independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Is Today's Music REALLY that horrific?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 4 <1234
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 10/30/07 8:07pm

Brendan

avatar

If I were the same exact person, only 15 years old, I would certainly see life differently.

How could I not? The world changes through experience.

I love my generation's music, future generation's music, my parent's generation, my grandparents and their parent's parents. How dumb would I have to be if thousands of albums made no indelible mark?

If all one ever embraces is their generation's music, I can guarantee that that will remain a self-fulfilling prophecy of sound.

The mainstream has always been fraught with countless problems, I'm just surmising through experience that it's sicker now than ever before. Doesn't mean that there aren't any great artists or songs that find their way onto the airwaves.

The world is not black and white like that. It's endlessly complicated and gray. No one flipped a switch and made radio bad one day back in September.

And being sicker than ever before might just be where were headed, with more music everyday seemingly getting buried in private sessions with iPods, satellite radio, CDs and Music Choice on cable; radio -- and even music videos -- just don't have that same large audience in which to influence.

And part of the beauty of the system is that no matter how awful things get, including gifting and payola, radio listeners will remain adamant that they are getting mostly fed the best meals, when such beliefs are only disseminated to perpetuate their own existence.

But how can I possibly convince someone who is mostly fed on a steady diet of what commercial radio plays that it's more misguided than even before?

And, besides, on the complete flip side, rejecting something that's truly moving you would be horrible. I think we all have to learn from others, no matter what age or level of experience, but firstly you've got to trust your own instincts.

And the wiser you become, the more you'll change; even if part of being young is thinking that you know it all.

When the real truth is, the more you actually know, the more you'll realize just how little you know. And that include all of us.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 10/30/07 8:09pm

Brendan

avatar

Something is wrong here. More empty and worthless than my intended posts. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 10/30/07 8:16pm

Cinnie

I think that the charts like Billboard used to reflect a greater amount of the population, whereas now, like Brendan said, lots of music is "getting buried in private sessions with iPods [and] satellite radio" which has nothing to do with charts, but certainly would tell us more about what people really like if it was as trackable as "cassette sales" in the 1980s.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 10/31/07 8:21pm

Brendan

avatar

Cinnie said:

I think that the charts like Billboard used to reflect a greater amount of the population, whereas now, like Brendan said, lots of music is "getting buried in private sessions with iPods [and] satellite radio" which has nothing to do with charts, but certainly would tell us more about what people really like if it was as trackable as "cassette sales" in the 1980s.


It's just so splintered now.

MTV's rather significant audience completely switched over the many years from watching music videos to reality television.

Yet, somehow, I'm guessing that this demographic that has left music to the fringes would tell you flat out that they know what they're talking about.

That's that crazy thing about life, we all know what we're talking about, but is anybody really listening. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 11/01/07 2:54am

meow85

avatar

purplesweat said:

meow85 said:


WTH are you talking about? Everyone knew who Beyonce was when DC first hit the scene, whether we wanted to or not.


WTH are you talking about? Your reply had nothing to do with anything I said..unless you mean the 3 albums part, in which I was talking about Rihanna.

shrug Rihanna was all over the place too right from the get-go. What's your point? You act as if she had to actually, ya know, struggle or work or have talent to get where she was at and not suck a few cocks in the studio. Think she didn't? How else do you explain a "star" who can't dance, can't sing, and relies on producers to do everything for her?
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 11/01/07 2:57am

meow85

avatar

vainandy said:

meow85 said:

Sampling can be interesting but for the most part it's just lazy.


Exactly. The Egyptian Lover was a rapper but he made original music behind his raps. When he did sample, he sampled over his own original music and it was only quick, razor fine samples that you could only recognize if you were a big fan of the song he was sampling. Otherwise, you wouldn't even know he was sampling.

nod

That's why I like k-Os. He does sample, but it's not excessive, and when he does it's either something original or something obscure enough it's not a pissoff to hear it in the song.



I still can't believe that Sean Kingston twat used "Stand By Me". Not cool. mad
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 11/01/07 3:03am

meow85

avatar

theghostoftonym said:

bunch of stuff about sampling


Thanks for that. But I think you definitely veered off the thread topic about the profound shit that is mainstream Top 40 -which is what I was referring to -and into the realm of listenable music.

Where, pray tell, is the artistry in just singing or rapping over someone else's work? I mean in cases were (and this is all too common these days) the "sample" makes up the entire song?
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 11/01/07 3:08am

Illustrator

Brendan said:

That's that crazy thing about life, we all know what we're talking about, but is anybody really listening. wink

I can't tell you how many times I offered & explained very real, doable & practical solutions to various solutions to the world's problems,
but it was always here on prince.org.
So they're never stood a chance.

That's why,
when it comes my posts,
if it ain't gonna be heard,
then it's gonna be pointless.

And that's also the reason why I post the majority of 'em over in the General Discussion forum.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 11/01/07 8:06pm

thekidsgirl

avatar

we should just redirect this thread to here....

http://prince.org/msg/8/250719
If you will, so will I
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 11/02/07 12:15pm

goat2004

bboy87 said:

There's no individuality. Everyone uses the SAME producers. Hell, it's almost like it's more about the producer than the actual performer these days. mad lol


This whole thread can sumed up by bboy87's comments. Whoop, there it is! nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 4 <1234
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Is Today's Music REALLY that horrific?