VoicesCarry said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I think it's weird people expecting her to be the next Joan Baez Growing up we could all relate to the love stuff and dancing to the rhythm of a nation but it's just kind of weird people expecting this of her when she has never been Maya Angelou She did Rhythm Nation and suddenly some people thought she had to be a sociopolitical commentator for the rest of her life to "live up" to that album. Meanwhile, there's about 2 songs on that album (Livin' In A World (They Didn't Make) and State of the World) that had some social commentary. The rest is Janet dancing her ass off and singing about love. Don't know why she is held to a higher standard than her contemporaries. As long as it's fun and catchy (what a pop star should be), I'm there. Who are these people who are supposedly demanding Janet get political? Please name names. I've never heard anyone say that. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: VoicesCarry said: She did Rhythm Nation and suddenly some people thought she had to be a sociopolitical commentator for the rest of her life to "live up" to that album. Meanwhile, there's about 2 songs on that album (Livin' In A World (They Didn't Make) and State of the World) that had some social commentary. The rest is Janet dancing her ass off and singing about love. Don't know why she is held to a higher standard than her contemporaries. As long as it's fun and catchy (what a pop star should be), I'm there. Who are these people who are supposedly demanding Janet get political? Please name names. I've never heard anyone say that. I'll have my assistant fax them to you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Ten years ago, looking forward I do think I thought she would be more creative or innovative musically. I thought she would have taken more chances with dance, electronica and maybe some downtempo grooves. It’d be nice if she had a little pocket that was hers that no one could really touch.
Same here; Up until (and including) TVR, Janet was making state-of-the-art pop music. Afterwards, she just seemed to be chasing trends. I wish she'd have taken some big chances (hell, taken ANY chances) in her musical career. Even if it was a commercial disaster, I think Janft might get more respect. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: JackieBlue said: Ten years ago, looking forward I do think I thought she would be more creative or innovative musically. I thought she would have taken more chances with dance, electronica and maybe some downtempo grooves. It’d be nice if she had a little pocket that was hers that no one could really touch.
Same here; Up until (and including) TVR, Janet was making state-of-the-art pop music. Afterwards, she just seemed to be chasing trends. I wish she'd have taken some big chances (hell, taken ANY chances) in her musical career. Even if it was a commercial disaster, I think Janft might get more respect. Janet dug herself into a hole by associating herself so much with one production team. So now when the word got out that this album was not going to include any collaborations with Jam & Lewis, some people were disappointed. I'm glad she is taking the chance of working with new producers and starting from scratch, so to speak, by dissociating herself from the Jam & Lewis sound and trying something different (for her). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I think it's weird people expecting her to be the next Joan Baez Growing up we could all relate to the love stuff and dancing to the rhythm of a nation but it's just kind of weird people expecting this of her when she has never been Maya Angelou Another person completely misrepresenting the argument. Ain't no-one asking her to be Joan Baez, sweety. Re-read my previous post. I wasn't referring to you actually. Just making a general observation about that point of discussion 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Janet dug herself into a hole by associating herself so much with one production team. So now when the word got out that this album was not going to include any collaborations with Jam & Lewis, some people were disappointed. I'm glad she is taking the chance of working with new producers and starting from scratch, so to speak, by dissociating herself from the Jam & Lewis sound and trying something different (for her). See, I almost think of "Janet Jackson" as a band made up of Janet, JJ and TL. They were the directors of her image and sound, and as such, people have a hard time imagining her without them. And even though their time together has long since passed, it'll be their work that she's remembered for. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: VoicesCarry said: Janet dug herself into a hole by associating herself so much with one production team. So now when the word got out that this album was not going to include any collaborations with Jam & Lewis, some people were disappointed. I'm glad she is taking the chance of working with new producers and starting from scratch, so to speak, by dissociating herself from the Jam & Lewis sound and trying something different (for her). See, I almost think of "Janet Jackson" as a band made up of Janet, JJ and TL. They were the directors of her image and sound, and as such, people have a hard time imagining her without them. And even though their time together has long since passed, it'll be their work that she's remembered for. Yes, but I think that applies to basically any pop star who was around in the 80's and is still around now. The quality of production and songcraft was much higher in the 80's and 90's than it is today, so I think artists like Janet and Madonna, who depend on a producer's output, will always face that problem. [Edited 12/13/07 11:37am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: midnightmover said: Another person completely misrepresenting the argument. Ain't no-one asking her to be Joan Baez, sweety. Re-read my previous post. I wasn't referring to you actually. Just making a general observation about that point of discussion The key word here being general. So general that no-one can even name one example of these so-called political fans demanding Janet write a new anthem for our troubled times. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: purplecam said: That's just it. And Janet still does all that stuff better than Britney. Not lately When Britney, released Toxic, which is one of the most bad ass pop songs EVER what was Janet doing? Bet you can't even put them next together for the sheer embarrasment I'm committed to this album just from this song alone and I haven't touched a thing of hers since Velvet Rope. I should have been more specific about the dancing. Toxic WHUPPED Damita Jo's ass. I can't wait for the new CD either. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I wasn't referring to you actually. Just making a general observation about that point of discussion The key word here being general. So general that no-one can even name one example of these so-called political fans demanding Janet write a new anthem for our troubled times. I don't know. I just saw whiffs of the topic in the thread and commented on it 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I wasn't referring to you actually. Just making a general observation about that point of discussion The key word here being general. So general that no-one can even name one example of these so-called political fans demanding Janet write a new anthem for our troubled times. aww put a lid on it and dance, come on shake ya ass i know you can do it.i know you digging feedback but you just cant bring yourself to admit it, lmao@you giving darkchild props but still finding a way to trash janet, you are such a fan | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: JackieBlue said: Ten years ago, looking forward I do think I thought she would be more creative or innovative musically. I thought she would have taken more chances with dance, electronica and maybe some downtempo grooves. It’d be nice if she had a little pocket that was hers that no one could really touch.
Same here; Up until (and including) TVR, Janet was making state-of-the-art pop music. Afterwards, she just seemed to be chasing trends. I wish she'd have taken some big chances (hell, taken ANY chances) in her musical career. Even if it was a commercial disaster, I think Janft might get more respect. Just because she’s a youth-oriented 40-something year old doesn’t mean she has to keep up with the kids. She can make a nice transition into something other. She doesn’t have a strong voice but she has a pretty voice. She could do something in between the Brazilian and what Sade or Amel Larrieux does or do silky dance tracks. Create a whole new groove. Ugh. It’s really limitless. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Axchi696 said: Same here; Up until (and including) TVR, Janet was making state-of-the-art pop music. Afterwards, she just seemed to be chasing trends. I wish she'd have taken some big chances (hell, taken ANY chances) in her musical career. Even if it was a commercial disaster, I think Janft might get more respect. Just because she’s a youth-oriented 40-something year old doesn’t mean she has to keep up with the kids. She can make a nice transition into something other. She doesn’t have a strong voice but she has a pretty voice. She could do something in between the Brazilian and what Sade or Amel Larrieux does or do silky dance tracks. Create a whole new groove. Ugh. It’s really limitless. But I never really saw Janet doing that. Janet has her purpose just as Sade has her purpose. I mean Sade essentially did the same thing (very well) for 20 years, so... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: I should have been more specific about the dancing. Toxic WHUPPED Damita Jo's ass. I can't wait for the new CD either. I still can't believe that Damita Jo is looked on with such disdain. If you take out the inane interludes (which were probably the worst ones she's ever done), the awful album cover, and the album filler (which admittedly was a good 1/3 of the disc), you're left with about 9 or 10 really solid tracks. The stetch of tracks from 'All Nite' through 'Thinkin About My Ex' is one of my favorite on any Janet record, ever. "Just a Little While" was dumb, and never should've been the first single, but it's no worse than "Whoops Now" or, hell "Someone to Call My Lover". "Moist", save for the awful title, is probably her best sex song since "Rope Burn" or maybe even "Anytime, Anyplace". And "Put Your Hands On" should've made the cut. It would've sat well next to "Slo Love". So there are 9 winners: All Nite R&B Junkie I Want You Like You Don't Love Me Thinkin About My Ex Moist Slo Love Just a Little While Put Your Hands On and even "Strawberry Bounce" and "Sexhibition" weren't terrible. I digress, the album should've been a bigger hit, IMO. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: midnightmover said: The key word here being general. So general that no-one can even name one example of these so-called political fans demanding Janet write a new anthem for our troubled times. aww put a lid on it and dance, come on shake ya ass i know you can do it.i know you digging feedback but you just cant bring yourself to admit it, lmao@you giving darkchild props but still finding a way to trash janet, you are such a fan I give him props 'cos the production's tight, but he must have also commisioned the lyrics and approved them, so he ain't gonna make my Christmas card list either. As for Janet I exonerated her by saying that she wasn't responsible for this kindergarden verse. And regardless of the subject matter, it is kindergarden verse. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: JackieBlue said: Just because she’s a youth-oriented 40-something year old doesn’t mean she has to keep up with the kids. She can make a nice transition into something other. She doesn’t have a strong voice but she has a pretty voice. She could do something in between the Brazilian and what Sade or Amel Larrieux does or do silky dance tracks. Create a whole new groove. Ugh. It’s really limitless. But I never really saw Janet doing that. Janet has her purpose just as Sade has her purpose. I mean Sade essentially did the same thing (very well) for 20 years, so... And Sade can keep on until she retires. She's got that on lock. I’m talking about some sort of smooth groovy blend. Something we can still dance too or chill out to instead of something that could have been easily recorded by Britney or Ciara. In the past, this is what I thought she would have experimented a little more. This is what I thought but I don’t expect that from her anymore. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: purplecam said: I should have been more specific about the dancing. Toxic WHUPPED Damita Jo's ass. I can't wait for the new CD either. I still can't believe that Damita Jo is looked on with such disdain. If you take out the inane interludes (which were probably the worst ones she's ever done), the awful album cover, and the album filler (which admittedly was a good 1/3 of the disc), you're left with about 9 or 10 really solid tracks. The stetch of tracks from 'All Nite' through 'Thinkin About My Ex' is one of my favorite on any Janet record, ever. "Just a Little While" was dumb, and never should've been the first single, but it's no worse than "Whoops Now" or, hell "Someone to Call My Lover". "Moist", save for the awful title, is probably her best sex song since "Rope Burn" or maybe even "Anytime, Anyplace". And "Put Your Hands On" should've made the cut. It would've sat well next to "Slo Love". So there are 9 winners: All Nite R&B Junkie I Want You Like You Don't Love Me Thinkin About My Ex Moist Slo Love Just a Little While Put Your Hands On and even "Strawberry Bounce" and "Sexhibition" weren't terrible. I digress, the album should've been a bigger hit, IMO. I've only listened to Damita Jo once and that was all I needed. It was during a drive from San Diego to L.A. and it was the most painful ride because of that damn CD. I don't even remember 90% of that CD. It was the flop that it was supposed to be. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: VoicesCarry said: But I never really saw Janet doing that. Janet has her purpose just as Sade has her purpose. I mean Sade essentially did the same thing (very well) for 20 years, so... And Sade can keep on until she retires. She's got that on lock. I’m talking about some sort of smooth groovy blend. Something we can still dance too or chill out to instead of something that could have been easily recorded by Britney or Ciara. In the past, this is what I thought she would have experimented a little more. This is what I thought but I don’t expect that from her anymore. First and foremost, she's a commercial pop star so she has to make bank at the end of the day. I guess that's why I didn't really expect it of her at any point in her career. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: VoicesCarry said: But I never really saw Janet doing that. Janet has her purpose just as Sade has her purpose. I mean Sade essentially did the same thing (very well) for 20 years, so... And Sade can keep on until she retires. She's got that on lock. I’m talking about some sort of smooth groovy blend. Something we can still dance too or chill out to instead of something that could have been easily recorded by Britney or Ciara. In the past, this is what I thought she would have experimented a little more. This is what I thought but I don’t expect that from her anymore. This right here makes me wonder and I know it's way to early to ponder but what can Janet do in 5-10 years if dance pop is her thing? Will she change her style and should she change it? She's done hip-hop and look where that got her. I'd like to see her change it up a bit but honestly, I don't know what more she can do. Just throwing it out there. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: I've only listened to Damita Jo once and that was all I needed. It was during a drive from San Diego to L.A. and it was the most painful ride because of that damn CD. I don't even remember 90% of that CD. It was the flop that it was supposed to be. See. I think that's cause the album's sequencing leaves a lot to be desired. Most of the filler is grouped at the beginning of the album, and the good stuff is buried between ear-raping interludes. If you start the album at track 10, it works a lot better. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: JackieBlue said: And Sade can keep on until she retires. She's got that on lock. I’m talking about some sort of smooth groovy blend. Something we can still dance too or chill out to instead of something that could have been easily recorded by Britney or Ciara. In the past, this is what I thought she would have experimented a little more. This is what I thought but I don’t expect that from her anymore. This right here makes me wonder and I know it's way to early to ponder but what can Janet do in 5-10 years if dance pop is her thing? Will she change her style and should she change it? She's done hip-hop and look where that got her. I'd like to see her change it up a bit but honestly, I don't know what more she can do. Just throwing it out there. Janet could work with Goldfrapp or some Scandinavian producers (maybe Robyn, too?) and turn out a tight electropop album. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Axchi696 said: Same here; Up until (and including) TVR, Janet was making state-of-the-art pop music. Afterwards, she just seemed to be chasing trends. I wish she'd have taken some big chances (hell, taken ANY chances) in her musical career. Even if it was a commercial disaster, I think Janft might get more respect. Just because she’s a youth-oriented 40-something year old doesn’t mean she has to keep up with the kids. She can make a nice transition into something other. She doesn’t have a strong voice but she has a pretty voice. She could do something in between the Brazilian and what Sade or Amel Larrieux does or do silky dance tracks. Create a whole new groove. Ugh. It’s really limitless. It was always a little puzzling to me why Janet never explored the downbeat/chillout movement, especially since her voice is tailormade for it. Something along the lines of a Zero 7 or Frou Frou would be miles fresher than the "baby making tunes" which almost always begin with the Weather Channel cues. Strikes me as funny that TVR is now held as the standard bearer from the tastemakers...revisionist history is a bitch, man. I firmly believe that had that album been received well right off the bat, Janet would've been more open to continuing that experimental vibe of that era instead of trying to recapture 1993 on 4 albums straight. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: purplecam said: This right here makes me wonder and I know it's way to early to ponder but what can Janet do in 5-10 years if dance pop is her thing? Will she change her style and should she change it? She's done hip-hop and look where that got her. I'd like to see her change it up a bit but honestly, I don't know what more she can do. Just throwing it out there. Janet could work with Goldfrapp or some Scandinavian producers (maybe Robyn, too?) and turn out a tight electropop album. I'm not familar with Goldfrapp's work but I've heard a lot about them. I just want to see Janet flip the script for herself. That sounds like a good idea VC. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tuls101 said: I really think you may be eating your words with this one. If you mean BIG HIT like Umbrella or Irreplaceable type BIG HIT then you are probably right. But I do think this will put Janet back on the map and at least reconnect her to some fans she may have abandoned the past two albums. It's certainly going to get people shakin their asses in the club and Janet is one of the best DANCE music acts ever, this is closer to her comfort zone than anything she's released since All For You IMO. The response for this track has been great, not only here but at other forums as well....non Janet forums, which typically aren't kind to her. For me as a longtime Janet fan this was really do or die. I always would've loved her stuff from the past, but after buying AFY and liking half of it and then DJ and liking about a quarter of it and then 20 Y.O. and liking almost NONE of it....this was her last chance for me. But she pulled through like I knew she would. I'm just so happy for her, she deserves the positivity she's been getting lately with the movie and now this. Let's go back to the point : In 2004 she released All Nite (Don't Stop) a terrible "I'm sexy, I'm hot" anthem : it did flop BIG TIME In 2006 she released another "I'm sexy, i'm hot" anthem with So Excited : it did flop BIG TIME And Now in 2008 what does she do ? she releases AGAIN another "I'm sexy I'm hot" anthem with FeedBack Not only this is a bad song, but also she recycles the same ol concept Janet needs to get rid of that sex image, and do something NEW AND DIFFERENT... WITH A MORE MORE MATURE SOUND... A NEWCCE There's no concept behind Janet music anymore... But again she prefers to capitalize on her sex image that clearly doesn't work ... People are tired of that... When she made that superbowl performance it backfired at her BIG TIME, but she didn't learn from it AT ALL... SHE tries too HARD to sell a sex image that people don't like anymore... She is NOT A SEX SYMBOL ANYMORE... After the Superbowl incident, after the Damito Jo flop , after the 20 YO failure ... It was clear that she needed something new... She had to come back with something BIG... A BIG HIT... A GREAT SONG that could dominate the charts for several weeks and create excitment among fans... But she prefers to release another generic sex anthem From that point of view I think she is done... [Edited 12/13/07 12:11pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: purplecam said: I've only listened to Damita Jo once and that was all I needed. It was during a drive from San Diego to L.A. and it was the most painful ride because of that damn CD. I don't even remember 90% of that CD. It was the flop that it was supposed to be. See. I think that's cause the album's sequencing leaves a lot to be desired. Most of the filler is grouped at the beginning of the album, and the good stuff is buried between ear-raping interludes. If you start the album at track 10, it works a lot better. Man you're trying to make you find that God-awful CD. I might try it though. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
carmenjonze said: It was always a little puzzling to me why Janet never explored the downbeat/chillout movement, especially since her voice is tailormade for it. Something along the lines of a Zero 7 or Frou Frou would be miles fresher than the "baby making tunes" which almost always begin with the Weather Channel cues. Strikes me as funny that TVR is now held as the standard bearer from the tastemakers...revisionist history is a bitch, man.
I firmly believe that had that album been received well right off the bat, Janet would've been more open to continuing that experimental vibe of that era instead of trying to recapture 1993 on 4 albums straight. When Telepopmuzik was announced as a contributor to Damita Jo, I was really excited because I thought that she might just go in that direction. Sadly, all they did was that stupid interlude that starts the album. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: VoicesCarry said: Janet could work with Goldfrapp or some Scandinavian producers (maybe Robyn, too?) and turn out a tight electropop album. I'm not familar with Goldfrapp's work but I've heard a lot about them. I just want to see Janet flip the script for herself. That sounds like a good idea VC. Check out Goldfrapp, I think you'd like them, purplecam | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: Tuls101 said: I really think you may be eating your words with this one. If you mean BIG HIT like Umbrella or Irreplaceable type BIG HIT then you are probably right. But I do think this will put Janet back on the map and at least reconnect her to some fans she may have abandoned the past two albums. It's certainly going to get people shakin their asses in the club and Janet is one of the best DANCE music acts ever, this is closer to her comfort zone than anything she's released since All For You IMO. The response for this track has been great, not only here but at other forums as well....non Janet forums, which typically aren't kind to her. For me as a longtime Janet fan this was really do or die. I always would've loved her stuff from the past, but after buying AFY and liking half of it and then DJ and liking about a quarter of it and then 20 Y.O. and liking almost NONE of it....this was her last chance for me. But she pulled through like I knew she would. I'm just so happy for her, she deserves the positivity she's been getting lately with the movie and now this. Let's go back to the point : In 2004 she released All Nite (Don't Stop) a terrible "I'm sexy, I'm hot" anthem : it did flop BIG TIME In 2006 she released another "I'm sexy, i'm hot" anthem with So Excited : it did flop BIG TIME And Now in 2008 what does she do ? she releases AGAIN another "I'm sexy I'm hot" anthem with FeedBack Not only this is a bad song, but also she recycles the same ol concept Janet needs to get rid of that sex image, and do something NEW AND DIFFERENT... WITH A MORE MORE MATURE SOUND... A NEWCCE There's no concept behind Janet music anymore... But again she prefers to capitalize on her sex image that clearly doesn't work ... People are tired of that... When she made that superbowl performance it backfired at her BIG TIME, but she didn't learn from it AT ALL... SHE tries to HARD to sell a sex image that people don't like anymore... She is NOT A SEX SYMBOL ANYMORE... After the Superbowl incident, after the Damito Jo flop , after the 20 YO failure ... It was clear that she needed something new... She had to come back with somethin BIG... A BIG HIT... A GREAT SONG that could dominate the charts for several weeks and create excitment among fans... But she prefers to release another generic sex anthem From that point of view I think she is done... Those songs flopped for various reasons, but not because they were sex-themed. If All Nite (Don't Stop) had been released before the Superbowl, it would have been a big hit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
carmenjonze said: JackieBlue said: Just because she’s a youth-oriented 40-something year old doesn’t mean she has to keep up with the kids. She can make a nice transition into something other. She doesn’t have a strong voice but she has a pretty voice. She could do something in between the Brazilian and what Sade or Amel Larrieux does or do silky dance tracks. Create a whole new groove. Ugh. It’s really limitless. It was always a little puzzling to me why Janet never explored the downbeat/chillout movement, especially since her voice is tailormade for it. Something along the lines of a Zero 7 or Frou Frou would be miles fresher than the "baby making tunes" which almost always begin with the Weather Channel cues. Strikes me as funny that TVR is now held as the standard bearer from the tastemakers...revisionist history is a bitch, man. I firmly believe that had that album been received well right off the bat, Janet would've been more open to continuing that experimental vibe of that era instead of trying to recapture 1993 on 4 albums straight. Yes! This is what I'm saying. Just a give it a try. I would have more respect for her. You can be commercial and do something other. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: carmenjonze said: It was always a little puzzling to me why Janet never explored the downbeat/chillout movement, especially since her voice is tailormade for it. Something along the lines of a Zero 7 or Frou Frou would be miles fresher than the "baby making tunes" which almost always begin with the Weather Channel cues. Strikes me as funny that TVR is now held as the standard bearer from the tastemakers...revisionist history is a bitch, man.
I firmly believe that had that album been received well right off the bat, Janet would've been more open to continuing that experimental vibe of that era instead of trying to recapture 1993 on 4 albums straight. When Telepopmuzik was announced as a contributor to Damita Jo, I was really excited because I thought that she might just go in that direction. Sadly, all they did was that stupid interlude that starts the album. You and me both! I was heated that something so promising was limited to only a sound clip. Not to mention that Basement Jaxx has made it known they'd love to work with her and nothing ever came of it and instead we got Crap On Me with Band-Aid Boy and Jerky the magic leprechaun. [Edited 12/13/07 12:22pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |