independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > removal of youtube videos
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/18/09 5:42pm

insatiableshhh

removal of youtube videos

anyone know why some are removed and some are left untouched..these even have prince in their 'tags'
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/18/09 5:50pm

skoolteecher

Who knows, it's all so stupid.
It would behoove prince to keep all of his videos on youtube lest he continue his downward spiral into to Greater Irrelevance. Hell, he oughta have videos of himself brushing his teeth on that jawn.

confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/18/09 6:11pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

http://prince.org/msg/7/241416

http://prince.org/msg/7/231482

I guess people keep putting them up and youtube keeps taking them down. Prince believes it's his work therefore he "owns" it.
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/18/09 7:18pm

lilJ

just gotta change some letters biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/18/09 7:32pm

violetblues

I have always said that Prince should keep his music off there and continue to make a point, fuck what so called fans think. All artists should step up to the plate and not let a hand-full of artists do the dirty work for them.
Some have scoffed at the notion, but recently Fox's Rupert Murdock threatened Google to take all their product off their search engine and made them cry uncle real quick. People giggled and scoffed at litigation against Pirate Bay, and last I heard those fools were licking their wounds crying in a corner somewhere feeling sorry for themselves.

Until better safeguards are set in place to protect artists and intellectual property, artists and rights holders have to quickly get together to get new worldwide standards set in place ASAP to ease some of their financial hemorrhaging.
[Edited 12/18/09 19:47pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/18/09 7:57pm

vman4639

violetblues said:

I have always said that Prince should keep his music off there and continue to make a point, fuck what so called fans think. All artists should step up to the plate and not let a hand-full of artists do the dirty work for them.
Some have scoffed at the notion, but recently Fox's Rupert Murdock threatened Google to take all their product off their search engine and made them cry uncle real quick. People giggled and scoffed at litigation against Pirate Bay, and last I heard those fools were licking their wounds crying in a corner somewhere feeling sorry for themselves.

Until better safeguards are set in place to protect artists and intellectual property, artists and rights holders have to quickly get together to get new worldwide standards set in place ASAP to ease some of their financial hemorrhaging.
[Edited 12/18/09 19:47pm]


OK, but how does someone trying to play a Prince song on a piano or guitar hurt him in any way? It's not pirating a copy of his music - it's watching someone who really enjoys the music, and who spent a lot of time trying to learn it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/18/09 8:14pm

violetblues

vman4639 said:

violetblues said:

I have always said that Prince should keep his music off there and continue to make a point, fuck what so called fans think. All artists should step up to the plate and not let a hand-full of artists do the dirty work for them.
Some have scoffed at the notion, but recently Fox's Rupert Murdock threatened Google to take all their product off their search engine and made them cry uncle real quick. People giggled and scoffed at litigation against Pirate Bay, and last I heard those fools were licking their wounds crying in a corner somewhere feeling sorry for themselves.

Until better safeguards are set in place to protect artists and intellectual property, artists and rights holders have to quickly get together to get new worldwide standards set in place ASAP to ease some of their financial hemorrhaging.
[Edited 12/18/09 19:47pm]





OK, but how does someone trying to play a Prince song on a piano or guitar hurt him in any way? It's not pirating a copy of his music - it's watching someone who really enjoys the music, and who spent a lot of time trying to learn it.




Ohh, so we feel when someone's rights may be infringed but not others.

There will have to be comprises that go both ways, but right now, the only one's having the discussion are Prince and a few other artists.
This is an issue that is not going away and the sooner artists and other media producers and right's holders come to terms and seriously deal with it the better.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/19/09 2:21am

CandaceS

avatar

How does the kool-aid taste, violetblues? Looks like you've been drinking plenty of it! razz
"I would say that Prince's top thirty percent is great. Of that thirty percent, I'll bet the public has heard twenty percent of it." - Susan Rogers, "Hunting for Prince's Vault", BBC, 2015
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/19/09 3:44am

Isabell

avatar

violetblues said:

I have always said that Prince should keep his music off there and continue to make a point, fuck what so called fans think. All artists should step up to the plate and not let a hand-full of artists do the dirty work for them.
Some have scoffed at the notion, but recently Fox's Rupert Murdock threatened Google to take all their product off their search engine and made them cry uncle real quick. People giggled and scoffed at litigation against Pirate Bay, and last I heard those fools were licking their wounds crying in a corner somewhere feeling sorry for themselves.

Until better safeguards are set in place to protect artists and intellectual property, artists and rights holders have to quickly get together to get new worldwide standards set in place ASAP to ease some of their financial hemorrhaging.
[Edited 12/18/09 19:47pm]


In France, a publishing company has just won a lawsuit against Google. Google was found guilty of illegaly copying books and putting them up on their search website. Their idea was pretty good since they were sharing out-of-print or hard to find books. But the law is the law...

French parliament has just adopted a new law called HADOPI2 that's supposed to protect intellectual property from being illegaly downloaded from the internet... we'll see how that works...

I have to admit that I'm a happy trooper when I find videos that I have never seen before of Prince or other artists on the net. The net is also a good tool to discover artists you would never otherwise hear of.

But yes, there should be a defined legal frame to regulate what's going on out there.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/19/09 5:04am

violetblues

CandaceS said:

How does the kool-aid taste, violetblues? Looks like you've been drinking plenty of it! razz



Has nothing to do with Prince, I love everything about Google, there just seems to be no safeguard in protecting intellectual property and needs to be addressed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/19/09 5:52am

vman4639

Ohh, so we feel when someone's rights may be infringed but not others.

There will have to be comprises that go both ways, but right now, the only one's having the discussion are Prince and a few other artists.
This is an issue that is not going away and the sooner artists and other media producers and right's holders come to terms and seriously deal with it the better.


Sorry, I still don't understand (and I am trying to). I get what you are saying if it relates to people distributing other peoples work, if they are obtaining it for free, or if they are profiting from it. I think there can be some intelligent discussion there.

But, if I create a YouTube video where I struggle through a solo - who is losing money here? Who's rights are being infringed upon? Will it cause people to not buy a Prince CD because they can here it for free from me (ridiculous) ?????

Now if he is doing it to protect copyright infringement, well that may be a different story - funny laws there. If you do not fight every case then you can lose your rights - but I don't think that applies here (lawyers speak up if I am wrong).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/19/09 6:23am

violetblues

vman4639 said:


Sorry, I still don't understand (and I am trying to). I get what you are saying if it relates to people distributing other peoples work, if they are obtaining it for free, or if they are profiting from it. I think there can be some intelligent discussion there.

But, if I create a YouTube video where I struggle through a solo - who is losing money here? Who's rights are being infringed upon? Will it cause people to not buy a Prince CD because they can here it for free from me (ridiculous) ?????

Now if he is doing it to protect copyright infringement, well that may be a different story - funny laws there. If you do not fight every case then you can lose your rights - but I don't think that applies here (lawyers speak up if I am wrong).


A recent 1.6 million judgment against Google, plus yearly payment for use use brought on by ASCAP is a step in the right direction.

Just like hotels and restaurants have to pay yearly payments to ASCAP for music played through the speakers or in the dinning areas, or bands playing cover tunes, or Karaoke machines, if something you do that includes other peoples work is published and made public like you do when you post on Youtube, then the same rules should apply. If you play your solo and keep it at home and play it for you and your friends own entertainment is another story.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/19/09 7:01am

vman4639

violetblues said:

vman4639 said:


Sorry, I still don't understand (and I am trying to). I get what you are saying if it relates to people distributing other peoples work, if they are obtaining it for free, or if they are profiting from it. I think there can be some intelligent discussion there.

But, if I create a YouTube video where I struggle through a solo - who is losing money here? Who's rights are being infringed upon? Will it cause people to not buy a Prince CD because they can here it for free from me (ridiculous) ?????

Now if he is doing it to protect copyright infringement, well that may be a different story - funny laws there. If you do not fight every case then you can lose your rights - but I don't think that applies here (lawyers speak up if I am wrong).


A recent 1.6 million judgment against Google, plus yearly payment for use use brought on by ASCAP is a step in the right direction.

Just like hotels and restaurants have to pay yearly payments to ASCAP for music played through the speakers or in the dinning areas, or bands playing cover tunes, or Karaoke machines, if something you do that includes other peoples work is published and made public like you do when you post on Youtube, then the same rules should apply. If you play your solo and keep it at home and play it for you and your friends own entertainment is another story.


OK - I see your point, but it think it is painting with too broad a brush. Hotels, restaurants, bands - they are all making money off of the music. I am not. You could argue YouTube may be (due to traffic, small as it may be related to my video) - if so, and in your argument, would there be a problem with me posting my video of me performing a Prince solo on my own website - where NO money is being made at all, by anyone? I tend to see this as "sharing with my friends" as you said in your post, sure some people may look over our shoulders. Sort of like playing guitar and singing in the park - am I breaking your rules if other people hear me?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/19/09 7:02am

LizaWoman08

avatar

I think it's quite ridiculous to take his videos down off youtube. I always buy the CD if I really like the songs. I don't think Prince understands that youtube could actually help him as an artist. People like to see his videos and interveiws.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 12/19/09 7:04am

udo

avatar

It is because Prince has not yet gotten used to the new age (TM) of broadband, IT, etc.
`Intellectual property` (dunno what that is) needs a rethink.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 12/19/09 7:06am

minneapolisFun
q

avatar

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."


^
i have seen a few of them with this in description and they arent getting muted or taken down.

someone had to find a loophole eventually
You're so glam, every time I see you I wanna slam!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/19/09 7:11am

vman4639

minneapolisFunq said:

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."


^
i have seen a few of them with this in description and they arent getting muted or taken down.

someone had to find a loophole eventually


Excellent - so my earlier post concerning teaching someone how to play a section of a song seems to fit in there nicely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/19/09 7:22am

violetblues

vman4639 said:

minneapolisFunq said:

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."


^
i have seen a few of them with this in description and they arent getting muted or taken down.

someone had to find a loophole eventually


Excellent - so my earlier post concerning teaching someone how to play a section of a song seems to fit in there nicely.


Yep, i have to agree..
I do not know about your own lessons being taken down, but i do see a lot of them on their with no sound removed.
I totally agree that the laws should not work with a broad brush, and totally appreciate the usefulness of sites like youtube, beyond entertainment and educational use, but at the same time it must also protect others rights as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/19/09 7:33am

fingertips

avatar

without fans your nothing .. put a f'n vid up for gods sake u child. your the artist cause we helpd you get there!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/19/09 9:41am

violetblues

fingertips said:

without fans your nothing .. put a f'n vid up for gods sake u child. your the artist cause we helpd you get there!


Prince is fortunate to have the chops to make a living touring, many artists such as songwriters do not.
People may feign fake sadness when they hear about Motown artists who died broke, because when it come right down to it, people only care about themselves.

Good luck with any new artist trying to make it on Youtube fans alone, lol I would love to hear about some Youtube artist that became a huge success because of its Youtube fan base.

Artists must insist that their work have value and treat their work accordingly.
Sales are way down but It's not because there is not a market for music, its just that artists and music providers kept playing the same game while technology moved past them.
If demand and market wasn't there, you wouldnt be getting all these morons in a hissy fit clamoring to keep getting it free.
[Edited 12/19/09 9:45am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/19/09 9:50am

lezama

avatar

While Prince's name continues to be solely associated with such efforts. This is now a common practice with many record companies to pull unauthorized videos of their artists unless the proper revenue strucutres are put in place.
Change it one more time..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/19/09 10:30am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

violetblues said:

fingertips said:

without fans your nothing .. put a f'n vid up for gods sake u child. your the artist cause we helpd you get there!


Prince is fortunate to have the chops to make a living touring, many artists such as songwriters do not.
People may feign fake sadness when they hear about Motown artists who died broke, because when it come right down to it, people only care about themselves.

Good luck with any new artist trying to make it on Youtube fans alone, lol I would love to hear about some Youtube artist that became a huge success because of its Youtube fan base.

Artists must insist that their work have value and treat their work accordingly.
Sales are way down but It's not because there is not a market for music, its just that artists and music providers kept playing the same game while technology moved past them.
If demand and market wasn't there, you wouldnt be getting all these morons in a hissy fit clamoring to keep getting it free.
[Edited 12/19/09 9:45am]


Soulja Boy Tell 'Em!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...Tell_%27Em

In November 2005, Way posted his songs on the website SoundClick. Following positive reviews on the site, he then established his own web pages on YouTube and MySpace.[9][10] In March 2007, he recorded "Crank That" and released his first independent album Unsigned & Still Major: Da Album Before da Album, followed by a low-budget video filmed demonstrating the "Crank That dance". By the end of May 2007, "Crank That (Soulja Boy)" received its first airplay and Way met with Mr. Collipark to sign a deal with Interscope Records.

On August 12, 2007, the song appeared on the Emmy-award winning HBO series Entourage, and by September 1, it topped the Billboard Hot 100 and Hot RingMasters charts.[11] Way's major label debut album Souljaboytellem.com, which was reportedly recorded using just the demo version of FL Studio,[8][12] was released in the United States on October 2,[13] peaking at #4 on both the Billboard 200 and Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums charts.


Before any of you Leave Prince Alone Brigadiers out there, get your panties in a twist...NO I AM NOT COMPARING SOULJA BOY TO PRINCE! I am simply presenting a new artist that HAS made it big utilizing the power of Youtube.

Now if an unknown upstart could pull that off with a little effort on his part, just imagine for a moment if you will, what Prince could do with what he has in his repertoire to bring to the table, if he ever got his head out of the chemtrail clouds long enough to take a look at the big picture!

There's a whole world full of people or as Prince's camp apparently likes to think of them...CASHCOWS...out there that have never heard of Prince but you can bet your ass...they have heard of and use Youtube!

.
[Edited 12/19/09 10:33am]
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/19/09 10:52am

violetblues

HatrinaHaterwitz said:[quote]

violetblues said:



Soulja Boy Tell 'Em!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...Tell_%27Em

In November 2005, Way posted his songs on the website SoundClick. Following positive reviews on the site, he then established his own web pages on YouTube and MySpace.[9][10] In March 2007, he recorded "Crank That" and released his first independent album Unsigned & Still Major: Da Album Before da Album, followed by a low-budget video filmed demonstrating the "Crank That dance". By the end of May 2007, "Crank That (Soulja Boy)" received its first airplay and Way met with Mr. Collipark to sign a deal with Interscope Records.

On August 12, 2007, the song appeared on the Emmy-award winning HBO series Entourage, and by September 1, it topped the Billboard Hot 100 and Hot RingMasters charts.[11] Way's major label debut album Souljaboytellem.com, which was reportedly recorded using just the demo version of FL Studio,[8][12] was released in the United States on October 2,[13] peaking at #4 on both the Billboard 200 and Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums charts.


Before any of you Leave Prince Alone Brigadiers out there, get your panties in a twist...NO I AM NOT COMPARING SOULJA BOY TO PRINCE! I am simply presenting a new artist that HAS made it big utilizing the power of Youtube.

Now if an unknown upstart could pull that off with a little effort on his part, just imagine for a moment if you will, what Prince could do with what he has in his repertoire to bring to the table, if he ever got his head out of the chemtrail clouds long enough to take a look at the big picture!

There's a whole world full of people or as Prince's camp apparently likes to think of them...CASHCOWS...out there that have never heard of Prince but you can bet your ass...they have heard of and use Youtube!

.
[Edited 12/19/09 10:33am]


Point taken, I'm not going to get into Souja Boys supposed tremendous financial success ( not to mention the push given by Interscope to take him to the next level), the thing is, this is not going away so quick that Prince or any artist has to rush in and roll over, artists and content providers have to fight for their rights and have to set the rules for their own future.
It was the initial rush by newspapers and TV to get their product online free that partially did them in. Now they are going back and trying to get people to pay for something they were giving away and people have a hard time dealing with that.
Whether we like it or not, a new mechanism of compensation will be set in place soon for the good of artists and content providers, and you all are just going to have to deal with it.


.
[Edited 12/21/09 19:56pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/19/09 2:38pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

violetblues said:


Whether we like it or not, a new mechanism...will be set...and you all are just going to have to deal with it.



EXACTLY!!! wink
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/20/09 12:38pm

MyNameIsCally

violetblues said:

fingertips said:

without fans your nothing .. put a f'n vid up for gods sake u child. your the artist cause we helpd you get there!


Prince is fortunate to have the chops to make a living touring, many artists such as songwriters do not.
People may feign fake sadness when they hear about Motown artists who died broke, because when it come right down to it, people only care about themselves.

Good luck with any new artist trying to make it on Youtube fans alone, lol I would love to hear about some Youtube artist that became a huge success because of its Youtube fan base.

Artists must insist that their work have value and treat their work accordingly.
Sales are way down but It's not because there is not a market for music, its just that artists and music providers kept playing the same game while technology moved past them.
If demand and market wasn't there, you wouldnt be getting all these morons in a hissy fit clamoring to keep getting it free.
[Edited 12/19/09 9:45am]


Apparently there has been quite a few people who posted vidoes of themselves singing on YouTube & signed record deals! I think YouTube should pay royalties for each play a song gets on there, just like radio. It's a great promotional tool though, for me it's great to discover new bands/artists. For example I heard a lot about Sly Stone & Earth Wind & Fire on here last year, checked them out on YouTube, loved it, baught the CD's!

EDIT: Pirate Bay, on the other hand, is completley wrong. I hope that place gets shut down, even though I am guilty of downloading a few albums form there myself when I'm low on money, it should be shut down to avoid any temptations! Sometimes it's just to hard to resist full legnth quality albums/movies for free at the click of a mouse.
[Edited 12/20/09 12:39pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/20/09 1:54pm

Amorist

There are hidden vids on youtube, hard to search. Id show some but would break the rules. Prince isn't the only factor opposing youtube, WB have taken down content themselves also.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/20/09 2:09pm

violetblues

MyNameIsCally said:



Apparently there has been quite a few people who posted vidoes of themselves singing on YouTube & signed record deals! I think YouTube should pay royalties for each play a song gets on there, just like radio. It's a great promotional tool though, for me it's great to discover new bands/artists. For example I heard a lot about Sly Stone & Earth Wind & Fire on here last year, checked them out on YouTube, loved it, baught the CD's!



The example of Soulja Boy and other artists who post promotional vids in an effort to be "signed" to traditional labels and the traditional means of the music industry says a lot. No one is questioning the usefulness of youtube or its ability to attract ears and eyeballs, the only thing in question is its ability to fairly deal with/compensate artists and content providers who feel taken advantage of.

.
[Edited 12/21/09 19:48pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > removal of youtube videos