A statement from attorneys for the Estate in response to the online posting:

FROM THE ESTATE:

Any doubts about the validity of Michael’s will and his selection of Executors were thoroughly and completely debunked two years ago when a challenge was rejected by the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the California Court of Appeals and, finally, the California Supreme Court.

Under the supervision of Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff, Co-Executors John Branca and John McClain have diligently carried out their fiduciary duties as well as their obligation to Michael to make sure that his Estate benefits the only family members he named in his will – his mother and his three children.

We are saddened that false and defamatory accusations grounded in stale Internet conspiracy theories are now being made by certain members of Michael’s family, whom he chose to leave out of his will. We are especially disheartened that they come at a time when remarkable progress has been made to secure the financial future of his children by turning around the Estate’s finances as well as during a time when so many of Michael’s fans, old and new, are enjoying his artistry through exciting new projects. ”

http://www.celebuzz.com/2...exclusive/

[Edited 7/18/12 6:58am]

[Edited 7/18/12 7:14am]

The Jacksons should just change their name to the Gofers because that's all they seem to do.

Here's a better look at the letter. What's interesting to me is that there is no date on this letter. Dont letters of this type usually have the date posted at the top or end of the letter?

http://www.scribd.com/doc...AEG-ET-ALL

NaughtyKitty said:

A statement from attorneys for the Estate in response to the online posting:

FROM THE ESTATE:

Any doubts about the validity of Michael’s will and his selection of Executors were thoroughly and completely debunked two years ago when a challenge was rejected by the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the California Court of Appeals and, finally, the California Supreme Court.

Under the supervision of Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff, Co-Executors John Branca and John McClain have diligently carried out their fiduciary duties as well as their obligation to Michael to make sure that his Estate benefits the only family members he named in his will – his mother and his three children.

We are saddened that false and defamatory accusations grounded in stale Internet conspiracy theories are now being made by certain members of Michael’s family, whom he chose to leave out of his will. We are especially disheartened that they come at a time when remarkable progress has been made to secure the financial future of his children by turning around the Estate’s finances as well as during a time when so many of Michael’s fans, old and new, are enjoying his artistry through exciting new projects. ”

[Edited 7/18/12 6:58am]

This is why I dont like the Jackson Family, this further supports why Michael stayed FAR away from them as possible. I will never understand how a family that claims to love their kin treats them like a 24 hour bank account through exploitation, lying and throwing them under the bus. If Ofah had said the kinds of things she did about Michael and was aware of it and was Michaels mother or any family member I would have not sat down with her and would have gave her a piece of my mind, weird ass money hungry family .

Whether this is authentic or not,this is how Ive always felt.

NaughtyKitty said:

I'm hearing that its legit, ppl are saying that Randy confirmed the letter on his Twitter. @ this family!!

Michael Jackson’s Family Demands Estate Executors Resign, Effective Immediately: ‘Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent’ (EXCLUSIVE)

Michael Jackson‘s family has demanded the executors of their late brother’s estate resign effective immediately, Celebuzz has exclusively learned.

In a scathing letter — obtained exclusively by Celebuzz and signed by Michael’s sisters Janet, Rebbie and brothers Tito, Randy and Jermaine Jackson — the family maintains that executors John Branca and John McClain faked the King of Pop’s last Will and Testament prior to his untimely death on June 25, 2009.

“At the time we couldn’t possibly fathom what is so obvious to us now: that the Will, without question, it’s Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent,” states the legal letter.

Received by Branca and McClain Tuesday, the Jackson family accuses the executors of falsifying a legal document in order to gain control of Michael’s estate against his wishes and using the court to seal any documents that might prove otherwise.

“Since the passing of Michael, our beloved brother, you have failed to perform your duties as executors of his estate, but what you have not failed at is taking advantage of a grieving mother, father and a grieving family,” says the Jackson’s letter. ”Our brother told us, in no uncertain terms and without hesitation in the months prior to his death, that he despised both of you and that he did not want either of you to have anything to do with his life or estate for that matter.”

The letter from the family also goes on to point out numerous inconsistencies, as well as alleged missing pages of Michael Jackson’s will.

“John Branca, when we called you regarding the Will you didn’t want to interrupt your vacation,” the family contends.”You said you wouldn’t return for four days, at which time you presented to our family an incomplete Will.”

“The Will that you presented did not have our brother’s signature on it, nor did it have a signature page attached to it. When asked about the missing signature page, John Branca replied, ‘it was on its way, and you were having just a little problem finding it.’”

“Amongst many other inconsistencies in the Will, there is also a conflict around Michael’s location on the day he supposedly signed the Will, July 7, 2002. We have evidence that undoubtedly supports and proves that Michael was absolutely not in Los Angeles, California, on the date of his signature reflected in the Will at-hand.”

The Jacksons also threaten to escalate their claims to police for investigation of “potential criminal misconduct,” as well as having law firm Baker Hosteller launch legal action against the pair.

“We are going to take every appropriate action to seek justice and to see to it that the truth be known,” the letter states.

“You’ve dishonored everything that our brother Michael stood for. Your greed and hasty business decisions have shown that you have no regard for the preservation of his legacy, nor the quality of work that he exemplified.”

The Jacksons accuse the executors of robbing Michael’s children, Prince Michael Jr, 15, Paris, 14 andPrince Michael II “Blanket,“ 10, and his mother, Katherine Jenkins, of rightful inheritances by increasing the percentage of the gross income the executors receive from the estate, as well as mismanaging projects the estate undertakes.

“Tragically your deceitful actions abrogate our brother’s hopes and dreams for the lives of his children, family and legacy,” the letter states.

Additionally, the family accuses executors Branca and McCalin of manipulating the court system during Michael’s mother’s wrongful death lawsuit against AEG, the entertainment company behind the star’s final tour.

The Jacksons say the company is using “heinous and heartless threats” against Jackson’s 82-year-old mother — who they reveal recently had a “mini-stroke” — to call off the suit.

“AEG has been very vocal about how they are going to destroy her and her family publicly and blame her for Michael’s death,” the family says.

“However, you did not hesitate writing a letter to Judge Palazuelos presiding over the AEG wrongful death case, wherein, you asked the judge to keep ALL documents handed over by AEG for discovery under court seal, clearly protecting AEG, but not protecting our mother nor our niece and nephews Paris, Prince and Blanket,” the letter contends.

“Who are you working for? What is it that you don’t want to be known?”

“We know there is most certainly a conspiracy surrounding our brother’s death and now coarse manipulation and fear are being used to cover it up.”

The family state in no uncertain terms they will stand united to ensure the executors step down:

“THIS HAS TO STOP NOW; NO MORE!! You will not succeed. John Branca, after our brother passed, you said to our mother, ‘I AM MICHAEL JACKSON NOW.’ How dare you. Make no mistake, Mr. Branca, before we hit the stage, were a family and still to this day we are a family.”

Noticeably missing from the group of signatures, however, are Michael’s other siblings Jackie, Marlon and his outspoken sister LaToya Jackson.

http://www.celebuzz.com/2...exclusive/

So why ae they saying all this now? Interesting how this letter comes out now--recently after the Estate executors filed papers showing that they've generated almost $500 million dollars for MJ's Estate as of May 2012. Why arent LaToya, Marlon and Jackie's signatures on this? And who the heck is Katherine Jenkins? at this family. The drama never stops.

[Edited 7/18/12 6:57am]

Either a misprint or could they mean Blanket's mother?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:17am]

NaughtyKitty said:

Here's a better look at the letter. What's interesting to me is that there is no date on this letter. Dont letters of this type usually have the date posted at the top or end of the letter?

http://www.scribd.com/doc...AEG-ET-ALL

This is why I can't take them seriously. And seriously Janet was one of the signers? Is she that scared that her brothers may try getting her money now? Because that's all I took from HER signature... if they really did this, it shows how stupid they seem, if they didn't do this, then someone is playing a cruel, mean joke on them. But either way, they still played a part in the public opinion that that's just what they are.

dag said:

NaughtyKitty said:

I'm hearing that its legit, ppl are saying that Randy confirmed the letter on his Twitter. @ this family!!

Michael Jackson’s Family Demands Estate Executors Resign, Effective Immediately: ‘Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent’ (EXCLUSIVE)

Michael Jackson‘s family has demanded the executors of their late brother’s estate resign effective immediately, Celebuzz has exclusively learned.

In a scathing letter — obtained exclusively by Celebuzz and signed by Michael’s sisters Janet, Rebbie and brothers Tito, Randy and Jermaine Jackson — the family maintains that executors John Branca and John McClain faked the King of Pop’s last Will and Testament prior to his untimely death on June 25, 2009.

“At the time we couldn’t possibly fathom what is so obvious to us now: that the Will, without question, it’s Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent,” states the legal letter.

Received by Branca and McClain Tuesday, the Jackson family accuses the executors of falsifying a legal document in order to gain control of Michael’s estate against his wishes and using the court to seal any documents that might prove otherwise.

“Since the passing of Michael, our beloved brother, you have failed to perform your duties as executors of his estate, but what you have not failed at is taking advantage of a grieving mother, father and a grieving family,” says the Jackson’s letter. ”Our brother told us, in no uncertain terms and without hesitation in the months prior to his death, that he despised both of you and that he did not want either of you to have anything to do with his life or estate for that matter.”

The letter from the family also goes on to point out numerous inconsistencies, as well as alleged missing pages of Michael Jackson’s will.

“John Branca, when we called you regarding the Will you didn’t want to interrupt your vacation,” the family contends.”You said you wouldn’t return for four days, at which time you presented to our family an incomplete Will.”

“The Will that you presented did not have our brother’s signature on it, nor did it have a signature page attached to it. When asked about the missing signature page, John Branca replied, ‘it was on its way, and you were having just a little problem finding it.’”

“Amongst many other inconsistencies in the Will, there is also a conflict around Michael’s location on the day he supposedly signed the Will, July 7, 2002. We have evidence that undoubtedly supports and proves that Michael was absolutely not in Los Angeles, California, on the date of his signature reflected in the Will at-hand.”

The Jacksons also threaten to escalate their claims to police for investigation of “potential criminal misconduct,” as well as having law firm Baker Hosteller launch legal action against the pair.

“We are going to take every appropriate action to seek justice and to see to it that the truth be known,” the letter states.

“You’ve dishonored everything that our brother Michael stood for. Your greed and hasty business decisions have shown that you have no regard for the preservation of his legacy, nor the quality of work that he exemplified.”

The Jacksons accuse the executors of robbing Michael’s children, Prince Michael Jr, 15, Paris, 14 andPrince Michael II “Blanket,“ 10, and his mother, Katherine Jenkins, of rightful inheritances by increasing the percentage of the gross income the executors receive from the estate, as well as mismanaging projects the estate undertakes.

“Tragically your deceitful actions abrogate our brother’s hopes and dreams for the lives of his children, family and legacy,” the letter states.

Additionally, the family accuses executors Branca and McCalin of manipulating the court system during Michael’s mother’s wrongful death lawsuit against AEG, the entertainment company behind the star’s final tour.

The Jacksons say the company is using “heinous and heartless threats” against Jackson’s 82-year-old mother — who they reveal recently had a “mini-stroke” — to call off the suit.

“AEG has been very vocal about how they are going to destroy her and her family publicly and blame her for Michael’s death,” the family says.

“However, you did not hesitate writing a letter to Judge Palazuelos presiding over the AEG wrongful death case, wherein, you asked the judge to keep ALL documents handed over by AEG for discovery under court seal, clearly protecting AEG, but not protecting our mother nor our niece and nephews Paris, Prince and Blanket,” the letter contends.

“Who are you working for? What is it that you don’t want to be known?”

“We know there is most certainly a conspiracy surrounding our brother’s death and now coarse manipulation and fear are being used to cover it up.”

The family state in no uncertain terms they will stand united to ensure the executors step down:

“THIS HAS TO STOP NOW; NO MORE!! You will not succeed. John Branca, after our brother passed, you said to our mother, ‘I AM MICHAEL JACKSON NOW.’ How dare you. Make no mistake, Mr. Branca, before we hit the stage, were a family and still to this day we are a family.”

Noticeably missing from the group of signatures, however, are Michael’s other siblings Jackie, Marlon and his outspoken sister LaToya Jackson.

http://www.celebuzz.com/2...exclusive/

So why ae they saying all this now? Interesting how this letter comes out now--recently after the Estate executors filed papers showing that they've generated almost $500 million dollars for MJ's Estate as of May 2012. Why arent LaToya, Marlon and Jackie's signatures on this? And who the heck is Katherine Jenkins? at this family. The drama never stops.

[Edited 7/18/12 6:57am]

Either a misprint or could they mean Blanket's mother?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:17am]

Nah they meant "Katherine Jackson". It's interesting they said KATHERINE JENKINS! Jenkins?!

Timmy84 said:

dag said:

Either a misprint or could they mean Blanket's mother?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:17am]

Nah they meant "Katherine Jackson". It's interesting they said KATHERINE JENKINS! Jenkins?!

I thought they meant Katherine Jackson too like you Timmy. But when I read the sentence again I wondered if they were referring to Blanket's mom like Dag said too...I dont know. Could be a typo but then again, that's one hell of a typo...screwing up their own mother's name like that! Didnt they have anyone proofread this before they sent it out?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:44am]

NaughtyKitty said:

Timmy84 said:

Nah they meant "Katherine Jackson". It's interesting they said KATHERINE JENKINS! Jenkins?!

I thought they meant Katherine Jackson too like you Timmy. But when I read the sentence again I wondered if they were referring to Blanket's mom like Dag said too...I dont know. Could be a typo but then again, that's one hell of a typo...screwing up their own mother's name like that! Didnt they have anyone proofread this before they sent it out?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:44am]

No they didn't. They just foolishly sent it as if no one was gonna point it out. These Jacksons are so gullible they wouldn't even know about learning about business and they wonder why Michael left them OUT THE DAMN WILL! If anything happens to Katherine and since Diana is on the will, Diana better be prepared because... smh, this is gonna be a barn burner, even more than it already is. But yeah they actually typed KATHERINE JENKINS, their MAMA!

I keep on reading the actual letter and I can't see Katherine's name on it at all. It's just in the article, so is it the journalist's mistake or do they really quote parts of the letter that we don't see?

Timmy84 said:

NaughtyKitty said:

Here's a better look at the letter. What's interesting to me is that there is no date on this letter. Dont letters of this type usually have the date posted at the top or end of the letter?

http://www.scribd.com/doc...AEG-ET-ALL

This is why I can't take them seriously. And seriously Janet was one of the signers? Is she that scared that her brothers may try getting her money now? Because that's all I took from HER signature... if they really did this, it shows how stupid they seem, if they didn't do this, then someone is playing a cruel, mean joke on them. But either way, they still played a part in the public opinion that that's just what they are.

This is crazy! Even tho I dont agree with everything the estate has done since Mikes death, they've done a great job - paying back money - getting revenues - solving other problems like being sued by various people. I cant believe Janet is on this too? Wow... THis family is so money hungry, like seriously. Wow...

dag said:

I keep on reading the actual letter and I can't see Katherine's name on it at all. It's just in the article, so is it the journalist's mistake or do they really quote parts of the letter that we don't see?

Hmm now that you mention it and I'm reading the article again... it don't seem like Katherine's name ain't in the letter... sound like those fools at Celebuzz wrote it.

Timmy84 said:

dag said:

I keep on reading the actual letter and I can't see Katherine's name on it at all. It's just in the article, so is it the journalist's mistake or do they really quote parts of the letter that we don't see?

Hmm now that you mention it and I'm reading the article again... it don't seem like Katherine's name ain't in the letter... sound like those fools at Celebuzz wrote it.

But still even for a journalist that's quite a typo. I don't get it.

dag said:

Timmy84 said:

Hmm now that you mention it and I'm reading the article again... it don't seem like Katherine's name ain't in the letter... sound like those fools at Celebuzz wrote it.

But still even for a journalist that's quite a typo. I don't get it.

Well tabloid and celebrity blog writers are not exactly known for their smarts.

Timmy84 said:

dag said:

I keep on reading the actual letter and I can't see Katherine's name on it at all. It's just in the article, so is it the journalist's mistake or do they really quote parts of the letter that we don't see?

Hmm now that you mention it and I'm reading the article again... it don't seem like Katherine's name ain't in the letter... sound like those fools at Celebuzz wrote it.

They dont mention her by name in the letter, but they refer to her as "our mother".

NaughtyKitty said:

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8

We ask that everyone respects that this is a serious matter that will be handled by the proper authorities.

Details

13hRandy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8

Yes, the letter is authentic.

Makes me wish Tina had actually succeeding in shooting his foot because he always puts it in his mouth... fuck him.

NaughtyKitty said:

Timmy84 said:

Hmm now that you mention it and I'm reading the article again... it don't seem like Katherine's name ain't in the letter... sound like those fools at Celebuzz wrote it.

They dont mention her by name in the letter, but they refer to her as "our mother".

Like I said if they really cared about "their mother", they should help her and not let her get sick and die. Seriously, what went on in their minds as kids to make them behave the way they do now? Makes me think these children don't give a damn about their mother, that only Michael did. Going back at their history, the siblings had always demanded to their mother to get them money or speak to Michael. Talking about "this has made her ill" like they had nothing to do with it over the years. Fuck them. And where is her "loving husband"? Oh yeah, he's selling his suck ass perfume at a different store since they "sabotaged" it at the other store where he nearly fell off his seat sleeping. And Janet... I'm just disappointed in her. I really am. But then again, her actions in the last three years regarding Michael's death has just made me really upset.

Poor Michael's children growing in all of this. I hope they will stick together when they grow up in order to be strong enough to fight everyone trying to take advantage of them.

Timmy84 said:

NaughtyKitty said:

Randy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8

We ask that everyone respects that this is a serious matter that will be handled by the proper authorities.

Details

13hRandy Jackson ‏@randyjackson8

Yes, the letter is authentic.

Makes me wish Tina had actually succeeding in shooting his foot because he always puts it in his mouth... fuck him.

Ikr! Again I have to smh @ these peoples. The brothers need to be focusing on their Unity Tour and not channeling their energy trying to stir up nonsense and drama. And speaking of their Unity tour, I find it interesting that two of the brothers (Jermaine and Tito) signed their names to this letter while the other two (Marlon and Jackie) left their names out ot if. How's that for unity?

Like I said if they really cared about "their mother", they should help her and not let her get sick and die. Seriously, what went on in their minds as kids to make them behave the way they do now? Makes me think these children don't give a damn about their mother, that only Michael did. Going back at their history, the siblings had always demanded to their mother to get them money or speak to Michael. Talking about "this has made her ill" like they had nothing to do with it over the years. Fuck them. And where is her "loving husband"? Oh yeah, he's selling his suck ass perfume at a different store since they "sabotaged" it at the other store where he nearly fell off his seat sleeping. And Janet... I'm just disappointed in her. I really am. But then again, her actions in the last three years regarding Michael's death has just made me really upset.

I hear ya Timmy I. Just. Dont. Get. These. People.

dag said:

NaughtyKitty said:

I'm hearing that its legit, ppl are saying that Randy confirmed the letter on his Twitter. @ this family!!

Michael Jackson’s Family Demands Estate Executors Resign, Effective Immediately: ‘Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent’ (EXCLUSIVE)

Michael Jackson‘s family has demanded the executors of their late brother’s estate resign effective immediately, Celebuzz has exclusively learned.

In a scathing letter — obtained exclusively by Celebuzz and signed by Michael’s sisters Janet, Rebbie and brothers Tito, Randy and Jermaine Jackson — the family maintains that executors John Branca and John McClain faked the King of Pop’s last Will and Testament prior to his untimely death on June 25, 2009.

“At the time we couldn’t possibly fathom what is so obvious to us now: that the Will, without question, it’s Fake, Flawed and Fraudulent,” states the legal letter.

Received by Branca and McClain Tuesday, the Jackson family accuses the executors of falsifying a legal document in order to gain control of Michael’s estate against his wishes and using the court to seal any documents that might prove otherwise.

“Since the passing of Michael, our beloved brother, you have failed to perform your duties as executors of his estate, but what you have not failed at is taking advantage of a grieving mother, father and a grieving family,” says the Jackson’s letter. ”Our brother told us, in no uncertain terms and without hesitation in the months prior to his death, that he despised both of you and that he did not want either of you to have anything to do with his life or estate for that matter.”

The letter from the family also goes on to point out numerous inconsistencies, as well as alleged missing pages of Michael Jackson’s will.

“John Branca, when we called you regarding the Will you didn’t want to interrupt your vacation,” the family contends.”You said you wouldn’t return for four days, at which time you presented to our family an incomplete Will.”

“The Will that you presented did not have our brother’s signature on it, nor did it have a signature page attached to it. When asked about the missing signature page, John Branca replied, ‘it was on its way, and you were having just a little problem finding it.’”

“Amongst many other inconsistencies in the Will, there is also a conflict around Michael’s location on the day he supposedly signed the Will, July 7, 2002. We have evidence that undoubtedly supports and proves that Michael was absolutely not in Los Angeles, California, on the date of his signature reflected in the Will at-hand.”

The Jacksons also threaten to escalate their claims to police for investigation of “potential criminal misconduct,” as well as having law firm Baker Hosteller launch legal action against the pair.

“We are going to take every appropriate action to seek justice and to see to it that the truth be known,” the letter states.

“You’ve dishonored everything that our brother Michael stood for. Your greed and hasty business decisions have shown that you have no regard for the preservation of his legacy, nor the quality of work that he exemplified.”

The Jacksons accuse the executors of robbing Michael’s children, Prince Michael Jr, 15, Paris, 14 andPrince Michael II “Blanket,“ 10, and his mother, Katherine Jenkins, of rightful inheritances by increasing the percentage of the gross income the executors receive from the estate, as well as mismanaging projects the estate undertakes.

“Tragically your deceitful actions abrogate our brother’s hopes and dreams for the lives of his children, family and legacy,” the letter states.

Additionally, the family accuses executors Branca and McCalin of manipulating the court system during Michael’s mother’s wrongful death lawsuit against AEG, the entertainment company behind the star’s final tour.

The Jacksons say the company is using “heinous and heartless threats” against Jackson’s 82-year-old mother — who they reveal recently had a “mini-stroke” — to call off the suit.

“AEG has been very vocal about how they are going to destroy her and her family publicly and blame her for Michael’s death,” the family says.

“However, you did not hesitate writing a letter to Judge Palazuelos presiding over the AEG wrongful death case, wherein, you asked the judge to keep ALL documents handed over by AEG for discovery under court seal, clearly protecting AEG, but not protecting our mother nor our niece and nephews Paris, Prince and Blanket,” the letter contends.

“Who are you working for? What is it that you don’t want to be known?”

“We know there is most certainly a conspiracy surrounding our brother’s death and now coarse manipulation and fear are being used to cover it up.”

The family state in no uncertain terms they will stand united to ensure the executors step down:

“THIS HAS TO STOP NOW; NO MORE!! You will not succeed. John Branca, after our brother passed, you said to our mother, ‘I AM MICHAEL JACKSON NOW.’ How dare you. Make no mistake, Mr. Branca, before we hit the stage, were a family and still to this day we are a family.”

Noticeably missing from the group of signatures, however, are Michael’s other siblings Jackie, Marlon and his outspoken sister LaToya Jackson.

http://www.celebuzz.com/2...exclusive/

So why ae they saying all this now? Interesting how this letter comes out now--recently after the Estate executors filed papers showing that they've generated almost $500 million dollars for MJ's Estate as of May 2012. Why arent LaToya, Marlon and Jackie's signatures on this? And who the heck is Katherine Jenkins? at this family. The drama never stops.

[Edited 7/18/12 6:57am]

Either a misprint or could they mean Blanket's mother?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:17am]

Misprint. Come on...you think that this lady is Blanket's real mama? He doesn't even look like her.

[Edited 7/18/12 8:55am]

NaughtyKitty said:

Timmy84 said:

Ikr! Again I have to smh @ these peoples. The brothers need to be focusing on their Unity Tour and not channeling their energy trying to stir up nonsense and drama. And speaking of their Unity tour, I find it interesting that two of the brothers (Jermaine and Tito) signed their names to this letter while the other two (Marlon and Jackie) left their names out ot if. How's that for unity?

Like I said if they really cared about "their mother", they should help her and not let her get sick and die. Seriously, what went on in their minds as kids to make them behave the way they do now? Makes me think these children don't give a damn about their mother, that only Michael did. Going back at their history, the siblings had always demanded to their mother to get them money or speak to Michael. Talking about "this has made her ill" like they had nothing to do with it over the years. Fuck them. And where is her "loving husband"? Oh yeah, he's selling his suck ass perfume at a different store since they "sabotaged" it at the other store where he nearly fell off his seat sleeping. And Janet... I'm just disappointed in her. I really am. But then again, her actions in the last three years regarding Michael's death has just made me really upset.

I hear ya Timmy I. Just. Dont. Get. These. People.

I agree, how you gonna call your tour "The Unity Tour" when Marlon and Jackie Jackson won't agree to your schemes? It's like they treat each other as business transactions. Instead of being a family, they go off like greedy scavengers wanting to get a piece of the pie. And to be frank, this is something MOST of the family has been trying to do since "Thriller" sold all those damn copies 30 years ago.

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

dag said:

Either a misprint or could they mean Blanket's mother?

[Edited 7/18/12 7:17am]

Misprint. Come on...you think that this lady is Blanket's real mama? He doesn't even look like her.

[Edited 7/18/12 8:55am]

Come on, even if they were refering to Blanket's mother, do you think this is the only Katherine Jenkins in the world? Didn't actually Michael say she was black? Anyway, Blanket looks like Michael. He's like his clone and actually looking at her, her features are not that radically different from Blanket's. He could be a mix of the two of them. See what you can see when you try to see it?

[Edited 7/18/12 9:02am]

dag said:

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

Misprint. Come on...you think that this lady is Blanket's real mama? He doesn't even look like her.

[Edited 7/18/12 8:55am]

Come on, even if they were refering to Blanket's mother, do you think this is the only Katherine Jenkins in the world? Didn't actually Michael say she was black? Anyway, Blanket looks like Michael. He's like his clone and actually looking at her, her features are not that radically different from Blanket's. He could be a mix of the two of them. See what you can see when you try to see it?

[Edited 7/18/12 9:02am]

Ya, I know.

I'm just playin'. But she's the only person I heard of with that name. I doubt that they're referring to his biological mother because she wasn't mentioned or ever provided for in Michael's will.

And yeah, she was black, or black-hispanic (so Michael has mentioned).

Anyways, back on topic... guess now that their "tour" is coming to a close on July 29th, how do some of the brothers expect this stupid lawsuit to fly?

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

dag said:

Come on, even if they were refering to Blanket's mother, do you think this is the only Katherine Jenkins in the world? Didn't actually Michael say she was black? Anyway, Blanket looks like Michael. He's like his clone and actually looking at her, her features are not that radically different from Blanket's. He could be a mix of the two of them. See what you can see when you try to see it?

[Edited 7/18/12 9:02am]

Ya, I know.

I'm just playin'. But she's the only person I heard of with that name. I doubt that they're referring to his biological mother because she wasn't mentioned or ever provided for in Michael's will.

And yeah, she was black, or black-hispanic (so Michael has mentioned).

Yeah, I know, but I can't get the fact that MIchael mentioned putting together a contract to keep her indentity a secret away from my head, so I don't expect to see her being mentioned anywhere even if that happened to be by any chance the case.

[Edited 7/18/12 9:36am]

This is ridiculous. How can anyone of you pass judgement without possibly knowing what's going on?

[Edited 7/18/12 10:45am]

dag said:

Poor Michael's children growing in all of this. I hope they will stick together when they grow up in order to be strong enough to fight everyone trying to take advantage of them.

on the positive side, the smartest thing mj did was to put the estate in the hands of the two johns, or at least not in the hands of his family. i believe that the kids have to be 35 or 40 before any one of them can get full control of their share of the estate.

that means that the money will be in the control of the executors, pursuant to mj's will. as the two johns state in their response to this "letter", they have completed their fiduciary duties to make sure that mj3 and katherine only benefit from the estate. remember, they wasted no time in giving jermaine's "wife" and kids their walking papers from hayvenhurst.

so mj3 will have help. the family will not be able to get the kids to support them, cause the kids do not have control of the money and won't for a significant portion of their lives. the two johns are not going to let mj3 be taken advantage of. they are probably more disgusted by the jacksons than the fans b/c they've seen this behavior towards mj up close and personal for a long, long time. they were mj's advisors, working for him, and that's where their loyalties lie. they won't be handing money to mj3 knowing its really going to support other members of the family.

also, by the time mj3 are in their 30s, i'm sure they will have come to a lot of the same conclusions that we have about the alleged love that their father's family supposedly had for him.

Azz said:

This is ridiculous. How can anyone of you pass judgement without possibly knowing what's going on?

[Edited 7/18/12 10:45am]

Guess you didn't read into what was going on so to you it seems we're passing judgment but stay asleep. Go for what you know man.

Timmy84 said:

Azz said:

This is ridiculous. How can anyone of you pass judgement without possibly knowing what's going on?

[Edited 7/18/12 10:45am]

Guess you didn't read into what was going on so to you it seems we're passing judgment but stay asleep. Go for what you know man.

I didn't pass judgement; I merely asked a question.

Their mother just suffered some kind of stroke. AEG has been hounding her for filing a wrongful death suit. And their mother is also afraid. And yet you can't understand why they have written this letter? If not simply out of rash emotion.

Branca and McClain have enjoyed a huge financial windfall from this as well. They have a special arrangement, blessed by the probate judge who oversees the estate, allowing them to earn 10% from most deals they cut for the Estate.

And according to the family, Michael wasn't even in Los Angeles when the Will was supposedly written.

The letter also says that Michael told them in the months leading up to his death that he despised the pair and didn’t want them to have anything to do with his life or estate.

Michael's siblings will not, no matter what, benefit from the estate (And I'm sure they are well aware of this, as we all know their past history).

[Edited 7/18/12 12:17pm]