ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

Stymie said:

babynoz said:

Good question, I know I'd press charges.

There would be no amount of money that could compensate me. Also, if he really did molest those kids, those parent s don't deserve a fucking dime as they are the ones that left their kids alone with a grown man.

Exactly.

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

jonylawson...you're a troll.

Rehashing old shit...

[Edited 6/30/13 18:02pm]

old shit?

sorry but it was on the front of newspapers yesterday.

If it makes certain people sleep at night, and wake up in the morning, ok he did it.

.....Good night and good morning.

jonylawson said:

sad...

poor kids.

ah well..no great surprise

[img:$uid]http://i37.phot.../img:$uid]

[Edited 6/30/13 2:31am]

Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys: report

The King of Pop hired a private investigator to collect all the skeletons in his closet and bury them, according to an explosive report in London's Sunday People. But now a former associate of the investigator is talking.

Comments (287)

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.co...z2XlGVnUnV

SoulAlive said:

Does any of this stuff matter now? Michael Jackson is dead.I really don't see the point in re-hashing old,unproven accusations and vicious rumors when the person is not here to defend himself.

Let's move on,shall we?

...

[Edited 6/30/13 17:39pm]

Beautifulstarr123 said:

SoulAlive said:

Does any of this stuff matter now? Michael Jackson is dead.I really don't see the point in re-hashing old,unproven accusations and vicious rumors when the person is not here to defend himself.

Let's move on,shall we?

...

[Edited 6/30/13 17:39pm]

i think its a bit harder for the children MOLESTED to do that...........

Honestly who the fuck cares. He's rotting in the ground and the world has moved on. Let it go.

jonylawson said:

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

jonylawson...you're a troll.

Rehashing old shit...

[Edited 6/30/13 18:02pm]

old shit?

sorry but it was on the front of newspapers yesterday.

Y'know, for an educated person, it's quite surprising you believe tabloid fodder.

Like I said, you're a troll who enjoys fucking with the MJ fans.

Have a nice life.

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

jonylawson said:

old shit?

sorry but it was on the front of newspapers yesterday.

Y'know, for an educated person, it's quite surprising you believe tabloid fodder.

Like I said, you're a troll who enjoys fucking with the MJ fans.

Have a nice life.

do you think mj was guilty?

hey, i'm smoking indoors and i believe that Jackson is dead and pumped and victoria clembeing mountains and stephanie lawrencing kitchen furniture surfaces. Just pay me £100,000 and everybody gets off.

jonylawson said:

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

jonylawson...you're a troll.

Rehashing old shit...

old shit?

sorry but it was on the front of newspapers yesterday.

that looks like one of those sleazy tabloids that you see at the supermarket checkstands This isn't "news",this is nothing but recycled,irrelevent bullshit.

jonylawson said:

Beautifulstarr123 said:

i think its a bit harder for the children MOLESTED to do that...........

Michael Jackson is dead.He can't defend himself.When he was alive,he was investigated thoroughly and even went through a lengthy trial.If the accusers couldn't prove the charges back then,there's no point in trying to do it now.End of story.

jonylawson said:

dont know whats more disturbing..

the approximate what?? 30-40 childfen whom were alledged to have abused OR these crazy MJ fans??

imagine if your mate had been accused of one...okay maybe innocent..BUT DOZENS???

then you found out he had paid EVERY ONE OF THEM OFF??

because tabloid tabloid wrote about it??
Tom Sneddon did his best to prove the guilt of MJ, but he could not, and, it turns out, the FBI has such strong evidence against Jackson??
do you really believe that?

Media did not react to the news seriously, it just duplicated the tabloids.
When Robson accused Jackson a month ago, every newspaper in Europe, wrote about it.
Now - silence.
it is unworthy of attention nonsense from an anonymous source, hell, even TMZ ignored this "news."

[Edited 7/1/13 3:49am]

This is a smear campaign designed to attract the attention away from the people who murdered him, who are set to lose millions of dollars in the current wrongful death lawsuit.

There is not a *shred* of credible evidence to suggest that MJ did any of this stuff. His trial in 2005 dug up everything, and they found NOTHING.

Frankly, anyone that believes he is guilty is either a complete fucking moron or hasn't investigated thoroughly.

So, how about this?

http://charlesthomsonjour...-that.html

1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviewscompiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part.

2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence.

The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but weredestroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously.

3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again.

This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'.

Militant said:

This is a smear campaign designed to attract the attention away from the people who murdered him, who are set to lose millions of dollars in the current wrongful death lawsuit.

There is not a *shred* of credible evidence to suggest that MJ did any of this stuff. His trial in 2005 dug up everything, and they found NOTHING.

Frankly, anyone that believes he is guilty is either a complete fucking moron or hasn't investigated thoroughly.

So, how about this?

http://charlesthomsonjour...-that.html

1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviewscompiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part.

2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence.

The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but weredestroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously.

3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again.

This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'.

Just. Wow.

Has Nigella hunted down a home yet?

the public will never know the truth... which is a shame

a lot of ugly shit being said in this thread

MoBetterBliss said:

the public will never know the truth... which is a shame

a lot of ugly shit being said in this thread

I agree.

Please use the MJ sticky in the music: non-prince forum to discuss everying MJ