shaedove99 said:

the wild side/ horns isnt that the sign for fertility?

seriosuly, someone could write a book about this stuff
the scary thing, more than half of it would probably be true

Explain yourselve there snap? LOL

I mean, i have visited some conspiracy-sites lately, and the people visiting those kind of sites have the tendency to bring all kind of unrelated things and events together as some kind of 'proof' that there is some evil movement of freemasons and zionists, which they call 'illuminati' ruling the world.

The fact is, when you really look a bit deeper at those claims, most of them are very easy to debunk, its like people trying to find a simple 'enemy' for all their personal frustations and griefs, and therefore its allowed to put rational thinking and scientific proof aside easily.... yeah, umm...right.

I am not saying there aren't dark games played beneath the surface, most of us dont know about. But the idea of freemasons or 'illuminati' secretly running the world, for 2000 years even, is a farce, its more a case of people projecting their own insecurities and frustations on some non-existing 'entity', while those people should be better off when using their common sense and intelligence.

Riverpoet31 said:

freemasons and zionists are so low on the scale that it's not even fair to call them illumanist. Most freemasons are not even in the illuminati, most zionists are not really illumanists, since illumanists have no national allegiance, however they have used antisemitism to deflect their actions, case in point, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has nothing to do with Jews, but implicating that they do, or that the Rothschild's are jews, take focus away from their motives; anti-semitics will of course latch on to the dis-info and blame jews.

Illumanists are satanists. The Catholic Church "tried" to have them eradicated. Would you say that The Catholic Church has had considerable power in running the world, I'm mean they're an open organization. If there is a network of secret organizations which has had as much power as The Church over the last thousand plus years would you say that was an organization of considerable influence?
[Edited 4/30/07 17:08pm]

well, we can all agree that Prince has a dark side (Black Album especially), Androgyny is also popular amongst occultist, look at Bowie. We also have established the Prince uses esoteric imagery, I think 1999 is the first time he start doing so.

Worst. Thread. Ever.

An interest in symbolism and iconography does not necessarily indicate a membership as a Freemason.

Symbolism does play a part in Masonic history. But it also plays a part in many other groups and historical periods.

I think Prince was more interested in ancient Egypt than Freemasonary.

lilgish said:

Green coat? Isnt that the single LP release?

Funk-mason.

squirrelgrease said:

oldpurple said:

I don't know. I've mostly seen people use it at concerts ("rock on")?? I've heard really religious people say it's the devil's horns & to watch out for people who use it like Bush. I can't keep up.

NouveauDance said:

I, also, am of the opinion that all masonry should be locked up & the key thrown away.

shaedove99 said:

Its a Druid symbol for fertility so todays religious people would say that