independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > HOW IS PRINCE CHEATING? DID HE KNOCK ON BILLBOARD'S DOOR AND SAY COUNT THESE SEXY MF CDS?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/24/04 6:51pm

NUMBERTWOFANAT
IC

HOW IS PRINCE CHEATING? DID HE KNOCK ON BILLBOARD'S DOOR AND SAY COUNT THESE SEXY MF CDS?

I don't get it. Billboard decided to count the CDs. People act like Prince begged for these CDs to be counted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/24/04 6:58pm

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

they're just mad cuz they aint think of it first.
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/24/04 7:09pm

PinkPeach

avatar

Moonwalkbjrain said:

they're just mad cuz they aint think of it first.

lol TRUE TRUE-that was very smart of him 2 do that...
And like His promise is true
only my faith can undo
the many chances I blew-R.I.P. Left Eye
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/24/04 7:09pm

savoirfaire

avatar

I don't think that Prince "cheated" per se. I do however think his billboard sales shouldn't count. After all, people are not buying these tickets for the CDs. They're MOSTLY buying them to hear his old hits. This could be the worst CD ever released! It could be a CD of pure silence, and it would still be on the billboard charts, which indicates to me that the sales are not motivated by an interest in the CD, but by an interest in his live show.

that's all.
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring faith. If we crave some cosmic purpose, then let us find ourselves a worthy goal" - Carl Sagan
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/24/04 7:12pm

PurpleCharm

lol @ count these sexy mf cds
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/24/04 7:15pm

AsianBomb777

savoirfaire said:

I don't think that Prince "cheated" per se. I do however think his billboard sales shouldn't count. After all, people are not buying these tickets for the CDs. They're MOSTLY buying them to hear his old hits. This could be the worst CD ever released! It could be a CD of pure silence, and it would still be on the billboard charts, which indicates to me that the sales are not motivated by an interest in the CD, but by an interest in his live show.

that's all.



Agreed, Billboard is supposed to be tracking units that are intentionally bought. Buying the concert tickets and getting a free CD does not necessarily mean that their was a specific interest in attaining the CD.

That is why "The Cure" is making theirs an optional purchase. THe purchase of the CD would then show that their was a specific intention to buy the CD.

I personally think if Prince made his CD optional with the purchase that he would still seel a hellova lot of them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/24/04 7:22pm

Supernova

avatar

Let 'em complain.

The music industry has for DECADES had corrupt practices at the expense of recording artists, and that includes the perceived oh-so-noble billboard charts according to Soundscan. Everybody who knows that, and has a beef with Prince's over the table tactics can't absolve themselves of being silently hypocritical about that.




`
[This message was edited Thu Jun 24 19:24:26 2004 by Supernova]
This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/24/04 7:35pm

NUMBERTWOFANAT
IC

Yeah, but Billboard purposes of counting these CDs are different from what Prince's purpose is for giving out CDs. He wanted the people at the concerts to hear the new music. And that's a great idea!

Another thing, these concert goers like getting the CD. We'll always like getting something because we think it's free.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/24/04 8:40pm

lovemachine

avatar

NUMBERTWOFANATIC said:

I don't get it. Billboard decided to count the CDs. People act like Prince begged for these CDs to be counted.



He did sent his lawyers in demanding they be counted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/24/04 8:42pm

lovemachine

avatar

savoirfaire said:

It could be a CD of pure silence, and it would still be on the billboard charts, which indicates to me that the sales are not motivated by an interest in the CD, but by an interest in his live show.

that's all.


Very good point.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/24/04 9:59pm

asg

avatar

Even if the album was optional how much could he have chrged. i mean i bought mine for $10 with the full packaging so he would chanrge maybe $5
since it is the bare CD and he has no marketing costs.

I am sure alteast 60% of the ppl would have added it
That means it could still be top 10.

Talking of the Cure Wanted it the same way without the option but now they changed the policy. so they changed too


He would have given it with the ticket regardless becasue he wanted more to hear him!! But i remeber b4 the CD came out everyone was saying the sales r goin to be poor becasue ppl will get it from the concert!! so they wont buy!!

why billboard agreed to it:
1> Who thought prince could play to 1.5million ppl
2> The cost of a bare CD(~$5) is only 10% or lower then the ticket.
3> The CD is totally related to the tour and him!!
4> if ppl r gettin CD from concert then the sales at retail be lower which is true!!


I dont know what the biggest tour in terms of ppl attended is!!

Not many ppl can pull off such a thing:
1) Tour is 1.5mil pp!!l how many acts can do that
2) He recorded it with his own money. Owns the master
3) he wrote all the songs played all the intruments! so no copyrite problems.

he can do it only coz he is so talented!!

Big success he will make $60million+ this yr and have a big CD which will stay in topten for 6months!! and all the Fans get a free CD!! no one is complaining
could it have ever been better!!!
[This message was edited Thu Jun 24 22:05:24 2004 by asg]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/24/04 10:07pm

Janfriend

Please tell me there are not fans who actually have a problem with this! confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/24/04 10:48pm

purplecam

avatar

Janfriend said:

Please tell me there are not fans who actually have a problem with this! confused

Ha, it's crazy isn't it? IMO, I find it sickening that a fan could really be bothered by this. This is one of the best ways that I've ever heard of in getting music out to the people. Literally giving it away to those going to a show so that the experience can last even longer. If one has the CD already, give it to someone who you think wants it. I've had a lot of people show interest in this CD so it wouldn't be such a hard thing to do for once. People are trying to make a mountain out of a mohill when it's really simple. It was BILLBOARD'S doing that these CD's be counted NOT PRINCE. He's not the enemy. Period.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/25/04 7:02am

Heidi

avatar

purplecam said:


This is one of the best ways that I've ever heard of in getting music out to the people.


Oh no, those poor people that don't have the intelligence and/or taste to go out and buy a Prince album need to be helped. We need to be getting the music out to the people. Thank God Prince is helping those poor little souls.

You have to realise that concert-venues can hold thousands of people. Not all of those people are fans who buy the album - actually, most of them aren't - they are casual fans who wouldn't necessarily buy his latest album, but who know all of his big hits and want to see him play live. I mean imagine he would have done the same for The Rainbow Children

It was BILLBOARD'S doing that these CD's be counted NOT PRINCE.


Actually, Prince doesn't work with a major label but puts out his own albums which means that it is his company that gives Billboard the numbers of the sales.

I mean imagine Prince would have done the same thing for The Rainbow Children. I have noticed that many people don't like the album. BUT, if he was touring and instead of MUsicology giving TRC away, and the album would be in the top 5 of billboard, wouldn't that seem like cheating?


.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/25/04 7:22am

lovemachine

avatar

asg said:

Even if the album was optional how much could he have chrged. i mean i bought mine for $10 with the full packaging so he would chanrge maybe $5
since it is the bare CD and he has no marketing costs.

I am sure alteast 60% of the ppl would have added it
That means it could still be top 10.

Talking of the Cure Wanted it the same way without the option but now they changed the policy. so they changed too


He would have given it with the ticket regardless becasue he wanted more to hear him!! But i remeber b4 the CD came out everyone was saying the sales r goin to be poor becasue ppl will get it from the concert!! so they wont buy!!

why billboard agreed to it:
1> Who thought prince could play to 1.5million ppl
2> The cost of a bare CD(~$5) is only 10% or lower then the ticket.
3> The CD is totally related to the tour and him!!
4> if ppl r gettin CD from concert then the sales at retail be lower which is true!!


I dont know what the biggest tour in terms of ppl attended is!!

Not many ppl can pull off such a thing:
1) Tour is 1.5mil pp!!l how many acts can do that
2) He recorded it with his own money. Owns the master
3) he wrote all the songs played all the intruments! so no copyrite problems.

he can do it only coz he is so talented!!

Big success he will make $60million+ this yr and have a big CD which will stay in topten for 6months!! and all the Fans get a free CD!! no one is complaining
could it have ever been better!!!
[This message was edited Thu Jun 24 22:05:24 2004 by asg]


Dude you are forgetting that a very big percentage of the people are seeing multiple-shows and their is no way that people are going to KEEP on paying for the cd's which means your 60 percent number is WAY off.

Also, for the record Springsteen's last tour drew 3.1 million people.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/25/04 7:23am

NouveauDance

avatar

NUMBERTWOFANATIC said:

Yeah, but Billboard purposes of counting these CDs are different from what Prince's purpose is for giving out CDs. He wanted the people at the concerts to hear the new music. And that's a great idea!


Yeah, right! lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/25/04 7:31am

asg

avatar

lovemachine said:[quote]

asg said:



Also, for the record Springsteen's last tour drew 3.1 million people.


Wrong
Springsteen Drew in 1.1 million grossin about 110million last yr
That included a 10nite stand at some nyc stadium with 50,000/nite

I know purple Rain tour had a draw of almost 1.7million

Does any one know the correct # for the most attended concert??


I dont think ppl mind payign $5 extra for another CD
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 7:33:02 2004 by asg]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/25/04 7:55am

neronava

avatar

AsianBomb777 said:

savoirfaire said:

I don't think that Prince "cheated" per se. I do however think his billboard sales shouldn't count. After all, people are not buying these tickets for the CDs. They're MOSTLY buying them to hear his old hits. This could be the worst CD ever released! It could be a CD of pure silence, and it would still be on the billboard charts, which indicates to me that the sales are not motivated by an interest in the CD, but by an interest in his live show.

that's all.



Agreed, Billboard is supposed to be tracking units that are intentionally bought. Buying the concert tickets and getting a free CD does not necessarily mean that their was a specific interest in attaining the CD.

That is why "The Cure" is making theirs an optional purchase. THe purchase of the CD would then show that their was a specific intention to buy the CD.

I personally think if Prince made his CD optional with the purchase that he would still seel a hellova lot of them.



Billboard DOES NOT track units that "intenetionally bought". Ever see how Soundscan numbers are compiled. They are figured by "scan sales" (actual bought or scanned by a reg), & corporate music buyers bulk buy (thats how you see that tag line about a record: sold 3 million its first week). 3 million people didn't buy the record, a bunch of music buyers ordered/bought 3 million pieces.
That number s figured into some mathematic equataion none of will know about & voila-a number of "sales". Billboard also includes Soundscan numbers. I own a small label and also work for a music vendor so I know all about this. Prince isn't doing anything dishonest, because if anything he's being more honest-at least these millions of people actually have these CD's. Its not sitting in some warehouse somewhere.

Clive Davis "loaned" Tower Records a few million dollars to "buy" Alicia keys first record. Why would he do that? What better promotion is there then being on the top of the charts. Get it. He was eventually fined by the RIAA. So these numbers are about promotion not sales. Prince did a brilliant thing (as far as music industry business savvy goes) he kept his new music in attention while playing a hits tour. So he opened it up for his new stuff to have maximum exposure and kept him in full industry attention by keeping the numbers up. He found a loophole...they can't deny there own crooked system.


Nero
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/25/04 8:05am

otan

avatar

Why is the Bible one of the top-selling books? They give it away at churches, door to door, hotels, etc.

Prince might have gotten the idea from there.
The Last Otan Track: www.funkmusician.com/what.mp3
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 06/25/04 9:08am

lovemachine

avatar

asg said:[quote]

lovemachine said:

asg said:



Also, for the record Springsteen's last tour drew 3.1 million people.


Wrong
Springsteen Drew in 1.1 million grossin about 110million last yr
That included a 10nite stand at some nyc stadium with 50,000/nite

I know purple Rain tour had a draw of almost 1.7million

Does any one know the correct # for the most attended concert??


I dont think ppl mind payign $5 extra for another CD
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 7:33:02 2004 by asg]



Dude contact me if you would like to make a bet on this.

From the news section of Bruce's website:

"...This represents the 120th and final show of Springsteen and the Band's world tour, which has now played to over 3 million people. No additional dates will be announced."

You only looked at the stadium leg of the tour when quoting your numbers.

.
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 9:24:58 2004 by lovemachine]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 06/25/04 9:38am

OdysseyMiles

neronava said:

AsianBomb777 said:




Agreed, Billboard is supposed to be tracking units that are intentionally bought. Buying the concert tickets and getting a free CD does not necessarily mean that their was a specific interest in attaining the CD.

That is why "The Cure" is making theirs an optional purchase. THe purchase of the CD would then show that their was a specific intention to buy the CD.

I personally think if Prince made his CD optional with the purchase that he would still seel a hellova lot of them.



Billboard DOES NOT track units that are "intentionally bought". Ever see how Soundscan numbers are compiled. They are figured by "scan sales" (actual bought or scanned by a reg), & corporate music buyers bulk buy (thats how you see that tag line about a record: sold 3 million its first week). 3 million people didn't buy the record, a bunch of music buyers ordered/bought 3 million pieces.
That number s figured into some mathematic equataion none of will know about & voila-a number of "sales". Billboard also includes Soundscan numbers. I own a small label and also work for a music vendor so I know all about this. Prince isn't doing anything dishonest, because if anything he's being more honest-at least these millions of people actually have these CD's. Its not sitting in some warehouse somewhere.

Clive Davis "loaned" Tower Records a few million dollars to "buy" Alicia keys first record. Why would he do that? What better promotion is there then being on the top of the charts. Get it. He was eventually fined by the RIAA. So these numbers are about promotion not sales. Prince did a brilliant thing (as far as music industry business savvy goes) he kept his new music in attention while playing a hits tour. So he opened it up for his new stuff to have maximum exposure and kept him in full industry attention by keeping the numbers up. He found a loophole...they can't deny there own crooked system.


Nero


Excellent points.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 06/25/04 10:33am

lovemachine

avatar

OdysseyMiles said:

neronava said:




Billboard DOES NOT track units that are "intentionally bought". Ever see how Soundscan numbers are compiled. They are figured by "scan sales" (actual bought or scanned by a reg), & corporate music buyers bulk buy (thats how you see that tag line about a record: sold 3 million its first week). 3 million people didn't buy the record, a bunch of music buyers ordered/bought 3 million pieces.
That number s figured into some mathematic equataion none of will know about & voila-a number of "sales". Billboard also includes Soundscan numbers. I own a small label and also work for a music vendor so I know all about this. Prince isn't doing anything dishonest, because if anything he's being more honest-at least these millions of people actually have these CD's. Its not sitting in some warehouse somewhere.

Clive Davis "loaned" Tower Records a few million dollars to "buy" Alicia keys first record. Why would he do that? What better promotion is there then being on the top of the charts. Get it. He was eventually fined by the RIAA. So these numbers are about promotion not sales. Prince did a brilliant thing (as far as music industry business savvy goes) he kept his new music in attention while playing a hits tour. So he opened it up for his new stuff to have maximum exposure and kept him in full industry attention by keeping the numbers up. He found a loophole...they can't deny there own crooked system.


Nero


Excellent points.


But so is the fact that he could be handing out cd's of silence or even worse "1999 - The New Master" and it would be in the top 10.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 06/25/04 10:45am

Universaluv

Here's the thing. Billboard decided to count the cds. Billboard has since revised its position. Why is this "debate" continuing? confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 06/25/04 11:14am

asg

avatar

lovemachine said:

asg said:



Wrong
Springsteen Drew in 1.1 million grossin about 110million last yr
That included a 10nite stand at some nyc stadium with 50,000/nite

I know purple Rain tour had a draw of almost 1.7million

Does any one know the correct # for the most attended concert??


I dont think ppl mind payign $5 extra for another CD
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 7:33:02 2004 by asg]



Dude contact me if you would like to make a bet on this.

From the news section of Bruce's website:

"...This represents the 120th and final show of Springsteen and the Band's world tour, which has now played to over 3 million people. No additional dates will be announced."

You only looked at the stadium leg of the tour when quoting your numbers.

.
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 9:24:58 2004 by lovemachine]



i was wrong it was 1.6million ppl which is still less then purple Rain with 1.7mill

http://www.antimusic.com/...em61.shtml

Bruce Springsteen was clearly the Boss in the 2003 concert season. On Wednesday, Pollstar released the list of the Top 20 grossing tours of 2003.
Springsteen was far and away the leader. Bruce Springsteen & The E. St. Band brought in $115.9 million dollars in 2003 with an average per concert gross of $3.9 million. Springsteen managed to pack the crowds in and sold over 1.6 million concert tickets in 2003 with an average price of $71.36 per ticket.


but my point is no one will mind paying $5 extra for a CD i am sure about 60% of ppl will opt for it making it still top 10!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 06/25/04 12:13pm

lovemachine

avatar

asg said:

lovemachine said:




Dude contact me if you would like to make a bet on this.

From the news section of Bruce's website:

"...This represents the 120th and final show of Springsteen and the Band's world tour, which has now played to over 3 million people. No additional dates will be announced."

You only looked at the stadium leg of the tour when quoting your numbers.

.
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 9:24:58 2004 by lovemachine]



i was wrong it was 1.6million ppl which is still less then purple Rain with 1.7mill

http://www.antimusic.com/...em61.shtml

Bruce Springsteen was clearly the Boss in the 2003 concert season. On Wednesday, Pollstar released the list of the Top 20 grossing tours of 2003.
Springsteen was far and away the leader. Bruce Springsteen & The E. St. Band brought in $115.9 million dollars in 2003 with an average per concert gross of $3.9 million. Springsteen managed to pack the crowds in and sold over 1.6 million concert tickets in 2003 with an average price of $71.36 per ticket.


but my point is no one will mind paying $5 extra for a CD i am sure about 60% of ppl will opt for it making it still top 10!!


So he doesn't get to count the first half of the tour because it wasn't part of the calander year? The tour was 14 months long with 3 long breaks and over 3,100,000 attended the 120 shows.

WHy do you think people would not keep buying the same cd over and over. If they already owned it they would not buy it again. Husbands and Wives would both not buy the cd and people seeing many shows would not buy it. It would be nowhere near 60 percent.


.
[This message was edited Fri Jun 25 12:14:38 2004 by lovemachine]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 06/25/04 12:22pm

OdysseyMiles

lovemachine said:

OdysseyMiles said:



Excellent points.


But so is the fact that he could be handing out cd's of silence or even worse "1999 - The New Master" and it would be in the top 10.


A cd of silence? And you believe that would be allowed? C'mon, man.
Nero makes a great point because the concert sales are guaranteeing that the cd gets into folks' hands. Record labels have been counting "units shipped" as sales for years. Prince's method of being direct with the audience is the most honest way to sell a cd. Again, Billboard does not count what you INTENDED to buy, they count what's been SCANNED. Labels have been benefitting from this arrangement for a long time. Prince found a way for it to work for him and other artists with a significant live audience.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 06/25/04 12:54pm

psykosoul

Supernova said:

Let 'em complain.

The music industry has for DECADES had corrupt practices at the expense of recording artists, and that includes the perceived oh-so-noble billboard charts according to Soundscan. Everybody who knows that, and has a beef with Prince's over the table tactics can't absolve themselves of being silently hypocritical about that.



clapping I wish I could have your babies sigh
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 06/25/04 1:18pm

superspaceboy

avatar

Universaluv said:

Here's the thing. Billboard decided to count the cds. Billboard has since revised its position. Why is this "debate" continuing? confused


THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!

I was going to post such...how many threads do we need on this. And what is the point.

It's done, debated, dragged, kicked, stomped, tarred, feathered, tied up, stripped, whipped, clipped, washed, dried, folded and put away.

Thank you, drive through and DONT FORGET THOSE NAPKINS!

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 06/25/04 1:28pm

CynicKill

Here's another loophole for Prince:
For his next tour he probably won't even supply his cd to retail but still add it into the ticket price. Since he doesn't have a major label supplying at retail he'll be able to count all the cd's given away at the concert without having to specify which tickets are bundles and which are not.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 06/25/04 2:00pm

Octavius

Hey, it's just an innovative way to move CDs. I wouldn't call it cheating at all. It's just a different way of doing things. It's not like the concert tickets are astronomically priced or anything. Hell, concert-goers should be happy to get a free CD. Of course, I'd prefer a disk of those vaunted outtakes from 82-91.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > HOW IS PRINCE CHEATING? DID HE KNOCK ON BILLBOARD'S DOOR AND SAY COUNT THESE SEXY MF CDS?