Author | Message |
Should Under the Cherry Moon be re-released in Color? I just saw this clip on YouTube. What are your thougts?
https://www.youtube.com/w...qtAEMDYSJ0
If you have trouble seeing it...the title of the clip is Prince being a Dramatic Comedian | Under the Cherry Moon (1986) Colorized using A.I[Edited 8/9/22 7:09am] [Edited 8/9/22 17:34pm] To All the Haters on the Internet
No more Candy 4 U | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Definitely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. If you don't like to watch it in black and white, then simply don't watch it. If it was supposed to be in color, then it would have been initially released in color. And yeah, "blah blah blah but it was filmed in color blah blah blah." Whatever. Don't mess with Under The Cherry Moon. It's perfectly fine the way it is. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
YES!!!
I just watch a whole interview with Einstein that was colorized, it was great. Not the same thing but geesh imagine the costumes in color, worth buying twice. [Edited 8/9/22 8:41am] Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. It'll still be shit. [Edited 8/9/22 9:48am] Formerly TheDigitalGardener etc. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes I will take my place, In the great below | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. This is 100% the correct answer. . Furthermore, NOTHING that exists in Black & White should EVER be colorized. I’ve been informed that my opinion is worth less than those expressed by others here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That ship has sailed. Graycap23 was ME! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just watched that clip and even in color,I have to admit,it's still a very bad movie.Atrocious acting throughout. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said:
I just watched that clip and even in color,I have to admit,it's still a very bad movie.Atrocious acting throughout. Ohhh, so you think UTCM was meant to be Citizen Kane? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, since it was originally shot in color. It was then transferred into black and white, probably because of a poor photography. It color, it would then offer a new viewing experience, which would be interesting, especially in these dire times. On YouTube, some fans colorized it with AI, and the result is interesting and make it worth watching it. https://youtu.be/WqtAEMDYSJ0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I certainly enjoyed watching the color clips...and frankly..I think they should re-release both the original and the colored version on the same disc or in a two-disc set and let fans choose which version they prefer to watch. Just in case the estate is listening. [Edited 8/9/22 17:38pm] To All the Haters on the Internet
No more Candy 4 U | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Warners gave him alot of rope on this decision, to put it mildly LOL | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RODSERLING said: Yes, since it was originally shot in color. It was then transferred into black and white, probably because of a poor photography. It color, it would then offer a new viewing experience, which would be interesting, especially in these dire times. On YouTube, some fans colorized it with AI, and the result is interesting and make it worth watching it. https://youtu.be/WqtAEMDYSJ0 You're wrong. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveGalore said: RODSERLING said: Yes, since it was originally shot in color. It was then transferred into black and white, probably because of a poor photography. It color, it would then offer a new viewing experience, which would be interesting, especially in these dire times. On YouTube, some fans colorized it with AI, and the result is interesting and make it worth watching it. https://youtu.be/WqtAEMDYSJ0 You're wrong. No, you are. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RODSERLING said: LoveGalore said: You're wrong. No, you are. Sigh. The film was purposely shot on color film and reprocessed in b/w because Prince conceived it in b/w. Please stop with the bullshit in half your posts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
no ... that was his whole plan of it B&W | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
very well put | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Can someone explain how Jerome can act like such a HUUUUGE Queen and no one calls him out on that??? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GaryMF said: Can someone explain how Jerome can act like such a HUUUUGE Queen and no one calls him out on that??? The picture above shows a man wearing a silk top exposing the small of his back and silk pants in a matching print and you're worried about Jerome? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Love It!!! I would buy this! Did you make this image SoulAlive? To All the Haters on the Internet
No more Candy 4 U | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Both Prince and Jerome were behaving like Queens...one reviewer even said that the "Chemistry" between Prince and Jerome was more palpable than the Chemistry between Prince and his female co-star. To All the Haters on the Internet
No more Candy 4 U | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DonRants said:
Love It!!! I would buy this! Did you make this image SoulAlive? No,I just googled it and this pic came up apparently,there are some unauthorized copies of this movie in color | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveGalore said: RODSERLING said: No, you are. Sigh. The film was purposely shot on color film and reprocessed in b/w because Prince conceived it in b/w. Please stop with the bullshit in half your posts. That's complete BS. B&W film cost less than in color, so why don't use the B&W film from the start?😂 More, a director of photography doesn't light a spot the same way in color, he would do in B&W. That's the base of that work, everybody knows that. So there was no reason for the movie to be shot in color, other than the fact it was originally planned and payed for to be in color. That's beyond stupid to think the studio would pay for a more expensive film, just to reprocess it after to make it look cheaper. That would have been a hell of a job for the director of photography, a useless pain in the ass. [Edited 8/10/22 4:25am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Except shooting it in color WAS cheaper, you dumb ass. And why wouldn't it be cheaper considering movies weren't typically shot on b/w film in 1986? You think b/w film is cheaper than color and LOOKS cheaper? You're dead wrong, as usual. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Welcome to "the org", laytonian… come bathe with me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Welcome to "the org", laytonian… come bathe with me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |