FunkyBrotha said:

So, why doesn't he then? He's been in a cash-crisis for years. Why not just do some bloody work and resolve it?

And, where's the libel case for all the "shit" thrown around in that documentary? Including suing the poor guy that had worked with him for years and was sacked with no severance or explanation. Or can Jacko not afford to take people to court anymore? Or has he seen enough of the inside of courtrooms? (BTW - only one quote from what I wrote previously was from that program. The rest of the shit was opinion based on facts I've witnessed).

Time will tell - until then, stick to your blind faith, eh?
[Edited 12/15/07 12:34pm]

Cyra said:

Since he doesn't even sing live, it will be more like a circus show, again, than a concert.
*
[Edited 12/15/07 13:25pm]

jn2 said:

True enough. Old Wacko seems to be nothing but rumor and pseudo-hype these days. Just like its supposed new album, I wouldn't be surprised if this tour of its amounts to nothing.

You can't deny that if MJ did do these shows or if he did tour, everyone would be going! The tickets would sell out in a second! Even the haters would be going, I can imagine them screaming alongside the fans in the front row!.. Its too much of a oppurtunity to waste, who wouldnt wanna see MJ perform?

DANGEROUSx said:

Me! Nope, I will definitely not be there....

Jeffiner said:

That's what they all say

Mindflux said:

Yeah, he should do the tour.
I mean, a Blanket has gotta eat, right?

DANGEROUSx said:

it all really depends on ticket price...thats what it all boils down to. prince did a risky thing, but he got the tickets to a great price, and it paid off big time for him.

mj could do it, but he'd also need ticket prices people can really afford, low price; otherwise it would be an embarrasment. id pay certainly, i love MJ, but a lot of people have been hugely swayed over the years by the controversy, atleast prince was on a huge status boost from having hit cds again and huge sellout concerts before hand, plus he's known as being fantastic live, even by non-fans.
MJ doesnt have these traits at the moment sadly.

You know, I should have guessed by now, after all that's been done people are still WILLFULLY praising this DEMONIC guy! THIS MAN IS A CHILD MOLESTER!!!!! Doesn't that mean anything to people anymore? And anyone supporting a person who would willingly prey off the innocence of a child for their own sexual gratification is MORALLY BANKRUBT!

No amount of talent on Earth should ever excempt ANYONE from such HARROWING acts.

Michael Jackson is literally the LIVING DEAD! Yes, as in NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD! He just hasn't figured it out yet, and he's the last thing in this world I'd want to be.

Michael Jackson WAS a good entertainer, but he's no musician and no songwriter, he'd be nothing without Quincy Jones and the rest of them.

He wont sell out 21 nights, i'd be suprised if he could manage more than 6 plus he'd probably colapse. I cant see him doing 2 hours plus per night.

honer said:

on the contrary, he has been a very good songwriter and a good musician...just because we dont see him constantly playing instruments doesnt mean he isnt a talented musician; it would be easy to say the same about david bowie and trent reznor, even though both are talented multi-instrumentalists for example.

i love MJ to death, but he simply doesn't have the live reputation that Prince does, and he doesnt have the large catalogue of songs either, which means that anything more than 5 nights would be overkill.

I saw him live at Wembley on the History tour in 1997 and although it was great, it was lip-synched, and more so about the visuals and dancing than the music (which you can pretty much say about the majority of his career since the mid 80's)

in my opinion the only way he could do it for longer would be if he included an acoustic set in every show (5 or 6 songs) and switched up that every night. That would give a residency of his more shelf-life I think.

PanicAttack said:

Ouch!!!!! I hear you loud and clear with that.

DANGEROUSx said:

I have better things to do. Not interested

fan09 said:

Hand to hand? Prince would be all over poor Michael.

Professionally? Prince. But, Michael ain't no punk!...

...If Michael broke into a rendition of the The Jackson 5's "Sugar Daddy" Prince might sing/play along.

prime said:

As long as MJ was grabbing himself, people were willing to pay to see him in concert. The problem started when he was accused more than once, to grab little boys. That was pretty much the end of his career and I don't think people will ever forget about that. Understandably so.

purplecam said:

I mean, honestly, people DON"T GET IT! Thery're so BLINDED by MJ's celebrity and their own SELFISH NEED to be ENTERTAINED, they're willing to LOOK THE OTHER WAY!

Now what if Michael had of PERPETRATED these SEXUAL ACTS of VILONCE on their 11, 12 or God know-how-young sons!

MJ is a DANGER to young boys. And any HONEST-HEARTED obsever knows in their HEART OF HEARTS that this man is GUILTY!

It's funny because he was pronounced innocent on all 10 charges, and the trial in the 90's was proven to be a setup.

But hey, yeah. He's definitley a child molester. I mean you know that for sure

I have to say, I used to consider the majority of Prince fans surprisingly intelligent. But you make up for it with staggering ignorance.
[Edited 12/16/07 10:30am]

honer said:

Michael writes nearly all his songs and he is a brilliant song writer, when he didnt work with Quincy Jones he released his Dangerous Album which was a huge. The reason MJ doesnt tour anymore is simply because he doesnt like touring, but there have been rumors he will tour again
[Edited 12/16/07 10:38am]

SunsetDriver said:

If I'm not mistaken, QUINCY JONES no longer wants ANYTHING to do with MJ. He brushes him off every chance he gets.

PanicAttack said:

I've seen Quincy state that he was too busy to ever work with Michael again. The way he stressed it gave the impression that he was'nt interested in ever working with Michael again.

honer said:

fantasticjoy said:

You know why, don't you? It's not PC for Quincey to come right out and be HONET! And thanks for verifying the information I just skimed over.

I wonder who could go into a studio by themslves and produce/create an album with no help.

zsasz said:

Hopefully MJ isn't in a bad mood when he does the prices then I love MJ but damn, he needs to get his reputation as an entertainer back.

PanicAttack said:

LMAO.

What do you have to support that?

MJ was ACQUITTED on ten charges. If he was guilty he would of been found out on one. :]

PanicAttack said:

Mj is many things.....but I don't believe that.

lottielooloo1968 said:

Exactly... the music may be good... but the press will rip into him. Plus when I saw him at Wembley Stadium a while back he lip synched and got all emotional pretending to cry on floor! Nothing on Prince live at all! Don't get me wrong I like Jacko's music of old but not sure about him...

Cyra said:

I think people will 'grow up' on here once you chill out a bit!