OK, orgers wait 5 days from the time they create and account to the time they can post. But they're capable of posting as many posts and threads as folks who have been on the org for a very

Imago said:

Imago said:

The 5 day waiting period is ben's rule

OK, orgers wait 5 days from the time they create and account to the time they can post. But they're capable of posting as many posts and threads as folks who have been on the org for a very long time.

It just appears that it would make sense to give them a limited number of posts, say 10 or so until they've proven themselves in each specific forum.



Also, I think the structure of the forums and the rights users have should not be flat.


If you are constantly posting in General Discussion, you should have to prove yourself in P&R before being allowed to post as much as folks post in P&R, and vice versa.


Take for Example Lammastide.


His posts in P&R are smart, articulate, and very well informed. He conducts himself with a great deal of class and has become a staple of the P&R forum.

But lawd are Lammastide's General Discussion threads ever embarassing. Take this shit for example: http://prince.org/msg/100/310791

What. the. hell?



Lammastide should only be allowed 5 posts in General Discussion on any given day, and not be allowed to start but 1 thread a month until he's improved.



Who's with me on this?

luv4u said:

since when?
I don't remember a 5 day rule when I joined. {mutters to self} Has it been THAT long??

prodigalfan said:

it was in force when i joined just over 2 yrs ago...

by the time it was over id 4gotten what i wanted to post in the first place

i can't help but consider what kind of rule ben could have created to have stopped this thread from ever happening.

The 5-day-rule was to stop people posting immediately upon account creation. IIRC folks were getting banned, opening a new account and carrying on right where they left off. Within minutes. So a trial period would circumnavigate this.

But I'll give you for at least trying to bring forth new ideas. Well done!

mcmeekle said:

You'd think getting my alters to post on a thread was like purchasing a machine gun.

Anxiety said:

I have no clue what you're implying, honestly.

prb said:

Your posts are worst than Lammastides, young lady!


:PROBATION:

so we need a newbie forum! folks can only post outside of that one after 1000 posts once they have successfully passed a 50 question quiz about who is who in the cliques, what NOT to post etc they can be set free

Charlotte and I already came up with the proper solution.

http://prince.org/msg/3/309957

ZombieKitten said:

they also need a sponsor of at least over 10000 post and voted approval of at least 50% of those with 15000 or more
[Edited 6/12/09 18:43pm]

Charlotte and I already came up with the proper solution.

http://prince.org/msg/3/309957

ZombieKitten said:

they also need a sponsor of at least over 10000 post and voted approval of at least 50% of those with 15000 or more
[Edited 6/12/09 18:43pm]

ehuffnsd said:

Do Old Schoolers who've returned count? I gotta have 10,000 posts altogether...

OK, orgers wait 5 days from the time they create and account to the time they can post. But they're capable of posting as many posts and threads as folks who have been on the org for a very long time.

It just appears that it would make sense to give them a limited number of posts, say 10 or so until they've proven themselves in each specific forum.



Also, I think the structure of the forums and the rights users have should not be flat.


If you are constantly posting in General Discussion, you should have to prove yourself in P&R before being allowed to post as much as folks post in P&R, and vice versa.


Take for Example Lammastide.


His posts in P&R are smart, articulate, and very well informed. He conducts himself with a great deal of class and has become a staple of the P&R forum.

But lawd are Lammastide's General Discussion threads ever embarassing. Take this shit for example: http://prince.org/msg/100/310791

What. the. hell?



Lammastide should only be allowed 5 posts in General Discussion on any given day, and not be allowed to start but 1 thread a month until he's improved.



Who's with me on this?

ThreadBare said:

hmmm. possibly.

OK, orgers wait 5 days from the time they create and account to the time they can post. But they're capable of posting as many posts and threads as folks who have been on the org for a very long time.

It just appears that it would make sense to give them a limited number of posts, say 10 or so until they've proven themselves in each specific forum.



Also, I think the structure of the forums and the rights users have should not be flat.


If you are constantly posting in General Discussion, you should have to prove yourself in P&R before being allowed to post as much as folks post in P&R, and vice versa.


Take for Example Lammastide.


His posts in P&R are smart, articulate, and very well informed. He conducts himself with a great deal of class and has become a staple of the P&R forum.

But lawd are Lammastide's General Discussion threads ever embarassing. Take this shit for example: http://prince.org/msg/100/310791

What. the. hell?



Lammastide should only be allowed 5 posts in General Discussion on any given day, and not be allowed to start but 1 thread a month until he's improved.



Who's with me on this?

ehuffnsd said:

I think absolutely

OK, orgers wait 5 days from the time they create and account to the time they can post. But they're capable of posting as many posts and threads as folks who have been on the org for a very long time.

It just appears that it would make sense to give them a limited number of posts, say 10 or so until they've proven themselves in each specific forum.



Also, I think the structure of the forums and the rights users have should not be flat.


If you are constantly posting in General Discussion, you should have to prove yourself in P&R before being allowed to post as much as folks post in P&R, and vice versa.


Take for Example Lammastide.


His posts in P&R are smart, articulate, and very well informed. He conducts himself with a great deal of class and has become a staple of the P&R forum.

But lawd are Lammastide's General Discussion threads ever embarassing. Take this shit for example: http://prince.org/msg/100/310791

What. the. hell?



Lammastide should only be allowed 5 posts in General Discussion on any given day, and not be allowed to start but 1 thread a month until he's improved.



Who's with me on this?