Where would u go?

As much as I enjoyed the beaches and the sun and the amusement parks at Los Angeles...I don't feel it can top the persoanlity of New York City

Ur turn..

Cali...cuz I've never been. NY is only 3 hours away and I can go there whenever I want.

I want the beach~!!!!! Not more credit card debt from NYC!

paisleypark4 said:

Ny coz it's closer to where i am

California...the entire state, from top to bottom, has such diverse scenery, especially if the three days are spent in February or March. I would start at the most northern tip...then spend the next three days leisurely making my way down to San Diego...stopping at small towns along the way, diverging into the national parks, driving thru the wine country, staying at out-of-the-way hotels along the beach and trying the local restaurants to end my day with food and wine...with my camera around my neck the entire time...

I honestly enjoy both.

i love both
but i've been 2 nyc 2 many times


my next destination is Cali

Cali, because I've never been there.

dammit, every1 pikkin CA cuz they never been there

paisleypark4 said:

Are you deciding between the two for an upcoming trip?

been to both many times.....3 days NYC and you are ok to leave with great memories, 3 days in Cali and you'll cry because you are leaving....craving to come back!

California.

San Francisco to be more specific.

Los Angeles dominates New York City anyday, time. Straight up.

saintsation said:

Even though I haven't been 2 L.A. yet, I don't know about it dominating N.Y.C. I always felt that NYC is the city that all others r judged by.

saintsation said:

Not in a million years!
Sorry to folks that live there, but I really didn't care for LA. New York, on the other hand, is my kinda town!
But if you're talking San Francisco, well that's a city I could probably live in.

Dugen said:

No way. i been to both and Los angeles is way better and not copying no one.

Hawaii... Honestly, California....it's been my dream state for the longest. damn, nobody likes NY?

Either one

CarrieMpls said:

U know i felt the same way. I went to new york in 2000 and 2001 and i said new york destroys the west soast. Then a mont hlater i finally went to San fran, Los angeles and vegas and i said no way. I love los angeles and vegas so much i go every year. I love new york too last visit was 2 yrs ago and 2 weeks before wtc fell down in towers on a tuesday. But anyway. Los angeles has more entertainment, better highways and its free. I LOVE Los angeles and Las vegas. No town can compare to those two. Paisley park4 knows better than that to post this.

minneapolisgenius said:

CarrieMpls said:

San Francisco was ok, but i love Los Angeles and Las Vegas. The 1-2 punch and only 3hrs apart. San Francisco to me is too hilly and the only entertainment i saw was the pier with the seals lying around. Then u have alcatraz in clear site also. Los angeles has so much more than that. San diego was boring and dull. I grabbed myself and ex(supposelyif thats what call em self) and high tailed to Los Angeles.

saintsation said:

:thumbsdown:

CarrieLee said:

Oh no you can't, bitch!!

sosgemini said:

Tell me what i missed in San francisco?

saintsation said:

did you visit castro? if not..good.

Coit Tower/Twin Peaks? That crooked street I can never remember the name of? Umm..Theres Union Square where you can catch a trolly.....

sosgemini said:

Been to all those included that crooked hilly street u talking about.

saintsation said:

then did you catch bart for a fifteen minute ride into Oakland to check out Jack London Square? And then take another five minute ride up to Berkeley and check out Telegraph where you can find the bestest food, vintage clothes shops, record stores (used and new) that would make you gage? oh oh oh...and homeless and smelly people to picture for days...

NYC...raised in SoCa...visit there (Northern and Southern) often...never been to NY...would love to go for three days...

Never saw the hype over San Francisco.