No albums after Purple Rain? until 1987
The movie would have been successful, if 1. Prince did direct it 2. had bands in the movie(remove the gigolo(Morris/Jerome aspect) have Christopher the leader of a group of eclectic musicians known among the wealthy of France. Would have made better sense for Christopher to be at Mary's Party. The Girls & Boys video should have been in place of the G&B movie scene etc
The movie would have been a success
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Also best at what? He'd have looked pretty tired still doing the 1999 shtick for the rest of his life. It still looks fresh now because he didn't milk it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Believe it or not, waiting a few years for music did wonders for artists. In fact, many of the best selling album in history came out after the artist had some time to think things over.
Thriller-3 year gap from Off The Wall Bad-3 year gap after Thriller Songs In The Key Of Life-2 years and maybe 3 months since Fulfillingness' First Finale Rhythm Nation- 3 year gap after control Purple Rain- 20 months after 1999, and the longest Gap for Prince until he was already past his prime. Hotel California-although just 18 months after One of These Nights-the longest gap in album releases for their 70's albums | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
in later eras (post 60's) it was common to go years between albums but the beatles, the stones, elvis, put out all kinds of stuff, some good, some not so good and some great. some have said purple rain was so great because he waited an extra year, maybe, maybe not. His audience was ready, that much we know for sure. MJ waited way too long between projects, it was five, not three years between thriller and bad, way too long. for an artist of his stature to have less than 10 solo albums is unusual. I have been looking over Elvis' discography, it's ridiculous. live, soundtack, ep's it's a lot of work, so much that I've never heard every elvis song and i'm the biggest elvis nut there is.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No one said to keep doing the same tour over and over again. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A certain kind of mellow. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said:
No one said to keep doing the same tour over and over again. I'm just trying to follow the thought process of this thread to a few conclusions: "if Prince had stayed being cool in a way i think is cool then he would have stayed cool but he didn't." I'm no fan of medleys or the big high concept Lovesexy shows myself but at least he wasn't repeating himself. Also, play the frickin' last verse of 1999 already! [Edited 5/29/19 0:10am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mikado said:
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's a shame there is no High Quality 1999 Tour video circulating. But, from hearing and seeing the low quality versions out there, I would say that's my favorite tour. My favorite Prince sound is the combination of Linn Drums, Synths, and Guitars. So, everything between '82-'84 is Gold for me. 1999 Tour, in my opinion, is peak vintage Prince sound. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JorisE73 said:
As far as MJ is concerned, you have to remember the dude was everywhere between '82 and '85. He needed to step back or risk overexposure. While Mike was nowhere near Prince's level of prolificness (is that a word?), the dude was busy as hell in that time span: a multitude of Top 40 hits (his own as well as a number written for other artists like Diana Ross and his family), many music videos and a record breaking tour and his involvement with "We Are The World" among other things. You can even extend that timespan as early as'81 (E.T. soundtrack) and as late as '86 (Captain EO). It's not like he dropped Thriller in (very late) '82 and then Bad in '87 with nothing in between. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
he was creative in that period, wrote muscles for diana, centipede for his sister, collabed with mick jagger on state of shock, we are the world etc.., but he was still taking too long between albums, five years is too damned long for an artist of his stature, most assumed it was the pressure to follow up thriller but in hindsight, it just seemed to be the way he worked, perfectionistic and always trying to use the newest technology and assimilate newer music trends into his music, (that part had mixed results, some of the stuff he did didn't age very well while off the wall, the least pretentious of his albums is still many people's favorite, sans bells and whistles). Captain eo was limited to people who visited the california disneyland. A great artist and he did plenty of quality work but his fans, of who I've always been one, wanted more. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PeteSilas said:
he was creative in that period, wrote muscles for diana, centipede for his sister, collabed with mick jagger on state of shock, we are the world etc.., but he was still taking too long between albums, five years is too damned long for an artist of his stature, most assumed it was the pressure to follow up thriller but in hindsight, it just seemed to be the way he worked, perfectionistic and always trying to use the newest technology and assimilate newer music trends into his music, (that part had mixed results, some of the stuff he did didn't age very well while off the wall, the least pretentious of his albums is still many people's favorite, sans bells and whistles). Captain eo was limited to people who visited the california disneyland. A great artist and he did plenty of quality work but his fans, of who I've always been one, wanted more. Prince was superhuman with how much music he made in the time he made it but he was an exception to the rule and shouldn't be used as a metric to judge the works of other artists (speaking quantitatively not qualitatively). Mike put out an album and got all the juice out he could; he was also an exception to the rule in that he was such a massive star that his albums had a longer shelf life than just about anyone else (it also helps that albums generally had longer shelf lives at the time). As an artist myself, I can sympathize with P getting bored with PR and wanting to move on and create more but I also can't fault any artist for seeking to get as much as they can out of their work. Why not get as big a return as possible out of your investment? Don't wanna derail the topic though. PM me if you want. [Edited 5/30/19 4:49am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
the houston is pretty good..why no?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I can't remember if I saw that one. I'll have to go through my files this evening. Is it Pro-shot?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes..not shot by prince's people | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Awesome. I'll definitely check that show out. Thanks for the heads up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I never said Prince should wait 5 years between albums. I gave a few examples of what the top selling artists of the day were doing. What Prince and Warners did as a team, was make certain that Prince's albums sold less than the one before, and that his career would languish with declining sales. It's pretty difficult to get an album as great as SOTT sell under a million, but they did it. It did have platinum status due to being a double record.
Was Prince's career awful because of this, no, but the glow from Purple Rain only lasted so long. An album every 3 years would have kept him from overflowing the market, and if each album from 1987-1996 was released every 3 years, there likely would have been at least 3 Top 40 or more singles for each one, keeping him in the limelight for 60-90 weeks per album.
With even greater focus on his career, he could have actually released MORE muisc and LESS albums. After Purple Rain: 1987, 1990, 1993, 1996...just 4 albums. But what if in 1996, he and Warners released a 10 cd box set with the leftovers? That could be around 15 hours of music...and if you can throw away your great memories of Glam Slam and New Power Generation as second single disasters, imagine SOTT being the follow up to Purple Rain with 5 Top 10 Singles:
Kiss, U Got The Look, SOTT, Raspberry Beret, I Could Never
and maybe even 3 more Top 40 hits: Starfish & Coffee, Forever In My Life, Paisley Park
Sure, we will never know, but nobody can possibly insist Prince did it perfect. Not saying my ideas for his career would have made him the biggest star EVER, but my vision for what would have been best for him, would've been albums not just made to fit the same sonic landscape, but simply the best songs on each album. Old Friends 4 Sale(Original Version), Witness, She's Always In My Hair, Crystal Ball, In A Large Room With No Light....all would have been album tracks....where Jughead, Daddy Pop, Graffiti Bridge, and The Flow would have not...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I went to the 1999 tour. It was wierd,
The Time show was fun, engaging and was funky as hell.
Prince's set was intentionally different. The music selection and he was building a persona/ mistique.
My opinion is that these were not his "best" shows.
I bleive the SOTT and Lovesexy shows were the best tours. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
we weren't privy to what we are now, Prince did plenty of shooting himself in the foot, poorly planned things like utcm (movie mainly but the album has it critics from a commercial perspective) Sott which could have done so much better with better singles choices and a supporting tour instead of a feature film of a tour. Lovesexy had that naked photo on the album of him which many stores didn't even carry and he was getting more and more into the wierd gibberish while his songs on lovesexy at least, had a lot of arrangements and not substantial songs for radio. Susan rogers has said that he also worked at such a pace that he didn't polish his music, never mattered to me personally but overall, I doubt that type of approach helped when applied to everything he did. It wasn't just the commercial glut of material, as I stated, the people he was partially emulating released lots of music in their era, the beatles, the stones, james, elvis, they all put out lots of stuff and even if everything wasn't a hit, there is more than enough where their fans can be familiar and even have favorites that are obscure. So, I don't know if the releasing an album per year couldn't have been done better, I'm not convinced it couldn't have. As a fan, I've always been proud of his workrate, always, and after he died, I've said several times that he went a few years without albums and what does he do before he checks out? he cranks out four albums to make up for it before he leaves the planet, amazing to me. It's not easy producing music, it's time consuming, frustrating, draining and shit is constantly changing, he did fine all things considered.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
stillwaiting said:
I never said Prince should wait 5 years between albums. I gave a few examples of what the top selling artists of the day were doing. What Prince and Warners did as a team, was make certain that Prince's albums sold less than the one before, and that his career would languish with declining sales. It's pretty difficult to get an album as great as SOTT sell under a million, but they did it. It did have platinum status due to being a double record.
Was Prince's career awful because of this, no, but the glow from Purple Rain only lasted so long. An album every 3 years would have kept him from overflowing the market, and if each album from 1987-1996 was released every 3 years, there likely would have been at least 3 Top 40 or more singles for each one, keeping him in the limelight for 60-90 weeks per album.
With even greater focus on his career, he could have actually released MORE muisc and LESS albums. After Purple Rain: 1987, 1990, 1993, 1996...just 4 albums. But what if in 1996, he and Warners released a 10 cd box set with the leftovers? That could be around 15 hours of music...and if you can throw away your great memories of Glam Slam and New Power Generation as second single disasters, imagine SOTT being the follow up to Purple Rain with 5 Top 10 Singles:
Kiss, U Got The Look, SOTT, Raspberry Beret, I Could Never
and maybe even 3 more Top 40 hits: Starfish & Coffee, Forever In My Life, Paisley Park
Sure, we will never know, but nobody can possibly insist Prince did it perfect. Not saying my ideas for his career would have made him the biggest star EVER, but my vision for what would have been best for him, would've been albums not just made to fit the same sonic landscape, but simply the best songs on each album. Old Friends 4 Sale(Original Version), Witness, She's Always In My Hair, Crystal Ball, In A Large Room With No Light....all would have been album tracks....where Jughead, Daddy Pop, Graffiti Bridge, and The Flow would have not...
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes pro shot | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I quote the wrong person all the time. I even make mistakes on purpose to see if Bart Van Halen gets upset. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
stillwaiting said:
I quote the wrong person all the time. I even make mistakes on purpose to see if Bart Van Halen gets upset. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |