lustmealways said: guys i'm not saying this is an absolutely terrible set or that it's entirely void of merit, but i am saying that there are like, idk, 5, people on this site (including me!!!! ) who i think would've done a better job and would've done it for free The org couldn't mobilize an Erector set much less assist the Estate in archival projects. The org doesn't even care that First Avenue is going to shut down. Or that Prince's demo tapes go up for auction. Unfortunately, reality is just never going to perfectly match our dreams and some people are better equipped to handle these projects from more than just the aspect of quality control for the material. [Edited 10/9/20 7:26am] [Edited 10/9/20 7:26am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I kind of see where this is going A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
databank said:
I kind of see where this is going To put it more succinctly: I believe the Vanity 6 SDE should come with a sex toy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. The real discussion will be about which one. Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rest assured that it will be the wrong one. RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheEnglishGent said:
Rest assured that it will be the wrong one. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheEnglishGent said:
Rest assured that it will be the wrong one. You know Udo will be the first one in here talmbout "I can't fit this in my-" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. No comments.... Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveGalore said: TheEnglishGent said:
Rest assured that it will be the wrong one. You know Udo will be the first one in here talmbout "I can't fit this in my-" A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But they left the drum stick count on "Everybody Want What They Don't Got". Why intentionally remove it from one song but not another? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. drifting policy Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lurker316 said:
But they left the drum stick count on "Everybody Want What They Don't Got". Why intentionally remove it from one song but not another? It could simply be that the boot of Adonis we had was a rough mix and the one with the countoff removed on this release was the final one | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You know, some people find it REALLY difficult to understand that one simple thing. That bootlegs they heard might not be the final version of the track. Because what comes out of the bootleg market is always "the truth", whilst the Estate in their opinion...is fucking up the truth. Sad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ugh. Another error. Popped the DVD in my computer to watch it and noticed the typo in the title, PrinceAtPasileyPark | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Might explain Adonis but the Visions error is inexcusable. The song had already been released by a major lable.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
partyup77 said: Ugh. Another error. Popped the DVD in my computer to watch it and noticed the typo in the title, PrinceAtPasileyPark A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 10/16/20 10:36am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What bout the feedback early in the Utrecht Live show? The feedback is an error. Not removing the feedback is an error. (bootleggars can do it to a certain extent) Not mentioning it in the booklet is an error. Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Please see the work at https://prince.org/msg/7/...?&pg=1 It shows several issues preventing the owner of SOTT SDE to assemble correct/coplete versions of Dream Factory, Camille or Crystal Ball. This means that either the set has errors or at least the statement about being able to assemble your own tracklists for these albums is kinda false. Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just got the box set on Friday and it's all I've listened to this weekend despite hearing these bootlegs for years already. I love it. The book is overwhelming actually. On some of the pages in the book, there are watermarks of "Page 1 and Page 2". That looks like a printing error no?
And a couple of the Vault discs have light scratches and even one disc has bits of plastic that didn't get shaved off when they cut the disc. I think the individual discs should have come in custom photo sleeves. The way they include the discs looks janky. But overall, I think it's a great, great box set. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IDK if we can talk about errors in this case. It's more an editorial decision that was made, followed by a PR error. Admitting that the configs couldn't be recreated would have been OK, I don't think anyone would have been mad at them for this. What was insulting was the lie in the interview. I can't imagine Michael Howe not realizing that his statement was false, so I suspect he just thought he'd get away with it. Which he probably did with most of the people who read the interview anyway: it's not like Rolling Stone, NME or Popmatters complained about it in a review or something. A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
udo said: What bout the feedback early in the Utrecht Live show? The feedback is an error. Not removing the feedback is an error. (bootleggars can do it to a certain extent) Not mentioning it in the booklet is an error. The tape speed is an error, feedback is baked into a sounboard mixdown. No bootlegger can magically treat a sounboard as a multitrack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. Please check again. Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
udo said:
. Please check again. Just did, in the sense that I listened to the show in full. What (preferably timestamped) specific sections did you have in mind? [Edited 10/26/20 20:49pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bootlegs may be unfinished and never intended for release in that version. Errors such as tape warble could be just deterioration of the vault material. A bootleg copy of Wally could have been made 30 years ago and that time stamp doesn't reflect the condition of the master today when they are getting the track ready for release. Drum stick count ins might not be meant to be there, or sometimes they might. The recording on the bootleg shouldn't be the measure of this. RIP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |