My God after nearly 300 posts on this thread, one thing is true. We're not any further along in this thread than we were when it started. There are people who think Prince is a funk artist and others who don't. So what? This thread isn't going to make anyone change their mind about anything, it's just going to continually be a fight or argument that no one wins. What more is there to say on this thread that hasn't been said already? If you weren't convinced that he's a funk artist then you won't be and vice versa. We're like a dog chasing it's tail and getting nowhere fast. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If I got anything out of this conversation it would b a Funk Education ... LoL ... Good lookin' BP ... [Edited 8/20/08 11:33am] Peace ... & Stay Funky ...
~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~ www.facebook.com/purplefunklover | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: pplrain said: You started this thread as 'The MYTH of Prince's FUNK.' Now you are saying he does have funk in OK "some" of his music... Oh wait! It is just one song. So now you are contradicting yourself. I like his style... he explores many genres of music.. No one said he was the "king" of funk... Btw I don't like funk. Yes, and i explained what the "myth" was. Not that Prince isn't "funky" but the myth in some of the minds of Prince fans that he's a "funk artist" or "bearer of the funk". I never said he wasn't funky, and i've admitted that he's gotten close on a few occasions the most being "Hide The Bone". But i haven't contradicted myself at all. And you don't like funk, but are a Prince fan. Understood. Now see you got me confused again... so what is it? Is Prince music funk-y or not? Whatever... I like family affair... now does that mean I like funk? Cos I don't know.. sorry I am :confused: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I haven't read most replies here, but Rickey Vincent talks about something called "naked funk" which is a category Prince belongs to... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: My God after nearly 300 posts on this thread, one thing is true. We're not any further along in this thread than we were when it started. There are people who think Prince is a funk artist and others who don't. So what? This thread isn't going to make anyone change their mind about anything, it's just going to continually be a fight or argument that no one wins. What more is there to say on this thread that hasn't been said already? If you weren't convinced that he's a funk artist then you won't be and vice versa. We're like a dog chasing it's tail and getting nowhere fast.
I agree. I didn't start this thread to change anyone's mind either way. I just wanted to understand where the mindset came from, and i get it now. So in my mind, mission accomplished. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: ButterscotchPimp said: Yes, and i explained what the "myth" was. Not that Prince isn't "funky" but the myth in some of the minds of Prince fans that he's a "funk artist" or "bearer of the funk". I never said he wasn't funky, and i've admitted that he's gotten close on a few occasions the most being "Hide The Bone". But i haven't contradicted myself at all. And you don't like funk, but are a Prince fan. Understood. Now see you got me confused again... so what is it? Is Prince music funk-y or not? Whatever... I like family affair... now does that mean I like funk? Cos I don't know.. sorry I am :confused: I know, it's confusing. Of course, some of Prince's music is funky. That doesn't make it "funk". and yes, if you like "Family Affair" it does mean you like funk! http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VenusBlingBling said: I haven't read most replies here, but Rickey Vincent talks about something called "naked funk" which is a category Prince belongs to...
Who's Rickey Vincent? http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I still don't see where u defined what FUNK is supposed 2 be. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
READ
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: VenusBlingBling said: I haven't read most replies here, but Rickey Vincent talks about something called "naked funk" which is a category Prince belongs to...
Who's Rickey Vincent? Oh, if you want to discuss FUNK you gotta know about Rickey Vincent, IMO. One of the few who has taken the genre seriously. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: pplrain said: Now see you got me confused again... so what is it? Is Prince music funk-y or not? Whatever... I like family affair... now does that mean I like funk? Cos I don't know.. sorry I am :confused: I know, it's confusing. Of course, some of Prince's music is funky. That doesn't make it "funk". and yes, if you like "Family Affair" it does mean you like funk! U are funny.....and WRONG. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: ThirdStrike said: Exactly Butterscotch! I mean we're on like what...the 9th page of this nonsense! Prince is funky, but not a FUNK artist? Like you said...dude, seriously? I mean, I can put in a light bulb. Does that mean I'm electric, but not an electrician? You see how dumb that sounds? According to your argument, Prince isn't a FUNK artist to be mentioned in the same breath as someone like say...Sly, Mr Clinton, or JB. Although I'd aggressively disagree, I'll humor you and roll with that for a second. What you should then point out is how P is far more musically versatile then they were (or continue to be). If you get past the FUNK thing (and yourself) and look at the bigger pictute, it can be argued that these guys couldn't be mentioned in the same breath as Prince in that regard...plain and simple!! Just my 2 cents... what is obvious to some, is clearly difficult for others to wrap their brain around. Prince isn't a "funk artist" in my mind. Yes, that is different from him being "funky" on occasion. Notice how i said "in my mind" back a few words ago? No one is saying that Prince isn't the more versatile and talented musician OVERALL. but that wasn't the question/discussion. for the millionth time i was trying to get at the root of where some people got the idea that Prince is a "funk artist" when in my mind he's obviously not. he's a pop artist that uses elements of other genres (yes, even funk) in creating his own distinct sound. that is drastically different from him being viewed as a funk artist or even being prolific in the genre. there have been on this thread, a few examples of tracks that are certainly "funky" but as far as the funk genre is concerned may not be considered "funk". So yes, where Prince cannot be mentioned in the same breath as the aforementioned funk legends as far as pure funk is concerned, no one is saying that these guys can be mentioned in the same breath as Prince from a pop or even overall musicianship standpoint. good lord, some of ya'll have your purple panties in a bunch as far as i'm concerned. and i didn't get your little "electrician" example at ALL. no matter what someone will display 2 u, the highlighted portion says it all so it's a pointless debate because u'll b closed off 2 any suggestions or facts someone says. u'll instead do what u have been doing , calling people names etc etc ..and still we await ur proof and ....still nothing man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThirdStrike said: Graycap23 said: One who goes 2 EXTREMES 2 prove his point.....had no point at all. Exactly what I was thinking Gray! I guess FuNkeNsteiN is the kind of person who believes the height of Muhammad Ali's career is his loss to Leon Spinks... Every artist's catalogue is filled with a little "fat". They all can't be classics. But I guess according you, the only fat George Clinton ever produced was around his midsection... I stand corrected! So, no humor allowed in this thread, huh? Ok then It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FuNkeNsteiN said: ThirdStrike said: Exactly what I was thinking Gray! I guess FuNkeNsteiN is the kind of person who believes the height of Muhammad Ali's career is his loss to Leon Spinks... Every artist's catalogue is filled with a little "fat". They all can't be classics. But I guess according you, the only fat George Clinton ever produced was around his midsection... I stand corrected! So, no humor allowed in this thread, huh? Ok then I'm all 4 humor but I could not tell if that was humor. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: laurarichardson said: ----- Keeping a genre alive would mean actually performing that style of music. As far as I know, P is still performing “funk” cuts live as well as recording. I do not see the old funk mob doing too much recording these days and few bands are out on the road but they do not and well not ever have the showmanship that P has therefore, right now, he is the torchbearer for funk. You do not have to like it but the facts are the facts. The issue is you do not care for his “funk” but the vast majority of music scholars and critics would disagree with you as well as the music buying and listening audience. The music-heads that agree with you are never going to give P the “funk’ title because he mixes it and delves in other genre which, according to the funk gods is not allowed. I say more power to Prince for being mulit-talented across many genres and all the haters can claim that he has Purple-Kool-Aid drinkers in his camp but you cannot keep a career going for 30 plus years from a few crazed fans. You have an opinion I have the facts. Deal with it. That is so cute! You told me!!!! "you have an opinion, and i have FACTS!" The fact that you think the Prince has "kept the funk going" by "performing funk cuts" is an opinion darlin, not a fact. and is quite debatable, which was the point of this. but again, i don't get why ya'll keep running in here LATE trying to make your points NOW when the convo is over for the most part. Prince isn't "the torchbearer for the funk" and never was. and a self admitted kool-aid-kid certainly isn't going to concede that Prince isn't the master of any genre of music, so i get where you're coming from. ----- He is out doing his thang. I do not see any other mainstream artist doing it right now. So my statement stands as a fact. I have never admitted to being a "kool-aid' kid and you have yet to describe your definition of "funk" which explains why the topic is not closed. You opened a discussion and never did say what "funk' is to you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince isn't that "funky". Not in the purest definition of the genre. And what higher power has – A. Created such a definition. B. Bestowed the power to interpret this definition upon you? Sure he likes to throw the word around, but in the PUREST sense of the genre he's not even taken that seriously.
Short of George using Prince to get yet another label home for a minute, no one in the P-Funk camp takes Prince seriously from a "funk" standpoint. To be blunt, he's a joke in the real "funk" camp. No such camp. He's LAUGHED AT. He's respected as a musician, and for having a lengthy career, but Prince is so fucking far from the "standard bearer" for funk that's it's not even funny. No such person as as a”Standard Bearer”. I'm not pulling this opinion out of my ass No, you're pulling it out of hatred. (although i know i'm going to get accused of doing just that). I'm in Detroit and know and have talked to quite a few heavy hitters over the years who are main-stays in the funk community No such community. and Prince isn't taken seriously with these guys AT ALL. I mean short of borrowing some stage tricks from James Brown, as well as some horn inflections (also borrowed from JB'S) in the TRUEST sense of the genre, how is Prince really that "funky"? So explain to me how to some of you, Prince became the "keeper of the FUNK"?[/quote] This ladies and gentlemen is just about the stupidest post I have ever seen on any forum ever. How can someone that says so little be so hated (like he claims)? First – Beware of anyone that says they can define “funk”. That's like defining the “Blues”. Funk is a feeling. Second – He talks about funk like it's some structured place, like there are a set of instructions or ingredients that make it up. What a bunch of shit. There is an old SNL sketch in which Dan Akroyd plays the part of Tom Snyder interviewing BB King. He asks BB King, “What exactly are 'the blues'?” The audience laughed of course. Now for the first time in years, he's back, Tom Snyder, played by someone calling himself, of all things, “ButterscotchPimp” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: Much of his stuff is not actually funky, only from a colder place. Hard to dance to lots of his grooves.
And it is easy to dance to some of the "Funkadelic stuff"? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
savvy said: Prince isn't that "funky". Not in the purest definition of the genre. And what higher power has – A. Created such a definition. B. Bestowed the power to interpret this definition upon you? Sure he likes to throw the word around, but in the PUREST sense of the genre he's not even taken that seriously.
Short of George using Prince to get yet another label home for a minute, no one in the P-Funk camp takes Prince seriously from a "funk" standpoint. To be blunt, he's a joke in the real "funk" camp. No such camp. He's LAUGHED AT. He's respected as a musician, and for having a lengthy career, but Prince is so fucking far from the "standard bearer" for funk that's it's not even funny. No such person as as a”Standard Bearer”. I'm not pulling this opinion out of my ass No, you're pulling it out of hatred. (although i know i'm going to get accused of doing just that). I'm in Detroit and know and have talked to quite a few heavy hitters over the years who are main-stays in the funk community No such community. and Prince isn't taken seriously with these guys AT ALL. I mean short of borrowing some stage tricks from James Brown, as well as some horn inflections (also borrowed from JB'S) in the TRUEST sense of the genre, how is Prince really that "funky"? So explain to me how to some of you, Prince became the "keeper of the FUNK"? This ladies and gentlemen is just about the stupidest post I have ever seen on any forum ever. How can someone that says so little be so hated (like he claims)? First – Beware of anyone that says they can define “funk”. That's like defining the “Blues”. Funk is a feeling. Second – He talks about funk like it's some structured place, like there are a set of instructions or ingredients that make it up. What a bunch of shit. There is an old SNL sketch in which Dan Akroyd plays the part of Tom Snyder interviewing BB King. He asks BB King, “What exactly are 'the blues'?” The audience laughed of course. Now for the first time in years, he's back, Tom Snyder, played by someone calling himself, of all things, “ButterscotchPimp”[/quote] Co-sign 2 the Funk POWER of Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: VenusBlingBling said: I haven't read most replies here, but Rickey Vincent talks about something called "naked funk" which is a category Prince belongs to...
Who's Rickey Vincent? ----- Okay Mr.Detroit you just lost your funk card. Check out Ricky's book and website and get back to us. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
savvy said: Prince isn't that "funky". Not in the purest definition of the genre. And what higher power has – A. Created such a definition. B. Bestowed the power to interpret this definition upon you? Sure he likes to throw the word around, but in the PUREST sense of the genre he's not even taken that seriously.
Short of George using Prince to get yet another label home for a minute, no one in the P-Funk camp takes Prince seriously from a "funk" standpoint. To be blunt, he's a joke in the real "funk" camp. No such camp. He's LAUGHED AT. He's respected as a musician, and for having a lengthy career, but Prince is so fucking far from the "standard bearer" for funk that's it's not even funny. No such person as as a”Standard Bearer”. I'm not pulling this opinion out of my ass No, you're pulling it out of hatred. (although i know i'm going to get accused of doing just that). I'm in Detroit and know and have talked to quite a few heavy hitters over the years who are main-stays in the funk community No such community. and Prince isn't taken seriously with these guys AT ALL. I mean short of borrowing some stage tricks from James Brown, as well as some horn inflections (also borrowed from JB'S) in the TRUEST sense of the genre, how is Prince really that "funky"? So explain to me how to some of you, Prince became the "keeper of the FUNK"? This ladies and gentlemen is just about the stupidest post I have ever seen on any forum ever. How can someone that says so little be so hated (like he claims)? First – Beware of anyone that says they can define “funk”. That's like defining the “Blues”. Funk is a feeling. Second – He talks about funk like it's some structured place, like there are a set of instructions or ingredients that make it up. What a bunch of shit. There is an old SNL sketch in which Dan Akroyd plays the part of Tom Snyder interviewing BB King. He asks BB King, “What exactly are 'the blues'?” The audience laughed of course. Now for the first time in years, he's back, Tom Snyder, played by someone calling himself, of all things, “ButterscotchPimp”[/quote] DAYUM!!!!! I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Most people seem to agree that while Prince may be funky, he is not a Funk artist because he is pulling together somany other elements (but that funk is definately one of them).
As for the 'keeper of funk' or 'keeping funk alive'... maybe he is without acyually being a 'true funk artist in the purest definition of the genre'. A number of people in the thread have said that Prince introduced them to a larger world of funk... If through listening to Prince people are inpsired to listen/ play funk themselves... doesn't that make him somewhat of a gate-keeper into that world. For me personally, it was through listening to the Beastie Boys. I saw them live, and i went away feeling a desperate need to know more. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
savvy said: This ladies and gentlemen is just about the stupidest post I have ever seen on any forum ever. You don't read a lot of posts over here at Music & More then, do you? It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ButterscotchPimp said: HamsterHuey said: www.allmusic.com says Named after a slang word for "stink," funk was indeed the rawest, most primal form of R&B, surpassing even Southern soul in terms of earthiness. It was also the least structured, often stretching out into extended jams, and the most Africanized, built on dynamic, highly syncopated polyrhythms. As such, it originally appealed only to hardcore R&B audiences. The groove was the most important musical element of funk — all the instruments of the ensemble played off of one another to create it, and worked it over and over. Deep electric bass lines often served as main riffs, with an interlocking web of short, scratchy guitar chords and blaring horns over the top. Unlike nearly every form of R&B that had come before it, funk didn't confine itself to the 45-rpm single format and the classic verse/chorus song structure. Funk bands were just as likely to repeat a catchy chant or hook out of the blue, and to give different song sections equal weight, so as not to disrupt the groove by building to a chorus-type climax. In essence, funk allowed for more freedom and improvisation, and in that respect it was similar to what was happening around the same time in blues-rock, psychedelia, and hard rock (in fact, Jimi Hendrix was a major inspiration for funk guitar soloists). The roots of funk lay in James Brown's post-1965 soul hits, particularly "Papa's Got a Brand New Bag" (1965) and "Cold Sweat" (1967). Sly & the Family Stone, who started out as a soul band influenced by rock and psychedelia, became a full-fledged (albeit pop-savvy) funk outfit with 1969's Stand!. However, the record that officially ushered in the funk era was James Brown's epochal "Get Up (I Feel Like Being A) Sex Machine." The arrangement was spare, the groove hard-hitting, and Brown's lyrics were either stream-of-consciousness slogans or wordless noises. Brown followed it with more records over the course of 1970 that revolutionized R&B, and paved the way for the third artist of funk's holy trinity, George Clinton. Clinton's Parliament and Funkadelic outfits made funk the ultimate party music, not just with their bizarre conceptual humor, but their sheer excess — huge ensembles of musicians and dancers, all jamming on the same groove as long as they possibly could. Thanks to Sly, Brown, and Clinton, many new and veteran R&B acts adopted funk as a central style during the '70s. Funk gradually became smoother as disco came to prominence in the mid- to late '70s, and lost much of its distinguishing earthiness. However, it had a major impact on jazz (both fusion and soul-jazz), and became the musical foundation of hip-hop. Thanks to the latter, funk enjoyed a renaissance during the '90s, especially among white audiences who rushed to explore its original classics. I'll take that as a good a definition as any over that crap on Wikipedia. So let's use that. Mine would take a freaking hour and i'd have to be able to play soundbites in the middle of it. GOOD LORD. Gave an answer on Page 6 of the thread. I swear some of ya'll absolutely refuse to read what i write. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wow, all this over one person's definition of Funk. Funk is a subgenre of Rock and Roll which is a derivative of "Race" music, Blues, etc. You can get a little crazy trying to define musical variations. I would say that P is not "purely" a funk genre artist but he has definately created funk songs and dabbled in live funk moments in concert.
BP, How can you say Heatwave and Isley Brothers are torch bearers for the funk when they also routinely crossed genre lines? I just saw Brick in concert in Atlanta. Now they definately were still flying the funk flag. Definately underrated musicians and funksters. They got down! George Clinton and P's "We Can Funk" is a funk jam. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this proves to me that the funky side of Prince is just about the most funk that I have been exposed to.
I am not a funkologist. I must be a Princeologist. who is a musicologist. anyone get the gist? We are all so full of here | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleLove7 said: If I got anything out of this conversation it would b a Funk Education ... LoL ... Good lookin' BP ...
[Edited 8/20/08 11:33am] Anytime, bruh! http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VenusBlingBling said: ButterscotchPimp said: Who's Rickey Vincent? Oh, if you want to discuss FUNK you gotta know about Rickey Vincent, IMO. One of the few who has taken the genre seriously. I asked some of the camp, and was told he's a straight up MAGGOT from way back. I'd never heard his name before. So i'm definately going to read his book and check out some of his radio programs. Love learning about shit i didn't know about. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
btw I went to youtube and found Fruit at the Bottom.
Not even impressed. Also, type in SOTT (long version) on youtube and you will find Simple Minds covering the song. It's a wonder they ain't been yanked. WEB SHERIFF, you missed one you incompetent focks. We are all so full of here | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
L4OATheOriginal said: ButterscotchPimp said: what is obvious to some, is clearly difficult for others to wrap their brain around. Prince isn't a "funk artist" in my mind. Yes, that is different from him being "funky" on occasion. Notice how i said "in my mind" back a few words ago? No one is saying that Prince isn't the more versatile and talented musician OVERALL. but that wasn't the question/discussion. for the millionth time i was trying to get at the root of where some people got the idea that Prince is a "funk artist" when in my mind he's obviously not. he's a pop artist that uses elements of other genres (yes, even funk) in creating his own distinct sound. that is drastically different from him being viewed as a funk artist or even being prolific in the genre. there have been on this thread, a few examples of tracks that are certainly "funky" but as far as the funk genre is concerned may not be considered "funk". So yes, where Prince cannot be mentioned in the same breath as the aforementioned funk legends as far as pure funk is concerned, no one is saying that these guys can be mentioned in the same breath as Prince from a pop or even overall musicianship standpoint. good lord, some of ya'll have your purple panties in a bunch as far as i'm concerned. and i didn't get your little "electrician" example at ALL. no matter what someone will display 2 u, the highlighted portion says it all so it's a pointless debate because u'll b closed off 2 any suggestions or facts someone says. u'll instead do what u have been doing , calling people names etc etc ..and still we await ur proof and ....still nothing Dude. What do you want? I've said over and over again, that it wasn't an argument i was looking for. I GOT what i was looking for. I get it now. And the proof is in black and white. I know you hate my guts, but i haven't been on here calling people names other than the usual reference to the cult (the kak's) and the occasional fuck you to someone that was calling me names. I mean do i need to have the mods lock this now? I don't get what you're still here looking for? Many others have gotten quite a bit out of this due to the responses on this thread and the orgnotes i've received about this thread. I guess i can't satisfy EVERYONE. I can sleep well knowing that. [Edited 8/20/08 17:29pm] http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: ButterscotchPimp said: That is so cute! You told me!!!! "you have an opinion, and i have FACTS!" The fact that you think the Prince has "kept the funk going" by "performing funk cuts" is an opinion darlin, not a fact. and is quite debatable, which was the point of this. but again, i don't get why ya'll keep running in here LATE trying to make your points NOW when the convo is over for the most part. Prince isn't "the torchbearer for the funk" and never was. and a self admitted kool-aid-kid certainly isn't going to concede that Prince isn't the master of any genre of music, so i get where you're coming from. ----- He is out doing his thang. I do not see any other mainstream artist doing it right now. So my statement stands as a fact. I have never admitted to being a "kool-aid' kid and you have yet to describe your definition of "funk" which explains why the topic is not closed. You opened a discussion and never did say what "funk' is to you. Um, did you not say that P wouldn't have the career that he's had without a few crazed fans, implying that you're one of the proud, the few, the kak's??? And again, not only did i point out let's use the definition that was brought up from page 6 on this, i've been tweaking the definition throughout this entire thread. Again, a good chunk of the responses on here show that a bunch of people get that i was going for with this thread. Not going to lose sleep over the fact that every single person doesn't get it. Again, i wasn't trying to get anyone to think like i think, i wanted to understand how this myth of Prince, the Keeper Of The Funk got started and why it exists. I got my answer, and i'm satifsied. [Edited 8/20/08 17:24pm] http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |