All I know is that the Janet Jackson/Jermaine Dupri pairing NEVER received any respect from the media like the Victoria/David Beckham pairing does.

Just saying.

poetcorner61 said:

LMAO!

TonyVanDam said:

All I know is that the Janet Jackson/Jermaine Dupri pairing NEVER received any respect from the media like the Victoria/David Beckham pairing does.

Just saying.

You're correct..and of course not many would expect the media to.

Rarely comment on these types of issues; kinda difficult when the gays and lesbians on the org congregate together and muddy the waters when they comment free reign on issues between a man and a woman...hetero men and women...yet...you try and comment on aspects of their 'lifestyle'...it's like ...chalk and cheese seriously...but hey they'll, 'Do as thou wilt'...

but anyway... I like to make a broader point once in a while... for straight guys mainly...so much misandry in the world today..

So...as for Janet blaming Jermaine? Surely not! Not a 'Miss Jackson if you're nasty' 'independent' 'go gurrrl-ing it'...woman.

Not a 44 year old 'independent' woman in charge of her own career. Surely 40 yrs of feminism means that women take responsibility for their own failings and successes...can't be the 'dreaded' patriarchy this time...

Oh yeah, Janet is free to do whatever she wants sexually...wear that see-through butt showing material...sexual freedom...you go gurrl.

Always surprises me how men continually put women in a pedestal...but then they are taught to...so many haven't felt the need to examine the true nature of women in theory and in practice unless certain experiences force you to...women don't need to examine...though the time is fast coming when they will have to...men are wising up.

Guys...'straight' guys...feel free to personal message (pm) me...I'll give you pointers as to what you really should know about the dynamics between the sexes in current times..it's not hard...though I learned the hard way...you don't have to...and my relationship with any woman of my choice has been plain sailing ever since.

Oh, women can pm too.

Jermaine Dupre...depends what he was after..a life long committed relationship? Only works with certain types of women..rare women these days...she'll have to be...principled...and so will he.

Janet...will do whatever she wants according to how she feels...unless she's led and directed...or else she will lead and direct you...and given that womens' emotions and moods in general can change like the wind...well then you will be led by the wind...yeah, many years ago when I had sympathy with feminism I used to think that kind of view was misoygnistic too...

l8r sweet orgers

supposed to be "on" a pedestal...and "misogynistic"...'scuse the errors..

funkyandy said:

TonyVanDam said:

All I know is that the Janet Jackson/Jermaine Dupri pairing NEVER received any respect from the media like the Victoria/David Beckham pairing does.

Just saying.

You're correct..and of course not many would expect the media to.

Rarely comment on these types of issues; kinda difficult when the gays and lesbians on the org congregate together and muddy the waters when they comment free reign on issues between a man and a woman...hetero men and women...yet...you try and comment on aspects of their 'lifestyle'...it's like ...chalk and cheese seriously...but hey they'll, 'Do as thou wilt'...

but anyway... I like to make a broader point once in a while... for straight guys mainly...so much misandry in the world today..

So...as for Janet blaming Jermaine? Surely not! Not a 'Miss Jackson if you're nasty' 'independent' 'go gurrrl-ing it'...woman.

Not a 44 year old 'independent' woman in charge of her own career. Surely 40 yrs of feminism means that women take responsibility for their own failings and successes...can't be the 'dreaded' patriarchy this time...

Oh yeah, Janet is free to do whatever she wants sexually...wear that see-through butt showing material...sexual freedom...you go gurrl.

Always surprises me how men continually put women in a pedestal...but then they are taught to...so many haven't felt the need to examine the true nature of women in theory and in practice unless certain experiences force you to...women don't need to examine...though the time is fast coming when they will have to...men are wising up.

Guys...'straight' guys...feel free to personal message (pm) me...I'll give you pointers as to what you really should know about the dynamics between the sexes in current times..it's not hard...though I learned the hard way...you don't have to...and my relationship with any woman of my choice has been plain sailing ever since.

Oh, women can pm too.

Jermaine Dupre...depends what he was after..a life long committed relationship? Only works with certain types of women..rare women these days...she'll have to be...principled...and so will he.

Janet...will do whatever she wants according to how she feels...unless she's led and directed...or else she will lead and direct you...and given that womens' emotions and moods in general can change like the wind...well then you will be led by the wind...yeah, many years ago when I had sympathy with feminism I used to think that kind of view was misoygnistic too...

l8r sweet orgers

Who cares what the media and the general public likes anyway about their own relationship? I know I don't. I doubt if she did either. If you're looking at your approval ratings of popularity, you shouldn't be in a relationship anyway. You're not serious.

Funkyandy, RU serious or are you fishing for a certain response? RU supposed to be Dr. Phil or something? Why would someone value your counsel?

On another note, "Oh yeah, Janet is free to do whatever she wants sexually...wear that see-through butt showing material...sexual freedom...you go gurrl." Surely you know she wasn't wearing any "butt showing material" Go take a second look Ever heard of nude colored stockings?

[Edited 7/30/10 10:29am]

[Edited 7/30/10 10:30am]

Evvy said:

Hmmm...gosh my post was long...

MusicSlave...look at the last time I posted b4 today...I'm the opposite of an attention seeker..I get too much already...

I'm perfectly upfront and straight talking. Not fishing at all. Dr Phil!...he's the biggest mangina out there, so no... I'm not trying to be like him...lol

Some might value my 'counsel'...those that suspect I might have gone through something...something traumatic and learned from it and moved on...more guys out there hurting than maybe you realise if you didn't know...girls too...but women in general seem to have have enough support...but I'm open to those who will listen

I'm a school teacher from the UK...so somewhat of 'counsellor' at times...

Hmmm...nude coloured stockings..."she wasn't showing any butt coloured material"...hmmm...

I hadn't heard of nude coloured stockings actually...my bad?!

I wasn't casting any judgement on Janet...she and others can choose to do whatever they like...and I can choose also...

We don't know what happened between Janet and Jermaine...but most of us know a fair bit about relationships...

Go Janet...you gorgeous sister of a genius, you...

Loved u in the 'Nasty' video...sexy without being 'dirty' ya know?

x

Vendetta1 said:

Evvy said:

what bothers me is why aallllll of y'all are not concerned- oh I forgot- it's the org and ANY and EVERY thing goes when it comes to sex. And people here will attack your sex life when you express concern- not obsession mind you -over someone else's.

Am I the one who posted intrudung pics of her with her love interest? No- I can and will however, express my opinion about it.

And somebody here just has a chip on their shoulders about me and my beliefs- you know who you are- get over it!!

Timmy - I know she grown and can do what she wants- but I care so....

any time I see anyone on here that claims to be something but then acts like a hypocrite I will call them on it just like I expect to be called on it. You're saying something about someone AGAIN that you have zero proof about. If you don't like people's responses, stop talking out the side of your neck.

what have I claimed to be -hypocritically? you don't have any proof to base your opinions of me but you are entitled to them. You really and truly have an issue with me and I don't remember how it started but it's not worth it. Life is too short- for me- it's ok to agree to disagree but I don't like it when people who truly don't know me pass judgement upon me every time I speak. Whatever I did to cross you please forgive me. Humility is not beneath me. If you'd like to tell me exactly what it was please org note me.

Again life is to short to be feeling hatred over "opinions" of celebrities who don't even know we exist.

TonyVanDam said:

All I know is that the Janet Jackson/Jermaine Dupri pairing NEVER received any respect from the media like the Victoria/David Beckham pairing does.

Just saying.

Once again, the media never had any interest in the Janet and JD pairing.

In what world was Victoria/David Beckham not well recepted? Those two are the media's darlings!

Evvy said:

what bothers me is why aallllll of y'all are not concerned- oh I forgot- it's the org and ANY and EVERY thing goes when it comes to sex. And people here will attack your sex life when you express concern- not obsession mind you -over someone else's.

Am I the one who posted intrudung pics of her with her love interest? No- I can and will however, express my opinion about it.

And somebody here just has a chip on their shoulders about me and my beliefs- you know who you are- get over it!!

Timmy - I know she grown and can do what she wants- but I care so....

But why!?!

Janet Jackson doesn't know you nor care how you feel about her private life. She's a grown woman and will do as she pleases. She can make her own decisions. There's no need to be concerned for a celebrity's private life.

I don't know but some people think Janet need help like Whitney or something. Least that's the vibe I'm getting. As long as she ain't destroying herself, what's it to you? Did Madonna need help because she started her relationship with Jesus Luz, who's 23 years her junior? I hardly saw some plea of help for her because of that and she's almost 52. So why Janet need to be look on as she's still that 11-year-old girl from "Good Times"?

She told us 23 years ago what she wanted to be in:

So why are people asking her to do something she was already doing?

Also back on topic, Janet & Jermaine had a good run, now they're back being friends, let's just move on from this, please lol

Dang. I didn't know it was that deep, guys...

MyNameIsPiper said:

Dang. I didn't know it was that deep, guys...

It shouldn't be but I guess this wouldn't be the ORG if people didn't take it that far lmao But you're right it shouldn't. It's their lives.

kenny88 said:

TonyVanDam said:

All I know is that the Janet Jackson/Jermaine Dupri pairing NEVER received any respect from the media like the Victoria/David Beckham pairing does.

Just saying.

Once again, the media never had any interest in the Janet and JD pairing.

In what world was Victoria/David Beckham not well recepted? Those two are the media's darlings!

Think abou it like THIS:

Victoria is an original member of The Spice Girl. A big deal without question.

Janet is a member of The Jackson Family. Definitely a big deal.

So the entertainment media mean to tell me that Janet did NOT deserve the respect the media gave to Victoria because Victoria's man is better than Janet's man?!?

I don't get this kind of double standard at all. Yes, David Beckham is a euro football/soccer icon. But good grief, Jermaine Durpi is (OR was?) a successful hit making hip-hop/r&b producer throughout the 1990's & 2000's.

Just saying.

You're 'Just saying' nothing. Really.

midiscover said:

You're 'Just saying' nothing. Really.

Cerebus said:

The Org is a great place to hang out if you want to be regularly reminded of how much hate most humans harbor for their fellow man.

aint that the truth...

I'm sure I'm not the only one that had seen the "sunbathing" video? JD so little he had to do his best to climb up and reach the mountain top to put his flag in the ground. I'd be depressed too if I used to dip in that. He mustve felt big for such a tiny, tiny man.