Author | Message |
Hypercritical of Prince? It seems very easy to criticize Prince for not doing this or doing that with his music. I would just like to remind everyone that it is about the music. Just as Van Gogh is just about his paintings. It seems to me that some Prince fans, if they could go back in time, would stand behind Van Gogh's shoulder and tell Van Gogh to paint "Starry Night" red for it will match their couch. [Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm] 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it??? . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That is a nice paiting U are refering to. Prince is who He is and does as He does...and we love him 4 it. "The Lion Sleeps Tonight... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work. 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kewlschool said: SquirrelMeat said: Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work. But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw. . [Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm] . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: kewlschool said: This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work. But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw. . [Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm] That is a worthy viewpoint for discussion, perhaps another posting would suit that topic. But, my post was addressing the Fan critics of Prince music wanting Prince to do this or that with his music. (ie typically postings: R&b or Rock or the 80's are better than the 90's stuff that marginalizes Prince's music. etc.) [Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm] 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would suggest that if there's anyone still confused about Prince and the way he operates after all these yrs...check out this thread: http://prince.org/msg/7/308612
No particular reason for postin this here but oh well I swear the words "HATER" is wayyy over-rated...smh | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: lemme guess... an undercover "why all the fan hate thread"? To Sir, with Love | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
He would or more! and u know it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
the hypercritical tone of Prince on this site existed long b4 the Lotusflower site and its fee. I thought it was too high, i didn't pay it and i kept it moving. separate issues. but yes this site is. he can't win for losing. the number of insatiable, complaining, nostalgic, demanding, judgmental, ungrateful ppl on this site is alarming | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thanks for getting it Datdude. Money separate issue from Art issue.
[Edited 5/25/09 12:02pm] 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
that's cold | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So cold
99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kewlschool said: It seems very easy to criticize Prince for not doing this or doing that with his music. I would just like to remind everyone that it is about the music. Just as Van Gogh is just about his paintings. It seems to me that some Prince fans, if they could go back in time, would stand behind Van Gogh's shoulder and tell Van Gogh to paint "Starry Night" red for it will match their couch.
[Edited 5/25/09 12:03pm] I love "Starry Night" jst the way it is....sorry, my f'n cat popped the letter that comes after "t" off my keyboard. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In his words: Im Satisfied... & | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: Would Van Gogh charge $77 to view it???
Maybe he should have, he wouldn't have died broke. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...all i can say instead is...
..oh yeah i'm loaded verbal rap-ability baby..i know u inspire me 2 poetry..so listen while i recite naughty-nothings..that'll WET ur ear-drums...I LIKE 2..i like 2.. ...can i make sweet L-O-V-E 2 u baby?.. ..JUST LIVING AND A L-O-V-En ...waiting 4 the moment..WHEN U GOT TIME 2 GIVE..and if i can get 2 L-O-V-E u....WHAT'S A TELEFONE BILL?.. ..mzsexybaby'CLASSIC' ..She's Just A Baby..but she's my lady..my loveR..my only friend!..true love that will last!..PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND..WHAT SHE SEES IN AN OLDER MAN..they never stop 2 think that maybe i'm what she's looking 4..THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME..2 look in her mind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
perhaps this thread should be moved to the positivity, negativity, etc. sticky?
man, do people even read stuff before the just post random crap? [Edited 5/30/09 5:48am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lock it down, yes? this thread is nonsense. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: kewlschool said: This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work. But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw. . [Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm] That's fair enough, Prince should start busking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
japanrocks said: perhaps this thread should be moved to the positivity, negativity, etc. sticky?
man, do people even read stuff before the just post random crap? [Edited 5/30/09 5:48am] ----- This thread is not about why people hate or love on Prince. This thread is about artistic choice and how some people would like to tell the painter how to paint his picture. You either like the picture or you don't. But are you hypercritical because it was a water scene and you wanted an abstract? 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Constructive criticism is every bit as valuable as praise.
Unfortunately a lot of criticism – including some of my own -- tends to be far more self centered than insightful. Some of the best advice I’ve ever received was to separate the art for the artist. For all I know Van Gogh might have been a difficult prick much of the time. But no matter. I don’t have to live with him and I’m not seeking validation or a kindred spirit. I’m eagerly seeking out someone’s unique view of the world that can hopefully add to my own ever-changing landscape. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: kewlschool said: This post is meant to be about the artistic choice of the artist. Not designed to please the seemingly picky and ever changing tastes of the consumer. But, instead an artist exploring who they are and capturing it in their work. But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw. . [Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm] ----- All artists should be paid for their work. If you had your way, I guess all artist should give away their music or work for the record labels free. It is ridiculous to expect an artist who is not signed to a label to foot the bill for a website and receive no revenue for the content. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
We should be happy that Prince still makes music and does tours. He could've closed up shop ages ago if he wanted to. He has a gift for making music and feels that it's a part of what he's here for. I for one am grateful for every album he's put out. It doesn't mean I loved them all but I appreciate the time and effort that goes into each one. Sometimes when I read the posts here I wonder why people feel that they should dictate how Prince does what he does. You wouldn't want anyone telling you how to create/express something from your heart. I notice how easy it is for people to say what they hate but not what they love.
When go 2 a Prince concert or related event it's all up in the house but when log onto this site and the miasma of bitchiness is completely overwhelming! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: SquirrelMeat said: But you said you are reminding people its about the music/art. But its Prince that turns his art into commerce. With commerce comes viewpoint. He should accept those views or withdraw. . [Edited 5/20/09 16:35pm] All artists should be paid for their work. If you had your way, I guess all artist should give away their music or work for the record labels free. It is ridiculous to expect an artist who is not signed to a label to foot the bill for a website and receive no revenue for the content. No one is saying he should do his stuff for free. The topic is discussing whether it's fair to critize the music. I believe, if you charge for something, you have to be open to potential praise or critism. When a musician receives rave reviews, you very rarely hear fans asking the critics to stop. It cuts both ways. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No one is saying he should do his stuff for free. The topic is discussing whether it's fair to critize the music.
I believe, if you charge for something, you have to be open to potential praise or critism. When a musician receives rave reviews, you very rarely hear fans asking the critics to stop. It cuts both ways.[/quote] Let's make this clear I never said that you couldn't, shouldn't, wouldn't critique a work (In this case music). Critiquing and criticizing are two different thought levels. One comes from a place of love and respect, the other from a negative ego perspective with a goal to find fault with such work/person. My point being, if you criticize you have already predetermine the results. Watch for the contradiction.... Now, that being said, criticizing is a key component to comedy! 99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |