Yep...I nailed Syllogisms like a boss last night in my legal process tute...yeah...your probably as confused as I was....

a syllogism is a theoretical process of inductive and deductive reasoning used in law to come to a conclusion....that can be argued.......

yeah...................

here is an example of a syllogism

All Australians are bad drivers

Dave is Australian

Dave is a bad driver......

Chaching

by the way if your interested......I officially graduate with a Bch of Social Science 15 september 2013. when i have my ceromony......whoooohoooo...

All soon to be College Grads are awesome!

MaxiMPact is a soon to be College Grad

MaxiMPact is awesome!

OnlyNDaUsa said:

All soon to be College Grads are awesome!

MaxiMPact is a soon to be College Grad

MaxiMPact is awesome!

thankyou...you nailed syllagisms...wanna be a lawyer too? hahahahahhaahxxxoooo

Nawwww your sweet..unfortunatly I dont feel the same way but you have made my day...

jonylawson said:

I want to nail u

P.S..I thought you were leaving the org...what happened to change your mind?

MaxiMPact said:

MaxiMPact said:

Yep...I nailed Syllogisms like a boss last night in my legal process tute...yeah...your probably as confused as I was....

a syllogism is a theoretical process of inductive and deductive reasoning used in law to come to a conclusion....that can be argued.......

yeah...................

here is an example of a syllogism

All Australians are bad drivers

Dave is Australian

Dave is a bad driver......

Chaching

by the way if your interested......I officially graduate with a Bch of Social Science 15 september 2013. when i have my ceromony......whoooohoooo...

just one correction......

All Australian males r bad drivers

jonylawson said:

MaxiMPact said:

Nawwww your sweet..unfortunatly I dont feel the same way but you have made my day...

P.S..I thought you were leaving the org...what happened to change your mind?

Drunk post dear.

Congrats Maxim!

symbolic logic

Cheers

PurpleJedi said:

Congrats Maxim!

now to get thru post grad law..........fun fun fun.....

MaxiMPact said:

Yep...I nailed Syllogisms like a boss last night in my legal process tute...yeah...your probably as confused as I was....

a syllogism is a theoretical process of inductive and deductive reasoning used in law to come to a conclusion....that can be argued.......

yeah...................

here is an example of a syllogism

All Australians are bad drivers

Dave is Australian

Dave is a bad driver......

Chaching

by the way if your interested......I officially graduate with a Bch of Social Science 15 september 2013. when i have my ceromony......whoooohoooo...

Congrats!

ThisOne said:

MaxiMPact said:

Yep...I nailed Syllogisms like a boss last night in my legal process tute...yeah...your probably as confused as I was....

a syllogism is a theoretical process of inductive and deductive reasoning used in law to come to a conclusion....that can be argued.......

yeah...................

here is an example of a syllogism

All Australians are bad drivers

Dave is Australian

Dave is a bad driver......

Chaching

by the way if your interested......I officially graduate with a Bch of Social Science 15 september 2013. when i have my ceromony......whoooohoooo...

just one correction......

All Australian males r bad drivers

^ does not understand the concept of a syllogism

Genesia said:

MaxiMPact said:

Dave is Australian

Dave is a bad driver......

congrats

but i'm not a bad driver

Syllagism is a theoretical thing to state an an argument

Issue

Rule

Arguement

Conclusion

there must be a major premise

a minor premise

and a conclusion

there can be a flawed conclusion

ie.

all reptiles are cold blooded (major premise)

snails are cold blooded (minor premise)

snails are reptiles......................(Conclusion)......flawed reasoning

yeah took me a long time to get it and I kept asking th electurer to explain it to me over and over again...........till I got it

MaxiMPact said:

Syllagism is a theoretical thing to state an an argument

Issue

Rule

Arguement

Conclusion

there must be a major premise

a minor premise

and a conclusion

there can be a flawed conclusion

ie.

all reptiles are cold blooded (major premise)

snails are cold blooded (minor premise)

snails are reptiles......................(Conclusion)......flawed reasoning

yeah took me a long time to get it and I kept asking th electurer to explain it to me over and over again...........till I got it

LOL lots of people make that error.

it is like:


If it rains the lawn will be wet

the lawn is wet

therefor it rained. (except there is not only one way for a lawn to get wet)

in your example adding 2 words would make it correct! (changing one word would also make it correct)

here is a classic example can can you spot the error?

If I was hungry a ham sandwich is better than nothing

Nothing is better than god

I am hungry.

there for a ham sandwich is better than god

[Edited 8/9/13 7:00am]

someones been googling....yes you are quite right...now can you apply it to a specific piece of case law.......such as the Annets case.( event happened in Australia 1986)......duty of care...........psychiatric injury compensation to the parents of James Annetts.....

OnlyNDaUsa said:

MaxiMPact said:

Syllagism is a theoretical thing to state an an argument

Issue

Rule

Arguement

Conclusion

there must be a major premise

a minor premise

and a conclusion

there can be a flawed conclusion

ie.

all reptiles are cold blooded (major premise)

snails are cold blooded (minor premise)

snails are reptiles......................(Conclusion)......flawed reasoning

yeah took me a long time to get it and I kept asking th electurer to explain it to me over and over again...........till I got it

LOL lots of people make that error.

it is like:


If it rains the lawn will be wet

the lawn is wet

therefor it rained. (except there is not only one way for a lawn to get wet)

in your example adding 2 words would make it correct! (changing one word would also make it correct)

here is a classic example can can you spot the error?

If I was hungry a ham sandwich is better than nothing

Nothing is better than god

I am hungry.

there for a ham sandwich is better than god

[Edited 8/9/13 7:00am]

MaxiMPact said:

someones been googling....yes you are quite right...now can you apply it to a specific piece of case law.......such as the Annets case.( event happened in Australia 1986)......duty of care...........psychiatric injury compensation to the parents of James Annetts.....

huh what?