Author | Message |
China Girl- Iggy Pop Or David Bowie? Now either way Bowie was involved with both song's, cause he produced Iggy's album the idiot so he was the perfect person to cover the song.
But i find it hard... It's a dark song and Iggy's has a very gothic feel to it, but Bowie's is a little more poppy with a dar underlying tone.
Both are great song's off great albums....
Which one would you choose is superior? Pistols sounded like "Fuck off," wheras The Clash sounded like "Fuck Off, but here's why.."- Thedigitialgardener
All music is shit music and no music is real- gunsnhalen Datdonkeydick- Asherfierce Gary Hunts Album Isn't That Good- Soulalive | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The rockier live version Bowie started playing in the late-90s is the one I prefer. It's actually one of my favourite pieces of music of all time when performed that way:
It must have been one of his own favourites as well, because it was constantly on his set list.
If I had to make a choice between the two originals, I'd still prefer David's. It was more his type of a song than Iggy's anyway. Even the version on "Let's Dance" has a certain sense of "tender cruelty" to it that I find quite exceptional. The subject matter isn't entirely politically correct, but it captures quite well what being in a relationship with a person that doesn't share your cultural background can be like. That is, from the male point of view. It has a "macho" as well as a "defensive" quality to it and that's probably why it's a more honest portrayal of the whole thing than what would ever get printed in an article dealing with the same subject matter. I feel that David is able to channel that "I know I am a fool myself, but I keep doing it anyway" aspect of the song better than Iggy.
For that matter, many have commented that the song is "about colonialism and not about love" or some shit like that, but I've always taken it to be primarily a song about a Caucasian man having an affair with an Asian woman. The references to colonialism work as a metaphor for the affair and not the other way around.
[edit - link corrected] [Edited 3/6/11 22:48pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bowie's version is one of my favorite songs from the 80s. I can't put it any better than novabrkr brilliantly did. It was the highlight of his decade for me, bar Scary Monsters, and towers above the rest of the Let's Dance album.
Iggy's version is pretty cool, but it isn't the masterpiece that Bowie's is. Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
David Bowie gets my vote for having a better video! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bowie no question though Iggy's was nice. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bowie's version | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Iggy's EVERY TIME
The Idiot, Lust for Life, Low & Heroes are 4 of my favourite albums. Bowie really lost his way after scary Monsters (IMO) although prob had more success than previously. Dont like Bowies version at all, too cheesy.
but hey all things subjective. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
god his voice is so beautiful in the period of that video... did you check LIFE ON MARS?
i like Bowie's version of CHINA GIRL better btw, because of Iggy's sounding too harsh for my liking.
yes SIR! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I love them both. Iggy's is more manic and obsessive and unhinged; Bowie's version is dramatic with barely restrained tension. It's a brilliant song either way. * * *
Prince's Classic Finally Expanded The Deluxe 'Purple Rain' Reissue http://www.popmatters.com...n-reissue/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
perfectly stated. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Actually now that I watched a few more renditions of it I caught David himself saying that the song is really about "invasion and exploitation". So I have to retract a bit on that "or some shit like that" comment.
So it's about both - a song about an affair and a song about cultural exploitation. I just think it works better when you take it primarily as a song about an affair with the cultural aspects projected on it. Otherwise, verses 1 and 2 really would be sort of redundant. Even the metaphorical scenario depicted during the third verse about David / Iggy "stumbling into town" with "visions of swastikas in head" is a bit questionable in that regard. Metaphorical structures do not usually work equally in both directions. There's a "source" and a "target" and at least to me the third verse would seem to be using the "colonialist" themes to describe something essential about the affair and how the male participant relates to it. Oh, well...
I like the more dissonant oriental parts of the original version on the Iggy Pop version quite a lot. The original definitely had a Berlin era Bowie / Pop sound to it. It just seemed to be a song that got changed a lot by both men when doing live versions of it throughout the years. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Interesting lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BOWIE. "I don't think you'd do well in captivity." - random person's comment to me the other day | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Love both - maybe I prefer Bowie's better
oh baby, just you shut your mouth
. Lion -- Go Peter go!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I prefer Iggy's, I'd like to say i prefer Bowie's version because Iggy comes across as such an a##hole, but if i'm being true to myself, Iggy Pop's version is superior. We're here, might as well get into it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |