independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > New album “Timeless” to be released on 28th August
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 7 <1234567
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 06/06/26 2:07pm

johnpiex

You can’t simultaneously blame the guys before while taking credit for their work. It doesn’t work like that. “Timeless” seems like it’s going to be the Prince Estate’s “Michael.”
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 06/06/26 6:48pm

ShellyMcG

johnpiex said:

You can’t simultaneously blame the guys before while taking credit for their work. It doesn’t work like that. “Timeless” seems like it’s going to be the Prince Estate’s “Michael.”


It won't be that bad. I assume the songs on Timeless will actually be Prince songs at least.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 06/06/26 9:09pm

Vannormal

We have good basic information on most songs via Princevault, except for "Bestest Friend" (4:38).

Let's hope they provide much more info on all songs this time, it looks like they wanna do that.

But again, an uncertain wait till 28 august, or maybe even not.

They actually already could provide that, can do no harm to the official date of release.

It would show some improvement on their lack of decent communication.

-

Why didn't they provide more clear information on "Timeless"?

Why that choice?

Why (not a clear and detailed explanation on) the change of their course on releases? Even if it is pure financial, at least that would be honest and openly clear for all to try to understand.

Why didn't they explained basic info on each track yet? WHy not? Can do no harm. It can even attrack interest from media to write about it, and anxiously want to hear it.

Why only 9 songs?

Why a live song?

Why the artwork?

Why no video's yet?

-

And as far as I understand, Primary Wave has certainly played a somewhat more low-key role in this whole affair, refraining (for the time being) from sending out any unfiltered BS or ambiguous statements (unlike the two lightweights do).

But it does seem that PW are fully on The Estate’s side when it comes to future releases.
Perhaps we should hear more from them, interview them, probe them, see if there is a difference or not (in communication alone).

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 06/07/26 8:38am

Marrk

avatar

AvocadosMax said:

Just what is this.. Worse than the Michael Jackson estate and that’s saying something

The estate that is worth anywhere between $2.5 - $5bn? That one that does stuff? I say that as I stare at my Inart 1/6 Dangerous and Smooth Criminal MJ figures and having just enjoyed his biopic. Prince's estate has gone backwards since the heights of the 1999 and SOTT SDE's. Such a shame. Prince should be everywhere, whether people like commercial stuff or not.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 06/07/26 10:31am

TweetyV6

avatar

trickyjoe7777 said:

Obviously so many things wrong with this but the ultimate kick in the balls for me is trimming Heaven to a radio edit - it's been an absolute grail for me (and many others) to have this pristine with presumably the start and the fuckwits lop over three minutes off of it.

i fucking despair

You will get that with the 'Timeless SDE' release next year cool

The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification - Thomas Henry Huxley
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 06/07/26 11:30am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

I don't think there will be any info on the songs included from the estate
Let's hope there's liner notes of some sort though
It's a stingy release but hey I know I will like some/most of the songs on there even if there aren't many to choose from
The mj estate is diff as it has so many ppl from family to ppl mj worked with involved
The prince estate has none of that
You'd need someone like Alan Leeds on board as an equivalent or something other close label /business (ie not just band members) collaborators
As it stands it looks like no one he worked with is involved really
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 06/07/26 9:56pm

homesquid

avatar

Marrk said:

AvocadosMax said:

Just what is this.. Worse than the Michael Jackson estate and that’s saying something

The estate that is worth anywhere between $2.5 - $5bn? That one that does stuff? I say that as I stare at my Inart 1/6 Dangerous and Smooth Criminal MJ figures and having just enjoyed his biopic. Prince's estate has gone backwards since the heights of the 1999 and SOTT SDE's. Such a shame. Prince should be everywhere, whether people like commercial stuff or not.

Word! The MJ estate are a godzillion times better than McMillions & company. Look even SOTT SDE wasn't perfect. Where the FUCK is the sax version of "Crucial" my personal favorite outtake by a mile

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 06/08/26 8:08pm

NICKthebrick

From reports elsewhere it sounds as if the version of Heaven is the mix Prince intended for The Dawn project.

So it's not been edited by the estate but is as Prince intended.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 06/08/26 8:31pm

shakalakaboom

avatar

NICKthebrick said:

From reports elsewhere it sounds as if the version of Heaven is the mix Prince intended for The Dawn project.

.
.
I’m actually happy to hear this, as I’m firmly of the opinion that MOST of Prince’s songs over 6 minutes need an edit. Lots of noodly jamming in that catalogue, and there are so many songs that benefited from a prerelease edit.
That 8 minute Heaven really loses steam about the 5 minute mark….
.
.
Also I don’t care if this is your favorite song and Prince can do no wrong.
if you could just pass your history class, baby, life would be all right.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 06/09/26 1:11am

FunkyStrange

avatar

ShellyMcG said:

They shouldn't abandon the entire SDE model just because Diamonds & Pearls didn't sell as much as they were hoping for. They should instead be asking WHY it didn't sell as well as they thought.


Never going to happen. That would involve even the simplest form of self reflection and Londell truly believes that every move they make is absolutely genius. And why look in the mirror when you can simply bitch and whine about ungrateful fans and blame them for all your issues?
[Edited 6/9/26 1:11am]
Hard to believe I've been on the org for over 25 years now!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 06/09/26 8:55am

olb99

avatar

shakalakaboom said:

MOST of Prince’s songs over 6 minutes need an edit


What are the exceptions, in your opinion?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 06/09/26 2:02pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

shakalakaboom said:

NICKthebrick said:
From reports elsewhere it sounds as if the version of Heaven is the mix Prince intended for The Dawn project.
. . I’m actually happy to hear this, as I’m firmly of the opinion that MOST of Prince’s songs over 6 minutes need an edit. Lots of noodly jamming in that catalogue, and there are so many songs that benefited from a prerelease edit. That 8 minute Heaven really loses steam about the 5 minute mark…. . . Also I don’t care if this is your favorite song and Prince can do no wrong.


Luckily, your opinion is in the minority.


Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 06/09/26 2:34pm

dustoff

avatar

Noodly jamming is the best.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 06/09/26 3:35pm

JorisE73

homesquid said:

Marrk said:

The estate that is worth anywhere between $2.5 - $5bn? That one that does stuff? I say that as I stare at my Inart 1/6 Dangerous and Smooth Criminal MJ figures and having just enjoyed his biopic. Prince's estate has gone backwards since the heights of the 1999 and SOTT SDE's. Such a shame. Prince should be everywhere, whether people like commercial stuff or not.

Word! The MJ estate are a godzillion times better than McMillions & company. Look even SOTT SDE wasn't perfect. Where the FUCK is the sax version of "Crucial" my personal favorite outtake by a mile


I would say Prince's estate is now on par with MJ's. MJ's estate has infuriated me more than Prince's but only becaus s he's gone for a longer time than PRince.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 06/10/26 12:52pm

BlackCandle

avatar

There's only one classic Timeless album:
https://en.wikipedia.org/...meless.jpg
"Had to get off the boat so I could walk on water..."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 06/10/26 4:12pm

NICKthebrick

If they were to release these kind of collections regularly say every 6 to 8 months I would be happy with that.

Smaller collections you can really digest.

Cheaper and more easily assembled. No need for great big books, just simple liner notes. Focus on the music.

I actually think this would be the best way forward.

Release deluxe editions of albums like they did with Around The World in a Day.

Regular smaller vault releases like Timeless.

Release live shows on their own seperate releases.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 06/10/26 11:33pm

Gooddoctor23

NICKthebrick said:

If they were to release these kind of collections regularly say every 6 to 8 months I would be happy with that. Smaller collections you can really digest. Cheaper and more easily assembled. No need for great big books, just simple liner notes. Focus on the music. I actually think this would be the best way forward. Release deluxe editions of albums like they did with Around The World in a Day. Regular smaller vault releases like Timeless. Release live shows on their own seperate releases.

Makes zero sense.

Every other artist can figure this out but these folks can't?

Graycap23 was ME!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 06/11/26 1:36am

shakalakaboom

avatar

olb99 said:

shakalakaboom said:

MOST of Prince’s songs over 6 minutes need an edit


What are the exceptions, in your opinion?

thanks for asking!

.

Well, i think the album versions of Controversy and Let's Pretend We're Married are perfection. DMSR too. and yet Automatic WEARS ME OUT. Lady Cab Driver: a total jam. but too damn long.

.

I think "Computer Blue" is perfection in its edited album version. I even like the first edit (7 or 8 minutes?), before the one that ended up on the album. that being said: the 14 minute hallway speech version is also perfection. it's not an exact science.

.

Temptation is too damn long. but the meandering story telling and LOOOONG intro of "Condition of the Heart" is exactly the right length.

.

"It's gonna be a beautiful night" is too damn long. somehow "hot thing" is not. ha ha! i don't know.

.

All 7 minutes of "Positivity" slams. Glam Slam needs a minute trimmed off, in addition to that dumb synth string ending.

.

ETC. ETC.

.

all my opinions, and i can't justify or explain any of my choices. oh, and I didn't even bother with the ballads. two words: International Lover.

[Edited 6/11/26 2:06am]

if you could just pass your history class, baby, life would be all right.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 06/11/26 1:38am

shakalakaboom

avatar

dustoff said:

Noodly jamming is the best.

ha ha! i know, i'm in the minority here. i just like when he gets that groove going and gets to the point. i would say that his best work always benefits from an edit, and the bonus is that the noodly jamming becomes the 12" version. and they are frequently FANTASTIC.

if you could just pass your history class, baby, life would be all right.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 06/11/26 9:59pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

djThunderfunk said:

AvocadosMax said:

ShellyMcG said: You guys who purchase this crap will be the reason why they will continue to only put out half-assed releases Do not give them your money and stop your friends from buying this!!


Yes, and those that don't will be the reason if they don't bother with further vault releases.

It's lose/lose, hence the frustration.



Here's how money people in the entertainment industry think, illustrated by a current situation with sci/fi tv shows:

A new Stargate show was about to go into production. A new Battlestar Galactica show was in the planning stages. Both got cancelled/shelved. Why? Because recent Star Wars (The Acolyte) & Star Trek (Starfleet Academy) shows bombed hard. Fans turned on them because the shows sucked. The creators of the shows were focused on "the message" (aka "woke"), NOT on making good shows that respected the history of the IP. When the fans complained, criticized and explained exactly everything that was wrong with the shows and how/what they should be to make them good. The creators and the industry ignored the real criticism and derided the fans, calling them names. They blamed the fans for the failures all the while claiming to be aiming for a nebulous new and younger audience to take the franchises into the future. Sound familiar? For the most part, the younger audiences didn't show up, at least not in numbers necessary to justify the expense that went into the productions, as the older audiences, that clamored for more of what they've loved and followed for years checked out.

Of course bringing in new fans is essential to growing a franchise/IP/brand into the future, but, it has to be built on top of catering to the original audience (customers) or risks convincing the money men that it's just not worth it to finance future releases.

This is exactly where we are at with the estate which seems to be focused entirely on profit. We can stand our ground and refuse to buy the subpar new stuff, but then it's likely that we will never get the good stuff that we want.

This doesn't mean we shouldn't complain or criticize or let them know what they are doing wrong and what they need to do to make it right. We should keep sharing our opinions and ideas in the hopes eventually someone will listen. But, if we walk, they have no incentive to try to make us happy and will in fact blame us when they choose not to put anything out.

Like I said before... Lose/Lose. I for one have hope that if we continue to engage, eventually, someone will fire Londell and the next guy might listen to us. Maybe not, but I hope...


Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 06/11/26 10:24pm

MIRvmn1

avatar

djThunderfunk said:



djThunderfunk said:




AvocadosMax said:


ShellyMcG said: You guys who purchase this crap will be the reason why they will continue to only put out half-assed releases Do not give them your money and stop your friends from buying this!!


Yes, and those that don't will be the reason if they don't bother with further vault releases.

It's lose/lose, hence the frustration.





Here's how money people in the entertainment industry think, illustrated by a current situation with sci/fi tv shows:

A new Stargate show was about to go into production. A new Battlestar Galactica show was in the planning stages. Both got cancelled/shelved. Why? Because recent Star Wars (The Acolyte) & Star Trek (Starfleet Academy) shows bombed hard. Fans turned on them because the shows sucked. The creators of the shows were focused on "the message" (aka "woke"), NOT on making good shows that respected the history of the IP. When the fans complained, criticized and explained exactly everything that was wrong with the shows and how/what they should be to make them good. The creators and the industry ignored the real criticism and derided the fans, calling them names. They blamed the fans for the failures all the while claiming to be aiming for a nebulous new and younger audience to take the franchises into the future. Sound familiar? For the most part, the younger audiences didn't show up, at least not in numbers necessary to justify the expense that went into the productions, as the older audiences, that clamored for more of what they've loved and followed for years checked out.

Of course bringing in new fans is essential to growing a franchise/IP/brand into the future, but, it has to be built on top of catering to the original audience (customers) or risks convincing the money men that it's just not worth it to finance future releases.

This is exactly where we are at with the estate which seems to be focused entirely on profit. We can stand our ground and refuse to buy the subpar new stuff, but then it's likely that we will never get the good stuff that we want.

This doesn't mean we shouldn't complain or criticize or let them know what they are doing wrong and what they need to do to make it right. We should keep sharing our opinions and ideas in the hopes eventually someone will listen. But, if we walk, they have no incentive to try to make us happy and will in fact blame us when they choose not to put anything out.

Like I said before... Lose/Lose. I for one have hope that if we continue to engage, eventually, someone will fire Londell and the next guy might listen to us. Maybe not, but I hope...



I agree and if we don't support and buy Timeless, then the Estate will probably soon go back to more Purple Rain re-releases instead. I also think that the Estate should communicate more and let us know their plans, if Timeless is part of a series of vault albums.
[Edited 6/11/26 22:38pm]
U are now an official member of the New Power Generation
Welcome 2 The Dawn
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 06/12/26 5:20am

themanfromnept
une

MIRvmn1 said:

djThunderfunk said:

I agree and if we don't support and buy Timeless, then the Estate will probably soon go back to more Purple Rain re-releases instead. I also think that the Estate should communicate more and let us know their plans, if Timeless is part of a series of vault albums. [Edited 6/11/26 22:38pm]

.

I did not bought ATWIAD SE as I never bought vynil repress of anything, I'm not a collector. I was disappointed for the short tracklist of Timeless, I was waiting for a new "Crystal Ball", at least 3 cds.

But I'm gonna buy it as soon as I can, because Timeless is a little step in the right direction: regular releases of vault tracks. I also like the tracklist, it is interesting and I like the idea to have a enjoyable 'album' instead of a heavy archive of alternate versions, demos et similia. The SDE are often unlistenable and some gems are sacrificed there.

I know I'm in the minority here, but despite the great material included on Sign or The Times SDE, I was disappointed. Those three CDs are soulless, packed with material but fail to convey the full extent of Prince's creativity during those years. There's too much, but not enough, at the same time.

I think the estate have to release different stuff for different audience: heavy archives with alternate versions, demos, jams for the hard fans, and light enjoyable albums for... fans, oblivious, but also casual listeners. For example, I think the Roadhouse Gardens tracks were a silly sacrifice, dismembered here and there in different SDEs, abandoned in NPGMC or still unreleased.

And well, I hope a leak of the Timeless album could emerge before end of august, I'd like to hear it this summer.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 06/12/26 7:01am

fredmagnus

djThunderfunk said:

djThunderfunk said:


Yes, and those that don't will be the reason if they don't bother with further vault releases.

It's lose/lose, hence the frustration.



Here's how money people in the entertainment industry think, illustrated by a current situation with sci/fi tv shows:

A new Stargate show was about to go into production. A new Battlestar Galactica show was in the planning stages. Both got cancelled/shelved. Why? Because recent Star Wars (The Acolyte) & Star Trek (Starfleet Academy) shows bombed hard. Fans turned on them because the shows sucked. The creators of the shows were focused on "the message" (aka "woke"), NOT on making good shows that respected the history of the IP. When the fans complained, criticized and explained exactly everything that was wrong with the shows and how/what they should be to make them good. The creators and the industry ignored the real criticism and derided the fans, calling them names. They blamed the fans for the failures all the while claiming to be aiming for a nebulous new and younger audience to take the franchises into the future. Sound familiar? For the most part, the younger audiences didn't show up, at least not in numbers necessary to justify the expense that went into the productions, as the older audiences, that clamored for more of what they've loved and followed for years checked out.

Of course bringing in new fans is essential to growing a franchise/IP/brand into the future, but, it has to be built on top of catering to the original audience (customers) or risks convincing the money men that it's just not worth it to finance future releases.

This is exactly where we are at with the estate which seems to be focused entirely on profit. We can stand our ground and refuse to buy the subpar new stuff, but then it's likely that we will never get the good stuff that we want.

This doesn't mean we shouldn't complain or criticize or let them know what they are doing wrong and what they need to do to make it right. We should keep sharing our opinions and ideas in the hopes eventually someone will listen. But, if we walk, they have no incentive to try to make us happy and will in fact blame us when they choose not to put anything out.

Like I said before... Lose/Lose. I for one have hope that if we continue to engage, eventually, someone will fire Londell and the next guy might listen to us. Maybe not, but I hope...


I will buy Timeless because of the reasons you mention here but, regardless if we buy it or not, I'm not optimistic for the future.

prince

On the other hand, I will not buy releases that don't feature any Vault material as I didn't buy ATWIAD last year. Maybe they will, at least, get this message from us : don't release anything if it doesn't include any Vault material. A 4-year-old boy would get it.

[Edited 6/12/26 7:05am]

Fire the 2 impostors from the Prince Estate !
Give us back Troy Carter, Michael Howe & Duane Tudahl.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 06/13/26 6:30am

Gooddoctor23

MIRvmn1 said:

djThunderfunk said:


Here's how money people in the entertainment industry think, illustrated by a current situation with sci/fi tv shows:



I agree and if we don't support and buy Timeless, then the Estate will probably soon go back to more Purple Rain re-releases instead. I also think that the Estate should communicate more and let us know their plans, if Timeless is part of a series of vault albums. [Edited 6/11/26 22:38pm]

interesting. At this point, the Estate will NEVER get a single penny out of my pocket again.

Graycap23 was ME!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 06/13/26 7:50am

ShellyMcG

Gooddoctor23 said:



MIRvmn1 said:


djThunderfunk said:



Here's how money people in the entertainment industry think, illustrated by a current situation with sci/fi tv shows:





I agree and if we don't support and buy Timeless, then the Estate will probably soon go back to more Purple Rain re-releases instead. I also think that the Estate should communicate more and let us know their plans, if Timeless is part of a series of vault albums. [Edited 6/11/26 22:38pm]

interesting. At this point, the Estate will NEVER get a single penny out of my pocket again.



So I guess what you're saying is that this is not what the good doctor ordered? lol
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 06/14/26 7:45am

Vannormal

Why isnt this news of a new album a sticky?

And why isn't it on the homepage?

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 7 <1234567
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > New album “Timeless” to be released on 28th August