You didn't mention me specifically. You mentioned it on an open forum where anyone can respond.

It doesn't matter to me which of Prince's girls the vandalism is against. It's wrong. Period.

babynoz said:

PennyPurple said:

What is it with you guys and people's join dates? So... those who joined after Prince died, between 6 months and 1 year means, that their agenda isn't about Prince?? Sorry babynoz. I've been a Prince fan since 1980-81. Just because I didn't join before 9/16 and didn't join right after his death, doesn't mean I'm not an authentic Prince fan. Get over it. At 1 point and time, you all were even newbies here. Seriously when the newbies joined right after he died, there wasn't 1 of you that had a nice thing to say about them either. And from everything that I've read, you oldies who have been here forever, weren't very nice to Prince and had some pretty bad things to say about him, when he was even posting here.

I don't recall mentioning you specifically and have not even looked at your join date but thank you for exposing yourself!

carmela3 said:

PennyPurple said:

What is it with you guys and people's join dates?

. Post #78

In reply to your post #76.

I see a lot of selective memory & selective observation here, regarding quite a number of things.


They may be fans, but it's quite obvious the boycott IG & the "m1 crusaders" types are Post April '16 'fans'


I see a few right here in this thread, trolls faking the funk. But like I said, I see a lot of selective memory here too.

carmela3 said:

PennyPurple said:

You didn't mention me specifically. You mentioned it on an open forum where anyone can respond.

It doesn't matter to me which of Prince's girls the vandalism is against. It's wrong. Period.

babynoz said:

I don't recall mentioning you specifically and have not even looked at your join date but thank you for exposing yourself!

Then there was no need to quote me just to say that, now was there???

PennyPurple said:

It's getting bad. Jerome of all people. Wish these crazies would leave them alone. I mean now they are even going after Maytes child. It's a bit much.

Misslink88 said:

rogifan said:

I think we can all agree that vandalism is wrong, period. Yet somehow I have a feeling if the vandalism wasn’t about Mayte this thread would have had a couple replies at most. For whatever reason the women in Prince’s life seem to generate a lot of noise here.

A couple of weeks ago Jerome posted something on his Instagram or Twitter (can't remember which) that "threats" against him would be taken seriously and were being reported. I mean, Tricky?? Come on. I'm not sure if any other associates have received something similar and are staying mum about it but I don't think it's just Mayte. Hostile behaviour is just wrong period. Prince was and never will be anyone's possession. If you want to display your loyalty, right the wrongs and buy his music. He doesn't need and never condoned violence.

babynoz said:

PennyPurple said:

You didn't mention me specifically. You mentioned it on an open forum where anyone can respond.

It doesn't matter to me which of Prince's girls the vandalism is against. It's wrong. Period.

Then there was no need to quote me just to say that, now was there???

? When I'm replying to you, then yes, I quote the person I'm replying to.

carmela3 said:

Woof woof?

PennyPurple said:

babynoz said:

Then there was no need to quote me just to say that, now was there???

? When I'm replying to you, then yes, I quote the person I'm replying to.

You do not need to quote me just to say that vandalism is wrong, because I never said it was okay. You got defensive because I was speaking on the new operatives here. The thing is, if you are not one of them then why did you holler?

You doth protest too much.

babynoz said:

PennyPurple said:

? When I'm replying to you, then yes, I quote the person I'm replying to.

You do not need to quote me just to say that vandalism is wrong, because I never said it was okay. You got defensive because I was speaking on the new operatives here. The thing is, if you are not one of them then why did you holler?

You doth protest too much.

Look. I'm quoting you again!!! Gosh I replied to your post with 2 sentences I'm sorry if it was to much for you to comprehend.

I actually thought that vandalism is the topic of this thread. My bad, to try to stay on topic. I should know better.

You didn't mention me specifically. You mentioned it on an open forum where anyone can respond.

It doesn't matter to me which of Prince's girls the vandalism is against. It's wrong. Period.

PennyPurple said:

It's getting bad. Jerome of all people. Wish these crazies would leave them alone. I mean now they are even going after Maytes child. It's a bit much.

Misslink88 said:

A couple of weeks ago Jerome posted something on his Instagram or Twitter (can't remember which) that "threats" against him would be taken seriously and were being reported. I mean, Tricky?? Come on. I'm not sure if any other associates have received something similar and are staying mum about it but I don't think it's just Mayte. Hostile behaviour is just wrong period. Prince was and never will be anyone's possession. If you want to display your loyalty, right the wrongs and buy his music. He doesn't need and never condoned violence.

Perhaps that is why most people in the public eye shield their children from such exposure?

PennyPurple said:

Look. I'm quoting you again!!! Gosh I replied to your post with 2 sentences I'm sorry if it was to much for you to comprehend.

I actually thought that vandalism is the topic of this thread. My bad, to try to stay on topic. I should know better.

You didn't mention me specifically. You mentioned it on an open forum where anyone can respond.

It doesn't matter to me which of Prince's girls the vandalism is against. It's wrong. Period.

Exactly the red bolded. I did not say one single word to or about you on this thread. I replied to morningsong and rogifan's comments.

YOU are the one who came at me, trying to make this about YOU as usual, not the other way around. YOU exposed yourself and backbedalling now with whining about the topic isn't going to save your face....too late for that.

I considered puttin' all y'all in a timeout, but reconsidered that it wouldn't amount to much. So...



:sofa:

BYO I ain't sharin'

[Edited 8/2/17 15:34pm]

Seriously? YOU were complaining about the newbies, who joined 6 months to 1 year after Prince died. I am 1 of that group you mentioned, so I replied.Why do you have such a problem with people replying to your open post, or people quoting you? Why you brought all this on the topic about vandalism is beyond me. Maybe you don't like that people stating the vandalism that was against Mayte is wrong.? You aren't going to tell me, how to reply, when to reply and who and who not to quote. You don't like a post, then skip it. Pretty simple. But you don't have any say on what anybody posts. You can complain all you want (which you do plenty of). But you don't get the final decision on people post.

babynoz said:

Exactly the red bolded. I did not say one single word to or about you on this thread. I replied to morningsong and rogifan's comments.

YOU are the one who came at me, trying to make this about YOU as usual, not the other way around. YOU exposed yourself and backbedalling now with whining about the topic isn't going to save your face....too late for that.

babynoz said:

Misslink88 said:

PennyPurple said:

It's getting bad. Jerome of all people. Wish these crazies would leave them alone. I mean now they are even going after Maytes child. It's a bit much.

Perhaps that is why most people in the public eye shield their children from such exposure?

Some do, some don't. It's a sad world anymore that people in the public eye can't enjoy regular life with their kids.

morningsong said:

I considered puttin' all y'all in a timeout, but reconsidered that it wouldn't amount to much. So...



:sofa:

BYO I ain't sharin'

[Edited 8/2/17 15:34pm]

Stoppit!

I brought the wangs,

PennyPurple said:

Seriously? YOU were complaining about the newbies, who joined 6 months to 1 year after Prince died. I am 1 of that group you mentioned, so I replied.Why do you have such a problem with people replying to your open post, or people quoting you? Why you brought all this on the topic about vandalism is beyond me. Maybe you don't like that people stating the vandalism that was against Mayte is wrong.? You aren't going to tell me, how to reply, when to reply and who and who not to quote. You don't like a post, then skip it. Pretty simple. But you don't have any say on what anybody posts. You can complain all you want (which you do plenty of). But you don't get the final decision on people post.

babynoz said:

Exactly the red bolded. I did not say one single word to or about you on this thread. I replied to morningsong and rogifan's comments.

YOU are the one who came at me, trying to make this about YOU as usual, not the other way around. YOU exposed yourself and backbedalling now with whining about the topic isn't going to save your face....too late for that.

U still protesting? LMAO!

BillieBalloon said:

babynoz said:

Exactly the red bolded. I did not say one single word to or about you on this thread. I replied to morningsong and rogifan's comments.

YOU are the one who came at me, trying to make this about YOU as usual, not the other way around. YOU exposed yourself and backbedalling now with whining about the topic isn't going to save your face....too late for that.

There have been times when i havent said a single word and i have been goaded into responding. Its a tactic some use. . [Edited 8/2/17 15:36pm]

The hilarious part is when they think they're being slick, not realizing that they just played themselves.

babynoz said:

morningsong said:

I considered puttin' all y'all in a timeout, but reconsidered that it wouldn't amount to much. So...



:sofa:

BYO I ain't sharin'

[Edited 8/2/17 15:34pm]

Stoppit!

I brought the wangs,

hmm, I think I might have to reconsider the sharing part.

morningsong said:

babynoz said:

Stoppit!

I brought the wangs,

hmm, I think I might have to reconsider the sharing part.

They hot wangs too!

babynoz said:

babynoz said:

BillieBalloon said:

babynoz said: There have been times when i havent said a single word and i have been goaded into responding. Its a tactic some use. . [Edited 8/2/17 15:36pm]

The hilarious part is when they think they're being slick, not realizing that they just played themselves.

? Didn't know telling the truth was being 'slick'. Played themselves on info available on each profile of the join date? What ever. Stop complaining and get back on topic. This newbie is here to stay.

Is the fence near the tunnel city property also?

rogifan said:

This is what the sidewalk looks like near/inside the Riley Creek tunnel. Such a mess. Honestly I wish they would put up a sign saying no graffiti on the sidewalk. People are allowed to leave tributes in the tunnel as well as hang things on the fence near the tunnel (only place things can be hung on the fence). I would hate to see the city or PP end that because of idiots and their stupid vandalism. smh [Edited 7/30/17 6:23am]

PennyPurple said:

PennyPurple said:

babynoz said:

The hilarious part is when they think they're being slick, not realizing that they just played themselves.

? Didn't know telling the truth was being 'slick'. Played themselves on info available on each profile of the join date? What ever. Stop complaining and get back on topic. This newbie is here to stay.

Didn't you just say......

"I actually thought that vandalism is the topic of this thread. My bad, to try to stay on topic. I should know better.


Why are you still whining? Try following your own advice.

Are these 2 seperate fences? I know the one at PP, but is this a different fence by the tunnel?

carmela3 said:

There are other photos online of the fence with damage to the fence & gifts. It is not in that photo.

PennyPurple said: