Author | Message |
Some of my opinions I need to share with y'all.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Shawy89 said:
LOL! Feel better? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
O Lawd. Prince did an interview with a woman at Record World. They talked about whatever, then he asked her: "Does your pubic hair go up to your navel?" At that moment, we thought maybe we shouldn't encourage him to do interviews. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Who gives a flying roast chicken about ur damn opinions. Feel better now? This Could Be Us But U Be Playin...
You Can Call It The Unexpected Or U Can Call It WOW | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yes, exactly, that's my point, no one gives a damn about a not so crazy Prince fan thoughts. Y'all are sick with Prince, he isn't the best, it's like you force him to be, but he ain't, I feel so much better that some reasonable fans will see this and discuss it with me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderator |
The good thing about opinions is that I am entitled to disagree with all of yours
Prince was never the greatest songwriter of all time? Rolling Stone, for one, disagrees. Prince has more songs in their "Top 500 Songs of All Time" list than anyone, unless you include Lennon/McCartney, which I don't, because some of the songs are clearly 95% Lennon compositions and some clearly 95% McCartney. If you pick one of them on their own, Prince has more songs in that list than either Lennon or McCartney. "Innovation" and "Groundbreaking" have nothing to do with great songwriting. "Big Yellow Taxi" isn't innovative or groundbreaking, yet it's one of the greatest songs ever written. "Revolution #9" might be innovative, but it's practically unlistenable. Everyone has their preferences. I think Prince is the greatest songwriter of all time because of his incredibly wide grasp of styles. You can pick any one genre he does and maybe find someone that writes better songs in that one genre, but find me someone that writes great songs in as many genres as Prince does.
Regarding Hendrix, it all comes down to taste. I prefer Prince. The fact that that comparison can even be discussed is testament to how good he is. Clapton called Prince the greatest guitarist alive. We don't know what Hendrix would be like if he was alive. He could be drugged out like Sly Stone and barely able to play. His legacy is preserved because of the fact that he's dead. Maybe if he was alive, you'd also say that Hendrix "isn't as good as he used to be".
|
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wow...you really took time out of your life to post all that bullshit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't agree with everything said here...But the spirit? Yeah...I feel u..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
oh lawd Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Militant said: The good thing about opinions is that I am entitled to disagree with all of yours
Prince was never the greatest songwriter of all time? Rolling Stone, for one, disagrees. Prince has more songs in their "Top 500 Songs of All Time" list than anyone, unless you include Lennon/McCartney, which I don't, because some of the songs are clearly 95% Lennon compositions and some clearly 95% McCartney. If you pick one of them on their own, Prince has more songs in that list than either Lennon or McCartney. "Innovation" and "Groundbreaking" have nothing to do with great songwriting. "Big Yellow Taxi" isn't innovative or groundbreaking, yet it's one of the greatest songs ever written. "Revolution #9" might be innovative, but it's practically unlistenable. Everyone has their preferences. I think Prince is the greatest songwriter of all time because of his incredibly wide grasp of styles. You can pick any one genre he does and maybe find someone that writes better songs in that one genre, but find me someone that writes great songs in as many genres as Prince does.
Regarding Hendrix, it all comes down to taste. I prefer Prince. The fact that that comparison can even be discussed is testament to how good he is. Clapton called Prince the greatest guitarist alive. We don't know what Hendrix would be like if he was alive. He could be drugged out like Sly Stone and barely able to play. His legacy is preserved because of the fact that he's dead. Maybe if he was alive, you'd also say that Hendrix "isn't as good as he used to be".
Said it better and less assy than I would have. Great post. Chili Sauce. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
some responses for you
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yawn She Believed in Fairytales and Princes, He Believed the voices coming from his stereo
If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! I was wondering if y'all dead horses beaters were all dead yourself or what: for months we had a new "Prince is over and done" thread every bloody week and then all of a sudden... SILENCE! Thanks for bringing back the weekly thread, I hope someone will make a new one on Monday so things can be normal again! A COMPREHENSIVE PRINCE DISCOGRAPHY (work in progress ^^): https://sites.google.com/...scography/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'd had a few beers last night and was thinking of responding to the OP on a point by point basis. Thanks for doing so far more eloquently than I could and saving the org from my drunken tirades. Heavenly wine and roses seems to whisper to me when you smile...
Always cry for love, never cry for pain... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^^^ yep bravo Militant She Believed in Fairytales and Princes, He Believed the voices coming from his stereo
If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah...no. You could have kept all that to yourself. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I actually agree with most of what you post here. But hey, I am considerate a negative force on here too. I would rather call it "reasonable/sensible" though.
I love Prince, he was my teenage musical hero and he will always have a special place in my heart. But to me his new music is often not as satisfying anymore as his albums were to me during the WB years. It misses innovation, adventure, good lyrics and good production: all the things his music often had in the 80's. The new songs are often weaker variations of songs he did in the past, and are often safe and (a bit) boring IMO, or just don't have any appeal to me.
I think he is a great musician and a great performer, but in the end Prince is more a jack of all trades, and not "the best songwriter" or "the best guitar player" or anything like that. Perhaps "the most complete artist" would be a more fitting title for Prince, with him having done so much different stuff (playing instruments, writing songs, music production, dancing, performing etc.)... RIP Prince: thank U 4 a funky Time... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So ... Fans need to stop being fans? Or, their fandom should mirror yours? This is a fansite, so of course there will be "fanatic" people who think everything he does is a masterpiece, but I've noticed there's a considerable amount of (unfounded) bashing of the man and his work on here too. Pretty unique for a fansite. I find it interesting also that for a fansite there's so much reverence for associated artists (e.g., Revolution, The Time, and all their individual members), which is fine, but it's reverence at the expense of the man himself sometimes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
All in all, whether one still likes his music or not, nobodys opinions are completely invalid. Sure, prince may not be releasing more than stellar music now but we as prince fans can agree on one thing: his music was damn good back then. If u are a hardcore fan u will most likely like his newer music because it sometimes reflects the old stuff. If u aren't a freak weirdo obsessed fan or a basic fan you may just like the old music. Dont expect everyone of his projects to be masterpieces. The man is only human and cant please everyone.If u want to hear the music he released ages ago, crack up the vinyl or pop a disc into the cd player and there you go. Express your opinions but dont make such bold statements about stuff you know most will not agree with. At the end of the day, the reason why we like Prince so much is because of what he did in the past and if we like his recent music that love will grow, if not, that fan love will still be there. [Edited 5/21/14 15:25pm] This Could Be Us But U Be Playin...
You Can Call It The Unexpected Or U Can Call It WOW | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
you know what, at least i agree with you. on all points. breakdown is just another horrible ballad. i wish he'd never had success with songs like 'diamonds and pearls' and 'the most beautiful...'. flops such as 'betcha by golly wow' and 'the greatest romance...' should have deterred him from constantly re-visiting that territory. but, as you said, he's really not that great of a songwriter. not that he hasn't written an incredible, absolutely mind-blowingly great amount of incredible songs. no, it's just that for every good song he's written, there's 5 songs'o'shite. his many failures in the writing-department must not be overlooked. as the great, late klaus kinski once said: "one should judge a man mainly from his depravities. virtues can be faked. depravities are real". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
* In your first point you are being just as circular and subjective as the people you are admonishing by speaking from a position of absolutism. So, because you don't like something then it's terrible? Wow, how not objective of you. On the other hand, from the moment I heard "Musicology" and "Colonized Mind" they immediately became two of my top ten favorite Prince songs, and I've been a fan since 1979. And, no, the fact that "Colonized Mind" is a complete rip-off of someone else's song doesn't bother me because my all-time favorite Prince song, "Party UP," was written by someone else. So, that says what? As for your other points, there is no need for me to repeat what Militant has said so well. What I don't understand, and I guess I'm beating a dead horse because I've asked this questions so many times before, is why you and so many others seem to desire for others to dislike Prince's new music just because you dislike it. I really dislike "I Wonder U" and "The Breakdown," but I'm not starting threads to discuss how much I dislike them just to convince others to dislike them. Rather, I just concentrate on and celebrate what I like. And, if Prince's new work no longer moves you, then why not just find someone whose work does move you. And, yes, there are many fans on this site and elsewhere who attempt to make Prince the God of all things music, but I just ignore them like I try to ignore the many fans on this site who have spent the last ten years complaining that Prince has "lost it". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
* Not to be adversarial, but you really don't seem to understand art or the craft of creating art because if you did you would know that the ratio of one great song per every five songs of crap is an amazingly excellent ratio that any artist would love to have. In fact, one great song or poem or short story or novel for every ten crap pieces of work is still a great ratio. One who understands the creative process knows that all artists create mountains of crap before they create something decent and even more mountains of crap before they create something good, and even more mountains of crap before they create something great. The notion of the artist that only creates greatness is a myth. As such, I'll respond to your Kinski statement with a simple "one is most remembered not for one's successes but for how one responds to one's failures and life's torments." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're just as predictable in your criticism as the fans you denounce are in their praise. Take the 29 instruments -- people have known for decades that this is at best a cumulative of keyboards, percussions, etc. Jimi? Maybe want to throw in a MJ IS A BETTER SINGER to be even more pointless? See, most fans enjoy Prince's talents globally and are aware there are people just as good or better at individual ones. Besides, anyone dismissive enough to think there was nothing special to WDC has absolutely no business thinking they are perceptive and deep. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1725topp said:
* Not to be adversarial, but you really don't seem to understand art or the craft of creating art because if you did you would know that the ratio of one great song per every five songs of crap is an amazingly excellent ratio that any artist would love to have. In fact, one great song or poem or short story or novel for every ten crap pieces of work is still a great ratio. One who understands the creative process knows that all artists create mountains of crap before they create something decent and even more mountains of crap before they create something good, and even more mountains of crap before they create something great. The notion of the artist that only creates greatness is a myth. As such, I'll respond to your Kinski statement with a simple "one is most remembered not for one's successes but for how one responds to one's failures and life's torments." Amen This Could Be Us But U Be Playin...
You Can Call It The Unexpected Or U Can Call It WOW | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Congratulations - you understand the ratio of great art vs. bad art very well indeed. And speaking of it: sometimes a great writer will even refuse to publish anything for 50 years (J.D. Salinger), a great composer will work on a piece for 20 years (Brahms' 1st symphony), etc... But what a great artist won't do is unload the 80% poop of his work onto an audience for 20 years or more. Great artists understand this very well. In fact, the "quote" you've responded with, illustrates Prince's greatest artistic failure perfectly: to not have answered to his potential of greatness, to not have furthered his considerable gifts in all these years. If you had an inkling of what it takes to create great art, you might comprehend this. However, appreciating one stillborn idea of a song after another won't help you. [Edited 5/22/14 1:12am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince is as good as he always has been.He hasn't lost his mojo.He hasn't stopped creating.Fingers crossed he releases more albums and carries on.He's so interesting that people on fan sites spend ages elequently writing about him in a negative way,possibly more than in a positive way.Put ANY album by Prince on from beginning to end and enjoy it for what it is.Funky rocky jazzy music about sex and parties.Its not deep.its just bloody good.I find it funny that everything in the arts has to be the most this and the best that.Its not a competition.Prince probably isn't competitive.He probably just HAS to create something every day after his captain crunch with soyamilk otherwise he feels like a day was wasted.Its not for us.so lets not get too worked up about it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
* I should have first noted how circular and subjective your first post was: you dislike something so it must be crap. While I don't like "The Breakdown," I greatly appreciate songs, such as "TGRES," "Diamonds and Pearls," and "TMBGITW," because I have wide-ranging tastes that allow me to appreciate those types of songs as well as rock and funk. So, while you have your right to your artistic taste, of course, nothing that you have said proves them to be crap. Secondly, while great artists do labor over works for years, that does not mean that laboring over them guarantees that they will be well-received. The laboring may enable them to craft works in a particular way, but even if they accomplish their goal/structure/form of production that still does not guarantee that the work will be well-received or noted as great. Thus, as for J. D. Salinger, Catcher in the Rye is well-crafted, as well as some of his short stories, and, yet, over half of his short stories do nothing for me. And, Brahms' "Symphony No. 1" is perfectly paced and layered, and I like his constant exploration of harmony and rhythm in much of his other work; yet, that same desire to explore harmony and rhythm causes a lot of his tunes to sound/feel/seem fragmented or disjointed to me. So, again, it's a myth that Salinger, Brahms, or anyone else produces greatness every time, no matter how much they labor. And, as for my inkling of what it takes to create great art, whether I have created "great" art is left for others to decide, but I have published poems, short stories, and essays in over 150 literary journals, magazines, and newspapers. So, more than a few editors think I know something about creating art (literature). However, my skills are not the issue. The issue is your skewed or flawed notion that any artist always creates great art. Even with Salinger and Brahms, like with all artists, not all of their work is "great," but sane people don't expect perfection from human beings, and sane people learn to enjoy what they love from Salinger, Brahms, and, even, Prince, and not waste time lamenting over what they don't like. Furthermore, sane people don't waste time berating people who like things that they don't like because sane people are too busy enjoying what they like. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Flame snip - luv4u] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |