Riverpoet31 said: I said it before, Prince is far more versatile then 'just' doing funk, but that doesnt mean he doesnt have had a lot of impact on the sound and style of funk-music. Which modern day Funk artists has Prince impacted? One could argue D'Angelo, but I wouldn't label him a Funk artist either. As i said before: his minimalistic, electronic, almost 'abstract' type of funk is his legacy. A new step, a very influential one too. Again, which modern Funk artist has been influenced by this sound? Currently, the global Funk scene is experiencing a revival of the late 1960s Funk sound. While I give Prince credit where credit is due, I think that replacing lively drums, the essence of Funk, with stale drum computers, didn't exactly do something positive to the genre. Which artists have had a higher (more important?) input in funk then him in the last two - three decades? First, you need to show how Prince had impacted the Funk genre. Second, Prince was a mega-star (not because of his Funk sounds, but his Pop hits), and of course no Funk artist can top that. Funk has, for the most part, always been rooted in the underground, not the mainstream. That is especially true for today. Cameo and Zapp? They polished and simplified the sound of P-funk. Not much development there. True. I don't particulary like either of them. The Time? Their records were Prince-records with Morris Day on vocals. Nothing to discuss there. The Time was probably Prince's funkiest project to date - and the reason why he created The Time was for him to explore hs funky interests without jeopardizing his mainstream pop appeal. Rick James? calling himself punk-funk, when his funk was more disco in the first place. Not too fond of Rick James either. And, so what if he didnt release an album entirely focussed on funk? George Clintons albums since Computer Games have been very tacky, and I take 2 - 3 great funk-tracks on an Prince album (how diverse it may be) anyday above another mediocre Clinton album. I stated before that I am not a big Clinton fan. Just tell me, who have been the funk-artists who have impressed you so much in the last 20 - 30 years? I am curious about their names. Not the last 20 - 30 years. The 80s were a dull decade for Funk. The revival of oldschool Funk began in the mid-1990s and it is now a full blown global phenomen. New Funk artists went back to the late 1960s and early 1970s sound, which is considered to be the golden era of Funk. These new groups may not impress you much, because you made clear earlier that you want Funk to progress, not go back where it came from. I happen to disagree with you. I did a couple of New Funk specials on my radio show in recent months, you can check out the names of the groups and actually listen to the sound. http://wrir.org/x/modules...ryid=10143 http://wrir.org/x/modules...oryid=8587 [Edited 8/7/09 15:15pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So, you are no big Cameo and Zapp fan.
You dont overrate Rick James either. And its obvious you dont give Prince credits for his work in the funk-field. Who are your defenders of the funk-crown then for the last 2,3 decades? When it comes to Prince using drum-machines on his funkier tracks, i disagree with you. The essence of funk doesnt lie in organic drum beats, it lies in the funkieness of the groove, wether it are real drums or electronic ones. IMO Prince has used drummachines to a great effect: giving the funk a more bleak and raw edge. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince is the Undisputed King of Mpls. Funk | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: So, you are no big Cameo and Zapp fan.
You dont overrate Rick James either. And its obvious you dont give Prince credits for his work in the funk-field. Who are your defenders of the funk-crown then for the last 2,3 decades? When it comes to Prince using drum-machines on his funkier tracks, i disagree with you. The essence of funk doesnt lie in organic drum beats, it lies in the funkieness of the groove, wether it are real drums or electronic ones. IMO Prince has used drummachines to a great effect: giving the funk a more bleak and raw edge. I give Prince credit for his contributions to Funk. But I believe that you give him too much credit. You did not even respond to my questions, and you did not elaborate how Prince is actually a Funk artists and which new Funk artists he has influenced. I also give credit to Clinton, Cameo, Rick James. I just prefer the earlier Funk sound. And I also believe that drum computers have contributed to Funk's downfall in the 1980s. No drum machine can ever create dynamics and the energy of a Clyde Stubblefield or Jab'O Starks, who always play a bit behind the beat - something that a drum machine doesn't do. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No Prince is not the King of Funk.
Many of you here are clueless when it comes to funk or music history in general. You are not familiar with Sly, JB or the Parliament/Funkadelic/Clinton Empire catalog. You know a few songs and tribble these artist have not made great lps as you know some of the hit only. Clinton alone has released over 100 odd some lps under many names and musical styles. Prince is a great artist but he's not the master of all music. People it's ok to be a fan but get a clue. Everyone is a fan of the artist they grew up on but doesn't make that artist the greatest on the planet. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Soulstar77A said: Lets get this straight: Without JB there wouldnt be something like funk music at all! You could say, that he basically invented the whole thing all by himself. JB's albums are the basis for all the "funky" things that came later on - including Prince!
Just my 2 cents... [Edited 8/7/09 3:42am] That may be true, but so what? Does inventing it mean no one can do it better? Hardly. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
abigail05 said: I was watching 'Black To The Future' yesterday on VH1 and came to the realization - Prince was never really as funky as he's been made out to be. True funk lived and reigned in the 70s and early 80s.
Prince's funk couldn't really hold a candle to those guys (Parliament, EWF, Chic etc). And they could never do what he does. Wow. I so disagree. Funk reigned in the 70's and 80's? I'd say the 70's . . .by '82 it was gone except for the occasional Bar-Kays . . . What happened to Cameo, Parliment/Funkadelic, Confunshun, and other charting funk acts? The '80's with synths washed them away. Personally I could care less what Prince is the king of . . . . I'm just in it for the music. I don't care what anyone thinks of Prince. I listen to Prince. If it's one of those days that's all Prince . . . get over it or see ya! I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: He is not a THE most important or greatest funk-artist, but who IS?
I mean, most well known funkateers have always mixed their funk with other styles and didn't limit themselves to playing 'pure funk' only, whatever that might be. Sly and the Family Stone did throw a lot of soul, gospel and rock into their 'mix'. George Clinton (and Parliament and Funkadelic) used jazz-elements and 'peppered' his music with psychedelic rock. Maybe the godfather himself, James Brown, was the one who stayed closest to the 'pure' uncut funk, but hey, he invented it... lol But also, dont forget he started as a soul / traditional R&B singer. About Prince, he might have went into all kind of directions stylewise during his career (from pop to rock, from folk to blues, from techno to hip-hip): during his early years in MPLS (1978 - 1984) funk was a main ingredient of his style, and he has done A LOT in reinventing the and redefining the sound of funk in the eighties. Also after 1984 he has regularly gone back to playing funk-based music (the Camille album, the Black album, parts of the Batdance and Symbol album, several individual songs later on) and with that he created, IMO, some of the greatest funk-tracks of the last 20 - 25 years. People here who say he can't 'reach' artists like Chic, Kool and the Gang and Earth, wind and fire, at least when it comes to FUNK, need there ears checked: Those bands might haved use some funk-elements in their music, but they were disco and soulbands in the first place: EWF was a disco show-revue in the first place, not a funk-band. To conclude, its hard to say who is the real 'king of funk', because, what i said, funk has often been a mix-genre, so its hard to decide who is more 'funkier'...lol But when i look at the history and the development of funk music these are really the BIG 4 IMO: James Brown - Sly Stone - George Clinton - Prince Co-Sign I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Riverpoet31 said: He is not a THE most important or greatest funk-artist, but who IS?
I mean, most well known funkateers have always mixed their funk with other styles and didn't limit themselves to playing 'pure funk' only, whatever that might be. Sly and the Family Stone did throw a lot of soul, gospel and rock into their 'mix'. George Clinton (and Parliament and Funkadelic) used jazz-elements and 'peppered' his music with psychedelic rock. Maybe the godfather himself, James Brown, was the one who stayed closest to the 'pure' uncut funk, but hey, he invented it... lol But also, dont forget he started as a soul / traditional R&B singer. About Prince, he might have went into all kind of directions stylewise during his career (from pop to rock, from folk to blues, from techno to hip-hip): during his early years in MPLS (1978 - 1984) funk was a main ingredient of his style, and he has done A LOT in reinventing the and redefining the sound of funk in the eighties. Also after 1984 he has regularly gone back to playing funk-based music (the Camille album, the Black album, parts of the Batdance and Symbol album, several individual songs later on) and with that he created, IMO, some of the greatest funk-tracks of the last 20 - 25 years. People here who say he can't 'reach' artists like Chic, Kool and the Gang and Earth, wind and fire, at least when it comes to FUNK, need there ears checked: Those bands might haved use some funk-elements in their music, but they were disco and soulbands in the first place: EWF was a disco show-revue in the first place, not a funk-band. To conclude, its hard to say who is the real 'king of funk', because, what i said, funk has often been a mix-genre, so its hard to decide who is more 'funkier'...lol But when i look at the history and the development of funk music these are really the BIG 4 IMO: James Brown - Sly Stone - George Clinton - Prince Co-Sign Who ever said Prince has lost it - has lost it. The Kid's still got game! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Soulstar77A said: Lets get this straight: Without JB there wouldnt be something like funk music at all! You could say, that he basically invented the whole thing all by himself. JB's albums are the basis for all the "funky" things that came later on - including Prince!
Just my 2 cents... [Edited 8/7/09 3:42am] That may be true, but so what? Does inventing it mean no one can do it better? Hardly. Where did i claim that nobody can do it better? "ohYeeeeeah" said: I'm a massive Bowie fan. Even on Scary Monsters, I always skip Fame ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Soulstar77A said: Lets get this straight: Without JB there wouldnt be something like funk music at all! You could say, that he basically invented the whole thing all by himself. JB's albums are the basis for all the "funky" things that came later on - including Prince!
Just my 2 cents... [Edited 8/7/09 3:42am] That may be true, but so what? Does inventing it mean no one can do it better? Hardly. Better is always a matter of personal taste. But I'd be surprised if anyone would say that the quality of James Brown's Funk could be touched and even surpassed by anyone else. I hardly think that's the case, especially not when we are talking about Prince. But then again, this is a Prince forum, and I shouldn't be surprised at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: abigail05 said: I was watching 'Black To The Future' yesterday on VH1 and came to the realization - Prince was never really as funky as he's been made out to be. True funk lived and reigned in the 70s and early 80s.
Prince's funk couldn't really hold a candle to those guys (Parliament, EWF, Chic etc). And they could never do what he does. Wow. I so disagree. Funk reigned in the 70's and 80's? I'd say the 70's . . .by '82 it was gone except for the occasional Bar-Kays . . . What happened to Cameo, Parliment/Funkadelic, Confunshun, and other charting funk acts? The '80's with synths washed them away. Personally I could care less what Prince is the king of . . . . I'm just in it for the music. I don't care what anyone thinks of Prince. I listen to Prince. If it's one of those days that's all Prince . . . get over it or see ya! I did say the early 80s, and that was mostly to keep people here happy. Funk was a 70s thing, and I'm glad people generally don't think Prince invented the genre anymore. I was confused about this myself, and I actually kinda hated "funk" for it. I'm glad to have been wrong! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thumparello said: No Prince is not the King of Funk.
Thank you!!!! It's about time somebody set the record straight here. It sounds like the OP was bored and decided to post a thread just for the hell of it.Many of you here are clueless when it comes to funk or music history in general. You are not familiar with Sly, JB or the Parliament/Funkadelic/Clinton Empire catalog. You know a few songs and tribble these artist have not made great lps as you know some of the hit only. Clinton alone has released over 100 odd some lps under many names and musical styles. Prince is a great artist but he's not the master of all music. People it's ok to be a fan but get a clue. Everyone is a fan of the artist they grew up on but doesn't make that artist the greatest on the planet. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: SUPRMAN said: That may be true, but so what? Does inventing it mean no one can do it better? Hardly. Better is always a matter of personal taste. But I'd be surprised if anyone would say that the quality of James Brown's Funk could be touched and even surpassed by anyone else. I hardly think that's the case, especially not when we are talking about Prince. But then again, this is a Prince forum, and I shouldn't be surprised at all. I disagree that "Better" is subjective, unless the subject being considered is subjective in and of itself. A "better" television is just that, regardless of personal preference for something else. HDTV is "better" than analog, even if for some reason you argue that you prefer analog. But that being said, you are probably right otherwise. JB always makes me want to listen to Prince though. [Edited 8/8/09 13:55pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
you know, it's an age old arguement but one listen to the 80's killer funk album trax and totally killer B-Sides shows how much of a master he is of the style. Not only was there the quantity BUT so too was the quality and what really stands out is the GROOVE, hell even the intro to Batdance kicks some mighty fine ass!. Everything was just so locked and loaded i.e. killer chicken grease MPLS style rythm guitar, the Linn in full original effect, synth grooves that put the current 80's retro sound hittin' the UK scene to shame etc. There was also sheer variety too.
Therefore the arguement is simple, he WAS the King in the 80's and now , for whatever reason he chooses to cruise with the occasional flash of brilliance [i.e. F.U.N.K.]. Of course old bastards like me can go and dig out the 1999 album and the old B-Sides BUT I just want that feelin' again of anew P joint that makes me get the funky face and an attitude when I walk!. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: EWF was a disco show-revue in the first place, not a funk-band.
EW&F was much more mixed styles than merely a disco show-revue. You can hear that by checking Maurice White's development as conceptual composer through EW&F's early work from late 60's to mid-70's. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: Which artists have had a higher (more important?) input in funk then him in the last two - three decades? Cameo and Zapp? They polished and simplified the sound of P-funk. Not much development there. Not to me lol. They might not have been as influential as Prince, but to degrade their sound as "undeveloped" is truly an insult and lack of following how they evolved musically. Around 1980, Cameo had completely developed their own sound and succesfully so with gold records for most of their albums. Around 1982, Larry Blackmon completely changed the group's sound from big band funk to minimalised new wave funk with their release of the "Alligator Woman" album. Yes, Prince was one of the pioneers with adding that new wave to the mix, but Cameo's sound from 1982 did sound nothing like a copied Minneapolis sound. They eventually crossed over to the pop-charts with "Word Up" (which i never really dug), but that's another story. Larry Blackmon had a clear, focussed vision of which direction he was heading and knew exactly what the funk he was doing, as Roger knew too. Roger might've picked up P-Funk sounds and had productional help from Bootsy on Zapp's debut-album, but he created a trademark mix of talkbox with syncopated rhythms and some quirky country into the mix lol. And besides their contribution to funk, Zapp created excellent soulful tunes too with sometimes a lil' bit of jazz-loops added in there. [Edited 8/9/09 0:51am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Shango said: Riverpoet31 said: EWF was a disco show-revue in the first place, not a funk-band.
EW&F was much more mixed styles than merely a disco show-revue. You can hear that by checking Maurice White's development as conceptual composer through EW&F's early work from late 60's to mid-70's. Amen! In their prime, they were such a fantastic blend of all that was right with popular music and no one sings like Philip Bailey! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
exenn said: Amen! In their prime, they were such a fantastic blend of all that was right with popular music and no one sings like Philip Bailey! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
''now watch what you say or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, a fanatical criminal'' | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kenlacam said: Hell no! The MPLS Sound is "lite "funk at best. His best funk days are way behind him. He used to be the "prince" of funk, but NEVER king. That goes to Geoge Clinton and Parliment.
I agree. Prince is prince. But when I think of Funk, George Clinton and the P-Funk Family top the cake. George Clinton IS Funk. “When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist.” Brazilian bishop Dom Hélder Câmara | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prince is a caretaker, a mainstream star with the access and talent to publicly say "keep the funk alive". in his prime he served as a bridge from pure 70's horn based funk to new wavish synth based funk, not "better" but the funk for an audience just coming into record buying age. I grew up with older cousins listening to P Funk and shit, that was their Prince because it was new, edgy and pushin James (who had his last stand with early 70's guitar based funk) to the disco floor.When i was a teenager, Zap was the shit and the cold synth based MPLS. Funk was my preference, our funk. My older cousins "got it"even while holding on to George like the previous generation held on to James. Now that i'm grown i realize that i appreciate all of it because it all of it (Stevie, Sly, Roger) was what i heard, now my ipod holds all of the funk James, Sly Parliment and Prince. I dont consider Prince the king but certainly part of a larger evolution. James is the King, he put it on the one and everybody else followed and added their own "stank"to the Funk.James would have to be the start for those too young to remember when the church WAS the black music industry and dont know anything about Congo Square. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
George Clinton, James Brown, The JB's, Bootsy Collins, Larry Graham & GCS, Sly Stone, Rick James and Prince.
Prince is a custodian of the funk IMO, now. George Clinton, to me, embodies funk at its absolute. But Prince is about the worthiest inheritor imaginable. He doesn't dilute it. Also, Prince has merged funk with different styles. In terms of bass-playing, it has to be Larry Graham. Highly influential, not only in terms of funk, but also other styles of music. Also, of course, Bootsy Collins. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Riverpoet31 said: EWF was a disco show-revue in the first place, not a funk-band.
Bullshit.Listen to some of their early albums ('The Need Of Love','Head To The Sky','Open Our Eyes',etc) and tell me exactly where you hear "disco". If anything,EW&F was a jazz/funk band who later ventured into other styles,but it's absurd to dismiss them as a disco show-revue band | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh hell naw, because to me Prince's idea of funky lately seems to be rooted in his James Brown grooves. Yes I will say it, I have NEVER been a fan of James brown's music. I hate it in fact and I don't really appreciate buying a Prince album just to here him revamp and ressurect James Brown groves. It makes me wanna play frisby with that CD and pop 1999 back in the CD play for the Prince I know and love.
James Brown is so unfunky to me. Yeah Yeah, I know there are some die hard prince fans out there who will like anything he hawk spits on. But I actually happen to be a Die Hard prince fan of 28 years with some taste. Just because that "lil purple Mu Fugga" made a song don't means I am genetically predisposed to like it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So people who dig James Brown have no taste ? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1dell said:James Brown is so unfunky to me
Blasphemy [Edited 8/19/09 5:31am] "ohYeeeeeah" said: I'm a massive Bowie fan. Even on Scary Monsters, I always skip Fame ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mzkqueen03 said: ...2 me...prince will ALWAYS b my KING-OF-FUNK
..there have been others...true....but prince has the MOST power!!! ...mzsexybaby'MESSAGE UR BODY ABOUT 2 HEAR..IS NOT MEANT 4 TRANSMISSION' Please, would somebody tell me if they ever meet her? And where she gets her crack from. God, I hope she lives in the States. Although as time goes by I keep getting this urge to meet and f**k her. Not sure why though. Reckon it'd be sensual, dirty, messy, long and weird. Uh oh, I'm falling for mzkqueen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Craig Charles is the King of Funk. He has the Trunk of Funk so he must be.
Radio 6, Craig Charles' Funk and Soul Show, Saturday's 6 till 9 for those now in the know. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No no, that subject had changed by then. I was then talking about the fans who will like just ANYTHING that he put out because it's "prince's" music
Shango said: So people who dig James Brown have no taste ? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |