independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 17 - Continued
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 11/20/18 5:08pm

PennyPurple

avatar

That would be the shitz for the brothers and sisters.

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 11/20/18 7:04pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



This guy already filed a claim and was denied.
This is round two for him.

One of many nutters nuts lol

Edmonton, AB - canada
Mod Goddess of the SNIP & BAN Making Moves - OF4S
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 11/20/18 8:39pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

luv4u said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



This guy already filed a claim and was denied.
This is round two for him.

One of many nutters nuts lol



lol

Forshure

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 11/21/18 2:30am

udo

avatar

luv4u said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



This guy already filed a claim and was denied.
This is round two for him.

One of many nutters nuts lol

.

golddiggaz ?

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 11/21/18 9:56pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

udo said:

luv4u said:

One of many nutters nuts lol

.

golddiggaz ?


That too nod

Edmonton, AB - canada
Mod Goddess of the SNIP & BAN Making Moves - OF4S
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 11/22/18 7:38am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

udo said:

luv4u said:

One of many nutters nuts lol

.

golddiggaz ?

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 11/22/18 4:32pm

PennyPurple

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

udo said:

.

golddiggaz ?

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...

If there is a child, that child would get everything.

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 11/22/18 4:52pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

PennyPurple said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...

If there is a child, that child would get everything.

as well they should. but there are several cases of people being denied even a DNA test due thinks like being adopted or not having a good enough story... and the potential of missing a timeline.

The person I talked to is being denied. But then I was skeptical of his story...

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 11/23/18 6:43am

udo

avatar

PennyPurple said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...

If there is a child, that child would get everything.

.

That would change the game...!

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 11/23/18 7:31am

ChocolateBox31
21

avatar

udo said:

PennyPurple said:

If there is a child, that child would get everything.

.

That would change the game...!

Sadly Prince wasn't able to produce a healthy offspring. Ahmir Nelson would have been MEGA RICH!

"eye feel like we're on the brink of something. It's going 2 B strict & wild & pretty" prince
This nomination is not just 4 me; it’s 4 prince & 4 the fans.prince truly did whatever prince needed 2 do 2 make the fans happy.prince gave his life 4 his fans. Ms E
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 11/23/18 10:02am

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

udo said:

.

golddiggaz ?

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...



Actually, potential heirs were given a two year deadline.

Patrick previously filed a claim and failed to give any information that would support his claim.



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 11/23/18 10:05am

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

PennyPurple said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...

If there is a child, that child would get everything.



Not necessararily. A Trust for a child could have been set up prior to Ps death which would prohibit a claim against the Estate.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 11/23/18 10:29am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

PennyPurple said:

If there is a child, that child would get everything.



Not necessararily. A Trust for a child could have been set up prior to Ps death which would prohibit a claim against the Estate.

but that is not the case

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 11/23/18 10:32am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...



Actually, potential heirs were given a two year deadline.

Patrick previously filed a claim and failed to give any information that would support his claim.



the deading is not necessarily be enforceable under extenuating circumstances.

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 11/23/18 3:10pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



Actually, potential heirs were given a two year deadline.

Patrick previously filed a claim and failed to give any information that would support his claim.



the deading is not necessarily be enforceable under extenuating circumstances.



It is enforceable pursuant to Minnesota law.

The Judge isnt arbitrarily making this stuff up.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 11/25/18 10:05am

onlyforaminute

OnlyNDaUsa said:



PennyPurple said:




OnlyNDaUsa said:





unless he is his son. any child of his should have their share... it is not gold digging. I say anyone that wants to make should be allowed to pay a fee and get compared. The one-year deadline seems arbitrary to me and any notion that they were adopted makes them ineligible is ridiculous.

but I do not believe he has any children...



If there is a child, that child would get everything.





as well they should. but there are several cases of people being denied even a DNA test due thinks like being adopted or not having a good enough story... and the potential of missing a timeline.

The person I talked to is being denied. But then I was skeptical of his story...




I remember 2 not several who were adopted, therefore were denied a court appointed test. A few simple skipped the DNA testing. Seems I read somewhere a while back there was a way to take the test out of pocket just to know. Seems no one has done that.
If you carry the egg basket do not dance.

Do good, then throw it into the sea.

#octavia tried to tell us
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 11/25/18 10:57am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

onlyforaminute said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

as well they should. but there are several cases of people being denied even a DNA test due thinks like being adopted or not having a good enough story... and the potential of missing a timeline.

The person I talked to is being denied. But then I was skeptical of his story...

I remember 2 not several who were adopted, therefore were denied a court appointed test. A few simple skipped the DNA testing. Seems I read somewhere a while back there was a way to take the test out of pocket just to know. Seems no one has done that.

denial on the bases of having been adopted denies them of due process. And no there is NO WAY to have test results compared without court approval.

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 11/25/18 12:39pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

onlyforaminute said:

OnlyNDaUsa said: I remember 2 not several who were adopted, therefore were denied a court appointed test. A few simple skipped the DNA testing. Seems I read somewhere a while back there was a way to take the test out of pocket just to know. Seems no one has done that.

denial on the bases of having been adopted denies them of due process. And no there is NO WAY to have test results compared without court approval.



They were denied pursuant to Minnesota case law.



The adoptees did not appeal the ruling.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 11/26/18 3:04pm

onlyforaminute

I see where Estabon's lawyers filed an objection to the order but wading thru trying to see the answer to this particular objection is too time consuming for me right now. I see there was some kind of petition drawn up. Wonder if folks donated to co era his attorney fees?
If you carry the egg basket do not dance.

Do good, then throw it into the sea.

#octavia tried to tell us
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 11/26/18 5:06pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

denial on the bases of having been adopted denies them of due process. And no there is NO WAY to have test results compared without court approval.



They were denied pursuant to Minnesota case law.



The adoptees did not appeal the ruling.

1) and what is the federal law?


2) as far as we know. the one I talked to seemed to think they were going to appeal.

the case is one of due process... a minor can not be held to a contract... so the adoption can not be used against them as a legal revocation of any rights or claims. (unless they did so after reaching 18)


But I am not sure if anyone has ever used that argument.

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 11/26/18 5:08pm

PennyPurple

avatar

onlyforaminute said:

I see where Estabon's lawyers filed an objection to the order but wading thru trying to see the answer to this particular objection is too time consuming for me right now. I see there was some kind of petition drawn up. Wonder if folks donated to co era his attorney fees?

So you are interested in the Estate matters? Imagine that.... lock

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 11/26/18 5:13pm

PennyPurple

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



They were denied pursuant to Minnesota case law.



The adoptees did not appeal the ruling.

1) and what is the federal law?


2) as far as we know. the one I talked to seemed to think they were going to appeal.

the case is one of due process... a minor can not be held to a contract... so the adoption can not be used against them as a legal revocation of any rights or claims. (unless they did so after reaching 18)


But I am not sure if anyone has ever used that argument.

Tyka did give 2 names to the court that has never been released to the public. Like ISLISJAG said, they could have a trust that prevents them from filing an heir claim.


If there is a child out there, I've never figured out why they haven't came forward because they could own the ENTIRE thing.

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 11/26/18 9:19pm

ISaidLifeIsJus
tAGame

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:



They were denied pursuant to Minnesota case law.



The adoptees did not appeal the ruling.

1) and what is the federal law?


2) as far as we know. the one I talked to seemed to think they were going to appeal.

the case is one of due process... a minor can not be held to a contract... so the adoption can not be used against them as a legal revocation of any rights or claims. (unless they did so after reaching 18)


But I am not sure if anyone has ever used that argument.



Federal law does not control how a case is decided in a State Court case.




The adoptees never appealed the decision to the Appellate Court. So, apparently they were not concerned about the decision as much as you appear to be. eek

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 11/27/18 2:07pm

onlyforaminute

Basically going in the same circles.


http://prince.org/msg/7/429086?pr



If you carry the egg basket do not dance.

Do good, then throw it into the sea.

#octavia tried to tell us
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 11/27/18 2:21pm

PennyPurple

avatar

onlyforaminute said:

Basically going in the same circles.


http://prince.org/msg/7/429086?pr



Yep & that thread is from 2016, so let's lock this one up. lock

The Estate thread deals with his death.


If we can't have a death thread or a drug thread, or a book that even mentions his death, thread. Then why do we still have this one?


There would be no Estate if he wasn't DEAD.


You complained about every single one of those threads. Your hypocrisy is hilarious.


lockdance

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 11/27/18 3:29pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

PennyPurple said:

onlyforaminute said:

Basically going in the same circles.


http://prince.org/msg/7/429086?pr



Yep & that thread is from 2016, so let's lock this one up. lock

The Estate thread deals with his death.


If we can't have a death thread or a drug thread, or a book that even mentions his death, thread. Then why do we still have this one?


There would be no Estate if he wasn't DEAD.


You complained about every single one of those threads. Your hypocrisy is hilarious.


lockdance

if you are not intrested in this topic... do not read it. I speak for no one when I say (as I AssUMe) This topic is NOT going to be locked or shut down or prevented from being carried on in part 18 on Dec 15ish when this one locks.

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 11/27/18 3:36pm

onlyforaminute

OnlyNDaUsa said:

PennyPurple said:

Yep & that thread is from 2016, so let's lock this one up. lock

The Estate thread deals with his death.


If we can't have a death thread or a drug thread, or a book that even mentions his death, thread. Then why do we still have this one?


There would be no Estate if he wasn't DEAD.


You complained about every single one of those threads. Your hypocrisy is hilarious.


lockdance

if you are not intrested in this topic... do not read it. I speak for no one when I say (as I AssUMe) This topic is NOT going to be locked or shut down or prevented from being carried on in part 18 on Dec 15ish when this one locks.



Just a tit for tat game, it's nothing they truly feel strongly about. Do with the info as you may.




If you carry the egg basket do not dance.

Do good, then throw it into the sea.

#octavia tried to tell us
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 11/27/18 7:10pm

PennyPurple

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

PennyPurple said:

Yep & that thread is from 2016, so let's lock this one up. lock

The Estate thread deals with his death.


If we can't have a death thread or a drug thread, or a book that even mentions his death, thread. Then why do we still have this one?


There would be no Estate if he wasn't DEAD.


You complained about every single one of those threads. Your hypocrisy is hilarious.


lockdance

if you are not intrested in this topic... do not read it. I speak for no one when I say (as I AssUMe) This topic is NOT going to be locked or shut down or prevented from being carried on in part 18 on Dec 15ish when this one locks.

That's exactly what I tell everybody else who does this to other threads. LOL I'm making a point, and doing the samething onlyforaminute does to other threads she doesn't like.

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 11/27/18 7:16pm

PennyPurple

avatar

onlyforaminute said:



Just a tit for tat game, it's nothing they truly feel strongly about. Do with the info as you may.




Exactly. I did the same thing you've done on many threads. I call it like I see it, you are a hypocrite. You complain on every thread that you don't agree with, and call for it to be locked, or to be shut down, or it's the same thing over and over again. Well open your eyes, this thread is the samething over and over again and guess what...it deals with his death. Hypocrite.

Free Poppy's, Bombsquad, 13, Nero, Mdiver, shanti0608, RDhull. If Glamslam can get a 2nd chance, they should be able to also. 2020=CHANGE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 11/28/18 11:26am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Related image

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
if you ever try the lotus position
Try it while you're being strangled
Do U understand what I'm saying?
#IDEFINEME
For the mystery of iniquity doth already work...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The Estate Discussion - Part 17 - Continued