Good for her. I say show em while you've got em girl! cause they're gonna fall like the wall of Berlin.
[Edited 12/25/07 12:01pm]

wlcm2thdwn said:

Good for her. I say show em while you've got em girl! cause they're gonna fall like the wall of Berlin.
[Edited 12/25/07 12:01pm]

meow85 said:

I know you're really tiny and all but Santa would never hire you as one of his elves anyway. You're not even remotely cheery enough.

I think people forget that there are 13 - 16 year olds that are members on this site, who also participate in discussions here, as well as cruise these forums.. I'm sure parents can't be everywhere to see what they are doing. Maybe the mods need to reconsider and change the minimum age to 18 plus, especially if the mods are allowing some members of this site to post links to explicit images like that here...just something to think about



I know you mean well Meow and I get what you mean, but there are sites that do it, they may not be able to actually enforce it, but raising the age limit or at least, stating as part of their policy in the heading of the site or before a person opens the site, to state that certain material/images/links or statements made by members may not be suitable for NSFW or NSFM(Not suitable for Minors) wouldn't hurt. This way it shows the site took responsibility for the material they allow and made the effort to inform visitors, and if the reader chooses to open it, then it would be at their own risk and the site wouldn't be liable.




Sure it is, in a fantasy world, but we all know in the real world that isn't always the case, and those under 18 will find a way to get access to whatever they want in this society. Not every kid may has a responsible adult around to monitor what society exposes them to. Even at movie theatres they have a policy informing parents what movies may not be suitable for kids, as well as warning notices shown before some television programs, stating that a particular program may not be suitable for young people under a certain age. It's called social responsibility, but then again, we have a long way to go with that.
[Edited 12/25/07 11:58am]

I think people forget that there are 13 - 16 year olds that are members on this site, who also participate in discussions here, as well as cruise these forums.. I'm sure parents can't be everywhere to see what they are doing. Maybe the mods need to reconsider and change the minimum age to 18 plus, especially if the mods are allowing some members of this site to post links to explicit images like that here...just something to think about

2elijah:




I don't know. I wouldn't be a Prince fan if I didn't find this site when I was 14 or 15 years old. and by the time I was that age, I already knew what boobs looked like. in fact, I even had my own pair!
I'm always surprised and saddened by the censorship and shame associated with the natural human body and sexuality.

P.S.- No matter how old you are... if you're listening to Prince, chances are you've already heard something "inappropriate".

violetblues said:

2elijah:




I don't know. I wouldn't be a Prince fan if I didn't find this site when I was 14 or 15 years old. and by the time I was that age, I already knew what boobs looked like. in fact, I even had my own pair!
I'm always surprised and saddened by the censorship and shame associated with the natural human body and sexuality.

P.S.- No matter how old you are... if you're listening to Prince, chances are you've already heard something "inappropriate".

laurarichardson said:

No you don't. Do your fucking job.

I wonder if Prince knew about these pictures when he hired her. Maybe he got in trouble for his association with M. Arcuri because of these pics.

I haven't read through ALL this thread but I thought P liked small boobs?!

Go find a desk job and stop worrying about other people. I pulled myself out of retail.

All this talk about what is appropriate for kids to see makes me wonder if the poster of this thread has kids or if they even care about kids. When this thread popped up with that link the first thing I thought was that someone has an ax to grind with Prince. Surely anyone can find pictures of semi nude women in all sorts of other places.
No wonder Prince wants to shut some sites down. Evidentially there's people with nothing better to do than to come here and try to portray him in a bad way. I bet she looks great in his video and I'm also going to bet she has all her clothes on.

colorblu said:

Pointing out that Prince has stellar taste in women is portraying him in a bad way?

laurarichardson said:

Uhhh....WHAT??? Hell I can't even understand the translation!

laurarichardson said:

It's cute that you think I'm worried. I've done desk work. Trust me -no one in that sort of job "needs" an internet break. Don't be so goddamned lazy.

New quote:
(sorry for crappy translation)

Did you have sex with Prince?
"No, he's a gentleman, he did hint to me that he liked me, but nothing more... and moreover, Prince has a very beautiful face, but it arrives at my breast" (she means he's too short for her).




http://www.tgcom.mediaset...5334.shtml

TheJourney4all7 said:

I was 8 years old when I saw Prince nude and climbing out of a bathtub for the When Doves Cry vid, and at that moment I thought that I had found a kindred soul. I didn't feel corrupted.

Wow....I actually see more warmth in her face and eyes with her clothes on.



And seriously, Prince needed someone beautiful for his new video, and out of all the gorgeous women in the world who don't have 1000 nude pics, he picked the one that did? And he liked her "voice" when he heard her in a Spanish film? Sure he did....will she be reading from the NWT in the video?