New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
And the point is? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
The person who wrote this article has way too much time on their hands.  NCC2012... your local Trekkie. =/\=
http://www.ncc2012.com | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why would anyone ever want to party like that? Not "tonight", not any night. No, the parties of 1999 are best left to 1999. PRINCE must feel that his lyrics painfully mock him now. Hindsight is excruciatingly 20/20. All those years of aspiring to party like it was one of the suckiest party years since the Great Depression! Perhaps PRINCE gazes blankly into his sapphire encrusted reflecting pond while "pondering" a different turn of past events: "If only I'd have wanted to party like it was 1995! That was a great year!" Yes PRINCE, but how could you have known? Previous to 1995, the year 1995 was a "future event." PRINCE could have had no advance knowledge that 1995 was going to be a far better year for partying than 1999. That is unless... and mind you this is a very slim chance... in the future technology may allow living matter to be propelled backward across the span of time. Having full knowledge of the best partying years between 1983 and the year of his departure, PRINCE could return to 1983 and rewrite his hit single, changing the title from "1999" to a more appropriately partying year.
...somebody needs to up their dosage.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NCC2012 said: The person who wrote this article has way too much time on their hands.
I definitely have too much time on my hands when I end up finding this piece of douche bag | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ConsciousContact said: NCC2012 said: The person who wrote this article has way too much time on their hands.
I definitely have too much time on my hands when I end up finding this piece of douche bag ??? I'm talking about the person writing the article that was being linked to (Chris Bickel), not your post! Sheesh!  NCC2012... your local Trekkie. =/\=
http://www.ncc2012.com | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1999 is pure exstacy strait up...bad ass jam... Prince Fan~Natic 32 Years & Counting | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NCC2012 said: ConsciousContact said: NCC2012 said: The person who wrote this article has way too much time on their hands.
I definitely have too much time on my hands when I end up finding this piece of douche bag ??? I'm talking about the person writing the article that was being linked to (Chris Bickel), not your post! Sheesh! I know who you were talking about. I was making a little joke about me having the time to search out that piece of nonsense. It's called irony!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ConsciousContact said: NCC2012 said: ConsciousContact said: NCC2012 said: The person who wrote this article has way too much time on their hands.
I definitely have too much time on my hands when I end up finding this piece of douche bag ??? I'm talking about the person writing the article that was being linked to (Chris Bickel), not your post! Sheesh! I know who you were talking about. I was making a little joke about me having the time to search out that piece of nonsense. It's called irony! Oh. Ok. 
NCC2012... your local Trekkie. =/\=
http://www.ncc2012.com | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Why would anyone ever want to party like that? Not "tonight", not any night. No, the parties of 1999 are best left to 1999. PRINCE must feel that his lyrics painfully mock him now. Hindsight is excruciatingly 20/20. All those years of aspiring to party like it was one of the suckiest party years since the Great Depression! Perhaps PRINCE gazes blankly into his sapphire encrusted reflecting pond while "pondering" a different turn of past events: "If only I'd have wanted to party like it was 1995! That was a great year!" Yes PRINCE, but how could you have known? Previous to 1995, the year 1995 was a "future event." PRINCE could have had no advance knowledge that 1995 was going to be a far better year for partying than 1999. That is unless... and mind you this is a very slim chance... in the future technology may allow living matter to be propelled backward across the span of time. Having full knowledge of the best partying years between 1983 and the year of his departure, PRINCE could return to 1983 and rewrite his hit single, changing the title from "1999" to a more appropriately partying year.
...somebody needs to up their dosage. or bloody reduce it!!! I'll leave graffiti where you've never been kissed | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LolaM said: Handclapsfingasnapz said: Why would anyone ever want to party like that? Not "tonight", not any night. No, the parties of 1999 are best left to 1999. PRINCE must feel that his lyrics painfully mock him now. Hindsight is excruciatingly 20/20. All those years of aspiring to party like it was one of the suckiest party years since the Great Depression! Perhaps PRINCE gazes blankly into his sapphire encrusted reflecting pond while "pondering" a different turn of past events: "If only I'd have wanted to party like it was 1995! That was a great year!" Yes PRINCE, but how could you have known? Previous to 1995, the year 1995 was a "future event." PRINCE could have had no advance knowledge that 1995 was going to be a far better year for partying than 1999. That is unless... and mind you this is a very slim chance... in the future technology may allow living matter to be propelled backward across the span of time. Having full knowledge of the best partying years between 1983 and the year of his departure, PRINCE could return to 1983 and rewrite his hit single, changing the title from "1999" to a more appropriately partying year.
...somebody needs to up their dosage. or bloody reduce it!!! Something. I mean whatthefuck: Famed 1950's TV psychic and star of Ed Wood's PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE, Criswell, had this to say about future events: "future events such as these will affect you in the future." This is an interesting statement because the future in which you are being affected by the "future events" is obviously at a different point in the future than the point in which the future events are actually taking place. The keyword here is "affected." If you are affected by a future event, the affectation must occur at a point in the future after the original "future event" transpires. Yeeesss... :backingawayslowly: The Normal Whores Club | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm obviously a loon, because I find these writings to be hilariously accurate. I mean, who can deny that 1995 was a much better year for partying than 1999? And of course, future events like these WILL affect you...IN THE FUTURE!!! Criswell's spot on, as always. No confusion, no tears. No enemies, no fear. No sorrow, no pain. No ball, no chain.
Sex is not love. Love is not sex. Putting words in other people's mouths will only get you elected. Need more sleep than coke or methamphetamine. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theblueangel said: And of course, future events like these WILL affect you...IN THE FUTURE!!! Criswell's spot on, as always.
Do we need a fucking psychic and ten lines of circular, whiplash-inducing text to tell us that??
Loon.  The Normal Whores Club | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wanna be a musiphysicist when I grow up now... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
