independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Could PRINCE STILL BE HAVING DIFFICULTIES With WARNER BROTHERS?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 12/24/05 10:26pm

TheCatWoman

CandaceS said:

metalorange said:

Well, after reading the new interview with Alan Leeds, he makes a comment that pretty much blows a whole in my theory:



Of course, Alan states he's no lawyer and doesn't know for sure - but he's certainly closer and more clued up to the subject than the rest of us.


I remembered this thread when I read that, too. sigh If WB and Prince have to work together to make it happen, methinks we won't be seeing anything from the vault. sad

IMHO, if it was well-handled and packaged, they could start selling that stuff to his fanbase and make more money than he will with songs like TAC. confused



I don't think Money is on Prince mind. I think he got more than his share from W/B already. I think he is more in2 keeping his fans and not losing the little he has left and at the same time, reaching out for a few more. I think he is targetting the younger generation. But with songs like TeAmo, he won't get to far.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 12/24/05 11:37pm

daPrettyman

avatar

Zelaira said:

Does he have a Problem maybe with Releasing Vault Material? Would he? I mean could stuff be owned or licensed to Warner's? If he is going through another divorce or Lonely time maybe the problem Isn't Women But maybe it's Control of his Music....
[Edited 12/22/05 4:11am]

neutral Man, I am getting tired of this question/comment. Bottom line, we don't know the aspects of the WB contract, therefore, there will be no vault releases until WB or Prince decides to release them.

I, for one, believe that Prince's contract before 1983 was TOTALLY different than the contract after 1984. That was the reason that Crystal Ball contains several tracks during the WB years. By that time, P had the income to secure his own studio time (or use Paisley to record). Therefore, he could turn over to WB whatever he wanted. Pre-1983, he wasn't that big and I'm sure WB probably owns the rights to all of the unreleased recordings.

Bottom line, it is a wait and see thing. Who knows, P may decide when he turns 50 to release another career retrospective (without outtakes).
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 12/25/05 12:09am

metalorange

avatar

daPrettyman said:

Zelaira said:

Does he have a Problem maybe with Releasing Vault Material? Would he? I mean could stuff be owned or licensed to Warner's? If he is going through another divorce or Lonely time maybe the problem Isn't Women But maybe it's Control of his Music....
[Edited 12/22/05 4:11am]

neutral Man, I am getting tired of this question/comment. Bottom line, we don't know the aspects of the WB contract, therefore, there will be no vault releases until WB or Prince decides to release them.

That's true. But there's enjoyment to be had and information to be shared by speculating, from what we know and have heard

I, for one, believe that Prince's contract before 1983 was TOTALLY different than the contract after 1984. That was the reason that Crystal Ball contains several tracks during the WB years. By that time, P had the income to secure his own studio time (or use Paisley to record). Therefore, he could turn over to WB whatever he wanted. Pre-1983, he wasn't that big and I'm sure WB probably owns the rights to all of the unreleased recordings.


That argument makes little sense. The contract undoubtedly changed over the years, but Prince was still with Warner Brothers upto 94/95 ish, therefore the 'WB years' extend from the beginning to then. Crystal Ball doesn't just contain 'several' tracks from the WB years, it is chock full of them. Besides 'Cloreen Bacon Skin' dates back to 1983, the earliest song on there, proving that material from 1983 could be released.

Crystal Ball was released after Prince had left Warners. Therefore it is clearly possible that vault materal theoretically can be released; whether it takes the permission of Warners or not, it is simply down to the will-power of Prince to make it happen - which clearly, he does not, upto now at least.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 12/28/05 1:31pm

Abrazo

metalorange said:[quote]

Abrazo said:



How sure are you about that? 100% or still a bit of speculation?


I think you're arguing a losing battle here! You could turn this around and say, can you prove that Prince had to ask permission? The evidence is far more weighted on the side that he didn't, there are many thankyou's on the Crystal Ball liner notes but nowhere does it say 'with kind permission of Warners' like you would expect if that was the case. There's no evidence Warners had any involvement in the album and the music is copyrighted to Prince's label.
[Edited 12/23/05 12:00pm]


I just would like to say that altho' there is no evidence that WB was involved in CB it doesn't necessarily mean that they weren't.



--
[Edited 12/28/05 13:40pm]
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 12/28/05 1:37pm

Abrazo

metalorange said:

Well, after reading the new interview with Alan Leeds, he makes a comment that pretty much blows a whole in my theory:

Though no lawyer, I assume his tape archive would be viewed as part of his general estate. On the other hand, anything that was recorded during the years he was under contract to Warner Brothers couldn't technically be released without Warners approval or involvement.


Of course, Alan states he's no lawyer and doesn't know for sure - but he's certainly closer and more clued up to the subject than the rest of us.


The whole WB contract story is one filled with dead-lock situations:

WB can't release unreleased recordings without p's permission and p can't do that without wb's permission.

WB can't release digital remasters of his (80's) albums without p's pemission and p can't release digital remasters (on CD at least) without WB's permission

and so the saga goes on and on...
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 12/28/05 1:38pm

Abrazo

TheCatWoman said:

CandaceS said:



I remembered this thread when I read that, too. sigh If WB and Prince have to work together to make it happen, methinks we won't be seeing anything from the vault. sad

IMHO, if it was well-handled and packaged, they could start selling that stuff to his fanbase and make more money than he will with songs like TAC. confused



I don't think Money is on Prince mind. I think he got more than his share from W/B already. I think he is more in2 keeping his fans and not losing the little he has left and at the same time, reaching out for a few more. I think he is targetting the younger generation. But with songs like TeAmo, he won't get to far.


If he wants to keep the fans left and if he has to work with WB to give the fans what they want (unreleased recordings and digital remasters) then he better start working with WB and they with him.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 12/28/05 1:59pm

kinke

naw prince ended up getting the last laugh and he's probably still laughing!!!
he got them with the name change then getting it back a few years later. so i think warner bros got played!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 12/28/05 2:24pm

metalorange

avatar

Abrazo said:


I just would like to say that altho' there is no evidence that WB was involved in CB it doesn't necessarily mean that they weren't.


There's not much evidence for any of this, so I try to approach it logically - Prince had bad-mouthed Warner's terribly for several years before he finally managed to get out from under them, for that reason it would be hard to believe Warner's obligingly helped him out on Crystal Ball without ever getting any credit for it.

Or is it more logical it went down this way: "You called our company a slave-ship, purposely released mediocre material to complete your record contract, released a song called 'Face Down - dead like Elvis' with the lyrics aimed directly at us, and now you want permission to release material we part-own without any involvement from us on distribution or otherwise and we won't even get a credit on the album?!! Yeah, okay, sure"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 12/28/05 2:33pm

Universaluv

Even when Prince and WB were chummy he had no real interest in releasing alot of vault material.

Regardless of what his relationship or contract with WB would allow, for whatever reason, he's never seemed all that interested in releasing a substantial number of songs in the vault.


.
[Edited 12/28/05 14:39pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 12/28/05 10:09pm

setyrmindphree

TheCatWoman said:

Anyway, he got his share from Warner Brothers. He won the lawsuit. I am sure he was very well compensated. smile


When was the lawsuit settled and what did he win?

What albums were regarded as "contractual"? The original contract from '92 or '93 was for 10 albums and 100 mill (I think). So what 10 albums would meet the obligation?

Symbol - ?
The Hits - ?
Come - Yes
The Black Album - Yes
The Gold Experience - ?
Girl 6 - ?
The Vault - Yes
Chaos and Disorder - Yes
[Edited 12/28/05 22:25pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 12/28/05 10:20pm

mozfonky

avatar

I was wondering this about the Purple Rain 20th anniversary dvd release, I just bought it last friday and have loved it to pieces, but remember that prince pleaded with everyone not to contribute, I mean why would he do this, it was a great thing for him and the record company and the fans too!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 12/29/05 1:10am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

metalorange said:

Abrazo said:


I just would like to say that altho' there is no evidence that WB was involved in CB it doesn't necessarily mean that they weren't.


There's not much evidence for any of this, so I try to approach it logically - Prince had bad-mouthed Warner's terribly for several years before he finally managed to get out from under them, for that reason it would be hard to believe Warner's obligingly helped him out on Crystal Ball without ever getting any credit for it.

Or is it more logical it went down this way: "You called our company a slave-ship, purposely released mediocre material to complete your record contract, released a song called 'Face Down - dead like Elvis' with the lyrics aimed directly at us, and now you want permission to release material we part-own without any involvement from us on distribution or otherwise and we won't even get a credit on the album?!! Yeah, okay, sure"


Exactly. All the evidence shows that Prince didn't get permission from WB for
any of the material released on Crystal Ball. Now whether he technically
should've done is another matter, but since no word ever leaked out
of WB taking Prince to court over it, or making any legal demands, I think
it's safe to say that they had no hold over the tracks.

Yes it's true that Prince recorded tons of songs while contracted under WB
that were never released, the truth is that WB only ever got to hear whatever
tracks Prince chose to submit to them as albums or singles. So they actually
have no (official) idea what songs are actually in the vault.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 12/29/05 4:09am

NME

on this subject:

WB is a very very different company now. It's far far more corporate and run by the City investors. It's not a nice place to be, even Madonna was recently re-negotiating her contract. I don't see P having any confidence in them....BUT

the likleyhood is that WB will merge soon with EMI. EMI are a far more 'music' company. EMI distributed Emancipation so P has no issues with them. When the merger happens and the CEO's, presidents, VP's, etc comb over the newly inherited WB catalouge P's music will come up. If some of the key players that were around with Emancipation are still there, it's very possible the communication could open and anything could happen.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 12/29/05 4:13am

NME

kinke said:

naw prince ended up getting the last laugh and he's probably still laughing!!!
he got them with the name change then getting it back a few years later. so i think warner bros got played!!!


let's be honest, who was everyone laughing at?..... yes, Prince. He looked like a dick. WB are a corporate compnay..... did you see people giving up on WB as a company and boycotting thier albums?... no. People just thought Prince was washed up.

got played? they made a fortune out of Prince and still make money by discouting his albums and sticking them in the sales.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 12/29/05 11:28am

metalorange

avatar

setyrmindphree said:

TheCatWoman said:

Anyway, he got his share from Warner Brothers. He won the lawsuit. I am sure he was very well compensated. smile


When was the lawsuit settled and what did he win?

What albums were regarded as "contractual"? The original contract from '92 or '93 was for 10 albums and 100 mill (I think). So what 10 albums would meet the obligation?

Symbol - ?
The Hits - ?
Come - Yes
The Black Album - Yes
The Gold Experience - ?
Girl 6 - ?
The Vault - Yes
Chaos and Disorder - Yes
[Edited 12/28/05 22:25pm]


I don't think there was a law-suit.

The original contract was for $100 million, I think for 10 albums. But it was contingent on album sales. If his albums sold as well as Diamonds & Pearls, which sold 5 million, then he would get $10 million an album. But as his sales went down, he got less and less.

At some point, his deal was renegotiated to only 6 albums, of which the first 3 were the Symbol album, Come and The Gold Experience. The Black Album was a seperate one-off deal for $1 million upfront, Girl 6 and the Hits were also not part of the deal (I guess because they were not proper 'original' albums).

Then his deal was renegotiated yet again, so that he only supply 2 more albums instead of the 3 left - which were Chaos & Disorder and The Vault.

So he went from a 10 album deal to a 5 album deal, thanks to the negotiating skill of L. Londell McMillan and because Prince was causing such a stink Warner's wanted rid of him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 12/29/05 12:38pm

TheCatWoman

Well I don't know any specific details nor do I want to know. But I know there was a lawsuit. And he was very well compensated.
Prince as always would want the details private as well as any company or business would to save face and in this case it would be W/B.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 12/29/05 12:59pm

Universaluv

TheCatWoman said:

Well I don't know any specific details nor do I want to know. But I know there was a lawsuit. And he was very well compensated.
Prince as always would want the details private as well as any company or business would to save face and in this case it would be W/B.


Prince has had several lawsuits over the years, but I don't recall one against WB.

Regardless of how private they'd want to keep it, lawsuits are filed in public courts and are fairly easy to track down. They certainly had a contractual dispute back in the day, but I don't think it ever resulted in actual litigation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 12/29/05 1:32pm

setyrmindphree

metalorange said:

setyrmindphree said:



When was the lawsuit settled and what did he win?

What albums were regarded as "contractual"? The original contract from '92 or '93 was for 10 albums and 100 mill (I think). So what 10 albums would meet the obligation?

Symbol - ?
The Hits - ?
Come - Yes
The Black Album - Yes
The Gold Experience - ?
Girl 6 - ?
The Vault - Yes
Chaos and Disorder - Yes
[Edited 12/28/05 22:25pm]


I don't think there was a law-suit.

The original contract was for $100 million, I think for 10 albums. But it was contingent on album sales. If his albums sold as well as Diamonds & Pearls, which sold 5 million, then he would get $10 million an album. But as his sales went down, he got less and less.

At some point, his deal was renegotiated to only 6 albums, of which the first 3 were the Symbol album, Come and The Gold Experience. The Black Album was a seperate one-off deal for $1 million upfront, Girl 6 and the Hits were also not part of the deal (I guess because they were not proper 'original' albums).

Then his deal was renegotiated yet again, so that he only supply 2 more albums instead of the 3 left - which were Chaos & Disorder and The Vault.

So he went from a 10 album deal to a 5 album deal, thanks to the negotiating skill of L. Londell McMillan and because Prince was causing such a stink Warner's wanted rid of him.


Thanks. Interesting progression. Lost track of what went down.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 12/29/05 5:57pm

CandaceS

avatar

TheCatWoman said:

Well I don't know any specific details nor do I want to know. But I know there was a lawsuit. And he was very well compensated.
Prince as always would want the details private as well as any company or business would to save face and in this case it would be W/B.


You don't want to know any of the details, but you do want to keep posting about this alleged suit and settlement! lol

Prince did not file a civil suit against WB, nor did he get any big settlement, either from a jury or via negotiations.

If WB had to pay out the kind of money you've previously claimed ($500 million) or anything close to that, it would have been in the news one way or another. They're part of a publicly traded company, they can't keep things that affect their finances secret...certainly not mega-million-dollar settlements.

Either post something to back up your claims, or quit claiming he won some suit/settlement...no one else has ever heard of this.
"I would say that Prince's top thirty percent is great. Of that thirty percent, I'll bet the public has heard twenty percent of it." - Susan Rogers, "Hunting for Prince's Vault", BBC, 2015
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 12/29/05 6:02pm

dewalliz

TheCatWoman said:

Well I don't know any specific details nor do I want to know. But I know there was a lawsuit. And he was very well compensated.
Prince as always would want the details private as well as any company or business would to save face and in this case it would be W/B.



I dont recalled Prince sued WB either and do u have any proof to back up? I think had Prince sued WB, it would been publicized since Prince already had issues with them in the 90s.
[Edited 12/29/05 18:02pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 12/30/05 7:38am

TheCatWoman

So, what ever happend to all the albums that were distributed by W/B, Prince requested be sent in from his fans a few years ago? What purpose did that (request) serve?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 12/30/05 7:50am

poeticrockstar

metalorange said:

I don't see how Warners could hold the rights to unreleased material. I doubt that Prince had a deal where everything he recorded while under contract belonged to them. He didn't have any trouble releasing the Crystal Ball vault material. Besides, he could simply re-record them and release that version instead, like he did with 1999.

No, the only thing stopping Prince releasing old material is Prince himself.


Well, I dunno about this one. Considering the fact that most of the stuff on "Crystal Ball" were different versions of the original stuff. If you listen to "Crystal Ball" that was released vs. the "Crystal Ball" from "The Dream Factory" sessions and it's very different. In other words, WB just may own that stuff as well and he just released a different version or take on the song.

If I am wrong on this, I stand corrected.
[Edited 12/30/05 7:51am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 12/30/05 7:59am

Universaluv

TheCatWoman said:

So, what ever happend to all the albums that were distributed by W/B, Prince requested be sent in from his fans a few years ago? What purpose did that (request) serve?


If I recall correctly, they said that they were preparing to sue, but no actual lawsuit was ever filed.

Could they have reached a settlement prior to suing? perhaps.

Could they have determined the a lawsuit would be more trouble than it was worth? perhaps.

Could it have just been that Prince woke up on the wrong side of the bed one day and decided to do something with no real intention of ever really suing? equally likely.

My vote goes to option 3, but only Prince and Londell know for certain.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 12/30/05 8:20am

poeticrockstar

But let me ask this, my friends. Do you think that evenutally something will be reached where the catalouge will be remastered? Do you think Prince's CDs should get that same treatment like Madonna, Michael, and Stevie Wonder? Seems like everyone has seen their catalouge remastered but Prince.

What's your take on this?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 12/30/05 10:14am

metalorange

avatar

poeticrockstar said:

But let me ask this, my friends. Do you think that evenutally something will be reached where the catalouge will be remastered? Do you think Prince's CDs should get that same treatment like Madonna, Michael, and Stevie Wonder? Seems like everyone has seen their catalouge remastered but Prince.

What's your take on this?


They can't release re-mastered versions without Prince's permission. So again it comes down to Prince. Some people have suggested if Warners is bought out by another record company (EMI has some interest apparently) then perhaps Prince will be more willing to work with new people. Though it could also be that he just won't co-operate until he has finally won back the rights to the masters completely, and it's very unlikely a record company would just hand those over for free. Or it could just be that Prince doen't want to concentrate on his past work, or want too much attention on it when he is trying to release new music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 12/31/05 12:37pm

kinke

NME said:

kinke said:

naw prince ended up getting the last laugh and he's probably still laughing!!!
he got them with the name change then getting it back a few years later. so i think warner bros got played!!!


let's be honest, who was everyone laughing at?..... yes, Prince. He looked like a dick. WB are a corporate compnay..... did you see people giving up on WB as a company and boycotting thier albums?... no. People just thought Prince was washed up.

got played? they made a fortune out of Prince and still make money by discouting his albums and sticking them in the sales.


yes you are right, but he still got his name back and they never got black balled either, plus he's still hot!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 12/31/05 7:02pm

origmnd

If WB had any "control" over the unreleased recordings wouldn't THEY be actively pursuing bootleg distributors?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 12/31/05 7:36pm

ImYours

There's really no tellin' what kind of deal he had with them in his early days. I mean, look what happened to Tony Orlando, who wrote Tie A Yellow Ribbon - he can't even sing this song in public without fear of getting sued, and this song made him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 01/01/06 3:33am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

poeticrockstar said:

metalorange said:

I don't see how Warners could hold the rights to unreleased material. I doubt that Prince had a deal where everything he recorded while under contract belonged to them. He didn't have any trouble releasing the Crystal Ball vault material. Besides, he could simply re-record them and release that version instead, like he did with 1999.

No, the only thing stopping Prince releasing old material is Prince himself.


Well, I dunno about this one. Considering the fact that most of the stuff on "Crystal Ball" were different versions of the original stuff. If you listen to "Crystal Ball" that was released vs. the "Crystal Ball" from "The Dream Factory" sessions and it's very different. In other words, WB just may own that stuff as well and he just released a different version or take on the song.

If I am wrong on this, I stand corrected.


Not true, almost all of the tracks on Crystal Ball are identical to the so
called 'original versions'. Yes, the title track is different to the version
on Dream Factory, but it is identical to the version on the original Crystal
Ball album which was actually submitted to WB in 1986.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 01/01/06 11:50am

origmnd

ImYours said:

There's really no tellin' what kind of deal he had with them in his early days. I mean, look what happened to Tony Orlando, who wrote Tie A Yellow Ribbon - he can't even sing this song in public without fear of getting sued, and this song made him.



Why? did he sell his rights ?
[Edited 1/1/06 12:32pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Could PRINCE STILL BE HAVING DIFFICULTIES With WARNER BROTHERS?