independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael Jackson sex abuse documentary coming to Sundance & HBO
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 44 of 48 « First<39404142434445464748>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #1290 posted 03/08/19 5:08pm

homesquid

avatar

I fell for this crap once. I actually turned on MJ during the 2005 trial. The I researched. I was wrong. I became an even bigger fan once it was clear he was falsely accused.

So....Nope. Robson and Safechuck are not believable. Fuck them. A child molester does not only molest a handful of children when he/she has hundreds possibly thousands of opportunties. It's absurd.

Love MJ and ain't a damn thing changed.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1291 posted 03/08/19 5:15pm

Purplestar88

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVsEhGCDdX8 Moniques has an interesting thoughts on Oprah and MJ.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1292 posted 03/08/19 5:50pm

scorp84

RichardS said:

scorp84 said:

A lot of interesting conversation in this thread about some "questionable" materials found during the search of MJ's home leads to even more interesting findings dating back long before what ultimately happened in '93 and beyond. If you have time, hell, you spent 4 hours on a "film", take some moments to take in this information. There are many familiar names here. Many of them are beginning to resurface now. It goes alot deeper than some allegations. Money is the root...well we know the rest.

https://vindicatemj.wordp...my-career/

Can you point me to the page on that site where they discuss the materials found by the search of Neverland, as detailed in the court document. Thanks.

I directed you to a helpful resource. I won't do the research for you. Part of the fun is in the discovery of new information. Enjoy!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1293 posted 03/08/19 9:15pm

darlingnikkkki

DiminutiveRocker said:



Lovejunky said:




DiminutiveRocker said:




The public conversation about this is so important. Imagine all the kids out there who have been abused, kept this secret and suffer in silence. So sad.



THIS...


I was one of those kids...


My mothers best Friends son sexually abused me...


The weight of who it was was unbearable...


He also groomed me, and everyone else by pretending that he saw me as a little sister..


So..my mother was very happy to leave me in his care when she went out at night...


and the shocking thing is..It felt good....I had a crush on him, 'I felt special"


and it wasnt until I was well into my 20.s that I even realised that He had done something wrong..


I made excuses for him in my mind...I told my self he loved me...



I didnt tell a single soul until I was 44 years old !!!!!


and when I did...


Guess what..?


No one believed me...


The same old questions..


"Why did you wait this long...?"


"Ive known him all his life, he couldnt possibly have done that "


even one person stooped as low as saying


"you were always a provocative little girl "


WTF...


I still havent seen finding neverland..but becasue of this thread I am identifying heavily with the boys...





hug Oh, man. I am so sorry this happened to you, but thank you for this post. It kind of drives home the whole insidious nature of these kinds of abuses and from what I have read many victims say the same thing - that they not only admired their abusers but that they made them feel special and adored --- but really, the victims were just too young to know that what they were actually experiencing was abuse. 'Neverland' will strike a chord with you as they basically express very similar feelings.




[Edited 3/8/19 17:06pm]



Indeed. The documentary was tough to watch with the graphic details of the abuse and more so for those watching who are also victims of child sexual abuse. I, too, am sorry for what happened to you and appreciate your sharing your story.
"I want to be the only one you come for...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1294 posted 03/08/19 10:04pm

Tuls101

homesquid said:

I fell for this crap once. I actually turned on MJ during the 2005 trial. The I researched. I was wrong. I became an even bigger fan once it was clear he was falsely accused.

So....Nope. Robson and Safechuck are not believable. Fuck them. A child molester does not only molest a handful of children when he/she has hundreds possibly thousands of opportunties. It's absurd.

Love MJ and ain't a damn thing changed.

That's actually not true. A child molester doesn't molest every child they come into contact with. They know who they can and can't fuck with. Furthermore, most people that experience abuse will never say anything at all so if this is true, then rest assured there are others out there that we'll never hear a word from. I understand your position on 2005. It wasn't presented honestly to the public and even though I do believe Robson and Safechuck I do still question the validity of the Arvizo allegations.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1295 posted 03/08/19 11:59pm

PeteSilas

carey feldman is doing an about face, probably because he realizes a sympathetic stance will help him make his own stupid docu. People are weak, they'll roll over on you in a second.

the man's work is there forever, they can't wipe that out but they'll try. Even if he was a molestor, that still doesn't mean he wasn't a great artist, I was thinking earlier to when I first saw him after his thriller transformation, in the beat it vid, i was mesmerized, i was in 9th grade and I still remember how I froze and watched the whole vid even though I needed to catch my bus, i was rivetted, there has never been a human that I'm aware who had that kind of aura, Elvis was close but I'm not sure if he even had that kind of charisma.

i kind of miss the days after he died when people felt so guilty that they bent over backwards to blame the media for all the stories and it was true, forget about molestation for a second, the poor guy never had a moments peace in terms of someone not trying to get some of his money be it for songrwriting credits or other stupid shit. He was too nice, as I've said, he should have stayed away from people, most of his problems would have been solved.

[Edited 3/9/19 0:01am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1296 posted 03/09/19 12:01am

2045RadicalMat
tZ

avatar

CherryMoon57 said:




REAL SERIOUS legal question:


What the hell are the LEGAL parameters of an "advised fund"? Is that even legally bound to the host charter/documentation?

I suspect the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element. I fear the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element (of a dead man and a team of LAWYERS acting in self preservation)
♫"Trollin, Trolling! We could have fun just trollin'!"♫
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1297 posted 03/09/19 12:27am

motownlover

2045RadicalMattZ said:

CherryMoon57 said:




REAL SERIOUS legal question:


What the hell are the LEGAL parameters of an "advised fund"? Is that even legally bound to the host charter/documentation?

I suspect the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element. I fear the worst because of the obvious potential criminal element (of a dead man and a team of LAWYERS acting in self preservation)



Shady... ive read there is a dvd release of this...
[Edited 3/9/19 0:29am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1298 posted 03/09/19 2:37am

RichardS

scorp84 said:

RichardS said:

Can you point me to the page on that site where they discuss the materials found by the search of Neverland, as detailed in the court document. Thanks.

I directed you to a helpful resource. I won't do the research for you. Part of the fun is in the discovery of new information. Enjoy!

Unfortunately it didn't help as they don't appear to discuss that particular issue.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1299 posted 03/09/19 5:04am

motownlover

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-giggling-reaction-victims-mother-092104513.html

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-james-safechucks-mum-declares-danced-michael-jackson-died-101852177.html

Mum glad Michael died in 2009 but Safeshuck didnt know he was raped untill 2014/5?

confused

[Edited 3/9/19 5:06am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1300 posted 03/09/19 5:12am

ElGorillos

avatar



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of corroborating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EG

[Edited 3/9/19 6:09am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1301 posted 03/09/19 5:46am

Superstition

avatar

ElGorillos said:



-----

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

-----


EG



Yeah, horse shit. Their “evidence” was
Porn magz with kids prints on them... because Sneddon and co. Took them out of evidence bags and let the kids handle them. They didn’t even know the dates MJ allegedly molested them... they had to refile their claims when it turned out MJ was on a different continent.

A sad joke.
[Edited 3/9/19 5:46am]
[Edited 3/9/19 5:47am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1302 posted 03/09/19 5:46am

RichardS

ElGorillos said:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EG

That is true - none of it was enough to convict him. Several of the jurors stated that they believed him to be guilty of child molestation (having sat through the case), but that their belief was not enough to convict him in a court of law.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1303 posted 03/09/19 5:52am

PatrickS77

avatar

ElGorillos said:



-----

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

-----


EG



"masses of cooperating evidence", but can't name a single one of it, whatever the hell that should be. How the hell can a thing "cooperate"? The fool should work on his terminology and not count on the stupid public to just believe every crap he says, but he just stays vague and hopes they will buy it. If there was masses of whatever and eywitneses, who were believable and didn't have axes to grind, Michael wouldn't have gotten aquitted. He, just like in his mockumentary, is fooling the public and misrepresenting the trial, when the right answer to the question would be "No. I just chose to believe them and love to have a movie everyone talks about.".
[Edited 3/9/19 5:53am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1304 posted 03/09/19 5:58am

RichardS

PatrickS77 said:

ElGorillos said:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EG

"masses of cooperating evidence", but can't name a single one of it, whatever the hell that should be. How the hell can a thing "cooperate"? The fool should work on his terminology and not count on the stupid public to just believe every crap he says, but he just stays vague and hopes they will buy it. If there was masses of whatever and eywitneses, who were believable and didn't have axes to grind, Michael wouldn't have gotten aquitted. He, just like in his mockumentary, is fooling the public and misrepresenting the trial, when the right answer to the question would be "No. I just chose to believe them and love to have a movie everyone talks about.". [Edited 3/9/19 5:53am]

He actually said corroborate, not cooperate. Whoever typed it up got it wrong.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1305 posted 03/09/19 6:07am

PatrickS77

avatar

RichardS said:



PatrickS77 said:


ElGorillos said:



-----

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

-----


EG



"masses of cooperating evidence", but can't name a single one of it, whatever the hell that should be. How the hell can a thing "cooperate"? The fool should work on his terminology and not count on the stupid public to just believe every crap he says, but he just stays vague and hopes they will buy it. If there was masses of whatever and eywitneses, who were believable and didn't have axes to grind, Michael wouldn't have gotten aquitted. He, just like in his mockumentary, is fooling the public and misrepresenting the trial, when the right answer to the question would be "No. I just chose to believe them and love to have a movie everyone talks about.". [Edited 3/9/19 5:53am]

He actually said corroborate, not cooperate. Whoever typed it up got it wrong.



biggrin i thought so too, after I typed my response, but that doesn't change the fact, that he got nothing new.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1306 posted 03/09/19 6:12am

ElGorillos

avatar

RichardS said:

He actually said corroborate, not cooperate. Whoever typed it up got it wrong.


Cheers, you're right. It was a mix between Google transcription, and me. Fixed now.


EG

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1307 posted 03/09/19 8:32am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

[Bait snip - luv4u]

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1308 posted 03/09/19 9:42am

Tuls101

motownlover said:

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-giggling-reaction-victims-mother-092104513.html

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leaving-neverland-viewers-shocked-james-safechucks-mum-declares-danced-michael-jackson-died-101852177.html

Mum glad Michael died in 2009 but Safeshuck didnt know he was raped untill 2014/5?

confused

[Edited 3/9/19 5:06am]

This isn't exactly accurate. MJ approached Safechuck about testifying on his behalf in 2005 and he refused to do so because of all of the attention it would bring and of course he was going through his own acceptance process. Safechuck's mother thought that he should testify on his behalf since MJ was a close friend of the family at one point and that's just the right thing to do. Safechuck informed his mother then that things weren't quite what they seem with MJ so she was aware for about 4 yrs by the time MJ died in '09. People are treating this like they had suppressed memory of the events that happened to them as a kid and that's not true. They were always aware. As they said, more clarity and understanding came to them after they had their own children. Which makes complete sense if you know anything about the process of acceptance for sexual abuse survivors. It was at that point that they felt confident enough to actually say something.

The people that are adamently refusing to even consider the legitimacy of what they're saying don't understand an extremely important component to this whole thing: essentially, at one point they were in love with MJ, down to being jealous of the other boys like Jordy Chandler that came along and "took their place". Another important factor here is that both the good and bad with MJ can be true. So, yes, he did help their careers, he also showered them with love and attention and I believe really cared about them but he also sexually abused them. He had a sickness. That doesn't take away from all of the good he did in his life and certainly doesn't take away his talent and achievements in his music career.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1309 posted 03/09/19 1:06pm

ItsLetoyaBaby

RichardS said:

ElGorillos said:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ..is other than what they're saying, did you unearth any actual evidence that proves that Michael Jackson was a pedophile?


- Well there's masses of cooperating evidence if you look at the investigations that the LAPD and the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department carried out
in 1993 when Jordan Chandler came forth with his accusations, and in 2003 to 2005 when 13 year old Gavin Arvizo accused Michael of molesting him.
So there's masses of you know eyewitness statements by Neverland staff, by the chambermaid, by the driver, by the cook..

- But none of it convicted him?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EG

That is true - none of it was enough to convict him. Several of the jurors stated that they believed him to be guilty of child molestation (having sat through the case), but that their belief was not enough to convict him in a court of law.

Some jurors said they believed MJ molested boys at some point in his life but not that specific boy, Gavin Arvizo. It is obvious Gavin was not molested and most people, even the "haters", don't believe him. There were so many contradictions, holes and careless mistakes in those Arvizo children's testimonies even the prosecution lost faith in them and pushed the previous acts envelope instead. They realized they wouldn't stand a chance with that kid so they desperately brought the 93 case evidence and the hundreds of one-on-one sleepovers to court as if saying "alright, so this kind was a casting mistake but he is still a pedo".

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1310 posted 03/09/19 1:27pm

Free2BMe

Why is Dan Reed deleting scenes from the fraudomentary? People who viewed the fraudomentary in the last few days, say the burning of MJ memomorbilia at the end has been deleted. Could it be because the liar Wade was called out that these were actually fake items, and that he had sold the real items to Julian’s Auction? There are other scenes that Reed has deleted because they have been called out by AWARE MJ fans and supporters. Why would these scam artists have to delete scenes, if they were really telling the truth? Of course, haters and other guillible and weak minded people don’t care. They WANT these lies to be true,because it fits their AGENDA.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1311 posted 03/09/19 1:50pm

Free2BMe

Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book.

It is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1312 posted 03/09/19 2:16pm

motownlover

Free2BMe said:

Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book.

It is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up.


Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1313 posted 03/09/19 2:16pm

RichardS

Free2BMe, surely it is the civic duty of anyone who feels that children are in danger from an individual or individuals to report the individual(s) to the relevant authorities. I would suggest that to be your next course of action.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1314 posted 03/09/19 2:40pm

Free2BMe

motownlover said:

Free2BMe said:

Why did a well-respected choreographer just reveal that fellow choreographers are disgusted with Wade Robson. Not only about his false accusations, but how corrupt his moral compass has been with other things. They were especially disgusted with he incest that he engaged in with his sister. Wade was at a function and TONGUE kissed his own sister, Chantal. This guy said all of the other people wh witnessed this incident couldn’t believe what they were watching. Robson’s rampant cocaine use was also mention in his irrational behavior. Wade has burned all of his bridges in the dance community and no one wants to work with him. He is broke, desperate and magical; thus the reason for the pedo obsessive FANTASIES. This man is a psychotic liar. Safechuck is also,obsessed and jumped on the bandwagon when he saw Robson’s allegations. Basically, these two,along with Reed, are pushing NAMBLA doctrines from the script of Victor Guitterez. Guitterez even acknowledged NAMBLA in the forward of his book.

It is reprehensible to think that REAL pedophiles have a film that glorifies what they do. Even Dan Reed said that the film was fulfilling. WTF? How can a film about so-called “victims” be fulfilling. I am extremely suspicious that Reed has pedophilic tendencies, as well as Robson and Safechuck. From their scripted allegations, I would never want a child of mine to even be within ten feet from them or Reed. I have said this many times, and I will repeat it again- children are in danger around Robson and Safechuck. I now add Dan Reed to that group. He seems to be obsessed with man/boy sex. Just the thought of what these perverts are promoting makes me want to throw up.
l

Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond?


Yes, Victor Guitterez is the one who claimed that Jordan Chandler kept a diary of his alleged abuse. The bottomline is that Jordan did not keep a diary and the perverted words in Victor’s book came from his obsession and endorsement of NAMBLA doctrine. To justify his INVOLVEMENT with NAMBLA, Guitterez claimed he was working undercover for the FBI. The problem is the FBI said that he never worked for FBI. Evan Chandler endorsed this trash book against his own son, and allowed Guitterez to portray his son, Jordan as the lover of a grown man. What father of a real victim does shit like that. I’ll answer for you, a person who,had tried to extort money from Michael and Michael refused. Chandler is heard on tape saying, “ if I go through with this(false allegations), I win BIG.” Dian Demon used this book, and still uses lies, to promote HER agenda. I think I have mentioned before that Michael sued Guitterez and WON a 2.7 million dollar settlement. The NAMBLA promoter, Guitterez, filed bankruptcy and fled to Chile. Fucking coward!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1315 posted 03/09/19 2:58pm

motownlover

Free2BMe said:

motownlover said:

l

Isnt Viktor the guy who Evan Chandler got his information from and the source of false information of Diane Dimond?


Yes, Victor Guitterez is the one who claimed that Jordan Chandler kept a diary of his alleged abuse. The bottomline is that Jordan did not keep a diary and the perverted words in Victor’s book came from his obsession and endorsement of NAMBLA doctrine. To justify his INVOLVEMENT with NAMBLA, Guitterez claimed he was working undercover for the FBI. The problem is the FBI said that he never worked for FBI. Evan Chandler endorsed this trash book against his own son, and allowed Guitterez to portray his son, Jordan as the lover of a grown man. What father of a real victim does shit like that. I’ll answer for you, a person who,had tried to extort money from Michael and Michael refused. Chandler is heard on tape saying, “ if I go through with this(false allegations), I win BIG.” Dian Demon used this book, and still uses lies, to promote HER agenda. I think I have mentioned before that Michael sued Guitterez and WON a 2.7 million dollar settlement. The NAMBLA promoter, Guitterez, filed bankruptcy and fled to Chile. Fucking coward!
i recently learned that Viktor is the source to all of this and other stories that are just his own fantasies... going back to 86 and
Probably the story these guys base their story off...this is pretty deep
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1316 posted 03/09/19 4:15pm

PeteSilas

so much misinformation going both ways, and who can believe a goddamned thing with that kind of money at stake? They are still going for money.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1317 posted 03/09/19 4:55pm

ChocolateBox31
21

avatar

Michael Jackson's Sales & Airplay Decline, After 'Leaving Neverland' Broadcast:

HBO's new documentary Leaving Neverland, which chronicles allegations of sexual abuse by Michael Jackson, led to a dip in sales and airplay, for his catalog of music in the U.S., according to initial reports Nielsen Music.

https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8501755/michael-jackson-sales-streaming-airplay-decline-leaving-neverland

"That mountain top situation is not really what it's all cracked up 2 B when eye was doing the Purple Rain tour eye had a lot of people who eye knew eye'll never c again @ the concerts.just screamin n places they thought they was suppose 2 scream."prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1318 posted 03/09/19 5:29pm

Mikado

ChocolateBox3121 said:

Michael Jackson's Sales & Airplay Decline, After 'Leaving Neverland' Broadcast:

HBO's new documentary Leaving Neverland, which chronicles allegations of sexual abuse by Michael Jackson, led to a dip in sales and airplay, for his catalog of music in the U.S., according to initial reports Nielsen Music.

https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8501755/michael-jackson-sales-streaming-airplay-decline-leaving-neverland


"Streams Increased"

Why did you leave that out of the headline?

A certain kind of mellow.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1319 posted 03/09/19 5:31pm

kremlinshadow

avatar

ChocolateBox3121 said:

Michael Jackson's Sales & Airplay Decline, After 'Leaving Neverland' Broadcast:

HBO's new documentary Leaving Neverland, which chronicles allegations of sexual abuse by Michael Jackson, led to a dip in sales and airplay, for his catalog of music in the U.S., according to initial reports Nielsen Music.

https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8501755/michael-jackson-sales-streaming-airplay-decline-leaving-neverland

And the complete opposite happens in the UK with albums re-entering charts. Seems UK audiences weren't as guilable to believe this crap piece.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 44 of 48 « First<39404142434445464748>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael Jackson sex abuse documentary coming to Sundance & HBO