Other thread that self locked - Part 1 - http://prince.org/msg/7/426092

Part 2 - http://prince.org/msg/7/429559

Part 3 - http://prince.org/msg/7/430380 - self-locked.

Aaaand, to continue....

babynoz said:

nursev said:

luv4u said: Now u know I gives two sh--- bout Mani

TBH she hasn't exactly kept herself under the radar for the past three months. Perhaps if she had she might have lucked out and the media would have forgotten about her.

This is the flip side of publicity.

Militant said:

Are former wives not allowed to grieve? Who organised the wonderful memorial service in LA that was desperately needed and helped give closure and acceptance to many friends, family and associates?

Why should she be "under the radar"? Or Mayte, or Sheila, or anyone?

I'm not seeing what the problem is.

I don't have a problem with it and if it was desperately needed for you then that's all well and good. I am just wondering why people are surprised by the scrutiny?

Gotta laugh at Luv4U's timing at locking down the end of The Estate Part 2 thread...

babynoz said:

purplethunder3121 said:

endiadj said:

Well if the mod had said that from the beginning it would have been fine, but he did not. Instead he chose to get pissy because we dared question him. Once again, I have no problem with him setting the record straight if that is the case.

[Edited 8/5/16 13:40pm]

nursev said:

purplethunder3121 said:

Gotta laugh at Luv4U's timing at locking down the end of The Estate Part 2 thread...

She's quick ain't she

nursev said:

babynoz said:

Aaaand, to continue....

I don't have a problem with it and if it was desperately needed for you then that's all well and good. I am just wondering why people are surprised by the scrutiny?

Babynoz it's cool we're still here for Prince and that's all that matters

babynoz said:

rogifan said:

Can someone explain why it's the StarTribune's business what Prince did during any of his marriages (or outside of them for that matter)?

TBH none of this is any of our business including the estate. We are upset with the ST about this because it's our Prince. When it was Whitney, Michael or someone else, not so much.

babynoz said:

rogifan said:

babynoz said:

TBH none of this is any of our business including the estate. We are upset with the ST about this because it's our Prince. When it was Whitney, Michael or someone else, not so much.

None of this stuff is anyone's business (MJ is obviously a different case). This isn't some public interest thing where the public has a right to know. That's why I hope the investigation and autopsy remain sealed.

Yep, so let's just change the subject and discuss other estate stuff please

rogifan said:

babynoz said:

TBH none of this is any of our business including the estate. We are upset with the ST about this because it's our Prince. When it was Whitney, Michael or someone else, not so much.

None of this stuff is anyone's business (MJ is obviously a different case). This isn't some public interest thing where the public has a right to know. That's why I hope the investigation and autopsy remain sealed.

That is true. It's natural to be curious but I'm trying to make peace with the possibility that we may never know what happened. My hat is off to the officials and people of Minneapolis for how they have protected Prince so far. He chose the right place to live.

luv4u said:

rogifan said:

luv4u said:

Yep, so let's just change the subject and discuss other estate stuff please

Sorry. I just hate the StarTribune so any chance I get to rip them I do.

I ain't mad at 'cha for that....

Am I reading this incorrectly....does this affidavit show Paisley Park as real estate to be sold? http://www.mncourts.gov/m...A-Hauk.pdf It would be great if there were someone who could interpret.

Mumio said:

Am I reading this incorrectly....does this affidavit show Paisley Park as real estate to be sold? http://www.mncourts.gov/m...A-Hauk.pdf It would be great if there were someone who could interpret.

According to the source posted in this thread http://prince.org/msg/7/430379 it is false.

babynoz said:

laurarichardson said:

babynoz said:

Aaaand, to continue....

I don't have a problem with it and if it was desperately needed for you then that's all well and good. I am just wondering why people are surprised by the scrutiny?

-/ I don't doubt what Militant said is true but why is Mani worried it will not reflect badly on her. [Edited 8/5/16 14:59pm]

Like I said.......... let's move on. This thread is not about Mani, there are other places on the net for folks to diss, discuss other matters of the estate please .........

http://www.startribune.com/who-s-family-sibling-question-at-heart-of-prince-estate-case/389316281/

The Minneapolis Star Tribune is reporting on the as-yet-unanswered question of whether Duane Nelson and Prince genetically shared the same father, John L. Nelson, or not.

Mumio said:

laurarichardson said:

luv4u said:

Mumio said:

Am I reading this incorrectly....does this affidavit show Paisley Park as real estate to be sold? http://www.mncourts.gov/m...A-Hauk.pdf It would be great if there were someone who could interpret.

According to the source posted in this thread http://prince.org/msg/7/430379 it is false.

But my source isn't TMZ, it's a legitimate affidavit filed in the court system.

morningsong said:

Mumio said:

Am I reading this incorrectly....does this affidavit show Paisley Park as real estate to be sold? http://www.mncourts.gov/m...A-Hauk.pdf It would be great if there were someone who could interpret.

Yep it is listed. $7,000,000+ Can somebody explain this??? [Edited 8/5/16 15:04pm]

Ack. Thanks. I hope that someone who knows the legal mumbo-jumbo will fill us in on what's going on.

http://www.startribune.com/prince-s-paisley-park-other-properties-could-go-on-sale/389333051/

The Minneapolis Star Tribune has posted the Associated Press's story about Bremer Trust asking the judge to allow the sale of Prince's properties, including Paisley Park.

My vote right now says that Star Tribune are NOT to be trusted.

Since they are in a legal battle against Bremer Trust, trying to force the uncovering of private documents, why should we trust anything they have to say?

A headline such as "Paisley Park could go on sale" is meaningless anyway. Take away the fact that it's Paisley Park, which is the clickbait, and the headline would be "Property could go on sale". Well whoop-de-doo. You could have said that at any time since it was built. People who own or look after a property have the right to sell it if they want to. That's not news.

That affidavit simply says that they retain the right to sell it if they want to, and it lists the valuation of all of Prince's properties. They need to know the market valuation so they can figure out the total asset value. To ascertain the market value of the property they first have to have the permission to sell the property if they choose to. That's my take on it......

Anyway, Londell just tweeted that the story about it being sold is false.