independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael vs. Janet
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/04/05 3:04pm

squiddyren

Michael vs. Janet

Who do you prefer?

I actually dont have an answer for any Michael vs. Somebody debate anymore (I just enjoy gathering everyone else's opinion), but I'd like to point out that without Michael's extraordinarily early fame as front-man of the Jackson 5, Janet possibly wouldn't be anywhere.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/04/05 3:09pm

kookie

avatar

squiddyren said:

Who do you prefer?

I actually dont have an answer for any Michael vs. Somebody debate anymore (I just enjoy gathering everyone else's opinion), but I'd like to point out that without Michael's extraordinarily early fame as front-man of the Jackson 5, Janet possibly wouldn't be anywhere.










I agree.nod but I haven't any say for both of them,on account of Mike's molestation case,and Janet's nudity scandal with prettyboy J.Timberlake. They're all kind of weird,but hey,that's my twocents wink
[Edited 4/4/05 15:09pm]
[Edited 4/4/05 15:09pm]
When you wanna give up, don't cause ya' know, you've always got a friend-Tamar BLB
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/04/05 3:09pm

lilgish

avatar

Tito
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/04/05 3:13pm

ThreadCula

avatar

latoya
"Nobody makes me bleed my own blood...NOBODY!"
johnart says: "I'm THE shit"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/04/05 3:24pm

jayaredee

I dig Mike's music more than Janet's personally speaking.
He's certainly a better dancer and vocalist than Janet has ever been.
Her biggest success being Rhythm Nation was an idea that was originated from Michael Jackson, but let Janet use it.

However, Janet is much more sane, and has more of a career now in days than Michael has. I also like her a lot more as a person, i can connect better with her.
Michael, i just don't get.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/04/05 3:34pm

lilgish

avatar

jayaredee said:


Her biggest success being Rhythm Nation


I thought it was Janet in 93?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/04/05 3:35pm

VoicesCarry

Michael is certainly more talented - I don't think anyone can deny that.

But as to whom I prefer - Janet. The only two Michael albums I really listen to on a regular basis are Off The Wall (his masterpiece) and Thriller, although I also like a few songs from Bad (particularly Liberian Girl), Dangerous, and HIStory.

With the help of Jimmy & Terry, Janet made two absolutely seamless records in Control and Rhythm Nation. I think I actually prefer those to Thriller, which I find vastly overrated. They seem to work much better as cohesive albums. It's interesting that Michael himself thought Rhythm Nation was genius - and was concerned about what the future held for him when it only managed to shift 6 million copies. As for her 90's output, it goes without saying that janet. and The Velvet Rope are two of my favorite pop albums, although definitely not up to her 80's standards (TVR comes close). The main problem with janet. is that it doesn't work as an album so much as a vehicle for its singles (same problem I have with Thriller).

I liked All For You (didn't love it), and tolerated Damita Jo, because it contained some of the old spark and a few good songs here and there. But she was on autopilot, and I guess she knew it - the SB was a huge mistake on her part, but what artist doesn't have one of those after 20+ years on the market? I'm sure she'll bounce back with some excellent new material. She's been a more consistent hitmaker than Michael or Madonna - I think we'll see a return to form in a few years.

Also, she's really the only sane Jackson in the bunch, so she gets points for that.
[Edited 4/4/05 15:36pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/04/05 3:41pm

CinisterCee

Echoing VoicesCarry's sentiment here.. I could quote and nod every sentence.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/04/05 3:53pm

ThreadCula

avatar

Honestly,I have all of MJ's albums and I have one Janet Cassette confused
"Nobody makes me bleed my own blood...NOBODY!"
johnart says: "I'm THE shit"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 04/04/05 3:56pm

dancerella

Jacko!

Janet's voice doesn't really do it for me though I like a lot of her songs.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 04/04/05 3:56pm

jayaredee

lilgish said:

jayaredee said:


Her biggest success being Rhythm Nation


I thought it was Janet in 93?


No, Rhythm Nation is still Janet's most critically acclaimed work, with Velvet Rope trailing closely behind.
I personally prefer the Janet album over anything else she's done. Brilliance..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 04/04/05 4:00pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

Janet. I can also agree with almost everything VoicesCarry said. smile But I also think that Janet is a better performer than MJ in terms of theatricality and the way she can connect with the audience. I've always thought she puts on a much better show than Mike.
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 04/04/05 4:04pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

Michael.


No surprise there, eh? wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 04/04/05 4:09pm

lilgish

avatar

theVelvetRoper said:

But I also think that Janet is a better performer than MJ in terms of theatricality and the way she can connect with the audience. I've always thought she puts on a much better show than Mike.


I find that impossible to believe (I know we’ve been through this before.) I doubt you saw Mike in his prime. Look at his J5 stuff...I mean you like Janet better...no big deal... smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 04/04/05 4:14pm

lilgish

avatar

Mike’s adult solo stuff is just a primer.

It’s hard for me to gage the evolution of Janet’s career because I stopped listening to the R&B/pop music from 95 to 01. The whole is HIStory project was a turn off to me (the album is good though) and I became strictly interested in metal and alternative.

I gotta listen to All For You and Damita Jo again. I wasn’t posting when Damita Jo came out, but I liked the album. The album was marketed awfully though.
[Edited 4/4/05 16:50pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 04/04/05 4:48pm

Moonbeam

avatar

I like them both, but I have stuck by Janet more. She's an all-time favorite for life. biggrin
Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 04/04/05 5:56pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

I actually dont have an answer for any Michael vs. Somebody debate anymore (I just enjoy gathering everyone else's opinion), but I'd like to point out that without Michael's extraordinarily early fame as front-man of the Jackson 5, Janet possibly wouldn't be anywhere.


I agree. I prefer Michael. I never liked Janet. I always liked Michael ever since I was little. He's the most talented in the family by far. He's an incredible performer, dancer, and singer. He's very interesting and misunderstood.I like his music videos too. A lot of Janets are boring or weird. I only like two cds of hers- Janet and Velvet Rope. She's a good dancer. I also think she's overrated and that she cannot sing really at all.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 04/04/05 6:03pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

BoOTyLiCioUs said:[quote]
I also think she's overrated and that she cannot sing really at all.


Yeah, her voice is lame.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 04/04/05 6:16pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

Yeah, her voice is lame.


I know, lol. She got to have one of the worst voices I've heard besides Britney Spears etc. Really, if her brother wasn't Michael Jackson, theres probably no way she would get signed. Do u know that she didn't even have to sing to a record deal?! They just signed her
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 04/04/05 6:22pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

Yeah, her voice is lame.


I know, lol. She got to have one of the worst voices I've heard besides Britney Spears etc. Really, if her brother wasn't Michael Jackson, theres probably no way she would get signed. Do u know that she didn't even have to sign to a record deal?! They just signed her


disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 04/04/05 6:30pm

VoicesCarry

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

Yeah, her voice is lame.


I know, lol. She got to have one of the worst voices I've heard besides Britney Spears etc. Really, if her brother wasn't Michael Jackson, theres probably no way she would get signed. Do u know that she didn't even have to sing to a record deal?! They just signed her


As far as I know, Janet auditioned with A&M. Where did you get this info that "they just signed her"?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 04/04/05 6:35pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

VoicesCarry said:

Michael is certainly more talented - I don't think anyone can deny that.

But as to whom I prefer - Janet. The only two Michael albums I really listen to on a regular basis are Off The Wall (his masterpiece) and Thriller, although I also like a few songs from Bad (particularly Liberian Girl), Dangerous, and HIStory.

With the help of Jimmy & Terry, Janet made two absolutely seamless records in Control and Rhythm Nation. I think I actually prefer those to Thriller, which I find vastly overrated. They seem to work much better as cohesive albums. It's interesting that Michael himself thought Rhythm Nation was genius - and was concerned about what the future held for him when it only managed to shift 6 million copies. As for her 90's output, it goes without saying that janet. and The Velvet Rope are two of my favorite pop albums, although definitely not up to her 80's standards (TVR comes close). The main problem with janet. is that it doesn't work as an album so much as a vehicle for its singles (same problem I have with Thriller).

I liked All For You (didn't love it), and tolerated Damita Jo, because it contained some of the old spark and a few good songs here and there. But she was on autopilot, and I guess she knew it - the SB was a huge mistake on her part, but what artist doesn't have one of those after 20+ years on the market? I'm sure she'll bounce back with some excellent new material. She's been a more consistent hitmaker than Michael or Madonna - I think we'll see a return to form in a few years.

Also, she's really the only sane Jackson in the bunch, so she gets points for that.
[Edited 4/4/05 15:36pm]
Janet? Sane? falloff

I do prefer her to Michael though.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 04/04/05 6:36pm

VoicesCarry

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

VoicesCarry said:

Michael is certainly more talented - I don't think anyone can deny that.

But as to whom I prefer - Janet. The only two Michael albums I really listen to on a regular basis are Off The Wall (his masterpiece) and Thriller, although I also like a few songs from Bad (particularly Liberian Girl), Dangerous, and HIStory.

With the help of Jimmy & Terry, Janet made two absolutely seamless records in Control and Rhythm Nation. I think I actually prefer those to Thriller, which I find vastly overrated. They seem to work much better as cohesive albums. It's interesting that Michael himself thought Rhythm Nation was genius - and was concerned about what the future held for him when it only managed to shift 6 million copies. As for her 90's output, it goes without saying that janet. and The Velvet Rope are two of my favorite pop albums, although definitely not up to her 80's standards (TVR comes close). The main problem with janet. is that it doesn't work as an album so much as a vehicle for its singles (same problem I have with Thriller).

I liked All For You (didn't love it), and tolerated Damita Jo, because it contained some of the old spark and a few good songs here and there. But she was on autopilot, and I guess she knew it - the SB was a huge mistake on her part, but what artist doesn't have one of those after 20+ years on the market? I'm sure she'll bounce back with some excellent new material. She's been a more consistent hitmaker than Michael or Madonna - I think we'll see a return to form in a few years.

Also, she's really the only sane Jackson in the bunch, so she gets points for that.
[Edited 4/4/05 15:36pm]
Janet? Sane? falloff

I do prefer her to Michael though.


Ok, so how is she insane?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 04/04/05 6:37pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

As far as I know, Janet auditioned with A&M. Where did you get this info that "they just signed her"?


I heard it from a friend who is a big fan of Michael and she has a lot of Janet's stuff so I don't know if this is true but I wouldn't doubt it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 04/04/05 6:38pm

BoOTyLiCioUs

Ok, so how is she insane?


I can tell ur a janet fan. lol. She's not insane, just odd.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 04/04/05 6:39pm

VoicesCarry

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

As far as I know, Janet auditioned with A&M. Where did you get this info that "they just signed her"?


I heard it from a friend who is a big fan of Michael and she has a lot of Janet's stuff so I don't know if this is true but I wouldn't doubt it.


Ok, never heard about that. I've read from several sources that she got an audition with A&M (through MJ or not - I'm not sure). I'll trust that over "I heard it from a friend of a friend...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 04/04/05 6:41pm

VoicesCarry

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

Ok, so how is she insane?


I can tell ur a janet fan. lol. She's not insane, just odd.


lol I guess I really can't see this. I mean she has some weird sexual fetishes, I'm sure, but who doesn't?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 04/04/05 6:43pm

squiddyren

Cloudbuster said:[quote]

BoOTyLiCioUs said:

I also think she's overrated and that she cannot sing really at all.


Yeah, her voice is lame.


I think her voice has a lovely sound.. it's just that she has no range.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 04/04/05 6:43pm

TheOrgerFormer
lyKnownAs

VoicesCarry said:

BoOTyLiCioUs said:



I can tell ur a janet fan. lol. She's not insane, just odd.


lol I guess I really can't see this. I mean she has some weird sexual fetishes, I'm sure, but who doesn't?
Okay, I take back insane. Weird, she is. Trust me, I know weird. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 04/04/05 6:44pm

VoicesCarry

TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said:

VoicesCarry said:



lol I guess I really can't see this. I mean she has some weird sexual fetishes, I'm sure, but who doesn't?
Okay, I take back insane. Weird, she is. Trust me, I know weird. nod


That's ok. I like kinky weird. But we'll reserve the insane for Michael. He's earned it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael vs. Janet