if a 5 year old girl pushed her chest together to form a cleavage, would that rock too?
Oh come on, don't make it a bigger deal than it is. It's cute.
The kid's dressed like Prince, therefore needs eyeliner chesthairs.
Sheesh.
i think what bobgeorge meant by someone's comment being unintentionally borderline inappropriate, is because of the concept of sexualizing children without realizing it.
i dont know if putting chesthairs on a 5 year old means they've been sexualized, but i figured if it was a girl trying to look like dolly parton, how is it any different, and what would you think then?
does the 'sexualization' occur in the mind of the observer, or does it start with the parent?
Oh come on, don't make it a bigger deal than it is. It's cute.
The kid's dressed like Prince, therefore needs eyeliner chesthairs.
Sheesh.
i think what bobgeorge meant by someone's comment being unintentionally borderline inappropriate, is because of the concept of sexualizing children without realizing it.
i dont know if putting chesthairs on a 5 year old means they've been sexualized, but i figured if it was a girl trying to look like dolly parton, how is it any different, and what would you think then?
does the 'sexualization' occur in the mind of the observer, or does it start with the parent?
Oh, no, I wasn't singling out Bobgeorge, or implying that he was passing judgement, just making a generalized statement.
I think there's a line between what's apropriate in the 'sexualization' for children and what isn't. In my opinion, chest hair squiggles on Halloween to tie into a costume theme is on the same level as a little makeup on a small girl to add the finishing touch to a fairy princess costume.
Something like pushing together nonexsistant breasts on a little girl for 'cleavidge' would fall into the catagory of inappropriate, to the equivelant of a small boy having socks stuffed in his pants to give the appearance of... well... 'junk'. That's crossing over a big, bold line.
Just sayin'.
ACRYLIC I do nothing professionally.
I only do things for fun.
johnart: Acrylic's old bras is where tits of all sizes go to frolic after they die. Tit Heaven.
i think what bobgeorge meant by someone's comment being unintentionally borderline inappropriate, is because of the concept of sexualizing children without realizing it.
i dont know if putting chesthairs on a 5 year old means they've been sexualized, but i figured if it was a girl trying to look like dolly parton, how is it any different, and what would you think then?
does the 'sexualization' occur in the mind of the observer, or does it start with the parent?
Oh, no, I wasn't singling out Bobgeorge, or implying that he was passing judgement, just making a generalized statement.
I think there's a line between what's apropriate in the 'sexualization' for children and what isn't. In my opinion, chest hair squiggles on Halloween to tie into a costume theme is on the same level as a little makeup on a small girl to add the finishing touch to a fairy princess costume.
Something like pushing together nonexsistant breasts on a little girl for 'cleavidge' would fall into the catagory of inappropriate, to the equivelant of a small boy having socks stuffed in his pants to give the appearance of... well... 'junk'. That's crossing over a big, bold line.
Just sayin'.
I agree with Acrylic. How are drawing chest hairs on that kid sexual? It's not like he was wearing assless chaps or imitating Prince's sexy moves.
New topic
Printable
Report post to moderator
ACRYLIC 
This picture makes me afraid to make any sudden movements.
ga ga ga