if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

They'd have to talk fast. I really don't believe messing around with physics is bad or that we'll blow up the universe or this planet. Maybe it's all part of the plan, we're just taking the long route cause we're stubborn.

angel345 said:

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

But I don't think they are doing it or even could do it. There's more simple problems they have yet to solve like finding the cure for cancer and figuring out how to stop those "Anonymous" hackers.

the truth is that 1. they have discovered and created antimatter

which is part and parcel 'the big bang' or the cause

and the are causin little big bangs as we speak...

the qwestion is wheather or not they are distroyin

universes in the process, and if so, will the tell us.

continue discussion

Antimatter = molecules formed by atoms consisting of antiprotons, antinuetrons, and positrons.

Man tries and tries but never quite succeeds.

In other words, I cry bullshit on what the scientists claim they have done or are doing and what they are doing or have done would destroy on a smaller level first.

your talkin' the multiverses? We don't know. But for the sake of arguement, it is possible that if another universe is useful to our world in someway, then yes it will get used. Would we the average citizens know about it, of course not, it would cause too much interference. If the understanding is there are infinite numbers of them and not all of them are conducive to life. But that's very broad. Everything we know of requires an energy source to make it work. With the exception of nuclear there is no energy source that's abundant enough for such experiments

HotGritz said:

angel345 said:

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

But I don't think they are doing it or even could do it. There's more simple problems they have yet to solve like finding the cure for cancer and figuring out how to stop those "Anonymous" hackers.

But I'm still waiting for them to prove that religious folks or creationists are nutjobs

KingBAD said:

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

i whipped up a little something of my own out back in the laboratory; figured out a way to utilize planet earth's magnetic field, amplify and store it in an orbiting satellite which i control remotely. plan is, i'll use three satellites to generate and triangulate a high-intensity electromagnetic field capable of generating condensation midair so i can control the world's the rainfall patterns. hope y'alls don't mind!!!

XxAxX said:

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

i whipped up a little something of my own out back in the laboratory; figured out a way to utilize planet earth's magnetic field, amplify and store it in an orbiting satellite which i control remotely. plan is, i'll use three satellites to generate and triangulate a high-intensity electromagnetic field capable of generating condensation midair so i can control the world's the rainfall patterns. hope y'alls don't mind!!!

that was my idea

and i would hope that you'ld be lady enough

to give credit here credit is due

KingBAD said:

XxAxX said:

i whipped up a little something of my own out back in the laboratory; figured out a way to utilize planet earth's magnetic field, amplify and store it in an orbiting satellite which i control remotely. plan is, i'll use three satellites to generate and triangulate a high-intensity electromagnetic field capable of generating condensation midair so i can control the world's the rainfall patterns. hope y'alls don't mind!!!

that was my idea

and i would hope that you'ld be lady enough

to give credit here credit is due

honey, that ain't theft, it's file sharing

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

There not trying to create a universe at all.In a way there trying to pinpoint the building blocks of everything...just one imperfect atom call it, that determined whether this was that.In life most things have simitary. This particle was different in some way and is the building blocks of not just life as we know it but everything that has ever been and shall be.

It's like dark matter. The majority of all the universe is made up of it yet we still can't determine what it is. The work that is being carried out at CERN with the hadron collider concerning particle physics is with time, will have a profound affect on our lives in a good way.

Don't listen to the tabloid press with their scaremongering bullshit.

another Big Bang: I did not even know Kim Kardashin was making another porn tape

angel345 said:

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

it will not prove or provide any such thing. if anything it will add support that there is or was a creator/creators.

maybe our universe it the result of such an experiment?

funkmunki said:

KingBAD said:

if the scientific community

is replicatin the 'BIG BANG'

and they create a universe

and distroy that universe in the experiment.

do you think they would tell us???

There not trying to create a universe at all.In a way there trying to pinpoint the building blocks of everything...just one imperfect atom call it, that determined whether this was that.In life most things have simitary. This particle was different in some way and is the building blocks of not just life as we know it but everything that has ever been and shall be.

It's like dark matter. The majority of all the universe is made up of it yet we still can't determine what it is. The work that is being carried out at CERN with the hadron collider concerning particle physics is with time, will have a profound affect on our lives in a good way.

Don't listen to the tabloid press with their scaremongering bullshit.

I just need to stick this in here.

It turns out that roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the Universe.

That's all.

OnlyNDaUsa said:

angel345 said:

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

it will not prove or provide any such thing. if anything it will add support that there is or was a creator/creators.

maybe our universe it the result of such an experiment?

nobody created the universe mate...no nothing nadda....It's all about Physics ask Einstein whos theory is still so precise to this day and has yet to be rebuked.

Man's obsesion on story telling one up manship has perpetuated into his need for being and belonging, and the constant reasurance in times of need for a figure head. Something that you can put your finger on that can make sence. In a way religion worked for a while but nowadays as most are educated we have the where with all to induvidually make up our own mind and not take old tales as gospel.

So there you go there aint no God so live for today because when your gone your gone baby...

Feel free to ignore my ramblings

morningsong said:

funkmunki said:

There not trying to create a universe at all.In a way there trying to pinpoint the building blocks of everything...just one imperfect atom call it, that determined whether this was that.In life most things have simitary. This particle was different in some way and is the building blocks of not just life as we know it but everything that has ever been and shall be.

It's like dark matter. The majority of all the universe is made up of it yet we still can't determine what it is. The work that is being carried out at CERN with the hadron collider concerning particle physics is with time, will have a profound affect on our lives in a good way.

Don't listen to the tabloid press with their scaremongering bullshit.

I just need to stick this in here.

It turns out that roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the Universe.

That's all.

i could have used google 2 but i just shot from the hip.... i mixed up matter with energy....please accept my apologie....I blame the drink

[Edited 1/20/12 17:29pm]

funkmunki said:

morningsong said:

I just need to stick this in here.

It turns out that roughly 70% of the Universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 25%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the Universe.

That's all.

i could have used google 2 but i just shot from the hip.... i mixed up matter with energy....please accept my apologie....I blame the drink

[Edited 1/20/12 17:29pm]

I remembered it as 98%, glad I googled it. No prob.

OnlyNDaUsa said:

angel345 said:

In order to prove their theory that the existing universe was not created by the creator, I think so. Man is proud.

it will not prove or provide any such thing. if anything it will add support that there is or was a creator/creators.

maybe our universe it the result of such an experiment?

not to prove, but to recreate

and now that i think of it with

some things i've raed here,

i have come to think that IF the

big bang was recreated

scientist couldn't wait to say they did it.

BUT the qwestion is IF they did it and accidently

distroyed the thing, WOULD THEY ADMIT IT!!!

KingBAD said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

it will not prove or provide any such thing. if anything it will add support that there is or was a creator/creators.

maybe our universe it the result of such an experiment?

not to prove, but to recreate

and now that i think of it with

some things i've raed here,

i have come to think that IF the

big bang was recreated

scientist couldn't wait to say they did it.

BUT the qwestion is IF they did it and accidently

distroyed the thing, WOULD THEY ADMIT IT!!!

Listen.............

nobody's fucking creating the big bang.

funkmunki said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

it will not prove or provide any such thing. if anything it will add support that there is or was a creator/creators.

maybe our universe it the result of such an experiment?

nobody created the universe mate...no nothing nadda....It's all about Physics ask Einstein whos theory is still so precise to this day and has yet to be rebuked.

Man's obsesion on story telling one up manship has perpetuated into his need for being and belonging, and the constant reasurance in times of need for a figure head. Something that you can put your finger on that can make sence. In a way religion worked for a while but nowadays as most are educated we have the where with all to induvidually make up our own mind and not take old tales as gospel.

So there you go there aint no God so live for today because when your gone your gone baby...

Feel free to ignore my ramblings

You have someone like Hawking that says God did not create the universe, but yet and still, his M-theory about creation is inconclusive. Issac Newton believed that the universe was created by a powerful Being:

Einstein supported Newton's belief by this statement, though not deeply religious:

Then something in wikipedia caught my attention about Einstein:

Scope

The theory of relativity transformed physics and astronomy during the 20th century. When first published, relativity superseded a 200-year-old theory of mechanics elucidated by Isaac Newton. It changed perceptions.^[4][5][6] However, Einstein denied that Newton could ever be superseded by his own work.

The theory of relativity overturned the concept of motion from Newton's day, by positing that all motion is relative. Time was no longer uniform and absolute. Physics could no longer be understood as space by itself, and time by itself. Instead, an added dimension had to be taken into account with curved spacetime. Time now depended on velocity, and contraction became a fundamental consequence at appropriate speeds.

With this statement in the Scope, wouldn't you say that Einstein believe there was a cause for cause and effect. He took an added dimension into account.

Not trying to convince you about the supernatural or the divine, for you have your own beliefs. My belief is if creatism is based on a book of lies, then prove that it is. Not one of these scientist listed prove that it is.

angel345 said:

funkmunki said:

nobody created the universe mate...no nothing nadda....It's all about Physics ask Einstein whos theory is still so precise to this day and has yet to be rebuked.

Man's obsesion on story telling one up manship has perpetuated into his need for being and belonging, and the constant reasurance in times of need for a figure head. Something that you can put your finger on that can make sence. In a way religion worked for a while but nowadays as most are educated we have the where with all to induvidually make up our own mind and not take old tales as gospel.

So there you go there aint no God so live for today because when your gone your gone baby...

Feel free to ignore my ramblings

You have someone like Hawking that says God did not create the universe, but yet and still, his M-theory about creation is inconclusive. Issac Newton believed that the universe was created by a powerful Being:

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God was essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

Einstein supported Newton's belief by this statement, though not deeply religious:

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Then something in wikipedia caught my attention about Einstein:

Scope

The theory of relativity transformed physics and astronomy during the 20th century. When first published, relativity superseded a 200-year-old theory of mechanics elucidated by Isaac Newton. It changed perceptions.^[4][5][6] However, Einstein denied that Newton could ever be superseded by his own work.

The theory of relativity overturned the concept of motion from Newton's day, by positing that all motion is relative. Time was no longer uniform and absolute. Physics could no longer be understood as space by itself, and time by itself. Instead, an added dimension had to be taken into account with curved spacetime. Time now depended on velocity, and contraction became a fundamental consequence at appropriate speeds.

With this statement in the Scope, wouldn't you say that Einstein believe there was a cause for cause and effect. He took an added dimension into account.

Not trying to convince you about the supernatural or the divine, for you have your own beliefs. My belief is if creatism is based on a book of lies, then prove that it is. Not one of these scientist listed prove that it is.

OH SHIT!!!!

i said a qwestion for REGULAR FOLKS

in life we all know if we drop something it lands on the ground...so almost all particles in physics behave in a pre determined way.

So what cern are doing is colliding 2 particles at each other at extreme speed and then analyze the similarities that we know!... then look for the abnormalities which occur randomly yet analyze it to determine a pattern so we can pinpoint a pre determined point we hypothetically think exists.....call it the life particle as it does not conform or act like any other we know apparently!!

or are we trapped in a funk filled vortex and trapped in 1993 and Prince is just about to drop the best album of his life?....

KingBAD said:

angel345 said:

You have someone like Hawking that says God did not create the universe, but yet and still, his M-theory about creation is inconclusive. Issac Newton believed that the universe was created by a powerful Being:

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God was essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

Einstein supported Newton's belief by this statement, though not deeply religious:

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Then something in wikipedia caught my attention about Einstein:

Scope

The theory of relativity transformed physics and astronomy during the 20th century. When first published, relativity superseded a 200-year-old theory of mechanics elucidated by Isaac Newton. It changed perceptions.^[4][5][6] However, Einstein denied that Newton could ever be superseded by his own work.

The theory of relativity overturned the concept of motion from Newton's day, by positing that all motion is relative. Time was no longer uniform and absolute. Physics could no longer be understood as space by itself, and time by itself. Instead, an added dimension had to be taken into account with curved spacetime. Time now depended on velocity, and contraction became a fundamental consequence at appropriate speeds.

With this statement in the Scope, wouldn't you say that Einstein believe there was a cause for cause and effect. He took an added dimension into account.

Not trying to convince you about the supernatural or the divine, for you have your own beliefs. My belief is if creatism is based on a book of lies, then prove that it is. Not one of these scientist listed prove that it is.

OH SHIT!!!!

i said a qwestion for REGULAR FOLKS