independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Insatiable Appreciation
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 12/06/22 3:59pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

dodger07 said:

TrivialPursuit said:


Crucial is ear piercingly bad. Periodt! It's more hype than content.

I thought I was the only P fan with this opinion. I like most his ballads but never got this


We're def on the same page then, because once I finally heard it, I thought - this is it? It's squawky, tinny, aurally garish, and sounds like it was recorded in an empty Folger's can.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 12/06/22 4:47pm

LoveGalore

TrivialPursuit said:



dodger07 said:


TrivialPursuit said:



Crucial is ear piercingly bad. Periodt! It's more hype than content.



I thought I was the only P fan with this opinion. I like most his ballads but never got this


We're def on the same page then, because once I finally heard it, I thought - this is it? It's squawky, tinny, aurally garish, and sounds like it was recorded in an empty Folger's can.



Boy you are smoking something potent. Crucial is operatic and lush and full and scintillating just like Adonis & Bathsheba. He was on point with all of his sexy ballads at the time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 12/06/22 7:25pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

LoveGalore said:

Boy you are smoking something potent. Crucial is operatic and lush and full and scintillating just like Adonis & Bathsheba. He was on point with all of his sexy ballads at the time.


Agree for you to be wrong to disagree. lol

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 12/07/22 8:06am

dodger07

TrivialPursuit said:



dodger07 said:


TrivialPursuit said:



Crucial is ear piercingly bad. Periodt! It's more hype than content.



I thought I was the only P fan with this opinion. I like most his ballads but never got this


We're def on the same page then, because once I finally heard it, I thought - this is it? It's squawky, tinny, aurally garish, and sounds like it was recorded in an empty Folger's can.



Yes, all that. And I’ve never liked the ‘opposite gender…army surrender’ line so it was interesting to get alternate lyrics on the SDE.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 12/07/22 9:15am

CAL3

Some of you must have alerts on your phone to let you know when “Insatiable” is mentioned so you can get on here and say “Scandalous” is a better song. It’s like some sort of requirement for some people to compare these two songs, always with the same party-line “Scandalous is better” lockstep, goose-stepping, groupthink, conformist “opinion.”
.
Give it a rest. Like one more than the other. Hate both. Love both. But it’s time to acknowledge that THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT SONGS.
.
They both fit under the broad categorization of “seduction ballad,” like many other Prince songs.
.
They are in different keys, different time signatures, similar tempo but perhaps most importantly the tone/mood of these two songs are entirely different.
.
“Scandalous” is not lyrically playful in the way that “Insatiable” is, what with all the videotaping instructions etc.
.
Prince’s falsetto delivery is strikingly-different between the two songs. Much more of his natural lower range is utilized in “Insatiable.” “Scandalous” finds him employing a ‘scratchier’ (for lack of a better word) sound to his falsetto and he stays in it for most of the song.
.
Even more could be said to distinguish these two songs. It’s fine to compare/contrast, but why OH WHY do people insist on linking these two as if “Insatiable” is specifically a literal rewrite of “Scandalous?”
I’ve been informed that my opinion is worth less than those expressed by others here.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 12/17/22 7:19am

thisisreece

CAL3 said:

Some of you must have alerts on your phone to let you know when “Insatiable” is mentioned so you can get on here and say “Scandalous” is a better song. It’s like some sort of requirement for some people to compare these two songs, always with the same party-line “Scandalous is better” lockstep, goose-stepping, groupthink, conformist “opinion.”
.
Give it a rest. Like one more than the other. Hate both. Love both. But it’s time to acknowledge that THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT SONGS.
.
They both fit under the broad categorization of “seduction ballad,” like many other Prince songs.
.
They are in different keys, different time signatures, similar tempo but perhaps most importantly the tone/mood of these two songs are entirely different.
.
“Scandalous” is not lyrically playful in the way that “Insatiable” is, what with all the videotaping instructions etc.
.
Prince’s falsetto delivery is strikingly-different between the two songs. Much more of his natural lower range is utilized in “Insatiable.” “Scandalous” finds him employing a ‘scratchier’ (for lack of a better word) sound to his falsetto and he stays in it for most of the song.
.
Even more could be said to distinguish these two songs. It’s fine to compare/contrast, but why OH WHY do people insist on linking these two as if “Insatiable” is specifically a literal rewrite of “Scandalous?”

Just got a phone alert, which must mean people are talking about the song Insatiable. I feel it is my duty to say, while it is an enjoyable song existing in the same seduction ballad wheelhouse, it pales to the dreamy majesty of Scandalous.
Hundalasiliah!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Insatiable Appreciation