you are straight, you are not welcome.

They really should remove the former part. Even though I'm sure they are trying to weed out the comments from the 'Christian zealots' and such, it inherently assumes that if you are straight, then you are homophobic. They might not have meant it in that manner, but that is what it infers.

And that upsets me.

Nikster said:

Coo coo... glad to hear that, Nikster.



(and that's a mighty fancy typo there )


[This message was edited Sat Jun 7 19:23:01 PDT 2003 by Natsume]

Natsume said:

I understand. And I don't think they meant it that way. . .I think the second part of the statement is meant to say that non-homophobic straight women are welcome--it wouldn't make much sense to tell people who identify themselves as queer that they must be queer AND not offended by queers to enter! But you're right that they worded it very poorly.

Natsume said:

I'll bring that up to her again.

If you'd like to address her directly, her email is rachel@fallengoddess.com

tackam said:

Yeah, their intention got muddled up in the poor wording. I get what they mean, but it can be easily misread.

It's funny how we're conversing on two different threads about two totally different topics

Natsume said:

Umm..I fixed the typo

Please don't feel that you'd be unwelcome there...I'd like to see some of you there

Nikster said:

Done.

Thanks, Nikster!

Natsume said:

Let's merge them by considering the following question: are bangs as horrible as the image of old ladies getting off?

I would argue that each can be ok in the right context, ie. as long as I don't have to be the one doing the work, I don't mind.

tackam said:

LMAO!!

That was brilliant!!

Natsume said:

Ummm...that is really not helping my situation here, ladies :O

Ummm...hotties please?














Please??? :puppydogeyes:

gil elvgren kix ass. (hope this helps, nikster!)

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

Hmmm...maybe

Is she under 40?

Nikster said:

i think all of elvgren's models were under 40...

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

Oh...ok...*whew*