Let's be fair, Rolling Stone does marvelous political reporting. Their exclusive story on the use on Psy-ops on Senators was mind blowing.

Matt Taibbi, what about Matt Taibbi! I know that's not the topic...lol

And also be honest, if they didn't do Bieber do you think they would sell as many mags?

Timmy84 said:

TD3 said:

Yeah, OK. It like saying I don't assocaite The New York Times with news.

I see.

note. i think timmy knows i'm razzing him for another post in another thread.

You like to play pin the tail on Timmy anyways.

I stand guilty as charged.

Seriously.

Is "The Rolling Stone Magazine" relevant as in years past? No, not really.

@their political coverage and all of that: maybe they need a separate magazine for that. Same for the tits and ass they always have on their covers.

[Edited 2/28/11 16:36pm]

TD3 said:

Timmy84 said:

You like to play pin the tail on Timmy anyways.

I stand guilty as charged.

Seriously.

Is "The Rolling Stone Magazine" relevant as in years past? No, not really.

Yeah it hasn't been relevant since 1979.

Timmy84 said:

lastdecember said:

Its hilarious though because they hand out five stars to every band like Linkin Park and Arcade Fire etc....so they now blame them for the shit rock thats out there??? stop giving it five stars then, i mean i can name plenty of the top of my head but they are by artists that rolling stone would call old and over in their reviews...so like U said Fuck em.

Always sucking dick then get mad when they call themselves reviewing the music scene. They ain't nothing but fucking posers.

Rolling Stone = one good BM with a lot of pretty pictures of ugly people.

Timmy84 said:

TD3 said:

I stand guilty as charged.

Seriously.

Is "The Rolling Stone Magazine" relevant as in years past? No, not really.

Yeah it hasn't been relevant since 1979.

Oh, naw ! I wouldn't go back that far Timmy. When was Janet Jackson on the cover with her man covering her breast? A lil after that, things started to change.

TD3 said:

Timmy84 said:

Yeah it hasn't been relevant since 1979.

Oh, naw ! I wouldn't go back that far Timmy. When was Janet Jackson on the cover with her man covering her breast? A lil after that, things started to change.

Nah when Britney was on the cover the first time.

Timmy84 said:

TD3 said:

Oh, naw ! I wouldn't go back that far Timmy. When was Janet Jackson on the cover with her man covering her breast? A lil after that, things started to change.

Nah when Britney was on the cover the first time.

Mea culpa

damn, throw that chil's name in the conversation and you know if she's associated with it, it's dead.

TD3 said:

Timmy84 said:

Nah when Britney was on the cover the first time.

Mea culpa

damn, throw that chil's name in the conversation and you know if she's associated with it, it's dead.

People still read Rolling Stone??? Sniveling, insideous, weasels parading as rock journalists. As Timmy said...hypocritical a'holes.

I've said it before I say it again...they just need to fade away. They wouldn't know a rock or pop hit if it came and bit them in the behind. They ignore the black music scene more often than not anyways....

rialb said:

I don't necessarily agree with your pics but you are the first one to actually offer some songs that you think deserve to be among the top 25 of the year. Everyone else is just bitching about how shitty Rolling Stone is. I think they have a point and the state of rock music is appalling.

Thanks! I think there is a lot of great music being produced in every genre if you look hard enough. I know that I've barely scratched the surface, even in genres that I love.