independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > What if Prince took part in the TMBGITW lawsuit?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 09/03/20 8:00pm

AaronReturn200
5

What if Prince took part in the TMBGITW lawsuit?

Here's my version: After reciving various letters about the lawsuit, Prince gives Taking Me To Paradise a listen and finds out how unnesscary the lawsuit is. Prince would then try to tell them "IT WAS MY SONG, IT WAS MY MELODY, I DIDN'T COPY IT!!! I BELIEVE MY SONG WAS ONE OF THE BEST 90S BALLADS EVER WRITTEN AND THERE'S NO WAY TRYING TO STOP ITS LEGACY AND ITS ROLE IN THE "PRINCE VERSES WARNER BROTHERS" SERIES OF EVENTS" to prove he wanted him stopped and they would ignore him. To prove that he had no role with the lawsuit, Prince decides to reissue the Gold Experience album [through Sony via NPG Records] with a modification idea taken directly from Monty Phyton, and also warns fans that TGE wasn't a Warner-owned album ,as he personally owns the masters. The replacement to TMBGITW features the NPG Operator saying something among the lines of this:

"This track cannot be found in The Beautiful Experience due to being involved in a ongoing plagiarisment lawsuit which The Artist thinks is total bogus. Sorry about that!" (maybe have the song's intro cut to the Operator before the melody can kick in)

The lawsuit contuines without Prince, and the spoken TMBGITW replacement is labelled as an NPG Opreator segue when it is reissued by Sony.

[Edited 9/3/20 23:47pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/03/20 8:04pm

lustmealways

avatar

this is the worst fan fic i've ever read

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/03/20 10:18pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

lustmealways said:

this is the worst fan fic i've ever read


Wait. You actually read it?

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/04/20 4:46am

Militant

avatar

moderator

That lawsuit has been going on for a long time. Prince had ample opportunity to be involved with it, and almost certainly was at various stages.


It's a bogus lawsuit anyway. The songs sound nothing alike other than a similar few notes on a vocal part. Well, there's only so many melodies in the world. When you've written thousands of songs, some of them will bear small similarities to others just on coincidence.

It's not a Blurred Lines situation, which was very obviously taken whole-sale from Marvin Gaye.



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/04/20 6:28am

LoveGalore

Militant said:

That lawsuit has been going on for a long time. Prince had ample opportunity to be involved with it, and almost certainly was at various stages.



It's a bogus lawsuit anyway. The songs sound nothing alike other than a similar few notes on a vocal part. Well, there's only so many melodies in the world. When you've written thousands of songs, some of them will bear small similarities to others just on coincidence.

It's not a Blurred Lines situation, which was very obviously taken whole-sale from Marvin Gaye.





I mean they've let the lawsuit complete tank an album for 20 years. If it is so bogus, why don't they snuff this shit out and release it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/04/20 1:30pm

steakfinger

LoveGalore said:

Militant said:

That lawsuit has been going on for a long time. Prince had ample opportunity to be involved with it, and almost certainly was at various stages.



It's a bogus lawsuit anyway. The songs sound nothing alike other than a similar few notes on a vocal part. Well, there's only so many melodies in the world. When you've written thousands of songs, some of them will bear small similarities to others just on coincidence.

It's not a Blurred Lines situation, which was very obviously taken whole-sale from Marvin Gaye.





I mean they've let the lawsuit complete tank an album for 20 years. If it is so bogus, why don't they snuff this shit out and release it.


The law doesn’t work that way in this country. Who knows how different it is in Italy? In spite of what Donald Trump would have you believe, most people cannot just “snuff out” a lawsuit no matter who they are and how much money they have.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/04/20 1:33pm

steakfinger

Militant said:

That lawsuit has been going on for a long time. Prince had ample opportunity to be involved with it, and almost certainly was at various stages.



It's a bogus lawsuit anyway. The songs sound nothing alike other than a similar few notes on a vocal part. Well, there's only so many melodies in the world. When you've written thousands of songs, some of them will bear small similarities to others just on coincidence.

It's not a Blurred Lines situation, which was very obviously taken whole-sale from Marvin Gaye.





One small point of disagreement: Blurred Lines sounds nothing like the Marvin Gaye song any more than Oh Sheila sounds like a Prince song. Using similar sounds and production techniques has nothing to do with chord changes, lyrics, and melody. If anything, Blurred Lines as a composition is closer to Kiss by Prince than anything by Marvin Gaye.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/04/20 1:39pm

LoveGalore

steakfinger said:

LoveGalore said:



I mean they've let the lawsuit complete tank an album for 20 years. If it is so bogus, why don't they snuff this shit out and release it.


The law doesn’t work that way in this country. Who knows how different it is in Italy? In spite of what Donald Trump would have you believe, most people cannot just “snuff out” a lawsuit no matter who they are and how much money they have.


I mean, your comment is lovely but I'm not talking about Donald Trump. I'm talking about an artist address a copyright claim so that they can release an old album in the US. I care not about Italy.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/04/20 1:59pm

paddypurple

avatar

The joke about a reissue was funny biggrin

"Wish eye had a dollar 4 everytime U say, don't U miss the feeling Music gave u, back in the day"
- Prince (2004)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/04/20 4:08pm

Se7en

avatar

I've heard quite a few Prince songs that sound like other songs . . . Erotic City sounds like White Horse (or was it vice versa?), Cream sounds like Bang A Gong, and Guitar sounds like both I Will Follow and Back In The USSR. Lavaux sounds like The Pointer Sisters' Automatic, which sounds like Prince to begin with, and Chelsea Rodgers sounds like a song that escapes me at the moment.

I know there are a handful of others -- BUT, I have never heard any similarity between TMBGITW and Taking Me To Paradise!! I've listened, and I've tried to hear something. I can't.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/04/20 4:54pm

WhisperingDand
elions

avatar

steakfinger said:

One small point of disagreement: Blurred Lines sounds nothing like the Marvin Gaye song any more than Oh Sheila sounds like a Prince song. Using similar sounds and production techniques has nothing to do with chord changes, lyrics, and melody. If anything, Blurred Lines as a composition is closer to Kiss by Prince than anything by Marvin Gaye.

You really think the instrumental to "Got to Give It Up" sounds nothing like "Blurred Lines"?
.

https://www.youtube.com/w...J3ryqN-1tg

.

Really? Nothing like? That's the take you're going with? Most people concede to a "well maybe vaugely similar" or even a "well there's only so many possible melodies or combinations of notes" blah blah.... But you're that brazen to go full "nothing like"? Of that specific instrumental linked?? It might as well be like comparing "Happy Birthday" to "O Fortuna"? k.

[Edited 9/4/20 16:57pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/05/20 6:06am

Rimshottbob

AaronReturn2005 said:

Here's my version: After reciving various letters about the lawsuit, Prince gives Taking Me To Paradise a listen and finds out how unnesscary the lawsuit is. Prince would then try to tell them "IT WAS MY SONG, IT WAS MY MELODY, I DIDN'T COPY IT!!! I BELIEVE MY SONG WAS ONE OF THE BEST 90S BALLADS EVER WRITTEN AND THERE'S NO WAY TRYING TO STOP ITS LEGACY AND ITS ROLE IN THE "PRINCE VERSES WARNER BROTHERS" SERIES OF EVENTS" to prove he wanted him stopped and they would ignore him. To prove that he had no role with the lawsuit, Prince decides to reissue the Gold Experience album [through Sony via NPG Records] with a modification idea taken directly from Monty Phyton, and also warns fans that TGE wasn't a Warner-owned album ,as he personally owns the masters. The replacement to TMBGITW features the NPG Operator saying something among the lines of this:

"This track cannot be found in The Beautiful Experience due to being involved in a ongoing plagiarisment lawsuit which The Artist thinks is total bogus. Sorry about that!" (maybe have the song's intro cut to the Operator before the melody can kick in)

The lawsuit contuines without Prince, and the spoken TMBGITW replacement is labelled as an NPG Opreator segue when it is reissued by Sony.

[Edited 9/3/20 23:47pm]

Jesus, put down the pipe and take a breath of some regular air.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > What if Prince took part in the TMBGITW lawsuit?