Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
Vegans and Vegitarians who own CATS/DOGS This part one of a multi-part series of animal ownership threads I'd like to start.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
I don't think any pet-owning vegan or vegetarian people really care what label you feel is accurate for them. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ugh, I hate this topic. I say everything in moderation.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But dogs and cats don't have people digestive systems.
http://www.myspace.com/butterscotchpimp
a kindler, gentler BSP for 2010? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
ButterscotchPimp said: But dogs and cats don't have people digestive systems.
My ex-gf who was vegan, tried to feed her cat that she loved dearly vegan food. He had multiple health problems as a result. so where people vegans can have very varied diets and should take supplements, it's very difficult to get a pet to do that. just my two cents. I think his point isn't that you should try to feed your pets food that isn't good for them (which is absolutely true, no one should feed a dog or cat a vegan diet), but that veggies who own meat-eating pets are contributing to industries they are morally opposed to, and that's somehow hypocritical. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: I don't think any pet-owning vegan or vegetarian people really care what label you feel is accurate for them.
This is the typical response I get. Very Pavlovian responses actually. (not aimed at you) [Edited 10/27/09 8:00am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Cats and Dogs and feeding them in proper healthy ways ~ to me, REALLY has very little bearing on a Human choosing to be a Veggie only type of eater
|
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: ButterscotchPimp said: But dogs and cats don't have people digestive systems.
My ex-gf who was vegan, tried to feed her cat that she loved dearly vegan food. He had multiple health problems as a result. so where people vegans can have very varied diets and should take supplements, it's very difficult to get a pet to do that. just my two cents. I think his point isn't that you should try to feed your pets food that isn't good for them (which is absolutely true, no one should feed a dog or cat a vegan diet), but that veggies who own meat-eating pets are contributing to industries they are morally opposed to, and that's somehow hypocritical. yes. It serves no purpose to own an animal an mistreat it too. That would be cruel. But this is true whether the animal is a cat or a rabbit, and not part of my point (As you pointed out) It's only hypocritical in my eyes, if their intention is indeed in opposition to these industries and a reflection of some moral calling. Now, I'm not saying that it's a waste of time to even bother being vegan/vegetarian. And I'm not saying that it isn't a step in the right direction, even if they chose to own these animals. But certainly, it's a moral delima that cant just be justified by "well, I'm nurturing this cute little fuzzy animal--I don't want it to suffer." edit [Edited 10/27/09 8:10am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
CarrieMpls said: ButterscotchPimp said: But dogs and cats don't have people digestive systems.
My ex-gf who was vegan, tried to feed her cat that she loved dearly vegan food. He had multiple health problems as a result. so where people vegans can have very varied diets and should take supplements, it's very difficult to get a pet to do that. just my two cents. I think his point isn't that you should try to feed your pets food that isn't good for them (which is absolutely true, no one should feed a dog or cat a vegan diet), but that veggies who own meat-eating pets are contributing to industries they are morally opposed to, and that's somehow hypocritical. Ohhhh ... well I have never met a person that on some level is not hypocritical so ... |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieLee said: Ugh, I hate this topic. I say everything in moderation.
Lots of vegans who eat soy on a daily basis are getting cancer...there is an estrogen like substance called isoflavones that stimulates estrogen receptors. Not good!!! I don't think tofu is real food--not really good food anyways. Many types beans have very strong chemicals that are bad for human consumption. And yes, moderation is key. There are so many recipes that call for soy, in which combination of mushrooms can replace. Though I thought the estrogen theory was still debated? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Imago said: CarrieMpls said: I don't think any pet-owning vegan or vegetarian people really care what label you feel is accurate for them.
This is the typical response I get. Very Pavlovian at times responses actually. (not aimed at you) But you're attacking the label. The label really only applies to one's diet. I can be vegetarian and wear leather and fur and still call myself vegetarian - regardless of the reasons I choose to be vegetarian. If you want to think it's hypocritical to own a meat-eating pet while not eating meat yourself, knock yourself out. The only thing I will say is I would hazard to guess most of my veggie friends are far more educated on where their pet's food comes from than most folks. There are pet food companies I don't support because of how they do business, treat animals, etc. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: CarrieMpls said: I think his point isn't that you should try to feed your pets food that isn't good for them (which is absolutely true, no one should feed a dog or cat a vegan diet), but that veggies who own meat-eating pets are contributing to industries they are morally opposed to, and that's somehow hypocritical. Ohhhh ... well I have never met a person that on some level is not hypocritical so ... I've never a met a vegan who owned pets to admit they were hypocritical on the matter. Rather you get very long winded reasons why I'm just being a fuckbrain. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: CarrieMpls said: I think his point isn't that you should try to feed your pets food that isn't good for them (which is absolutely true, no one should feed a dog or cat a vegan diet), but that veggies who own meat-eating pets are contributing to industries they are morally opposed to, and that's somehow hypocritical. It's only hypocritical in my eyes, if thier intention is indeed in opposition to these industries and a reflection of some moral calling. yes. It serves no purpose to own an animal an mistreat it too. That would be cruel. But this is true whether the animal is a cat or a rabbit, and not part of my point (As you pointed out) Now, I'm not saying that it's a waste of time do even bother being vegan/vegetarian. And I'm not saying that it isn't a step in the right direction, even if they chose to own these animals. But certainly, it's a moral delima that cant just be justified by "well, I'm nurturing this cute little fuzzy animal--I don't want it to suffer." I get the argument. I'm vegan, but not a card carrying member of PETA or anything. For me it's a dietary choice not a political statement. In layman's terms, i don't want to eat a cow but i'll wear the fuck out of one. So yeah, for the card carrying PETA diehards, owning a pet is a tricky situation that presents some issues that are sort of at odds with one another. http://www.myspace.com/butterscotchpimp
a kindler, gentler BSP for 2010? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Imago said: Mach said: Ohhhh ... well I have never met a person that on some level is not hypocritical so ... I've never a met a vegan who owned pets to admit they were hypocritical on the matter. Rather you get very long winded reasons why I'm just being a fuckbrain. Oh we humans and our egos sometimes - ya know |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: CarrieLee said: Ugh, I hate this topic. I say everything in moderation.
Lots of vegans who eat soy on a daily basis are getting cancer...there is an estrogen like substance called isoflavones that stimulates estrogen receptors. Not good!!! I don't think tofu is real food--not really good food anyways. Many types beans have very strong chemicals that are bad for human consumption. And yes, moderation is key. There are so many recipes that call for soy, in which combination of mushrooms can replace. Though I thought the estrogen theory was still debated? It is still being debated but I work in a lab with a bunch of scientists and I tend to believe them! Plus there have been an alarming amount of people I know who are being diagnosed with cancer and they are vegans who don't drink or smoke. Makes me think.... Like I say, everything in moderation. ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: Cats and Dogs and feeding them in proper healthy ways ~ to me, REALLY has very little bearing on a Human choosing to be a Veggie only type of eater
So hell yes you can be a veggie person and own a CAT or DOG and feed them the meats they want/need /like ( veggie )Pet owners ( some/most ) may really not give a flying fuck what others think about them based on feeding meat eating pets MEAT seriously - this is a real concern for some ? ... really Whether they care about what I think or not is not really part of the debate. However, your opinion that they can consider themselves true vegan--is this predicated on the fact that it may not always be a moral decision, but one based on health? Or are you saying, depending on one's point of view, they can label themselves according to their own chosen ethics? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: Imago said: It's only hypocritical in my eyes, if thier intention is indeed in opposition to these industries and a reflection of some moral calling. yes. It serves no purpose to own an animal an mistreat it too. That would be cruel. But this is true whether the animal is a cat or a rabbit, and not part of my point (As you pointed out) Now, I'm not saying that it's a waste of time do even bother being vegan/vegetarian. And I'm not saying that it isn't a step in the right direction, even if they chose to own these animals. But certainly, it's a moral delima that cant just be justified by "well, I'm nurturing this cute little fuzzy animal--I don't want it to suffer." I get the argument. I'm vegan, but not a card carrying member of PETA or anything. For me it's a dietary choice not a political statement. In layman's terms, i don't want to eat a cow but i'll wear the fuck out of one. So yeah, for the card carrying PETA diehards, owning a pet is a tricky situation that presents some issues that are sort of at odds with one another. And I take no issues with either kind of vegan really. I'm more along the lines of you're type when I do go vegan. I'm just interested to see how once balances out such issues when it is a moral choice and not just one for health. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Imago said: Mach said: Cats and Dogs and feeding them in proper healthy ways ~ to me, REALLY has very little bearing on a Human choosing to be a Veggie only type of eater
So hell yes you can be a veggie person and own a CAT or DOG and feed them the meats they want/need /like ( veggie )Pet owners ( some/most ) may really not give a flying fuck what others think about them based on feeding meat eating pets MEAT seriously - this is a real concern for some ? ... really Whether they care about what I think or not is not really part of the debate. Yeah I know, I misunderstood @ 1st However, your opinion that they can consider themselves true vegan--is this predicated on the fact that it may not always be a moral decision, but one based on health? Sure Or are you saying, depending on one's point of view, they can label themselves according to their own chosen ethics? Yes, that too |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Is it better than being a full blown meat eater? yes, of course? But I still don't think you're a vegan/vegitarian, and regardless of what you have to say on the matter, my opinion is unwaivering. then why the pretense of an open discussion? i'm a burnt grilled-cheese sandwich. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: Imago said: Whether they care about what I think or not is not really part of the debate. Yeah I know, I misunderstood @ 1st However, your opinion that they can consider themselves true vegan--is this predicated on the fact that it may not always be a moral decision, but one based on health? Sure Or are you saying, depending on one's point of view, they can label themselves according to their own chosen ethics? Yes, that too Gotcha. I'm not saying vegans with meat eating pets are the Joe Liberman of vegans, but .... oh fuck it, I guess I am saying that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieLee said: Imago said: I don't think tofu is real food--not really good food anyways. Many types beans have very strong chemicals that are bad for human consumption. And yes, moderation is key. There are so many recipes that call for soy, in which combination of mushrooms can replace. Though I thought the estrogen theory was still debated? It is still being debated but I work in a lab with a bunch of scientists and I tend to believe them! Plus there have been an alarming amount of people I know who are being diagnosed with cancer and they are vegans who don't drink or smoke. Makes me think.... Like I say, everything in moderation. Yeah, but there are lots of things that we've been told are "safe" (like for example, sodium fluoride in our drinking water and triclosan which they're putting in everything from dishwashing liquid to toothpaste) that cause cancer. so even if you're vegan, that in itself doesn't mean that you're "safer" or "healthier" necessarily. HOWEVER, with that said i really don't get people who with all the information available today about our food that really still see benefits in eating dairy and meat. i'll take my chances with tofu everyday of the week. [Edited 10/27/09 8:14am] http://www.myspace.com/butterscotchpimp
a kindler, gentler BSP for 2010? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whistle said: Imago said: Is it better than being a full blown meat eater? yes, of course? But I still don't think you're a vegan/vegitarian, and regardless of what you have to say on the matter, my opinion is unwaivering. then why the pretense of an open discussion? It was a baitastic baitlexic, baitmorphic, baitvisceral question from the city of baitville, in the provice of Quebait, on the planet Baitune to get folks to engage in a discussion that otherwise would not be very interesting to most folks. PS. It's working. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Interesting topic. Also reminds me why I stopped labeling myself altho I'd say I adhere to a vegetarian/vegan diet.
The day has come for him to be free, and he laughs, he kicks and rolls up his sleeves, "I'm alive and I'm here forever." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Interesting topic. Also reminds me why I stopped labeling myself altho I'd say I adhere to a vegetarian/vegan diet.
Where my pet food comes from is a concern of mine and I try to find the best quality with the most humane souces but don't know if I've been successful. I'm constantly researching. My dietary choice is primarily for health but that does not exclude my attempt to live a more compassionate and conscious life for all living beings. This is the balanced way of thinking I think I'm trying to strive for, but I still label myself. I'm finding that whether trying to be kind to animals or to just simply be more 'green', it's all gray matter. I mean, it's like debating paper or plastic--how does one come to a conclusion? I find it fascinating that modern life has given us so many choices, but none without consequences. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: whistle said: then why the pretense of an open discussion? It was a baitastic baitlexic, baitmorphic, baitvisceral question from the city of baitville, in the provice of Quebait, on the planet Baitune to get folks to engage in a discussion that otherwise would not be very interesting to most folks. PS. It's working. ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think you actually pose an interesting point with this one... if its a moral choice then surely owning a cat or dog would go against your principles because they eat meat (or what is assumed to be meat... it certainly doesn't look or smell like it) JaneyPoos used to be it... then they changed what it was. Now what I am isn't it and what is it is strange and frightening to me...
I survived the Org Depression Spring 2003 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I've no strong opinions on the subject but I feel like you want me to lambaste you.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
technically, of course being a vegetarian only refers to what you actually eat. So it doesn't matter if your cat, dog, son, daughter, or husband eats meat. If you don't eat meat you're a vegetarian. FACE!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ultrablue said: I've no strong opinions on the subject but I feel like you want me to lambaste you.
Or give you 'slack'. Slab, ultrablue. I want you to give me your slab. Kow Jai? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: technically, of course being a vegetarian only refers to what you actually eat. So it doesn't matter if your cat, dog, son, daughter, or husband eats meat. If you don't eat meat you're a vegetarian. FACE!!
Come here, darling Come here, darling | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)