independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why aren't the albums Prince owns kept in print?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/05/09 12:32am

PimpandCircums
tance

Why aren't the albums Prince owns kept in print?

Can anyone answer this question? Why are the albums he owns only available for a limited time? Basically anything from "The Gold Experience" to "3121" is out of print. Why? This makes me very fearful that if he does get his masters back in 2013, that he might take everything from "For You" to "Come" off the shelves for good. What is the point of not allowing folks to enjoy your music? I also have a feeling that "Planet Earth" and "Lotusflow3r"'s days are numbered.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/05/09 1:23am

errant

avatar

because they are released through one-off distribution deals with labels/retailers.

he pays them a certain amount to press the discs and distribute them and (sometimes) promote them.

once they've done their job for the specified amount of time, i.e., the initial "life" or "run" of the album, they have no interest in keeping the albums in print.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/05/09 1:51am

squirrelgrease

avatar

Prince would have to front the costs for re-pressing and distributing. Or, get this... he would have to work with a record company. He could always release OOP items as downloads, but he doesn't like iTunes and seems to be uninterested in anything other than new projects.

Best guess on album status:

For You - In Print
Prince - In Print
Dirty Mind - In Print
Controversy - In Print
1999 - In Print
Purple Rain - In Print
Around The World In A Day - In Print
Parade - In Print
Sign O´ The Times - In Print
Lovesexy - In Print
Batman - In Print
Graffiti Bridge - In Print
Diamonds And Pearls - In Print
prince - In Print
The Hits 1 - In Print
The Hits 2 - In Print
The Hits/The B-Sides - In Print
Goldnigga - OOP
1-800-New-Funk - OOP
Come - In Print
The Black Album - OOP
The Gold Experience - OOP
Exodus - OOP
Girl 6 - OOP
Chaos And Disorder - In Print
Emancipation - OOP
Crystal Ball/The Truth - OOP
Newpower Soul - OOP
The Vault... Old friends 4 Sale - In Print
Rave Un2 The Joy Fantastic - OOP
Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic - OOP
The Very Best Of Prince - In Print
The Rainbow Children - NOS
One Nite Alone - Piano - OOP
One Nite Alone... Live/It Ain’t Over - NOS
N.E.W.S. - NOS
C-Note - Unavailable
Xpectation - Unavailable
The Chocolate Invasion - Unavailable
The Slaughterhouse - Unavailable
Musicology - NOS
Ultimate - In Print
3121 - NOS
Planet Earth - NOS
Indigo Nights - NOS
Lotus Flow3r/MPLSoUND - NOS
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/05/09 2:18am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

This is the main reason why it's bad for the fans if an artist isn't tied in some
way to ONE record company. Prince's back catalogue is a mess! Since the split
with WB, there's been a pretty random series of releases through various
different distributors and different formats. Most of which were one-shot
releases, and will probably never see the light of day again. It's very annoying.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/05/09 2:35am

NouveauDance

avatar

Thread title answers it's own question.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/05/09 3:15am

Se7en

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

This is the main reason why it's bad for the fans if an artist isn't tied in some
way to ONE record company. Prince's back catalogue is a mess! Since the split
with WB, there's been a pretty random series of releases through various
different distributors and different formats. Most of which were one-shot
releases, and will probably never see the light of day again. It's very annoying.


This is the reason most fans buy 2 copies of whatever he puts out post-WB. We know it's going to go out of print.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/05/09 3:17am

udo

avatar

Wel...
Since he left WB he owns the masters for all new releases.
So technically he can reprint them anytime he wants.

Of course it would be foolish to do so.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/05/09 4:45am

Mindflux

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

This is the main reason why it's bad for the fans if an artist isn't tied in some
way to ONE record company. Prince's back catalogue is a mess! Since the split
with WB, there's been a pretty random series of releases through various
different distributors and different formats. Most of which were one-shot
releases, and will probably never see the light of day again. It's very annoying.


Just wondering why you find that annoying?

Surely you own all the releases, so why is it annoying if they go out of print? If anything, that makes your copy all the more valuable, no?

Why should an artist compromise himself purely to satisfy commercial demands?
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/05/09 5:24am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

NouveauDance said:

Thread title answers it's own question.


It really does! lol
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/05/09 5:53am

SoulAlive

udo said:

Wel...
Since he left WB he owns the masters for all new releases.
So technically he can reprint them anytime he wants.

Of course it would be foolish to do so.


hmmm why would it be foolish? I am sure that there are newer fans who would like to explore the albums that they missed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/05/09 5:58am

SoulAlive

Mindflux said:

BorisFishpaw said:

This is the main reason why it's bad for the fans if an artist isn't tied in some
way to ONE record company. Prince's back catalogue is a mess! Since the split
with WB, there's been a pretty random series of releases through various
different distributors and different formats. Most of which were one-shot
releases, and will probably never see the light of day again. It's very annoying.


Just wondering why you find that annoying?

Surely you own all the releases, so why is it annoying if they go out of print? If anything, that makes your copy all the more valuable, no?

Why should an artist compromise himself purely to satisfy commercial demands?



How is Prince "compromising himself" by simply keeping his albums in print? confuse Remember,in the 90s he said that he wants to "flood the market".From a fan's perspective,how can this be a bad thing?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/05/09 6:09am

violetblues

At least his good ones are still in print. boxed
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/05/09 6:30am

Tame

avatar

I see that OOP is "Out of Print."

What is, NOS?
"The Lion Sleeps Tonight...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/05/09 6:38am

Giovanni777

avatar

Tame said:

I see that OOP is "Out of Print."

What is, NOS?


"New Old Stock"... Usually something that has been discontinued, but has never been opened.
"He's a musician's musician..."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/05/09 6:50am

squirrelgrease

avatar

Giovanni777 said:

Tame said:

I see that OOP is "Out of Print."

What is, NOS?


"New Old Stock"... Usually something that has been discontinued, but has never been opened.


Yeah. There's obviously some cases of N.E.W.S and Rainbow Children still getting cracked open. A lot of the other stuff like 3121(I still see the Gold Ticket CDs in stores), Musicology and Planet Earth will just get depleted or warehoused.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/05/09 6:53am

Mindflux

avatar

SoulAlive said:

Mindflux said:



Just wondering why you find that annoying?

Surely you own all the releases, so why is it annoying if they go out of print? If anything, that makes your copy all the more valuable, no?

Why should an artist compromise himself purely to satisfy commercial demands?



How is Prince "compromising himself" by simply keeping his albums in print? confuse Remember,in the 90s he said that he wants to "flood the market".From a fan's perspective,how can this be a bad thing?


Compromising himself did not allude to keeping albums in print, but to being "tied to one record company".

Flooding the market isn't necessarily a bad thing for the fan, but I'm sure Prince has realised that it would be a bad thing for his pocket. With the availability of digital downloads, it doesn't make financial sense for an artist to perpetually fund the re-pressing of cds. People can still access and purchase the music, but without it being a huge financial drain on the artist.
[Edited 5/5/09 6:55am]
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/05/09 7:00am

purplecam

avatar

This is one con to him being "free". It's a damn shame that you can't easily find Emancipation or 3121 in a record store. You'd think that that would be something Prince would discuss with the record labels he's done distribution deals with. It's not right at all.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/05/09 7:02am

emesem

errant said:

because they are released through one-off distribution deals with labels/retailers.

he pays them a certain amount to press the discs and distribute them and (sometimes) promote them.

once they've done their job for the specified amount of time, i.e., the initial "life" or "run" of the album, they have no interest in keeping the albums in print.


Sort of right except that, even with "one offs" the labels pay him an advance on his projected share of the profits. If the album is a dud, then Prince walks away with a nice gift while the label or retailer has to lay people off to make up the losses.

The only reason there are albums out of print is because no one has offered Prince a big enough advance. Any label would gladly take on the job of distributing these records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 05/05/09 7:56am

NouveauDance

avatar

Mindflux said:

With the availability of digital downloads, it doesn't make financial sense for an artist to perpetually fund the re-pressing of cds.

But these albums aren't even available for digital download, never mind physically. eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 05/05/09 8:19am

udo

avatar

SoulAlive said:

udo said:

Wel...
Since he left WB he owns the masters for all new releases.
So technically he can reprint them anytime he wants.

Of course it would be foolish to do so.


hmmm why would it be foolish? I am sure that there are newer fans who would like to explore the albums that they missed.

Yes, but did you see Prince apply any logic recently?
I mean: for a quick buck, yes.
But a more prudent, long term approach?
I.e.: a world-wide release of his albums, like the lotusflower fiasco (yes, he didn't succeed in arranging that himself, fact). (and yes, the albums themselves are OK)
I.e.: keeping stuff in print.
Etc.

Why would it be worthwhile for WB but not for Prince? He could print up albums at 10.000 pieces a time or more and store them. And let them out when the supply was needed. No big effort. Easy money.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 05/05/09 10:09am

ernestsewell

I still see Emancipation for $4.99 in cut out bins.

Don't forget, you can still get copies used in local stores, plus chains like FYE/Record Town
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 05/05/09 10:46am

Tremolina

'Why aren't the albums Prince owns kept in print?'


Better yet, why can't you download them to your computer from his website?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 05/05/09 11:23am

errant

avatar

btw, Best Buy seems to be trying to clear out their Rainbow Children stock for $5.99 if anyone is looking for a copy lol
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 05/05/09 12:50pm

ernestsewell

errant said:

btw, Best Buy seems to be trying to clear out their Rainbow Children stock for $5.99 if anyone is looking for a copy lol


I'd need a half off coupon to even consider purchasing that again, even for that price.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 05/05/09 12:55pm

Imago

It would be nice to see Prince offer all of those out-of-print albums on his website.

Most of them, to my knowledge, he could easily offer as downloads on lotusflow3r or some other type of online retail outlet.

It baffles me why he doesn't. He could be making a killing off offering online downloads, or even a print-and-ship per order method (even at a premium, many fans would gladly pay this).

I think he's sitting on a huge opportunity. Even if half the new stuff is crap, fans are willing to pay for it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 05/05/09 3:52pm

tricky2

Tame said:[quote]I see that OOP is "Out of Print."

What about OPP?? Other Peoples Property! (Warner Bros) lol

falloff
[Edited 5/5/09 15:53pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 05/05/09 3:55pm

tricky2

I'm sorry Nouveau, but your picture scares me! eek
[Edited 5/5/09 15:56pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 05/05/09 4:52pm

motherfunka

avatar

ernestsewell said:

errant said:

btw, Best Buy seems to be trying to clear out their Rainbow Children stock for $5.99 if anyone is looking for a copy lol


I'd need a half off coupon to even consider purchasing that again, even for that price.

They might as well throw them in the garbage where they belong!
TRUE BLUE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 05/06/09 2:25am

FlamingRaindro
p

violetblues said:

At least his good ones are still in print. boxed

evillol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 05/06/09 5:56am

udo

avatar

Tremolina said:

'Why aren't the albums Prince owns kept in print?'


Better yet, why can't you download them to your computer from his website?

We want decent media.
Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Why aren't the albums Prince owns kept in print?