"IS BEYONCE THE HEIR APPARENT TO MICHAEL JACKSON?"

According to Dayo Olopade at "The Root," Beyonce is the heir apparent to Michael Jackson.

The two weeks since Michael Jackson’s death have been awash in tributes and testimonies to the man and his music. Yet the tide of nostalgia and revisionism that has gripped the entire planet obscures a nagging truth: The very idea of superstardom may have died with Michael. After all, so many of the eulogies have focused less on Jackson’s iconic music than on his extraordinary fame, his status as ruler of a kingdom called Pop. He won this crown with a fusion of precocious talent and gleefully bizarre antics—the thrilling 1983 moonwalk at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium and the shocking 2005 baby-dangle in Berlin contribute equally to the idea of Michael as spectacle.

Jackson’s omnipresence during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s—from prison yards to bar mitzvah scenes—extended his cultural wingspan, eventually reaching fashion, film and kids like myself who weren't even born when “Thriller” dropped. For our generation, the death of the “Man in the Mirror” only exposes the sorry state of contemporary music, and begs the question: Who's next?

I've got one word: Beyoncé. It used to be two words, but such are the heights the 27-year-old from Houston has scaled in a career that has already spanned two decades. Say what you will about her scantily clad BET tribute to Michael—she is the only living performer to even approximate Jackson's blend of talent and cultural clout. Yes, she's a woman; but her work ethic, daring musical choices and chameleonic artistic presence makes her more of an heir to the Gloved One than any man out there. The fact that she is already one of the most famous people on the planet only adds to the case for passing her the torch.

The synergy between Michael Jackson and Beyoncé Knowles is not just a matter of their biographies—but it's a good starting point. We know the story: Thrust into showbiz while still in rompers, Knowles entered the entertainment industry in earnest as the 9-year-old lead of girl group Destiny's Child. As early as Jackson was charming Motown executives and mid-century television bandleaders, she was singing lead and navigating both a “Momager” and “Dadager” in the forms of pushy Mathew and Tina Knowles. While her rearing was considerably less scarring than the abusive, exploitative relationship that Jackson maintained with his father Joe, Knowles entered her teens steeled with the same tireless work ethic many saw in a young Jackson. In an interview from the early days of Destiny’s Child, bandmates describe her as “the serious one” and “the overseer of it all.”

But like Jackson’s controversial 1977 decision to break up the band of brothers then performing as “The Jacksons,” Knowles gave the people what they wanted and strode into her 20s as a solo artist. Her freshman effort, Dangerously in Love, was a bit of a gamble: The summer before the LP was released, even her handlers weren’t sure that she could hack it on her own. The album had been slated for the fall of 2003, to give audiences a chance to absorb the odd sound of the first single, “Crazy in Love,” released in February. It wasn't necessary. The infectious hook and horns, from a 1970 Chi-Lites song, “Are You My Woman? (Tell Me So),” produced a sound completely unexpected in mainstream pop or R&B. Audiences went wild for the blend of Jackson-era funk and contemporary dance pop. The verse from then-boyfriend Jay-Z was the icing on the wax. Her studio promptly moved up the album release date.

At times, her aesthetic choices are inexplicable—nobody asked Ms. Knowles to frolic in a human-sized champagne glass, play with a ball of yarn or spin through a beachy marsh wearing what can only be described as a grass skirt tutu. And no one insisted that she wear motorcycle handlebars as a bustier. But Jackson’s style was equally outrageous—and like Michael, she doesn't really seem to care about convention. The singer has been seen flashing a custom-made metal glove around town, and in the series of videos accompanying her third solo album, I am...Sasha Fierce, Beyoncé has done for pantsless outerwear what Michael did for epaulets. “Diva” is all angles and attitude, and in her avant garde new video for “Sweet Dreams," she wears a gold-plated bodysuit, with Annie Lenox-style cropped hair. There is no Bubbles the chimp—only Jay-Z and the occasional alligator—but the costumery hasn't fallen far from the Michael Jackson glam-rock tree.

But what makes Beyoncé the most plausible living heir to the pop monarchy is the magnitude of her fame. Michael Jackson’s legacy is special precisely because he was famous for young and old, rich and poor, black and white—on six inhabited continents. Beyoncé’s musical reach is not nearly as large (frat boys look, but don't buy). However, like Jackson, her cultural impact extends beyond music, to the realms of fashion, film and beauty. Sasha Frere-Jones of The New Yorker wrote that she “is creating a new kind of supersized music, a triumphalist pop that makes its point through magnitude as much as style.” And that was before she spent more weeks at No. 1 than any female this decade, sold out a national tour this summer, or carried the schlocky stalker flick Obsessed to a $28.5 million, No. 1 opening weekend.

Like MJ in The Wiz and Francis Ford Coppolla's pricey epic Captain EO, Knowles’ acting has been widely panned. But the point is that she’s out there. Countless talented female singers—from ‘60s talents such as Wendy Rene and Ann Peebles to ‘70s giants such as Diana Ross and Tina Turner—have laid the track for how to revel in the spotlight. And Knowles, whose vocal talents are not the best of her generation, has been training for this fame triathlon ever since her parents strapped on that first pair of sparkly disco pants. Between makeup endorsements and PSAs for hunger, Beyoncé has become a business, man.

Want proof? She has fans in high places. Jackson paid four visits to the White House over the years. But the first daughters, Malia and Sasha Obama, begged to attend a Beyoncé show in Washington. And at the nationally televised concert preceding Barack Obama’s inauguration as president, Knowles was the de facto headliner—beating out other boldface names such as Garth Brooks, Mary J. Blige and Bon Jovi. Even the president was spotted waving his palm back and forth, in echoes of “Single Ladies.” And of course, Knowles sang “At Last” for the new president and his wife at the Neighborhood Inaugural Ball that evening.

In 2009, it's Knowles' willingness to use the first person pronoun that distinguishes her from Jackson—who, even at the peak of fame was retiring, self-effacing, and, as Brooke Shields pointed out at his memorial, eager to be teased. The Destiny’s Child catalogue, however, much of which Knowles wrote—“Survivor,” “Independent Women” and “Lose My Breath” (can you keep up?)—suggests a level of confidence that Jackson never had. Her recent video, for the single “Ego,” follows that trend as well. “I like to think that I was created for a special purpose,” she declares, clad in the fishnets and Diana Ross get-up. “I don’t need a beat; I can sing it with piano."

Her vocal range and clarity may not be quite as large as her desire to entertain, but having the guts to perform anyway is what Knowles and Jackson have in common. Even at his most frail and supposedly drug-ridden, Jackson’s instinct was to get back onstage this summer, to win back the love that had been lost or forgotten in the years he retreated into the demons created by fame. He couldn’t make it. But as one of the hardest working folks in show business, Beyoncé can and should step into that spotlight

Long live the queen.

HELL NO

I'm really suprised that people are saying that Beyonce is equal to, or even better than Christina Aguilera and Jennifer Hudson vocally!

I'm not saying Beyonce is a bad singer, she is quite good when you compare her to the most of the weak singers on the charts, but she isn't that strong either!

The way people make a big deal out of her, she may be seen as a legend in 2-3 decades! LOL
I really hope that doesn't happen, unless she does something to deserve it.

ISF said:

Bouncy better than Jennifer Hudson & Christina????? In what universe?

ISF said:

Bouncy better than Jennifer Hudson & Christina????? In what universe?

noimageatall said:

(after over two hours singing live, hectic dancing)

I think her voice is one you have to hear live to appreciate. It sounds AMAZING the way it reaches all around the arena and reverberates off the walls.
[Edited 7/25/09 0:41am]

ISF said:

Bouncy better than Jennifer Hudson & Christina????? In what universe?

Yeah, sorry, but that Shanice is incredibly annoying. Halo isn't supposed to be sung at a snail's pace and it isn't supposed to have all those falsetto ad libs (there's some yes, but not THAT many gawd).

Monica?

Jennifer Hudson? They're level, in my opinion. I couldn't choose one over the other. I love them both.

Christina? She can sing, duh, but she can't, or doesn't want to, just sing beautiful melodies. She wants to BELT every goddamn time and it's so aggravating. Listen to "Hurt", sung normally, it could've been beautiful. But instead she shows no concept of restraint and goes gung ho for the chorus and most of the middle eight, completely ruining any chance at emotional effect and almost venturing towards melodrama.

Yes, Halo is a BIG song, but Beyonce shows restraint and variation in the verses and only really gets loud for the second part of the chorus (i can see your HALOOOO).

I guess it's all a matter of whether you judge who can sing by who can belt or who can vary it up AND belt. Belting is no doubt the measurement for most people, but for me it's more about the whole voice, not just the volume or strength.

That goes for pretty much all 4 of my favourite artists:

Beyonce - as above
Prince - dude probably has the most varied voice in pop music
MJ - as above
Britney - listen to "Unusual You" then "Amnesia" then "Boys" - huge variation, even if her voice is weak and she's unfortunately stopped singing live.

I haven't completely listened to I Am Sasha Fierce yet, and while I agree there are some mindless songs on there, that's not necessarily a bad thing. I definitely prefer the "Beyonce" side of the CD though.



Halo? If I Were A Boy? Broken Hearted Girl? Hell, even Sweet Dreams isn't that bad...

Anyway, Beyonce HAS the voice so what's wrong with adding sex appeal to it as well? It's up to the audience to recognise the good from the bad and they did that with Halo. Single Ladies was only big because the dance was easy to learn.

lol seriously this has gotta be the only forum on the planet where Beyonce's voice is considered weak.

You can think what you want about her voice, to say it's weak is just fucking stupid and biased to a ridiculous point.

purplesweat said:

I totally agree. Sometimes she annoys me too, but I can't deny that she can sing her ass off.

Daddy Knowles had those girls running while singing into microphones before they hit the big time so I know Beyonce's voice isn't weak; but to say her voice is stronger than Jennifer Hudson or Christina Aguilera is really pushing it.

They both have much bigger ranges than Beyonce so of course their voices are going to be stronger than hers. This is a readily documented fact. There are several websites dedicated to deciphering singer's vocal abilities.

Honestly, she can sing all day if it keeps her from talking...her speaking voice drives me nuts (Mariah's too).

They sound like they have frogs stuck in their throats...makes my throat hurt just thinking about their interviews. Unfortunately, I am often subjected to her speaking voice during almost every commercial brake since she insists on endorsing soo many products...can't escape this chick unless I give up radio and TV which really sucks because I like those two things very much.

lol seriously this has gotta be the only forum on the planet where Beyonce's voice is considered weak.

You can think what you want about her voice, to say it's weak is just fucking stupid and biased to a ridiculous point.

purplesweat said:

Wow..that's kind of harsh. What I'd say is that anyone who thinks Bouncy CAN sing is not used to hearing real singers. Face it..if she didn't have the 'face' and she didn't shake her half nekkid ass, no one would pay attention.

estelle81 said:

No, it's not. You just don't like her.

So, link us. If you want to convince so badly, provide evidence

WTF? How sad and pathetic does your life have to be for a stranger's voice to annoy you? I'm seriously laughing my ass off here.

E81: "They sound like they have frogs stuck in their throats...makes my throat hurt just thinking about their interviews. Unfortunately, I am often subjected to her speaking voice during almost every commercial brake since she insists on endorsing soo many products...can't escape this chick unless I give up radio and TV which really sucks because I like those two things very much."

PS: "What a terrible life you lead. You poor poor thing. Ever heard of a mute button?"

I don't get how she talks shit about the family in December and is now giving tributes to Michael

EmeraldSkies said:

Classic. U know Mike had these kinds of moments too...