independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Swearing may actually be a sign of intelligence
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 11/25/16 2:26pm

Ingela

Actually, I don't even think anyone ever goes back and checks out the story. If it's "fun", then it's repeated by every news source. That's how news is today. I'm surprised people are actually surprised that people take Facebook "news" seriously. Like fake news on Facebook is any different than what our local morning news show we watch while getting ready for work are "real" news.

The anchors on the early Channel 5 LA Morning News certainly don't take what they read seriously. They mock theses "studies" on air and roll their eyes at whatever is on their TelePrompTer. Lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 11/25/16 3:02pm

XxAxX

avatar

Ingela said:

Actually, I don't even think anyone ever goes back and checks out the story. If it's "fun", then it's repeated by every news source. That's how news is today. I'm surprised people are actually surprised that people take Facebook "news" seriously. Like fake news on Facebook is any different than what our local morning news show we watch while getting ready for work are "real" news. The anchors on the early Channel 5 LA Morning News certainly don't take what they read seriously. They mock theses "studies" on air and roll their eyes at whatever is on their TelePrompTer. Lol



normally, i'd be tempted to say something like shut the fuck up because this thread isn't about what *special* little old you thinks about studies and fake news and facebook so stay on topic you little thread-jacking should-be-on-the-road-already-far-from-here=ster and don't make me fucking report you to the moderators for being craptastically ego-ridden enough to come here with your teensy little pumpster out-of-your-pants-and-waving-it-around-in-the-air mentality.
.
but then i thought well fuck it, maybe i'll just post this instead:
.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/this-is-not-a-joke-government-issues-study-of-a-study-about-studies/

.

This Is Not a Joke: Government Issues Study of a Study About Studies

The Pentagon was inundated with so many studies in 2010 that it commissioned a study to determined how much it cost to produce all those studies.

Now the Government Accountability Office has reviewed the Pentagon's study and concluded in a report this week that it's a flop.

The study of a study of studies began in 2010 when Defense Secretary Robert Gates complained that his department was "awash in taskings for reports and studies." He wanted to know how much they cost.

Two years later, the Pentagon review is still continuing, which prompted Congress to ask the GAO to look over the Pentagon's shoulder. What they found lacked military precision.

The GAO found only nine studies that had been scrutinized by the Pentagon review, but the military was unable to "readily retrieve documentation" for six of the reports.

The Department of Defense's "approach is not fully consistent with relevant cost estimating best practices and cost accounting standards," the GAO concluded. In fact, they often did not include items like manpower, the report found.

The Pentagon "partially concurs" with the GAO's report.

The cost of the study of the study of the studies was not available from the GAO.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 11/25/16 3:04pm

XxAxX

avatar

purplethunder3121 said:

Ingela said:

EmmaMcG said: Well this study was obviously funded by The National Swearing Sailors Organization.

Image result for sailor gif

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 11/25/16 3:06pm

XxAxX

avatar

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 11/25/16 3:12pm

XxAxX

avatar

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 11/25/16 3:13pm

XxAxX

avatar

these fuckers are the best fucking users of obscene, profane and just plain sarcastic shit around. in my humble opinion:

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 11/25/16 3:33pm

Ingela

XxAxX said:



Ingela said:


Actually, I don't even think anyone ever goes back and checks out the story. If it's "fun", then it's repeated by every news source. That's how news is today. I'm surprised people are actually surprised that people take Facebook "news" seriously. Like fake news on Facebook is any different than what our local morning news show we watch while getting ready for work are "real" news. The anchors on the early Channel 5 LA Morning News certainly don't take what they read seriously. They mock theses "studies" on air and roll their eyes at whatever is on their TelePrompTer. Lol



normally, i'd be tempted to say something like shut the fuck up because this thread isn't about what *special* little old you thinks about studies and fake news and facebook so stay on topic you little thread-jacking should-be-on-the-road-already-far-from-here=ster and don't make me fucking report you to the moderators for being craptastically ego-ridden enough to come here with your teensy little pumpster out-of-your-pants-and-waving-it-around-in-the-air mentality.
.
but then i thought well fuck it, maybe i'll just post this instead:
.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/this-is-not-a-joke-government-issues-study-of-a-study-about-studies/


.




This Is Not a Joke: Government Issues Study of a Study About Studies








The Pentagon was inundated with so many studies in 2010 that it commissioned a study to determined how much it cost to produce all those studies.


Now the Government Accountability Office has reviewed the Pentagon's study and concluded in a report this week that it's a flop.


The study of a study of studies began in 2010 when Defense Secretary Robert Gates complained that his department was "awash in taskings for reports and studies." He wanted to know how much they cost.


Two years later, the Pentagon review is still continuing, which prompted Congress to ask the GAO to look over the Pentagon's shoulder. What they found lacked military precision.


The GAO found only nine studies that had been scrutinized by the Pentagon review, but the military was unable to "readily retrieve documentation" for six of the reports.


The Department of Defense's "approach is not fully consistent with relevant cost estimating best practices and cost accounting standards," the GAO concluded. In fact, they often did not include items like manpower, the report found.


The Pentagon "partially concurs" with the GAO's report.


The cost of the study of the study of the studies was not available from the GAO.




Wow you sound like a nutcase. Report me for what? Gtfoh
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 11/25/16 3:44pm

XxAxX

avatar

Ingela said:

XxAxX said:



normally, i'd be tempted to say something like shut the fuck up because this thread isn't about what *special* little old you thinks about studies and fake news and facebook so stay on topic you little thread-jacking should-be-on-the-road-already-far-from-here=ster and don't make me fucking report you to the moderators for being craptastically ego-ridden enough to come here with your teensy little pumpster out-of-your-pants-and-waving-it-around-in-the-air mentality.
.
but then i thought well fuck it, maybe i'll just post this instead:
.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/this-is-not-a-joke-government-issues-study-of-a-study-about-studies/

.

This Is Not a Joke: Government Issues Study of a Study About Studies

The Pentagon was inundated with so many studies in 2010 that it commissioned a study to determined how much it cost to produce all those studies.

Now the Government Accountability Office has reviewed the Pentagon's study and concluded in a report this week that it's a flop.

The study of a study of studies began in 2010 when Defense Secretary Robert Gates complained that his department was "awash in taskings for reports and studies." He wanted to know how much they cost.

Two years later, the Pentagon review is still continuing, which prompted Congress to ask the GAO to look over the Pentagon's shoulder. What they found lacked military precision.

The GAO found only nine studies that had been scrutinized by the Pentagon review, but the military was unable to "readily retrieve documentation" for six of the reports.

The Department of Defense's "approach is not fully consistent with relevant cost estimating best practices and cost accounting standards," the GAO concluded. In fact, they often did not include items like manpower, the report found.

The Pentagon "partially concurs" with the GAO's report.

The cost of the study of the study of the studies was not available from the GAO.

Wow you sound like a nutcase. Report me for what? Gtfoh



here are some studies for you to sink your rotty little teeth into. since i'm, guessing you clean missed my point, these are about having a sense of humor wink lol lol lol

http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/intelligence-humour-are-smart-people-funnier/

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289611000523

http://www.businessinsider.com/being-funny-is-associated-with-having-above-average-intelligence-2015-11


https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-intelligence-and-sense-of-humor

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 11/25/16 3:45pm

XxAxX

avatar

Ingela said:

XxAxX said:



normally, i'd be tempted to say something like shut the fuck up because this thread isn't about what *special* little old you thinks about studies and fake news and facebook so stay on topic you little thread-jacking should-be-on-the-road-already-far-from-here=ster and don't make me fucking report you to the moderators for being craptastically ego-ridden enough to come here with your teensy little pumpster out-of-your-pants-and-waving-it-around-in-the-air mentality.
.
but then i thought well fuck it, maybe i'll just post this instead:
.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/this-is-not-a-joke-government-issues-study-of-a-study-about-studies/

.

This Is Not a Joke: Government Issues Study of a Study About Studies

The Pentagon was inundated with so many studies in 2010 that it commissioned a study to determined how much it cost to produce all those studies.

Now the Government Accountability Office has reviewed the Pentagon's study and concluded in a report this week that it's a flop.

The study of a study of studies began in 2010 when Defense Secretary Robert Gates complained that his department was "awash in taskings for reports and studies." He wanted to know how much they cost.

Two years later, the Pentagon review is still continuing, which prompted Congress to ask the GAO to look over the Pentagon's shoulder. What they found lacked military precision.

The GAO found only nine studies that had been scrutinized by the Pentagon review, but the military was unable to "readily retrieve documentation" for six of the reports.

The Department of Defense's "approach is not fully consistent with relevant cost estimating best practices and cost accounting standards," the GAO concluded. In fact, they often did not include items like manpower, the report found.

The Pentagon "partially concurs" with the GAO's report.

The cost of the study of the study of the studies was not available from the GAO.

Wow you sound like a nutcase. Report me for what? Gtfoh




falloff lol lol lol i believe you meant GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 11/25/16 3:47pm

XxAxX

avatar

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Swearing may actually be a sign of intelligence