udo said:

I just listened to the two Star Trib reporters in a conversation on Minnesota Public Radio. They said they don't know what is in the divorce documents, but they need to find out. Two people called in and they asked very good questions about the entire investigation and how to preserve Prince's legacy. The ST is going to be on the case until the end.

1Sasha said:

I just listened to the two Star Trib reporters in a conversation on Minnesota Public Radio. They said they don't know what is in the divorce documents, but they need to find out. Two people called in and they asked very good questions about the entire investigation and how to preserve Prince's legacy. The ST is going to be on the case until the end.

Yay for ST!

Yes, I'm being sarcastic.

Another wait and see what they do with what they find. Proof is in the pudding as they say. It ain't what you say it's what you do.

1Sasha said:

rogifan said:

1Sasha said:

I just listened to the two Star Trib reporters in a conversation on Minnesota Public Radio. They said they don't know what is in the divorce documents, but they need to find out. Two people called in and they asked very good questions about the entire investigation and how to preserve Prince's legacy. The ST is going to be on the case until the end.

Did anyone challenge them on why they need to find out? I'd love someone to grill them on why they think the public needs to know this stuff.

If memory serves, you're a local....so why don't you call them and do it?

[Unauthorized seller snip - luv4u]

Uh oh. I just listened to the MPR interview.

There were depositions filed.

Uh oh oh oh

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Uh oh. I just listened to the MPR interview.

There were depositions filed.

Uh oh oh oh

Uh, what?

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Uh oh. I just listened to the MPR interview.

There were depositions filed.

Uh oh oh oh

Uh, what?

Does anyone have the link to the divorce file at court?

I need to look. Cant tell whether they said filed depositions or just depositions taken.

Oh no if they were filed.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

Uh, what?

Does anyone have the link to the divorce file at court?

I need to look. Cant tell whether they said filed depositions or just depositions taken.

Oh no if they were filed.

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Does anyone have the link to the divorce file at court?

I need to look. Cant tell whether they said filed depositions or just depositions taken.

Oh no if they were filed.

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

tmo1965 said:

morningsong said:

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

Thank you.


What the hell is with all the e-service?

morningsong said:

tmo1965 said:

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

Thank you.


What the hell is with all the e-service?

Thanks! I didnt see anything about a deposition either. In the MPR interview they said there were filed depositions. They must have confused the legal jargon. Maybe they meant affidavits.

Morningstar, any time something is filed, they serve attorneys of record an email notifiying them that something has been filed. That is the Court's notice to the attorney. Thus e-service, instead of mail service.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

Thank you.


What the hell is with all the e-service?

Thanks! I didnt see anything about a deposition either. In the MPR interview they said there were filed depositions. They must have confused the legal jargon. Maybe they meant affidavits.

Morningstar, any time something is filed, they serve attorneys of record an email notifiying them that something has been filed. That is the Court's notice to the attorney. Thus e-service, instead of mail service.

I see what you meant about a lot of activity. Is that what attracted ST, I wonder.

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Thanks! I didnt see anything about a deposition either. In the MPR interview they said there were filed depositions. They must have confused the legal jargon. Maybe they meant affidavits.

Morningstar, any time something is filed, they serve attorneys of record an email notifiying them that something has been filed. That is the Court's notice to the attorney. Thus e-service, instead of mail service.

I see what you meant about a lot of activity. Is that what attracted ST, I wonder.

Maybe. I never looked at the divorce file before because I thought it was sealed. I didnt know you could see the docket and activity. In my city, sealed means you cant even see the docket. Something was going on for several years after the divorce. I didnt realize the divorce case went on so long. She filed a Motion for Temporary Relief along with Affidavits. A negative narrative can be contained in her affidavit. Who knows? I mean we know what he passed away from, how much worse can that get?

Mumio said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

I see what you meant about a lot of activity. Is that what attracted ST, I wonder.

Maybe. I never looked at the divorce file before because I thought it was sealed. I didnt know you could see the docket and activity. In my city, sealed means you cant even see the docket. Something was going on for several years after the divorce. I didnt realize the divorce case went on so long. She filed a Motion for Temporary Relief along with Affidavits. A negative narrative can be contained in her affidavit. Who knows? I mean we know what he passed away from, how much worse can that get?

Just activity not what anything says, Just the titles of forms.

Explains the house being torn down. Geesh.

We'll see unfortunately, how much worse it can get.

tmo1965 said:

tmo1965 said:

morningsong said:

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

Interesting.

[Edited 8/18/16 20:34pm]

rogifan said:

Mumio said:

If memory serves, you're a local....so why don't you call them and do it?

I should. But I try to ignore them as much as possible.

I hear ya

rogifan said:

with a misdemeanor for drug paraphernalia back in May.

That made me ALMOST spit my wine on the monitor.

rogifan said:

tmo1965 said:

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Does anyone have the link to the divorce file at court?

I need to look. Cant tell whether they said filed depositions or just depositions taken.

Oh no if they were filed.

What is a deposition? And why is it an oh no?

I didn't see anything about a deposition, but there are a lot of afidavits and other stuff. Go to the Civil, Family, Probate link and do a party search for Nelson Manuela: http://pa.courts.state.mn...ault.aspx.

Going to this website I found out that my nephew, currently in college, was charged with a misdemeanor for drug paraphernalia back in May.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Maybe. I never looked at the divorce file before because I thought it was sealed. I didnt know you could see the docket and activity. In my city, sealed means you cant even see the docket. Something was going on for several years after the divorce. I didnt realize the divorce case went on so long. She filed a Motion for Temporary Relief along with Affidavits. A negative narrative can be contained in her affidavit. Who knows? I mean we know what he passed away from, how much worse can that get?

- What does temporary relief mean? Was she seeking money or do you think she meant like a restraining order even though the story is he abandoned her.

Temporary relief is when one spouse asks for temporary alimony for a short time, usually 6 months - 1 year.

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

Just activity not what anything says, Just the titles of forms.

Explains the house being torn down. Geesh.

We'll see unfortunately, how much worse it can get.

---- What does it say about the house? The rumor going around was that he bulldozed them when she tried to get the properties in the divorce. Supposedly he packed up the remains of homes and sent them to her with note saying you want houses you got them. Don't know if this is true but when she said they had a friendly divorce I thought will the court had to have a judgement against him so friendly was it.

I thought he bulldozed the house to avoid paying taxes. During the days of the NPG Music Club, one of the PP's (I assumed it was Prince) posted a thread about having a nice peice of property and having to pay a lot of taxes because there is a house (or something to that effect). Later we learned that the house was bulldozed. I remember NPGMC members making fun that Prince was using the website to complalin about his taxes.

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said:

---- What does it say about the house? The rumor going around was that he bulldozed them when she tried to get the properties in the divorce. Supposedly he packed up the remains of homes and sent them to her with note saying you want houses you got them. Don't know if this is true but when she said they had a friendly divorce I thought will the court had to have a judgement against him so friendly was it.

The house was my personal thought. No one can read any of the documents, you just see them listed. Seems to be a lot of them. But they look mundane and routine.

Did you notice that there was still activity up to 8/2010? Then motions were filed beginning 6/2016 with the case being reassigned 6/17/2016? I wonder if the case was ever settled at all?? Very confusing.

zenarose said:

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said: The house was my personal thought. No one can read any of the documents, you just see them listed. Seems to be a lot of them. But they look mundane and routine.

Did you notice that there was still activity up to 8/2010? Then motions were filed beginning 6/2016 with the case being reassigned 6/17/2016? I wonder if the case was ever settled at all?? Very confusing.

The June 2016 motions were filed by the Star Tribune.