independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince: the "most secret artist" - motives to why he's not releasing DVD's and other stuff?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 03/05/10 1:05pm

xlr8r

avatar

lotusflower said:

^ Yeah and Madonna and van Halen are in the same league as PRINCE lol

This is ridicules.... the point is... It would sell... and not only for 'Prince fans' but also the 'common' folks... they all know When Doves Cry, Purple Rain etc. etc.



stop with the straw man argument shit..madonna and van halen were used as exmaples..nobody said they are in th e same league or not..

no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do

but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 03/05/10 1:08pm

FunkyDissCo

I'm having problems with this part of the discussion eversince, i have to admit...
Folks, do you really, i mean do you REALLY think that guy ever has to work again to pay his bills? He's not depending on "sales numbers" anymore, guess why he even had the "choice" to leave a major contract, while other musicians spend their whole lives fighting to get one? He's still one of the most well-known pop stars worldwide, do you really think he couldn't get any deals anymore if he wanted?? And if so, then why the heck do you think putting live stuff out has to do with sales and dollar bills?
It's not about the money here, guys. And furthermore, the money thing sure isn't a reason for us fans to be understood imho.

The main point is, the whole Prince saga has become a ridiculous ego thing in the last years. Not that it hasn't always been a part of his image, but over the last years, he seems to have forgotten that there's more to it. Music and pleasing the fans that made him what he is, in the first instance.

Sorry for my bad language, but while he's still an awesome musician, one of the most talented song writers and a baaad guitarist, he's just behaving like an asshole to the people he built his life on.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 03/05/10 1:11pm

xlr8r

avatar

FunkyDissCo said:

I'm having problems with this part of the discussion eversince, i have to admit...
Folks, do you really, i mean do you REALLY think that guy ever has to work again to pay his bills? He's not depending on "sales numbers" anymore, guess why he even had the "choice" to leave a major contract, while other musicians spend their whole lives fighting to get one? He's still one of the most well-known pop stars worldwide, do you really think he couldn't get any deals anymore if he wanted?? And if so, then why the heck do you think putting live stuff out has to do with sales and dollar bills?
It's not about the money here, guys. And furthermore, the money thing sure isn't a reason for us fans to be understood imho.

The main point is, the whole Prince saga has become a ridiculous ego thing in the last years. Not that it hasn't always been a part of his image, but over the last years, he seems to have forgotten that there's more to it. Music and pleasing the fans that made him what he is, in the first instance.

Sorry for my bad language, but while he's still an awesome musician, one of the most talented song writers and a baaad guitarist, he's just behaving like an asshole to the people he built his life on.


Stop blaming it all on Prince as if you know. He wants to do remasters and stuff but lawyers on both sides muck it up.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 03/05/10 2:51pm

lotusflower

xlr8r said:

lotusflower said:

^ Yeah and Madonna and van Halen are in the same league as PRINCE lol

This is ridicules.... the point is... It would sell... and not only for 'Prince fans' but also the 'common' folks... they all know When Doves Cry, Purple Rain etc. etc.



stop with the straw man argument shit..madonna and van halen were used as exmaples..nobody said they are in th e same league or not..

no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do

but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck



nuts My 'SHIT' where also examples! We can do this all we like, we wont see any Live release of Dortmund or Atlanta anytime soon!
[Edited 3/5/10 14:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 03/05/10 3:00pm

xlr8r

avatar

lotusflower said:

xlr8r said:




stop with the straw man argument shit..madonna and van halen were used as exmaples..nobody said they are in th e same league or not..

no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do

but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck



nuts My 'SHIT' where also examples! We can do this all we like, we wont see any Live release of Dortmund or Atlanta anytime soon!
[Edited 3/5/10 14:52pm]


and I explained why..there's no market for them
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 03/05/10 3:01pm

FunkyDissCo

xlr8r said:

FunkyDissCo said:

I'm having problems with this part of the discussion eversince, i have to admit...
Folks, do you really, i mean do you REALLY think that guy ever has to work again to pay his bills? He's not depending on "sales numbers" anymore, guess why he even had the "choice" to leave a major contract, while other musicians spend their whole lives fighting to get one? He's still one of the most well-known pop stars worldwide, do you really think he couldn't get any deals anymore if he wanted?? And if so, then why the heck do you think putting live stuff out has to do with sales and dollar bills?
It's not about the money here, guys. And furthermore, the money thing sure isn't a reason for us fans to be understood imho.

The main point is, the whole Prince saga has become a ridiculous ego thing in the last years. Not that it hasn't always been a part of his image, but over the last years, he seems to have forgotten that there's more to it. Music and pleasing the fans that made him what he is, in the first instance.

Sorry for my bad language, but while he's still an awesome musician, one of the most talented song writers and a baaad guitarist, he's just behaving like an asshole to the people he built his life on.


Stop blaming it all on Prince as if you know. He wants to do remasters and stuff but lawyers on both sides muck it up.



I don't understand. You just said: "no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do. but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck"

That was what i was saying, in other words (well, part of it). Sure i don't know more than anybody else here, but that doesn't make my point invalid imo.
The point is, I'm not even talking about remastered versions of WB albums, I'm talking about recent live shows and unreleased vault material. I don't see the problem there with the "lawyers" you mention.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 03/05/10 3:03pm

xlr8r

avatar

FunkyDissCo said:

xlr8r said:



Stop blaming it all on Prince as if you know. He wants to do remasters and stuff but lawyers on both sides muck it up.



I don't understand. You just said: "no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do. but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck"

That was what i was saying, in other words (well, part of it). Sure i don't know more than anybody else here, but that doesn't make my point invalid imo.
The point is, I'm not even talking about remastered versions of WB albums, I'm talking about recent live shows and unreleased vault material. I don't see the problem there with the "lawyers" you mention.


agreed
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 03/05/10 3:04pm

Tremolina

2freaky4church1 said:

It would make money for Warner Brothers, that's why.

No it wouldn't, unless you are talking remasters of WB stuff.
[Edited 3/5/10 15:08pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 03/05/10 3:05pm

Tremolina

VelvetJ said:

Prince has a history of trying to "punish" people with whom he feels have betrayed him or in some way "done him wrong". So he will "punish" fans for not attending the LoveSexy tour by refusing to play in his home country for 9 years. He will completely demolish a muli-story muli-million dollar home just so a ex-wife couldn't get it. He will end friendships if the friendships can't be on HIS terms. And he will deny most of his most loyal followers of his music with what he KNOWS they want, just to keep someone else from making a cent (by they way, I DO understand why he wouldn't want to do that but my question is to what extreme).

I would also say that insecurity may be at the root of it all. We all know that Prince is a perfectionist and he is no question, a genious. BUT, I don't think Prince is as much of a genious as people in general believe that he is, and I think he is a bit paranoid that people as a whole, will discover this. With Prince being the genious he is, I also think his reality is a bit warped, which is common amongst his kind. Plus, Prince as we all know, can just simply be a jerk.

Who knows, and knowing Prince we will probably never find out.

*NOTE* This is all opinion, so please do not ask me for proof.
[Edited 3/5/10 12:52pm]




I think this makes sense.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 03/05/10 3:08pm

Tremolina

FunkyDissCo said:

It's not about the money here, guys. .

I agree
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 03/05/10 6:04pm

Soulstar77A

lotusflower said:

^ Yeah and Madonna and van Halen are in the same league as PRINCE lol

This is ridicules.... the point is... It would sell...


Madonna might not be in the same musical league , but when it comes to sales then things are a little different. She has sold how many albums in the past? 300 millions? Same goes for "Queen" btw. Prince has sold about 80 or 90 million albums worldwide i guess...
[Edited 3/5/10 18:13pm]
"ohYeeeeeah" said: I'm a massive Bowie fan. Even on Scary Monsters, I always skip Fame ...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 03/06/10 7:03am

dance4me3121

Soulstar77A said:

lotusflower said:

^ Yeah and Madonna and van Halen are in the same league as PRINCE lol This is ridicules.... the point is... It would sell...
Madonna might not be in the same musical league , but when it comes to sales then things are a little different. She has sold how many albums in the past? 300 millions? Same goes for "Queen" btw. Prince has sold about 80 or 90 million albums worldwide i guess... [Edited 3/5/10 18:13pm]
100 million albums
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 03/06/10 8:27am

LondonStyle

avatar

dance4me3121 said:

Soulstar77A said:

Madonna might not be in the same musical league , but when it comes to sales then things are a little different. She has sold how many albums in the past? 300 millions? Same goes for "Queen" btw. Prince has sold about 80 or 90 million albums worldwide i guess... [Edited 3/5/10 18:13pm]
100 million albums


and he's not been with a major label for the most part lol
Da, Da, Da....Emancipation....Free..don't think I ain't..! London 21 Nights...Clap your hands...you know the rest..
James Brown & Michael Jackson RIP, your music still lives with us!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 03/06/10 9:56am

erik319

avatar

LondonStyle said:

dance4me3121 said:

100 million albums


and he's not been with a major label for the most part lol

I think you'll find that the majority of that 100 million sales came from his major label released albums.
blah blah blah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 03/06/10 11:13am

FunkyDissCo

erik319 said:

LondonStyle said:



and he's not been with a major label for the most part lol

I think you'll find that the majority of that 100 million sales came from his major label released albums.


My thoughts exactly. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 03/06/10 11:16am

NelsonR

chances r prince has the most self-managed public profile of any celeb out there;
he only wants 2 b seen in certain ways
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 03/06/10 11:27am

xlr8r

avatar

NelsonR said:

chances r prince has the most self-managed public profile of any celeb out there;
he only wants 2 b seen in certain ways

the same as you and I
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 03/06/10 4:09pm

muleFunk

avatar

Tremolina said:

muleFunk said:

Most of you are not thinking of the business aspects that would apply here.

The number one business question here would be could I make a profit off this project ?


The short answer is no because ...

1. Who is going to assume the costs of producing/marketing?
2. What market will be targeted ?
Etc,Ect.
Then who owns certain distribution rights to the material ????

The best advise for Prince if he wanted to get this material out would be to use the lotusflow3r.com vehicle and put this stuff on the web. However this method is the easiest way for bootleggers to access the material and sell it without sharing the profits with Prince.

It's a lose/lose situation for Prince and that's the reason why this material is hidden.



Oh please, right now he makes zilch and the bootleggers still run with his shit.

So your argument makes no sense.


It makes plenty of "sense".Prince may not have the "rights" to his own material back during the WB timeframe.

AND that goes back to the theory of Prince bootlegging his own shit.

This theory has been disproven by people who claim to be on the inside of these companies so my theory is just that, a "theory".

Not to mention could there be a market for that material if you already have damn good copies that are bootlegged? If you don't have a market base of several hundred thousand customers then so one is going to even float the idea.

That's why the websites were good ideas to put material out there but he could have enlisted Orgers to do a better job that what has been done with that mess.
[Edited 3/6/10 17:40pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 03/06/10 6:31pm

Jacytoon

2freaky4church1 said:

It would make money for Warner Brothers, that's why.

I thought WB only made money off the actual recordings he released during his tenure.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 03/07/10 2:36am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

FunkyDissCo said:

I think him being the control-freak he is, n 110% perfectionist


PRINCE IS NOT A PERFECTIONIST. I can give thousands of examples of why Prince isn't one.
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 03/07/10 2:39am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

novabrkr said:

I think he's aware that a large percentage of people will just get his past albums from the net. These days people are more motivated to pay for the physical copy if it's brand spanking new.


Nonsense. If he was offering them people would buy them, simple as that. iTunes proves over & over: give the people a way to legally buy music online, and they'll do it. Yes, there are "free alternatives", but plenty of people rather pay a bit of money to get something the easy way instead of spending a lot of time looking for a "free alternative".
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 03/07/10 2:42am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

It would make money for Warner Brothers, that's why.


It's been FIFTEEN YEARS, you'd think Princey could have figured a way out, don'tcha think?

Oh, and him releasing live DVDs of concerts of the past 15 years wouldn't hand WB 1 dollar.
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 03/07/10 2:43am

MattyJam

avatar

thedance said:

The Beautiful Experience (1994) or Love 4 One Another (1996)


What's the setlist of these shows?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 03/07/10 2:45am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

VelvetJ said:

We all know that Prince is a perfectionist


PRINCE IS NOT A PERFECTIONIST.

VelvetJ said:

and he is no question, a genious.


If you can't spell the word "genius", you're not qualified to use that label on someone.
[Edited 3/7/10 2:49am]
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 03/07/10 2:47am

MattyJam

avatar

BartVanHemelen said:[quote]

VelvetJ said:

We all know that Prince is a perfectionist

PRINCE IS NOT A PERFECTIONIST.

VelvetJ said:

and he is no question, a genious.


If you can't spell the word "genius", you're not qualified to use that label on someone.


Ouch! lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 03/07/10 2:48am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

xlr8r said:

no, remasters will not sell enough to make a profit they rarely do

but that shouldnt deter him or other artists from doing them as they are usually created for other reasons than soley to make a buck


Hilarious. Try to pick up an issue of a magazine like Mojo and count the ads and reviews for remastered records. The most obscure shit gets remastered. Are you seriously thinking that's because there's no PROFIT in that?

I think Elvis Costello has released three different remasters of most of his catalog, for instance. Elvis frikking Costello. But Prince doing it wouldn't be profitable? Hilarious.
© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 03/07/10 2:53am

MattyJam

avatar

Prince himself has said that he believes a live concert experience should be just that. Whether you're talking about live DVDs or music videos, he's never been one to put effort into the visual side of his work.

I really think that's the answer.
[Edited 3/7/10 2:53am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 03/07/10 3:38am

thedance

avatar

MattyJam said:

live DVDs or music videos, he's never been one to put effort into the visual side of his work.

I really think that's the answer.

That's not true.

Gett Off was very visual and expensive too, just to name 1 video.



MattyJam said:

thedance said:

The Beautiful Experience (1994) or Love 4 One Another (1996)


What's the setlist of these shows?


The Beautiful Experience tv-special (Different tv stations 1994):

(I'm not mentioning the seagues)...

Interactive,
Days Of Wild
Come
Race
Acknowledge Me
Pheromone
The Jam
Shhh
Loose!
Papa
The Most Beautiful Girl In The World
Now
Poem/ Orgasm

Love 4 One Another tv-special (VH-1 1996):

Intro
Rock N Roll Is Alive (And Lives In Minneapolis)
Days Of Wild
Inner City Blues (Nona Gaye)
The Ride
The Jam
Purple Medley
Gold



The L4OA - Video Break (VH-1 1996):

(very funny imo. great Prince humour..)...

Intro
The Good Life (NPG)
Count The Days (NPG)
Dolphin
If I Love U 2 Nite (Mayte)
Outro

(Note.. may not be 100% accurate)


---
[Edited 3/7/10 3:45am]
Prince 4Ever. heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 03/07/10 4:12am

Tremolina

muleFunk said:

Tremolina said:




Oh please, right now he makes zilch and the bootleggers still run with his shit.

So your argument makes no sense.


It makes plenty of "sense".Prince may not have the "rights" to his own material back during the WB timeframe.

AND that goes back to the theory of Prince bootlegging his own shit.

This theory has been disproven by people who claim to be on the inside of these companies so my theory is just that, a "theory".

Not to mention could there be a market for that material if you already have damn good copies that are bootlegged? If you don't have a market base of several hundred thousand customers then so one is going to even float the idea.

That's why the websites were good ideas to put material out there but he could have enlisted Orgers to do a better job that what has been done with that mess.
[Edited 3/6/10 17:40pm]


What is this "theory" that Prince may not own the rights to his bootlegged and live material during the WB period? There is no reason whatsoever to assume that. WB owns the records that were officially released under their contract, why do you think they own all that other material too?

As for it not being profitable. That's so not true. He made a profit off CB and NPGMC. Compared to "normal" relases there are hardly any production, distribution and promotion costs needed when he releases it on his website. All the costs to produce the songs have already been made, while distribution and promotion is much cheaper using the internet. Then he has tens of thousands of fans waiting to finally buy those pristine clear copies of the songs they always wanted to have. Sure, there will be bootleggers and those who do not pay a dime, but damn, he can still make a nice profit off of that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 03/07/10 4:59am

leecaldon

FunkyDissCo said:

I think him being the control-freak he is, n 110% perfectionist, never satisfied, is prolly the most important reason not to release live stuff


A good theory, but the Aladdin DVD is hard evidence against that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince: the "most secret artist" - motives to why he's not releasing DVD's and other stuff?