Author | Message |
Prince's eclectism alienates the critics Hey guys, was just musing on this today.
We all know the man has a mastery of most popular music styles. Have you ever taught this was to his detriment vis a vis the general critical response to his music. A funk track, a rock track, a ballad, a pop song..... whadaya reckon? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're right, depending on who the critic is, and what they're in the mood to hear. At the same time, I don't think any true artist gives a dang about alienating critics. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
To SOME degree. I mean, I think the press has never fully forgiven Prince for some of his antics. A lot of this is P's fault, but who cares? There will be some critics who will give him his proper due no matter what he does; but I think for the most part, they respect his craft and his genius, even if they don't care for him personally or his music... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sorry guys .. i should clarify "some critics" Question: Will a Rock Publication dismiss him more do ya think if hes concentrating on a more mellow vibe? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I actually think the saavy critic appreciates ecclecticism and that the only damage it really did to Prince (if you want to call it damage) is that it caused him to lose the majority of the fickle, pop-of-the-moment buying public. Sure, critics were annoyed by this and that in Prince's path, but most have at least applauded him for being unique and talented. The public, I think, has been less forgiving.
Then of course, there's us...the smart ones all along. Keith/Kacey | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |