Why are people saying it's a different version on the new site.

It sounds the same to me.

What are the differences?

I don't hear any differences other than quality of the mp3 file

It won't play 4 me. It must be really busy right now. I'll try it again later.

It's 320 kbit now.

udo said:
"320 kbit/s"

Where can you check this?

jazzz said:

http://lotusflow3r.com/

mplsmike said:

I understand that I can check out (=listen to) the tracks at lotusflow3r.com. My question is: how can I see the specific properties of the separate mp3 files, like the bitrate?
[Edited 2/1/09 4:54am]

jazzz said:

One you get the file, use your favourite tool.
Why does that number bother you so much?
Just enjoy the music!

udo said:

Off course I enjoy P's music, I'm doing that for 25 years now. Do U, Udo?

I guess you are not really good at reading between the lines. The number is not what bothers me, point is that I want to "preserve" that music in mp3 format on my HD.

- In ieder geval bedankt voor de scherpe reply, heeft vast opgelucht-

It's exactly the same except for the bite rate quality

Peeps last night were claiming it was a different mix buts it's not

However it is still a great song and the best of the new bunch IMO
[Edited 2/1/09 9:12am]

wait till the album drops..
and we can forget about the bit rates

jazzz said:

Your judgement of my lack of `reading between the lines` is just that.
And asking to obtain content that is not meant to be used in that way, or how do I put it better, is not appreciated in this USA-like context. (C)-police is rampant and people are very scared for confrontations, even if 'fair use' would be an option. I.e.: They avoid `stuff` and suppress 'backups'.
So: sorry


You or me? I can't tell you anything as I explained.
Not even in the way like: 'you should NOT use tool xxx to do yyy'.
So: sorry
[Edited 2/1/09 10:02am]