independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Possibe Landmark Litigation
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/10/07 2:49pm

Blake282

Possibe Landmark Litigation

Hello friends. When one goes to see Prince in concert, that is a strict rule against ANY type of recording, documentation etc. This is usually posted on signs at venue entrances and I think may have been on tickets. So, if any video or sound clips or pictures are taken--Prince has a right to have them removed. Having such footage or sounds obviously was against the rules he had set in place by renting the venue.
Now, if a picture, footage, sound clip, or any documentation has been gained while he was in a public place, ie--airport, club, streets, malls, etc., he is facing a very uphill battle(and will probably lose). We can take photos in public of objects and record sounds, unless other wise stated for a particular reason and a certain amount of time. I hope his legal eagles are telling him this. No judge will rule in his favor on the public side of his arguement.
Notice no other entertainer(movie, sports, music) have spoken on his behalf. There is or has to be another reason for this action. I feel his has been irritated for some reason and is over reacting. OR, could it be mouse milk. Stir up alittle controversy to gain press coverage(no such thing as Bad Press) before a announcement of some sort. Things that make u think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/10/07 2:53pm

Flowerz

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/10/07 2:54pm

Flowerz

http://prince.org/msg/3/251366

and it is more than just photos n video.. was also bout freedom of speech.. he didnt want folks discussing anything bout him on the boards
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/10/07 3:05pm

katt

....
[Edited 1/19/08 12:39pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/10/07 4:08pm

cream72

Flowerz said:

http://prince.org/msg/3/251366

and it is more than just photos n video.. was also bout freedom of speech.. he didnt want folks discussing anything bout him on the boards


And i suppose you have proof of this do you that he doesnt want people to speak about him. Cause until i see Proof i dont believe it
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/10/07 4:33pm

laurarichardso
n

Flowerz said:

http://prince.org/msg/3/251366

and it is more than just photos n video.. was also bout freedom of speech.. he didnt want folks discussing anything bout him on the boards

-----
It does not matter if the cease and desist letter said anything about freedom of speech. He can't stop people from talking about him but, he could go after something in writing that is defaming.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/10/07 6:22pm

lspear76

avatar

Prince sucks and hasn't written a good song since 1987. Is that defaming?
"Don't you think one of the charms of marriage is that it makes deception a necessity for both parties?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/10/07 6:41pm

christos7

lspear76 said:

Prince sucks and hasn't written a good song since 1987. Is that defaming?


As a statement in a public forum without a preceding IMO, it may well be.
Besides, I think it's untrue. nana

Far 2 many people post opinions as facts.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Possibe Landmark Litigation