independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Trent Reznor AGAIN kicks Prince's ass
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 04/27/08 10:33am

Anxiety

BartVanHemelen said:

Anxiety said:

well, great. prince and bowie and todd rundgren and a few others blazed the trail that led to what's bringing these bands their massive success right now. prince, bowie, etc., were the first mainstream artists to take chances with marketing music online,


Bullshit. Prince NEVER was innovative when it came to online music. And whatever little credit that he had, he lost it by suing fans. Prince NEVER advanced online, instead he's one of the guys doing the harm.

Just like he NEVER gave a shit about artists' rights.


hasn't trent reznor even credited prince in recent interviews for exactly what you're calling bullshit on?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 04/27/08 10:57am

cloudguitar

avatar

I have a lot of respect for Prince

I have a lot of respect for Trent Reznor

From the interviews i've read over the years, they certainly have some respect for each other.

I remember reading an 'interview' with Prince where he was quoted as saying that he'd been listening to NIN a lot while driving his car.

I read an interview where Trent said he'd been to Paisley Park, and i would guess you wouldn't bother to do that unless you were interested in Prince...he did say that Prince had behaved a bit like a twat when he was there though
-----
Anyway. I've always thought of 'Closer' as a funky tune, reminiscent of Prince! I'd like to hear Prince do a cover of it!

Interesting that Prince did a cover of 'Creep' by Radiohead at Coachella this weekend too!
[Edited 4/27/08 10:57am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 04/27/08 12:52pm

Anxiety

ya know, i wish it could be 1988 forever and that prince would amaze and shock and awe fans with every move he made.

interestingly enough, somehow it got to be 2008 and the man is 50 years old.

funny how time works. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 04/27/08 1:07pm

cloudguitar

avatar

Anxiety said:

ya know, i wish it could be 1988 forever and that prince would amaze and shock and awe fans with every move he made.

interestingly enough, somehow it got to be 2008 and the man is 50 years old.

funny how time works. neutral


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

I know the covermount Planet Earth CD shocked and amazed the Music industry in the UK...covermounts are a contentious issue anyway, but releasing a full album that way was unprecedented

The 21 nights in London surprised a few people too

Isn't the fact he played Coachella a little unexpected too?

And doesn't it make us sound like old men/women if we reminisce/pine for 1988?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 04/27/08 1:29pm

violetblues

Bart i applaud your thoroughness, responded to dam well everybody, you know your shit and it shows, BUT you have to agree that the model Trent has created for him will not work for everyone but the ones that already have a large dedicated following and the luxury of the money to back it up.
I totally agree that the music and entertainment industry will change, but everyone will set up a business model that works for them.
What works for Trent may not work for Mariah, who is doing pretty well under the current system, and Prince is doing pretty good under his own whims, which is dam cool too.
Trent & Prince, you cant compare them, apples and oranges.
You sound bitter tho, like Prince personally sets out to gyp his fans, and i dont think thats the case.
[Edited 4/27/08 13:34pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 04/27/08 1:56pm

cloudguitar

avatar

violetblues said:

the model Trent has created for him will not work for everyone but the ones that already have a large dedicated following and the luxury of the money to back it up.
[Edited 4/27/08 13:34pm]


This is a good point...and it's been levelled at Prince and Radiohead as a criticism (i'm sure Reznor will get the same criticism too if he hasn't already)

All three artists have done some interesting/pioneering forms of music distribution recently, but all rely on the fact they have a following that was established by the old way of doing things!...which doesn't really help any new artists that are trying to earn a living from their passion.

having said that the thing Radiohead just did where you could download the individual (multi)tracks of the new single and submit your own remix was an opportunity...it certainly seems to have gotten 'Holy Fuck' some publicity over here in the UK
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 04/27/08 2:10pm

Dance

At what? neutral lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 04/27/08 6:07pm

purplecam

avatar

BartVanHemelen said:

purplecam said:

My problem with people like Bart and other which seems to include you Jezebel is when people like you and Bart feel it's their "duty" to tell people what to do and think and believe.


No, I don't. I point to the FACTS that DISPROVE the invalid opinions. I don't care if you think like me, all I do is point out that your opinion isn't based on facts.



Yet post after post in this thread continues to spew nonsense about Prince. So why are you upset when I remind people of the numerous times that Prince wasn't doing what you pretend he was doing?

purplecam said:

We should be mature enough to agree to disagree around here.


Start by posting that same comment to the people in this thread who've called me a rat, people who've referred to people like me as "haters", etc. Want a grown-up conversation? Then start behaving like a grown-up and aim your wrath at those who don't contribute anythign to this thread except insults and unfounded baloney. Want to prove me wrong? PROVE me wrong. Bullshit like "Prince was a pioneer" is empty talk, prove it with FACTS. But you can't, because you know I can easily prove to you that other artists did do what Prince did earlier and often better.

Very interesting what you wrote. But I have to ask you this. What do you get out of trying to give out "facts" about Prince, the majority of which tend to go to the negative? Is it to try and disprove that the man is a genius? To disprove the accomplishments of what Prince has done throughout his career? What is your point in all of this? Now I will say, you did bring up some very interesting facts with this thread and your posts throughout the years but to me, when you come up with these "facts", my thought is that you are posting this stuff so that you can get people to see what you see and then ultimately side with you or you try to start stuff up in here to get fans all mad. You can say that you don't care if others see what you see but you do, otherwise why post all the things that you do when you decide to post these so-called "facts"? You can LIE all you want with that but I would hope that the majority can see past what you said about that.

Look, we know you're not a fan anymore but even if Prince decided to become the man he was again doing songs like Lady Cab Driver, Darling Nikki and Head and he did everything you think he should do with the internet and the fans, you'd still find a way to rip him into a million pieces. I don't know what more there is to say with you, but I'm sure you'll come back here with more "facts" to try and disprove me. That's all you ever seem to do around here.
[Edited 4/27/08 18:10pm]
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 04/28/08 5:10am

SoulAlive

lurking lurking
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 04/28/08 7:07am

syble

BartVanHemelen said:

Riverpoet31 said:

Trent Reznor has never composed a song that comes close to Princes best efforts.


Number of Reznor songs covered by Johnny Cash: 1. It's called "Hurt", and is considered a highlight of his already astonishing career. The video makes grown men cry.

Remind me: how many Prince songs has Cash covered?




SCRAPING THE BARREL!! johnny who was that OMG pleeaase!

Tom Jones covered Prince hurray does that nake you someone of note then when another lame arse old guy covers your songs or does that just make them desperate to appeal to a younger audience -ooohhh let me think which could it be HMMMM!!!
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 04/28/08 7:16am

funkyhead

syble said:

BartVanHemelen said:



Number of Reznor songs covered by Johnny Cash: 1. It's called "Hurt", and is considered a highlight of his already astonishing career. The video makes grown men cry.

Remind me: how many Prince songs has Cash covered?




SCRAPING THE BARREL!! johnny who was that OMG pleeaase!

Tom Jones covered Prince hurray does that nake you someone of note then when another lame arse old guy covers your songs or does that just make them desperate to appeal to a younger audience -ooohhh let me think which could it be HMMMM!!!

wow, have you actually heard Johnny Cash's version of this? or seen the video, he totally makes it his own and I'd even call it his defining song. Seriously I could write a paragraph on this but all I'll say is go and listen to it and it'll blow you away.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 04/28/08 7:19am

Anxiety

syble said:

BartVanHemelen said:



Number of Reznor songs covered by Johnny Cash: 1. It's called "Hurt", and is considered a highlight of his already astonishing career. The video makes grown men cry.

Remind me: how many Prince songs has Cash covered?




SCRAPING THE BARREL!! johnny who was that OMG pleeaase!

Tom Jones covered Prince hurray does that nake you someone of note then when another lame arse old guy covers your songs or does that just make them desperate to appeal to a younger audience -ooohhh let me think which could it be HMMMM!!!


yeah, kinda like these days when an older musician covers radiohead OH OOPS redface
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 04/28/08 7:25am

Anxiety

cloudguitar said:

Anxiety said:

ya know, i wish it could be 1988 forever and that prince would amaze and shock and awe fans with every move he made.

interestingly enough, somehow it got to be 2008 and the man is 50 years old.

funny how time works. neutral


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

I know the covermount Planet Earth CD shocked and amazed the Music industry in the UK...covermounts are a contentious issue anyway, but releasing a full album that way was unprecedented

The 21 nights in London surprised a few people too

Isn't the fact he played Coachella a little unexpected too?

And doesn't it make us sound like old men/women if we reminisce/pine for 1988?


i'm not necessarily being sarcastic, but your response kinda makes my point for me.

the man is still doing things his way and turning a blind eye to what people say he "should" be doing, for better or for worse.

i think he carries out his rebellious/individualistic streak differently now than he did back in the '80s. he does a lot of things differently now than he did in the '80s. one reason for that may be that it's not the '80s anymore. i guess that was my point. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 04/28/08 7:33am

funkyhead

Anxiety said:

ya know, i wish it could be 1988 forever and that prince would amaze and shock and awe fans with every move he made.

interestingly enough, somehow it got to be 2008 and the man is 50 years old.

funny how time works. neutral

in that quote we have the true essence of what lots of us feel about P.Other long stayers such as Elton, Lionel, Stevie etc have all shot their creative loads long ago and now like P bank on a loyal fan base, put out an occasional 'lite' version of their sound on CD and above all else earn mega bucks from the touring circuit. Nobody with half a brain would begrudge them that but with P the case is that we know that he is capable of so much more and can still sell the tickets but also deliver great,original songs that mean something. Why he makes these song choices is beyond me. I adored the 02 shows and aftershows and just hope that one day soon he delivers the quality again.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 04/28/08 7:40am

Anxiety

funkyhead said:

Anxiety said:

ya know, i wish it could be 1988 forever and that prince would amaze and shock and awe fans with every move he made.

interestingly enough, somehow it got to be 2008 and the man is 50 years old.

funny how time works. neutral

in that quote we have the true essence of what lots of us feel about P.Other long stayers such as Elton, Lionel, Stevie etc have all shot their creative loads long ago and now like P bank on a loyal fan base, put out an occasional 'lite' version of their sound on CD and above all else earn mega bucks from the touring circuit. Nobody with half a brain would begrudge them that but with P the case is that we know that he is capable of so much more and can still sell the tickets but also deliver great,original songs that mean something. Why he makes these song choices is beyond me. I adored the 02 shows and aftershows and just hope that one day soon he delivers the quality again.


that wasn't necessarily what i meant. even artists who continue to put out challenging music in their older years are likely not repeating their past glories. david bowie would look a little silly in a ziggy stardust costume at 60 years old, and even saint trent has traded in his rubber suits and fishnets for a more dignified black t-shirt and jeans. and i know we're not just talking fashions here, but my point is that prince now is not the same person as prince then. if anyone expects the same energy from prince now that he radiated 20 years ago, yeah, there's going to be some substantial disappointment.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 04/28/08 8:07am

syble

violetblues said:

Bart i applaud your thoroughness, responded to dam well everybody, you know your shit and it shows, BUT you have to agree that the model Trent has created for him will not work for everyone but the ones that already have a large dedicated following and the luxury of the money to back it up.
I totally agree that the music and entertainment industry will change, but everyone will set up a business model that works for them.
What works for Trent may not work for Mariah, who is doing pretty well under the current system, and Prince is doing pretty good under his own whims, which is dam cool too.
Trent & Prince, you cant compare them, apples and oranges.
You sound bitter tho, like Prince personally sets out to gyp his fans, and i dont think thats the case.
[Edited 4/27/08 13:34pm]



I said this earlier - its not a competition its music!!

Agreed too about the bitter bit, so many 'fans' in here instantly have to post gripes against prince at his every move, in somes eyes he cant do anything right. As I said I think hes gone back to the old way of marketing himself - through live gigs.
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 04/28/08 8:26am

funkyhead

syble said:

violetblues said:

Bart i applaud your thoroughness, responded to dam well everybody, you know your shit and it shows, BUT you have to agree that the model Trent has created for him will not work for everyone but the ones that already have a large dedicated following and the luxury of the money to back it up.
I totally agree that the music and entertainment industry will change, but everyone will set up a business model that works for them.
What works for Trent may not work for Mariah, who is doing pretty well under the current system, and Prince is doing pretty good under his own whims, which is dam cool too.
Trent & Prince, you cant compare them, apples and oranges.
You sound bitter tho, like Prince personally sets out to gyp his fans, and i dont think thats the case.
[Edited 4/27/08 13:34pm]



I said this earlier - its not a competition its music!!

Agreed too about the bitter bit, so many 'fans' in here instantly have to post gripes against prince at his every move, in somes eyes he cant do anything right. As I said I think hes gone back to the old way of marketing himself - through live gigs.

nobody should have an issue with promotion through live gigs, i think it's more a case of just what is he promoting?. It's just down to quality control. Seriously a 50 year old man singing about bustin' the bed head and wanting to make you bleed is really not a good place to be and lets not mention the 'A' word!!. I don't really care whether it's the net or live performace that he chooses as a marketing tool as it all just comes down to the music, i think we can all agree on that?.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 04/28/08 9:12am

syble

Anxiety said:

syble said:





SCRAPING THE BARREL!! johnny who was that OMG pleeaase!

Tom Jones covered Prince hurray does that nake you someone of note then when another lame arse old guy covers your songs or does that just make them desperate to appeal to a younger audience -ooohhh let me think which could it be HMMMM!!!


yeah, kinda like these days when an older musician covers radiohead OH OOPS redface



Fair point! didnt say Prince wasnt doing that did I? in fact I posted elsewhere thats exactly what he did in order to play the crowd. Doesnt mean Radiohead should be considered wonderful just cos they got covered. Thats for the listener to decide when listening to their music.

My point was just cos Trent got covered doesnt mean anthing, doesnt make him brilliant or anything which is how I read it in the earlier post, like jonny cash covering him was some sort of endorsement of Trents pioneering abilities on the net which is of course the topic of this thread.


Id happily go listen to Jonny cash as I like a few bits of his as my mum did and we kinda grew up on this stuff. I still stand by my earlier posts about comparing Trent to prince.
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 04/28/08 9:25am

Neophyte

syble said:

BartVanHemelen said:



Number of Reznor songs covered by Johnny Cash: 1. It's called "Hurt", and is considered a highlight of his already astonishing career. The video makes grown men cry.

Remind me: how many Prince songs has Cash covered?



Is 'the man in black' now the yardstick by which all covers are measured? If he hasn't done it it ain't worth doing?

P has been covered by a number of artists - what is your point here?
"I know that living with u baby, was sometimes hard...but I'm willing 2 give it another try.
Cause nothing compares....nothing compares 2 u!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 04/28/08 9:28am

Anxiety

syble said:

Anxiety said:



yeah, kinda like these days when an older musician covers radiohead OH OOPS redface



Fair point! didnt say Prince wasnt doing that did I? in fact I posted elsewhere thats exactly what he did in order to play the crowd. Doesnt mean Radiohead should be considered wonderful just cos they got covered. Thats for the listener to decide when listening to their music.

My point was just cos Trent got covered doesnt mean anthing, doesnt make him brilliant or anything which is how I read it in the earlier post, like jonny cash covering him was some sort of endorsement of Trents pioneering abilities on the net which is of course the topic of this thread.


Id happily go listen to Jonny cash as I like a few bits of his as my mum did and we kinda grew up on this stuff. I still stand by my earlier posts about comparing Trent to prince.


i think a cover version is one artist's way of saying they enjoy another artist's song. i do think it's common practice for older artists to cover younger, "hipper" artists in an attempt to connect with a younger audience, but who's to say that those older artists aren't still enjoying the songs they're covering?

i think in johnny cash's case, his decision to cover people like NIN, beck and nick cave was pretty risky. he was considered a country music legend, but in his final years decided to release a series of albums produced by rick rubin with some songs written by modern alternative rock artists. it could have been seen as a betrayal of the country tradition, but i think cash just enjoyed the songs and wanted to interpret them through his own style. i think his cover versions were very thoughtfully done and very true to his own voice.

i also think it's a non-argument to say cash covered a NIN song but not a prince song. so what? other popular and legendary artists have covered prince, both on record and in live performance. has tina turner ever covered a NIN song? does it matter?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 04/28/08 10:16am

DarkKnight1

avatar

BartVanHemelen said:

Let's see: Reznor was free from his contract a couple of months ago, and what has he done:
- set up remix.nin.com where you can DL multi-tracks and make your own remix
- uploaded a ton of stuff on remix.nin.com including really rare stuff
- released an album in various formats, all non-drm and even including two different lossless formats (Ghosts I-IV)
- made a ton of money because he realises that some fans are willing to pay a lot of money for a beautifully produced collector's item
- announced tour dates

Oh yeah, and today he released yet another single online, for free. (Finalised a day earlier, and then sent to radio.) Multitracks to make your own remix: available. And NIN.com has "two weeks" on their front page a couple of days ago, just like with Ghosts; May 5 is the date to look out for. Yet another album already?


Arsonist
And to think Prince could have been doing all this years ago. Instead he sent the internet cops on his fans, threatened fanmags with lawsuits, released albums nobody gave a frak about, replayed his greatest hits on every tour,,...

What's Prince's next move? Oh yeah, a self-congratulating overpriced photo book of his tepid London shows which failed to promote yet another unspectacularly bombed album.

What a waste. So. Frikking. Depressing.
(Insert something clever here)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 04/28/08 10:28am

syble

Anxiety said:




i also think it's a non-argument to say cash covered a NIN song but not a prince song. so what? other popular and legendary artists have covered prince, both on record and in live performance. has tina turner ever covered a NIN song? does it matter?



my point exactly you just said it better! biggrin
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 04/28/08 10:39am

Anxiety

syble said:

Anxiety said:




i also think it's a non-argument to say cash covered a NIN song but not a prince song. so what? other popular and legendary artists have covered prince, both on record and in live performance. has tina turner ever covered a NIN song? does it matter?



my point exactly you just said it better! biggrin


i think we can both agree that it's a small relief that prince didn't sing "you're so ducking special" when he covered "creep" this weekend. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 04/28/08 10:48am

violetblues

Thanks Bart for a great thread.
I think the crux of all of Bart’s threads is that he always expected more from Prince because of his earlier work, as has felt letdown since, which is me and a lot of other people here.
I have always agreed with Bart more or less, and watched him get verbally beat down by the Fams once in a while because his focus is so heavy into the negative aspects. And yes hes a bitter angry fan,but I commend Bart for coming here and saying what he believes, a little too harshly but that is his way.
But mostly he always adds substance to this discussion, point by point dissecting everybody’s opinion, agree with it or not and keeps us thinking.bitchfight
[Edited 4/28/08 11:05am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 04/28/08 11:12am

Anxiety

violetblues said:

Thanks Bart for a great thread.
I think the crux of all of Bart’s threads is he always expected more from Prince because of his earlier work, as has felt letdown since, which is me and a lot of other people here.
I have always agreed with Bart more or less, and watched him get verbally beat up by the Fams once in a while because hes so heavy into the negatives aspects. And yes hes a bitter fan,but I commend Bart for coming here and saying what he believes, a little too harshly but that is his way.
But mostly he always adds substance to this discussion, point by point dissecting everybody’s opinion, agree with it or not and keeps us thinking.bitchfight
[Edited 4/28/08 11:00am]


yeah, i don't know. confused

sure, it's always enlightening to throw a good debate into the mix, but i think the original argument of this thread is so rigidly subjective that it's near impossible to shed any kind of objective insight on the matter without getting thrown into a "fam" or "naysayer" box. i prefer not to be confined to either label, thanks.

it's all fine and well for us to opine about what we think prince SHOULD be doing with his career, but at the end of the day, it's HIS career to do with as he pleases. we all know how fickle and mercurial prince has ALWAYS been, so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone when prince does something like drop the internet like a hot potato or put all his energy into promoting someone like tamar only to drop that whole project once something else attracts his attention. that's prince for ya. that's how he does. it's always been like that.

i guess i don't get how people can feel "let down" by what prince is doing these days, because really, an artist does what an artist does, and either it's well-received or it's not. prince has gone through phases in his career where he's focused his energies more toward his fan base than toward the mainstream public. right now, i think his focus is the opposite. he's going for the big crowds right now, because he knows his diehards will follow him through anything, and he is enjoying the ma$$ appeal of megacelebrity. well, that's not gonna bring us "the chocolate invasion vol. 2" but good for him all the same. it's a choice he's making for his career, and it's bringing him the success he wants. and he's still doing it on his terms. he communicates with the media and with his fans these days less than ever, which must be great for someone as private as him. sucks for us, but he has the leverage to do things on his own terms now more than ever, so if he doesn't want to say squat to the world other than through his music, he's earned that privilege.

i think that to fault prince for letting someone like trent reznor pick up where he left off with the whole internet distribution thing is like blaming sly stone for letting prince pick up where he left off with creating popular funk/rock music. isn't that the nature of things? one person innovates, then down the road someone is inspired and picks up the torch and carries it on?

kudos for prince for doing what he did when he did it, and kudos to trent for doing what he's doing in the here and now. and kudos to whomever continues when trent gets tired of what he's doing now, and someone else carries the idea forward. such is life. shrug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 04/28/08 11:18am

purplecam

avatar

Anxiety said:

violetblues said:

Thanks Bart for a great thread.
I think the crux of all of Bart’s threads is he always expected more from Prince because of his earlier work, as has felt letdown since, which is me and a lot of other people here.
I have always agreed with Bart more or less, and watched him get verbally beat up by the Fams once in a while because hes so heavy into the negatives aspects. And yes hes a bitter fan,but I commend Bart for coming here and saying what he believes, a little too harshly but that is his way.
But mostly he always adds substance to this discussion, point by point dissecting everybody’s opinion, agree with it or not and keeps us thinking.bitchfight
[Edited 4/28/08 11:00am]


yeah, i don't know. confused

sure, it's always enlightening to throw a good debate into the mix, but i think the original argument of this thread is so rigidly subjective that it's near impossible to shed any kind of objective insight on the matter without getting thrown into a "fam" or "naysayer" box. i prefer not to be confined to either label, thanks.

it's all fine and well for us to opine about what we think prince SHOULD be doing with his career, but at the end of the day, it's HIS career to do with as he pleases. we all know how fickle and mercurial prince has ALWAYS been, so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone when prince does something like drop the internet like a hot potato or put all his energy into promoting someone like tamar only to drop that whole project once something else attracts his attention. that's prince for ya. that's how he does. it's always been like that.

i guess i don't get how people can feel "let down" by what prince is doing these days, because really, an artist does what an artist does, and either it's well-received or it's not. prince has gone through phases in his career where he's focused his energies more toward his fan base than toward the mainstream public. right now, i think his focus is the opposite. he's going for the big crowds right now, because he knows his diehards will follow him through anything, and he is enjoying the ma$$ appeal of megacelebrity. well, that's not gonna bring us "the chocolate invasion vol. 2" but good for him all the same. it's a choice he's making for his career, and it's bringing him the success he wants. and he's still doing it on his terms. he communicates with the media and with his fans these days less than ever, which must be great for someone as private as him. sucks for us, but he has the leverage to do things on his own terms now more than ever, so if he doesn't want to say squat to the world other than through his music, he's earned that privilege.

i think that to fault prince for letting someone like trent reznor pick up where he left off with the whole internet distribution thing is like blaming sly stone for letting prince pick up where he left off with creating popular funk/rock music. isn't that the nature of things? one person innovates, then down the road someone is inspired and picks up the torch and carries it on?

kudos for prince for doing what he did when he did it, and kudos to trent for doing what he's doing in the here and now. and kudos to whomever continues when trent gets tired of what he's doing now, and someone else carries the idea forward. such is life. shrug

Damn Anx, you said that so much better than I could. You were on point 100%!
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 04/28/08 11:54am

violetblues

Anxiety said:

violetblues said:

Thanks Bart for a great thread.
I think the crux of all of Bart’s threads is he always expected more from Prince because of his earlier work, as has felt letdown since, which is me and a lot of other people here.
I have always agreed with Bart more or less, and watched him get verbally beat up by the Fams once in a while because hes so heavy into the negatives aspects. And yes hes a bitter fan,but I commend Bart for coming here and saying what he believes, a little too harshly but that is his way.
But mostly he always adds substance to this discussion, point by point dissecting everybody’s opinion, agree with it or not and keeps us thinking.bitchfight
[Edited 4/28/08 11:00am]


yeah, i don't know. confused

sure, it's always enlightening to throw a good debate into the mix, but i think the original argument of this thread is so rigidly subjective that it's near impossible to shed any kind of objective insight on the matter without getting thrown into a "fam" or "naysayer" box. i prefer not to be confined to either label, thanks.

it's all fine and well for us to opine about what we think prince SHOULD be doing with his career, but at the end of the day, it's HIS career to do with as he pleases. we all know how fickle and mercurial prince has ALWAYS been, so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone when prince does something like drop the internet like a hot potato or put all his energy into promoting someone like tamar only to drop that whole project once something else attracts his attention. that's prince for ya. that's how he does. it's always been like that.

i guess i don't get how people can feel "let down" by what prince is doing these days, because really, an artist does what an artist does, and either it's well-received or it's not. prince has gone through phases in his career where he's focused his energies more toward his fan base than toward the mainstream public. right now, i think his focus is the opposite. he's going for the big crowds right now, because he knows his diehards will follow him through anything, and he is enjoying the ma$$ appeal of megacelebrity. well, that's not gonna bring us "the chocolate invasion vol. 2" but good for him all the same. it's a choice he's making for his career, and it's bringing him the success he wants. and he's still doing it on his terms. he communicates with the media and with his fans these days less than ever, which must be great for someone as private as him. sucks for us, but he has the leverage to do things on his own terms now more than ever, so if he doesn't want to say squat to the world other than through his music, he's earned that privilege.

i think that to fault prince for letting someone like trent reznor pick up where he left off with the whole internet distribution thing is like blaming sly stone for letting prince pick up where he left off with creating popular funk/rock music. isn't that the nature of things? one person innovates, then down the road someone is inspired and picks up the torch and carries it on?

kudos for prince for doing what he did when he did it, and kudos to trent for doing what he's doing in the here and now. and kudos to whomever continues when trent gets tired of what he's doing now, and someone else carries the idea forward. such is life. shrug


And i agree with most of what you say too, one of the smarter cats here on the org.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #177 posted 04/28/08 11:57am

syble

purplecam said:

Anxiety said:



yeah, i don't know. confused

sure, it's always enlightening to throw a good debate into the mix, but i think the original argument of this thread is so rigidly subjective that it's near impossible to shed any kind of objective insight on the matter without getting thrown into a "fam" or "naysayer" box. i prefer not to be confined to either label, thanks.

it's all fine and well for us to opine about what we think prince SHOULD be doing with his career, but at the end of the day, it's HIS career to do with as he pleases. we all know how fickle and mercurial prince has ALWAYS been, so it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone when prince does something like drop the internet like a hot potato or put all his energy into promoting someone like tamar only to drop that whole project once something else attracts his attention. that's prince for ya. that's how he does. it's always been like that.

i guess i don't get how people can feel "let down" by what prince is doing these days, because really, an artist does what an artist does, and either it's well-received or it's not. prince has gone through phases in his career where he's focused his energies more toward his fan base than toward the mainstream public. right now, i think his focus is the opposite. he's going for the big crowds right now, because he knows his diehards will follow him through anything, and he is enjoying the ma$$ appeal of megacelebrity. well, that's not gonna bring us "the chocolate invasion vol. 2" but good for him all the same. it's a choice he's making for his career, and it's bringing him the success he wants. and he's still doing it on his terms. he communicates with the media and with his fans these days less than ever, which must be great for someone as private as him. sucks for us, but he has the leverage to do things on his own terms now more than ever, so if he doesn't want to say squat to the world other than through his music, he's earned that privilege.

i think that to fault prince for letting someone like trent reznor pick up where he left off with the whole internet distribution thing is like blaming sly stone for letting prince pick up where he left off with creating popular funk/rock music. isn't that the nature of things? one person innovates, then down the road someone is inspired and picks up the torch and carries it on?

kudos for prince for doing what he did when he did it, and kudos to trent for doing what he's doing in the here and now. and kudos to whomever continues when trent gets tired of what he's doing now, and someone else carries the idea forward. such is life. shrug

Damn Anx, you said that so much better than I could. You were on point 100%!



co-sign!
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #178 posted 04/28/08 1:31pm

cloudguitar

avatar

Something I'd like to add as Johnny Cash was mentioned...the American recording albums are amazing! and he was in his 60s when they were recorded!

I get the impression that some people write Prince off because off his age...and that some people think that artists only have something to contribute that's worthwhile if the artist is in their 20s

Using Cash as an example I'd say there's every chance we'll get some more beauties before he pops his clogs!

(personally, I think the One Nite Alone studio album is one such beauty)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #179 posted 04/28/08 1:35pm

Anxiety

cloudguitar said:

Something I'd like to add as Johnny Cash was mentioned...the American recording albums are amazing! and he was in his 60s when they were recorded!

I get the impression that some people write Prince off because off his age...and that some people think that artists only have something to contribute that's worthwhile if the artist is in their 20s

Using Cash as an example I'd say there's every chance we'll get some more beauties before he pops his clogs!

(personally, I think the One Nite Alone studio album is one such beauty)


agreed. i have all the american albums and the box set, and i think the american recordings albums are some of cash's best work. i love that he took chances with his choice of material, and succeeded in pulling in a younger generation of fans and a whole level of appreciation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Trent Reznor AGAIN kicks Prince's ass