independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Is he a major contributor to FUNK?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 05/21/10 11:48am

Handcuffs

ButterscotchPimp said:

No.

I brought this up awhile ago and the debate lasted WEEKS.


I guess u know more than Miles Davis & George Clinton on Funk.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 05/21/10 11:49am

dreamshaman32

avatar

If there was a Funk Hall of Fame it would have to be in either Detroit or Cincinatti. Prince would not be in the first class, but maybe a second class. The First Class might include James, Sly, George, Bootsy and Rick, i would even put Larry in due to inovation on the Bass.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 05/21/10 12:07pm

PurpleLove7

avatar

moderator

skywalker said:

He is so influenced by James and Sly that he could not help but be a major contributor. He built upon what they did and took the funk to places it had never been before. He crossed genres and created something new...we call it Prince music.

He also turned a lot of pop/rock listeners onto the funk. Many people who go into Prince because of his pop/rock stuff also dug Prince's funkier stuff. They did some music history and, in turn, got into the funk that came before.

Personally, being a Prince fan turned me onto a lot of music that was "before my time." Funk and otherwise. I am a James Brown fan and I found him through Prince.




Spot on SkyWalker ... My sentiments exactly ... Before I listened to P's music I was heavy into East Coast New York Hip Hop. Any music I heard before that was my dad's music or my step-father's music. My music is Prince's music. I knew what funk was from Sly and Bootsy and of course Mr. James Brown but when Dirty Mind and Controversy entered my scope "years" later Prince's music not just funk but Purple Funk as we call it now.

Peace ... & Stay Funky ...

~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~

www.facebook.com/purplefunklover
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 05/21/10 12:38pm

violetblues

chopingard said:

I would say yes. Simply for making drum machines funky.

Prince I think perfected funks synthesis with pop and rock. He gave a strong sense of song structure and arrangement to funk (one which he has mostly abandoned of late). The fusion of rock and funk had already been done but it was more psychedelic Prince made funk a structural element of pop and rock.

There's probably earlier examples but Prince is both a musical and cultural glue to these two worlds.



I agree.
Among all the things his music has done, if anything the drum machine patterns are his singular unique contribution that is his and his alone.
The funk he produced with the linn cannot be "directly" attributed to any other source.

I would also include his funky new wave synth-guitar-chicken-scratch work as a strong contribution to the funk vocabulary.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 05/21/10 12:44pm

violetblues

ButterscotchPimp said:

No.

I brought this up awhile ago and the debate lasted WEEKS.



Yeah but everyone called you out on it and you are dead wrong.

You have a myopic view and your own bubble of preconceptions as to what "Funk" is.

As I recall your "buddies" said it wasn't funk and hence its true. lol

It was a moronic thread akin to tring to prove pickles were or were not delicious.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 05/21/10 12:50pm

Cerebus

avatar

Erm, for the most part, The Rainbow Children is an old school, raw funk record. And yes, throughout his career I think he's done a fine job of bringing the funk. But he's also worked really hard at keeping the funk of others alive. However, I totally agree with whoever said Prince has just been a major contributor to music. Specifically, modern pop music. Let's say, post disco. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 05/21/10 1:04pm

Cerebus

avatar

And pickles are most definitely delicious. Mmmhmm.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 05/21/10 1:08pm

anthonyxanzald
o

avatar

DIRTY MIND
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 05/21/10 1:25pm

renfield

avatar

Absolutely, he was a major contributor to funk music. In some ways, he was part of the end of the line for the evolution of funk.

The funky drummer/horny hornz James Brown style of funk evolved with Sly & Larry, adding slap bass. George Clinton introduced synths while Bootsy and acts like the Ohio Players deepened the bottom end. Prince, Rick, The Time, and Cameo were sort of the last wave of old school funkateers, incorporating more synths and drum machines. That "Minneapolis Sound" evolved throughout the 80s into New Jack Swing and hip-hop, which effectively killed funk's own evolution. By the time acts like Digital Underground tried to bring the funk, they were just re-hashing what Parliament had done (through the use of samples). Funk artists now simply retread the masters, whether they're trying for a JB or Sly style or Prince and Rick's sound. Nothing new has really been contributed to funk since the era of early Prince, Rick, Lakeside, etc. Once those artists started being sampled and became "retro," funk as it's own genre stopped growing and evolving.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 05/21/10 1:44pm

violetblues

renfield said:

Absolutely, he was a major contributor to funk music. In some ways, he was part of the end of the line for the evolution of funk.

The funky drummer/horny hornz James Brown style of funk evolved with Sly & Larry, adding slap bass. George Clinton introduced synths while Bootsy and acts like the Ohio Players deepened the bottom end. Prince, Rick, The Time, and Cameo were sort of the last wave of old school funkateers, incorporating more synths and drum machines. That "Minneapolis Sound" evolved throughout the 80s into New Jack Swing and hip-hop, which effectively killed funk's own evolution. By the time acts like Digital Underground tried to bring the funk, they were just re-hashing what Parliament had done (through the use of samples). Funk artists now simply retread the masters, whether they're trying for a JB or Sly style or Prince and Rick's sound. Nothing new has really been contributed to funk since the era of early Prince, Rick, Lakeside, etc. Once those artists started being sampled and became "retro," funk as it's own genre stopped growing and evolving.


I agree.
The same can be said about RnB, its a stale retro world now without any innovation but rather just taking what has come before it and beating to the ground. Some of it well produced and performed of course, but still just taking something old and polishing it.

By the same token Prince has also been just dragging out his old shtick and polishing it too.

Elements of "The Truth" seemed like fresh a new direction he was taking his sound, but quickly abandoned. Thankfully it resurfaced with "Dreamer" & " Colonized Mind" Hopefully we will hear more of that sound instead of polished oldie funk like MPLSOUND
[Edited 5/21/10 13:46pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 05/21/10 2:11pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

Handcuffs said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

No.

I brought this up awhile ago and the debate lasted WEEKS.


I guess u know more than Miles Davis & George Clinton on Funk.



Um, i'm going to not go out on a limb and say without a shadow of a DOUBT that i know more about funk than Miles Davis.


Yeah, I said it.
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 05/21/10 2:12pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

violetblues said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

No.

I brought this up awhile ago and the debate lasted WEEKS.



Yeah but everyone called you out on it and you are dead wrong.

You have a myopic view and your own bubble of preconceptions as to what "Funk" is.

As I recall your "buddies" said it wasn't funk and hence its true. lol

It was a moronic thread akin to tring to prove pickles were or were not delicious.



That's cute how revisionist that is.
As a matter of fact, be a lamb and re-post the original so you can "prove how right you are".


I'll wait.
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 05/21/10 2:26pm

PurpleLove7

avatar

moderator

ButterscotchPimp said:

violetblues said:




Yeah but everyone called you out on it and you are dead wrong.

You have a myopic view and your own bubble of preconceptions as to what "Funk" is.

As I recall your "buddies" said it wasn't funk and hence its true. lol

It was a moronic thread akin to trying to prove pickles were or were not delicious.



That's cute how revisionist that is.
As a matter of fact, be a lamb and re-post the original so you can "prove how right you are".


I'll wait.


BP it is all a matter of "opinion" when you think of it. Not one person on here who may be a musician or non-musician can define or explain "who" is funk and who is not.
Only so said artist who were the god-fathers and god-mothers of funk can TRULY say so.

... one would think ...
Peace ... & Stay Funky ...

~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~

www.facebook.com/purplefunklover
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 05/21/10 2:34pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

PurpleLove7 said:

ButterscotchPimp said:




That's cute how revisionist that is.
As a matter of fact, be a lamb and re-post the original so you can "prove how right you are".


I'll wait.


BP it is all a matter of "opinion" when you think of it. Not one person on here who may be a musician or non-musician can define or explain "who" is funk and who is not.
Only so said artist who were the god-fathers and god-mothers of funk can TRULY say so.

... one would think ...




Or you can realize, like most real music fans that FUNK is a definitive genre and that Miles Davis or Prince have nothing to do with it.

And that there is a difference between having some "funky songs" and being FUNK.

(totally knows this is going to go sideways)
(again)

yawn
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 05/21/10 2:54pm

PurpleLove7

avatar

moderator

ButterscotchPimp said:


Or you can realize, like most real music fans that FUNK is a definitive genre and that Miles Davis or Prince have nothing to do with it.

And that there is a difference between having some "funky songs" and being FUNK.

(totally knows this is going to go sideways)
(again)

yawn


That's true ... This goes along the lines of Prince creating his own genre. It's like walkin' into a "wreca stow" and seeing the genres. I often wonder why Prince is in either Pop or Rock and sometimes in R&B. He of course should have his "own" section but, BP makes sense p.org.



Prince is "not" a Funk Artist (a contributor, yes) ...
Peace ... & Stay Funky ...

~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~

www.facebook.com/purplefunklover
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 05/21/10 5:12pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

PurpleLove7 said:

ButterscotchPimp said:


Or you can realize, like most real music fans that FUNK is a definitive genre and that Miles Davis or Prince have nothing to do with it.

And that there is a difference between having some "funky songs" and being FUNK.

(totally knows this is going to go sideways)
(again)

yawn


That's true ... This goes along the lines of Prince creating his own genre. It's like walkin' into a "wreca stow" and seeing the genres. I often wonder why Prince is in either Pop or Rock and sometimes in R&B. He of course should have his "own" section but, BP makes sense p.org.



Prince is "not" a Funk Artist (a contributor, yes) ...




I COMPLETELY AGREE with the take that Prince has created his own genre. He takes pop, rock, jazz and yes some funk and combines them in a way that is uniquely him and it is GENIUS.

HOWEVER, I (and most FUNK artists) wouldn't label him a "contributor".

So, my point being.

Prince is FUNKY.
Prince is NOT FUNK.

(waits for the inevitable fallout)
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 05/21/10 5:57pm

robinhood

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

Prince is NOT FUNK.


course he is. think about it. what are all the different meanings of the word Funk - how they are all aptly descriptive of not only his music - but who he really is.

:lightbulb:
this too shall pass
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 05/21/10 6:28pm

datdude

go listen to Sexy Dancer, DMSR, Erotic City, Irresistible B and come back and retract your thread
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 05/21/10 8:25pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

robinhood said:

ButterscotchPimp said:

Prince is NOT FUNK.


course he is. think about it. what are all the different meanings of the word Funk - how they are all aptly descriptive of not only his music - but who he really is.

:lightbulb:



NO he is NOT. Have given it much thought.
People who do not understand the genre of FUNK or the definition of word LOVE to throw it around in regards to Prince.

Prince IS NOT FUNK. NEVER WAS. NEVER WILL BE.
That is not to say that he isn't "funky".
[Edited 5/22/10 7:06am]
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 05/21/10 8:26pm

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

datdude said:

go listen to Sexy Dancer, DMSR, Erotic City, Irresistible B and come back and retract your thread



Who me? Or the OP?
Because none of those songs are remotely in the neighborhood of funk, so your point would be.....
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 05/21/10 8:50pm

whodknee

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

robinhood said:



course he is. think about it. what are all the different meanings of the word Funk - how they are all aptly descriptive of not only his music - but who he really is.

:lightbulb:



NO he is NOT. Have given it much thought.
People who do not understand the genre of FUNK of the definition of word LOVE to throw it around in regards to Prince.

Prince IS NOT FUNK. NEVER WAS. NEVER WILL BE.
That is not to say that he isn't "funky".


I'm gonna agree with you. Your best artists can't be put in one box. The same goes for Stevie Wonder. He's not FUNK as you put it, but he's funky. Only you say it like it's a badge of honor-- like it's some kind of prestigious club or some shit.

Personally, I don't have as much respect for an artist I can point at and neatly put a label on, much less one that willingly accepts that label. Rick James, Clinton, and them never really grew out of that funk shtick. Sure, they mastered that style but they were in too deep and couldn't get out. It's cool for a while but it gets old. Prince and Stevie instinctively knew that. They also knew that to reach a wider audience you have to experiment in different styles-- greater risk, greater reward. Only now after doing a little of everything are they revisiting old styles and getting a little stale.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 05/22/10 3:17am

rialb

avatar

PAISLEYREFUGEE said:

Simple question. Is Prince a major contributor to Funk, like James Brown, Sly Stone or George Clinton was to it? Did he really add anything that was groundbreaking? Look past the fact of being diehard fans, and at it from a musical standpoint.....by the way don't get upset at the question..Its just a question. biggrin

Eh, I think the way the question is worded is somewhat loaded. The artists you listed were from a different era than Prince, with the possible exception of George Clinton. If you are talking about '70s funk (live drums, lots of horns) Prince was not a major contributor. However, looking at how funk evolved in the '80s, specifically with keyboards largely replacing horns, I think Prince was arguably the major contributor. Yes, you had folks like Stevie Wonder, Junie Morrison and Bernie Worrell mixing keyboards with funk in a major way but they did it a bit differently than Prince. Their major innovation was probably using keyboards to replace the bass guitar while Prince used them to replace horns. There may well be some crossover between what those three guys did and what Prince did but he probably took things to a different place than they did.

It's kind of tough to compare because by the '80s funk had changed a great deal. The type of funk that was popular in the late '60s and into the '70s was kind of dead by the '80s. '80s funk was a lot cleaner and keyboard dominated which is maybe why James, Sly and George struggled in the '80s. (Yeah, I know "Atomic Dog" was a huge hit but otherwise George had a pretty rough decade)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 05/22/10 4:25am

KoolEaze

avatar

skywalker said:

He is so influenced by James and Sly that he could not help but be a major contributor. He built upon what they did and took the funk to places it had never been before. He crossed genres and created something new...we call it Prince music.

He also turned a lot of pop/rock listeners onto the funk. Many people who go into Prince because of his pop/rock stuff also dug Prince's funkier stuff. They did some music history and, in turn, got into the funk that came before.

Personally, being a Prince fan turned me onto a lot of music that was "before my time." Funk and otherwise. I am a James Brown fan and I found him through Prince.

[Edited 5/20/10 18:24pm]


Co-sign. If it wasn´t for Prince, I wouldn´t own all my Ohio Players and Sly Stone records.Prince and HipHop music opened my mind to dig deeper and discover the music of the 70s, like Funkadelic.
Before that, I only listened to music of my generation (HipHop, SOS Band, Midnight Star,and 1980s Cameo material.
But not only did he open people´s minds and ears to the Funk, he also added his own unique sounds and ideas to it and is still keeping the Funk alive, though unfortunately in a more retro, nostalgic revue style these days.

Even George Clinton and the late Rick James called him the last keeper of the Funk, so nuff said. They should know best.
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 05/22/10 4:51am

COMPUTERBLUE19
84

avatar

Interesting posts and great responses.

His brand of minimalist funk that was introduced with "Kiss" influenced Pharrell, Timbaland and a whole generation of pop/hip hop producers with some of their studio work.

I think of his body of work as a testament to his devotion to the genre, but in true Prince style, he refused to be defined by it. As so many have mentioned, his influences are peppered throughout his catalogue and what makes his music so captivating is that songs like Erotic City blend so effortlessly with more pop offerings he created. You will here a little James Brown, a little Sly and right after, you're just as likely to hear something Beatlesque.

Prince music=JB+Hendrix+Santana+Beatles+many others

In my opinion, Rick James had begun to lay a foundation, but didn't have the artistic vision Prince had to push the envelope further.

What comes next is anyones guess but the last thing I will say is he is far more "funky" live than he ever is on his records.
[Edited 5/22/10 4:53am]
[Edited 5/22/10 5:03am]
"Old man's gotta be the old man. Fish has got to be the fish."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 05/22/10 6:27am

Handcuffs

If Prince wanted to make the funkiest album ever I believe he is capable of it but Prince has got his own GENERE and that includes elements of funk,jazz, rock,soul,minneapolis sound,blues,p-funk etc.

He has contributed to funk & I hope he comes out with a diverse double or triple album of nothing but the Funk.

He has influence alot of musicians producers etc & his influence will continue.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 05/22/10 6:58am

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

whodknee said:

ButterscotchPimp said:




NO he is NOT. Have given it much thought.
People who do not understand the genre of FUNK of the definition of word LOVE to throw it around in regards to Prince.

Prince IS NOT FUNK. NEVER WAS. NEVER WILL BE.
That is not to say that he isn't "funky".


I'm gonna agree with you. Your best artists can't be put in one box. The same goes for Stevie Wonder. He's not FUNK as you put it, but he's funky. Only you say it like it's a badge of honor-- like it's some kind of prestigious club or some shit.

Personally, I don't have as much respect for an artist I can point at and neatly put a label on, much less one that willingly accepts that label. Rick James, Clinton, and them never really grew out of that funk shtick. Sure, they mastered that style but they were in too deep and couldn't get out. It's cool for a while but it gets old. Prince and Stevie instinctively knew that. They also knew that to reach a wider audience you have to experiment in different styles-- greater risk, greater reward. Only now after doing a little of everything are they revisiting old styles and getting a little stale.




It is a badge of honor to those in the genre.
It's akin to being a jazz artist. There are TONS of artists that casually get that label thrown on them, when the REAL JAZZ ARTISTS have studied, worked with peers in the field, paid their dues and then rise up to become pillars in the community.

Funk is also like that. The real funk heads love Prince. Sure he dabbles. He's aware of the funk. He can very cleverly drop elements of the funk into his music, and they respect him for that. But he is NOT a funk artist.

Arguably, neither was Rick James. Rick, like Prince took funk elements and combined them with punk and r&b to create his own hybrid. Although i'd still like to see that quote where he said that Prince was a "keeper of the funk."

Ditto with George. Although i'd wager dollars to donuts that when George said it, Prince was signing his paychecks. What else was he going to say? No one in George's camp believes that. Neither does George.
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 05/22/10 7:12am

KoolEaze

avatar

ButterscotchPimp said:

whodknee said:



I'm gonna agree with you. Your best artists can't be put in one box. The same goes for Stevie Wonder. He's not FUNK as you put it, but he's funky. Only you say it like it's a badge of honor-- like it's some kind of prestigious club or some shit.

Personally, I don't have as much respect for an artist I can point at and neatly put a label on, much less one that willingly accepts that label. Rick James, Clinton, and them never really grew out of that funk shtick. Sure, they mastered that style but they were in too deep and couldn't get out. It's cool for a while but it gets old. Prince and Stevie instinctively knew that. They also knew that to reach a wider audience you have to experiment in different styles-- greater risk, greater reward. Only now after doing a little of everything are they revisiting old styles and getting a little stale.




It is a badge of honor to those in the genre.
It's akin to being a jazz artist. There are TONS of artists that casually get that label thrown on them, when the REAL JAZZ ARTISTS have studied, worked with peers in the field, paid their dues and then rise up to become pillars in the community.

Funk is also like that. The real funk heads love Prince. Sure he dabbles. He's aware of the funk. He can very cleverly drop elements of the funk into his music, and they respect him for that. But he is NOT a funk artist.

Arguably, neither was Rick James. Rick, like Prince took funk elements and combined them with punk and r&b to create his own hybrid. Although i'd still like to see that quote where he said that Prince was a "keeper of the funk."

Ditto with George. Although i'd wager dollars to donuts that when George said it, Prince was signing his paychecks. What else was he going to say? No one in George's camp believes that. Neither does George.



Rick said that during an interview he gave a few days before he died.
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 05/22/10 7:30am

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

KoolEaze said:

ButterscotchPimp said:





It is a badge of honor to those in the genre.
It's akin to being a jazz artist. There are TONS of artists that casually get that label thrown on them, when the REAL JAZZ ARTISTS have studied, worked with peers in the field, paid their dues and then rise up to become pillars in the community.

Funk is also like that. The real funk heads love Prince. Sure he dabbles. He's aware of the funk. He can very cleverly drop elements of the funk into his music, and they respect him for that. But he is NOT a funk artist.

Arguably, neither was Rick James. Rick, like Prince took funk elements and combined them with punk and r&b to create his own hybrid. Although i'd still like to see that quote where he said that Prince was a "keeper of the funk."

Ditto with George. Although i'd wager dollars to donuts that when George said it, Prince was signing his paychecks. What else was he going to say? No one in George's camp believes that. Neither does George.



Rick said that during an interview he gave a few days before he died.


So i'm just supposed to take your word for it.

Link, perhaps?
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 05/22/10 7:32am

crazydoctor

ButterscotchPimp said:

robinhood said:



course he is. think about it. what are all the different meanings of the word Funk - how they are all aptly descriptive of not only his music - but who he really is.

:lightbulb:



NO he is NOT. Have given it much thought.
People who do not understand the genre of FUNK or the definition of word LOVE to throw it around in regards to Prince.

Prince IS NOT FUNK. NEVER WAS. NEVER WILL BE.
That is not to say that he isn't "funky".
[Edited 5/22/10 7:06am]


What exactly is funk and who are some funk artists?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 05/22/10 7:41am

ButterscotchPi
mp

avatar

crazydoctor said:

ButterscotchPimp said:




NO he is NOT. Have given it much thought.
People who do not understand the genre of FUNK or the definition of word LOVE to throw it around in regards to Prince.

Prince IS NOT FUNK. NEVER WAS. NEVER WILL BE.
That is not to say that he isn't "funky".
[Edited 5/22/10 7:06am]


What exactly is funk and who are some funk artists?



Ugh. Look it up. Or if someone wants to re-post the previous time we did this fine. I'm already getting bored with this, because we did this already.
http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me......
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Is he a major contributor to FUNK?