I fell for this crap once. I actually turned on MJ during the 2005 trial. The I researched. I was wrong. I became an even bigger fan once it was clear he was falsely accused.
So....Nope. Robson and Safechuck are not believable. Fuck them. A child molester does not only molest a handful of children when he/she has hundreds possibly thousands of opportunties. It's absurd.
Love MJ and ain't a damn thing changed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVsEhGCDdX8 Moniques has an interesting thoughts on Oprah and MJ. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I directed you to a helpful resource. I won't do the research for you. Part of the fun is in the discovery of new information. Enjoy! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DiminutiveRocker said:
Oh, man. I am so sorry this happened to you, but thank you for this post. It kind of drives home the whole insidious nature of these kinds of abuses and from what I have read many victims say the same thing - that they not only admired their abusers but that they made them feel special and adored --- but really, the victims were just too young to know that what they were actually experiencing was abuse. 'Neverland' will strike a chord with you as they basically express very similar feelings. [Edited 3/8/19 17:06pm] Indeed. The documentary was tough to watch with the graphic details of the abuse and more so for those watching who are also victims of child sexual abuse. I, too, am sorry for what happened to you and appreciate your sharing your story. "I want to be the only one you come for...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's actually not true. A child molester doesn't molest every child they come into contact with. They know who they can and can't fuck with. Furthermore, most people that experience abuse will never say anything at all so if this is true, then rest assured there are others out there that we'll never hear a word from. I understand your position on 2005. It wasn't presented honestly to the public and even though I do believe Robson and Safechuck I do still question the validity of the Arvizo allegations. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
carey feldman is doing an about face, probably because he realizes a sympathetic stance will help him make his own stupid docu. People are weak, they'll roll over on you in a second. the man's work is there forever, they can't wipe that out but they'll try. Even if he was a molestor, that still doesn't mean he wasn't a great artist, I was thinking earlier to when I first saw him after his thriller transformation, in the beat it vid, i was mesmerized, i was in 9th grade and I still remember how I froze and watched the whole vid even though I needed to catch my bus, i was rivetted, there has never been a human that I'm aware who had that kind of aura, Elvis was close but I'm not sure if he even had that kind of charisma.
i kind of miss the days after he died when people felt so guilty that they bent over backwards to blame the media for all the stories and it was true, forget about molestation for a second, the poor guy never had a moments peace in terms of someone not trying to get some of his money be it for songrwriting credits or other stupid shit. He was too nice, as I've said, he should have stayed away from people, most of his problems would have been solved. [Edited 3/9/19 0:01am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CherryMoon57 said:
REAL SERIOUS legal question: What the hell are the LEGAL parameters of an "advised fund"? Is that even legally bound to the host charter/documentation? I suspect the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element. I fear the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element (of a dead man and a team of LAWYERS acting in self preservation) ♫"Trollin, Trolling! We could have fun just trollin'!"♫ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2045RadicalMattZ said: CherryMoon57 said:
REAL SERIOUS legal question: What the hell are the LEGAL parameters of an "advised fund"? Is that even legally bound to the host charter/documentation? I suspect the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element. I fear the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element (of a dead man and a team of LAWYERS acting in self preservation) Shady... ive read there is a dvd release of this... [Edited 3/9/19 0:29am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Unfortunately it didn't help as they don't appear to discuss that particular issue. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-giggling-reaction-victims-mother-092104513.html
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-james-safechucks-mum-declares-danced-michael-jackson-died-101852177.html
Mum glad Michael died in 2009 but Safeshuck didnt know he was raped untill 2014/5? [Edited 3/9/19 5:06am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 3/9/19 6:09am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ElGorillos said:
Yeah, horse shit. Their “evidence” was Porn magz with kids prints on them... because Sneddon and co. Took them out of evidence bags and let the kids handle them. They didn’t even know the dates MJ allegedly molested them... they had to refile their claims when it turned out MJ was on a different continent. A sad joke. [Edited 3/9/19 5:46am] [Edited 3/9/19 5:47am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That is true - none of it was enough to convict him. Several of the jurors stated that they believed him to be guilty of child molestation (having sat through the case), but that their belief was not enough to convict him in a court of law. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ElGorillos said:
"masses of cooperating evidence", but can't name a single one of it, whatever the hell that should be. How the hell can a thing "cooperate"? The fool should work on his terminology and not count on the stupid public to just believe every crap he says, but he just stays vague and hopes they will buy it. If there was masses of whatever and eywitneses, who were believable and didn't have axes to grind, Michael wouldn't have gotten aquitted. He, just like in his mockumentary, is fooling the public and misrepresenting the trial, when the right answer to the question would be "No. I just chose to believe them and love to have a movie everyone talks about.". [Edited 3/9/19 5:53am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He actually said corroborate, not cooperate. Whoever typed it up got it wrong. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RichardS said:
He actually said corroborate, not cooperate. Whoever typed it up got it wrong. i thought so too, after I typed my response, but that doesn't change the fact, that he got nothing new. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Bait snip - luv4u] All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This isn't exactly accurate. MJ approached Safechuck about testifying on his behalf in 2005 and he refused to do so because of all of the attention it would bring and of course he was going through his own acceptance process. Safechuck's mother thought that he should testify on his behalf since MJ was a close friend of the family at one point and that's just the right thing to do. Safechuck informed his mother then that things weren't quite what they seem with MJ so she was aware for about 4 yrs by the time MJ died in '09. People are treating this like they had suppressed memory of the events that happened to them as a kid and that's not true. They were always aware. As they said, more clarity and understanding came to them after they had their own children. Which makes complete sense if you know anything about the process of acceptance for sexual abuse survivors. It was at that point that they felt confident enough to actually say something.
The people that are adamently refusing to even consider the legitimacy of what they're saying don't understand an extremely important component to this whole thing: essentially, at one point they were in love with MJ, down to being jealous of the other boys like Jordy Chandler that came along and "took their place". Another important factor here is that both the good and bad with MJ can be true. So, yes, he did help their careers, he also showered them with love and attention and I believe really cared about them but he also sexually abused them. He had a sickness. That doesn't take away from all of the good he did in his life and certainly doesn't take away his talent and achievements in his music career. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some jurors said they believed MJ molested boys at some point in his life but not that specific boy, Gavin Arvizo. It is obvious Gavin was not molested and most people, even the "haters", don't believe him. There were so many contradictions, holes and careless mistakes in those Arvizo children's testimonies even the prosecution lost faith in them and pushed the previous acts envelope instead. They realized they wouldn't stand a chance with that kid so they desperately brought the 93 case evidence and the hundreds of one-on-one sleepovers to court as if saying "alright, so this kind was a casting mistake but he is still a pedo". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why is Dan Reed deleting scenes from the fraudomentary? People who viewed the fraudomentary in the last few days, say the burning of MJ memomorbilia at the end has been deleted. Could it be because the liar Wade was called out that these were actually fake items, and that he had sold the real items to Julian’s Auction? There are other scenes that Reed has deleted because they have been called out by AWARE MJ fans and supporters. Why would these scam artists have to delete scenes, if they were really telling the truth? Of course, haters and other guillible and weak minded people don’t care. They WANT these lies to be true,because it fits their AGENDA. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book. It is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Free2BMe said: Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book. It is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up. Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Free2BMe, surely it is the civic duty of anyone who feels that children are in danger from an individual or individuals to report the individual(s) to the relevant authorities. I would suggest that to be your next course of action. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
motownlover said: Free2BMe said: Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book. lIt is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up. Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond? Yes, Victor Guitterez is the one who claimed that Jordan Chandler kept a diary of his alleged abuse. The bottomline is that Jordan did not keep a diary and the perverted words in Victor’s book came from his obsession and endorsement of NAMBLA doctrine. To justify his INVOLVEMENT with NAMBLA, Guitterez claimed he was working undercover for the FBI. The problem is the FBI said that he never worked for FBI. Evan Chandler endorsed this trash book against his own son, and allowed Guitterez to portray his son, Jordan as the lover of a grown man. What father of a real victim does shit like that. I’ll answer for you, a person who,had tried to extort money from Michael and Michael refused. Chandler is heard on tape saying, “ if I go through with this(false allegations), I win BIG.” Dian Demon used this book, and still uses lies, to promote HER agenda. I think I have mentioned before that Michael sued Guitterez and WON a 2.7 million dollar settlement. The NAMBLA promoter, Guitterez, filed bankruptcy and fled to Chile. Fucking coward! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Free2BMe said: motownlover said: l Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond? Yes, Victor Guitterez is the one who claimed that Jordan Chandler kept a diary of his alleged abuse. The bottomline is that Jordan did not keep a diary and the perverted words in Victor’s book came from his obsession and endorsement of NAMBLA doctrine. To justify his INVOLVEMENT with NAMBLA, Guitterez claimed he was working undercover for the FBI. The problem is the FBI said that he never worked for FBI. Evan Chandler endorsed this trash book against his own son, and allowed Guitterez to portray his son, Jordan as the lover of a grown man. What father of a real victim does shit like that. I’ll answer for you, a person who,had tried to extort money from Michael and Michael refused. Chandler is heard on tape saying, “ if I go through with this(false allegations), I win BIG.” Dian Demon used this book, and still uses lies, to promote HER agenda. I think I have mentioned before that Michael sued Guitterez and WON a 2.7 million dollar settlement. The NAMBLA promoter, Guitterez, filed bankruptcy and fled to Chile. Fucking coward! Probably the story these guys base their story off...this is pretty deep | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
so much misinformation going both ways, and who can believe a goddamned thing with that kind of money at stake? They are still going for money. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Michael Jackson's Sales & Airplay Decline, After 'Leaving Neverland' Broadcast:
HBO's new documentary Leaving Neverland, which chronicles allegations of sexual abuse by Michael Jackson, led to a dip in sales and airplay, for his catalog of music in the U.S., according to initial reports Nielsen Music.
https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8501755/michael-jackson-sales-streaming-airplay-decline-leaving-neverland "That mountain top situation is not really what it's all cracked up 2 B when was doing the Purple Rain tour had a lot of people who knew 'll never c again @ the concerts.just screamin n places they thought they was suppose 2 scream." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A certain kind of mellow. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And the complete opposite happens in the UK with albums re-entering charts. Seems UK audiences weren't as guilable to believe this crap piece. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |