independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Is Prince better than Elvis?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 05/01/07 10:01pm

Amaxx

kalelvisj said:

Hello all! I rarely post on this site but come here often to enjoy the shared love of Prince and his music that is so alive here. I have been a Prince fan since Controversy. I am also an Elvis Presley fan and have been since I was able to put the needle on a record. I find it interesting and odd that Prince and Elvis so often cross paths in this forum, but I must admit that it makes perfect sense to me.

I do not think that it is a mistake that there are so many people who are fans of both. I don’t think that there are two more comparable figures in the history of Rock and Roll than Elvis and Prince. “Mascara covered eyes, high heeled boots, “vulgar” and sexually charged stage performances, lacey shirts, high collars, androgynous posturing, cocky masculine bravado, self effacing humor…” The list goes on and on and applies equally to Elvis and Prince. But those surface similarities are nothing compared to what these great men have achieved musically. Both embraced the music that filled the air around them and filtered it through their own experience and creativity to present the world with music that blurred the color lines in beautiful and explosive ways. Both broke socially accepted roles of man/woman and black/white. At the center of everything they did was the explosive element of intense sexuality and overwhelming spirituality. I can think of no other artists who had such a deep impact during the peak of their popularity than Elvis and Prince. Both influenced how people dressed, danced, thought and, well—f@&ked. .

This whole debate reminds me of a conversation that I had with a senior NCO when I was stationed at Ft Bragg, NC during the late 80’s early 90’s. My NCO and close friend told me about how when he was young, an entertainer had appeared on the scene that made him feel free to dress how ever he wanted, made him feel like it was okay to spend time getting his hair and MAKE UP just right before he went and how for the first time he felt free to go out and dance with out knowing the “next step.” Most importantly, the performer made him proud of his own culture. I went on to tell him about how my generation had finally found someone who had the same powerful impact. Of course he was talking about Elvis and I was talking about Prince. At the heart of his story was a concert he attended in Seattle in 1957. It would be years later when I went to the Seattle Music Experience that I would learn that it was the same concert that had had such a powerful impact on Jimi Hendrix. Oh, and my NCO was African American, Of course he would have never used that term, he often said he was still "Black and proud."

James Brown is quoted as calling Elvis his “Soul Brother.” To me the same can be said of Elvis and Prince. Prince has asked his listeners to strive for a colorblind world and just dance, to let the pain of history fall away and just love each other (“Race,” “D.M.S.R.”, heck…you all know all the songs…) In 1968 Earl Brown composed the song “If I Can Dream” based on things Elvis had said during conversations with Steve Binder during rehearsals for the 1968 Special. In that song Elvis pleads for a world where all “his brothers walk hand in hand” and the passion and sincerity in his voice is heart wrenching.

It seems that we are a long way from seeing the dreams of these two artists come true.

In my view, when all is said and done and the history books have enough time to look back honestly at the music of the 20th Century, Elvis and Prince will both stand out and above most other performers because of their color blind music and the way they freed the youth of their generation.

I will be honest with all of you, it took me so long to write this that I got logged out before I could post the comment and had to rewrite it. Trust me, the original version was like poetry. Sorry to have to give you the “second hand” version!!!

Peace out and lovesexy!!


Well written! Thankyou for being so sincere! cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 05/01/07 10:10pm

Amaxx

girl66 said:

After thinking this over I think I should have phrased it "Will Prince's popularity be as big as Elvis"


Probably not! Elvis has got our parents, us & probably our kids on his side. While Prince has got us and with some luck our kids, but not likely.
Elvis brought voice to a generation of kids who'd been raised with centuries worth of ultra conservative upbringing. He stood alone among very few, including Johnny Cash. His poularity reached beyond the U.S. in very little time.
Prince had to stand out from a crowd of wannabes' in a world of now diverse music tastes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 05/01/07 10:12pm

Amaxx

egyptkizzee said:

MantuaPharoah said:

Elvis was a hero to most
But he never meant shit to me you see
Straight up racist that sucker was
Simple and plain
Motherfuck him and John Wayne

Cause I'm Black and I'm proud
I'm ready and hyped plus I'm amped
Most of my heroes don't appear on no stamps
Sample a look back you look and find
Nothing but rednecks for 400 years if you check
Don't worry be happy
Was a number one jam
Damn if I say it you can slap me right here

- Public Enemy... Fight the Power - 1989!

Hell yeah... FUCK ELVIS!

lol... but I like some of his music... especially Love me Tender! LOL
[Edited 4/7/07 12:59pm]


we dont know for sure if elvis was racist or not we can only assume.but if i knew for sure he was i would definitely strongly dislike him.


Why would a racist embrace "Black" music?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 05/01/07 10:14pm

Amaxx

motownlover said:

elvis was very popular
he had black songwriters/ producers and took credit for it
he had good songs no doubt i love the more popualar known ones
but to me hes more of an icon then a artist
american people think he can do no bad but he was a blown up drug adict
in his later years and lost all his glamour.


Watch "Walk the Line". It wasn't just in his later years. And the 50's aren't as clean and innocent like we were all led to believe! From the very start it was "Sex, Drugs & Rock 'n' Roll!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 05/01/07 10:27pm

Amaxx

mozfonky said:

Graycap23 said:


Unfortunately I will agree with this.


I think in time, perhaps over the centuries his legend will grow. I really don't think even the fans appreciate how remarkable Prince is, I mean just look at all the negative things being said about his music here.


I think that what pisses people off about Princes music here is, how ,for example, on 3121 it's Prince saunding like Destinies Child or any of the current crop chart toppers! Up to Diamonds and Pearls it was Prince being Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 05/01/07 10:36pm

Amaxx

kalelvisj said:

DavidW said:

Elvis is the most overrated musician in history. Can anyone name 5 good Elvis songs? His early music was a watered down version of the blues; sterilized for the masses.Listen to the original version of Hound Dog. It's raunchy, gutbucket blues. Then listen to Elvis' version. So snappy and cute.
Elvis was to blues what New Kids On the Block were to rap. The only people who liked Elvis in the 50's were white bread teenagers. After the 50's does anyone except Elvis nuts think that he did anything good?
His 50's stuff was influential simply because it turned on white America to an acceptable version of R and B or blues.I.E.watered down black music not performed by blacks.
Elvis was overrated, watered down,white bread, wimpy blues in the 50's. Absolute unclassifiable garbage in the 60's and 70's.


Love it!!!! cool


Some counterpoints to the above:

Elvis' version of Hound Dog was anything but watered down. As far as Hound Dog being an example of Elvis watering down anything, as much as I love Big Momma's version, there is little to make it stand out from any other blues song of the time. Big Momma Thornton's version of ound Dog also happened to be written AND produced by two white boys...Through modern ears, Elvis' version might sound tame, but at the time was the equivalent of heavy metal, industrial or the hardest hiphop of our time. It isn't fair to try to judge a song from the fifties impact based on how it sounds to modern ears. IF you think it is, play some classic Prince or MJ or U2 for a modern teenager...watch them shrug and look at you like your crazy. And that is only 20 or so years.

As far as Elvis only having "whitebread" listeners...please. Jimi, Sam Cooke, James Brown, Muhammad Ali, Jackie Wilson, )who really hit it big by doing his imitation of Elvis in Vegas,) Wilson Picket, Marvin Gaye, Prince (he didn't learn Jailhouse Rock or Teddy Bear by magical Osmosis), George Clinton( you should read his great essay about Elvis, George calls Elvis a sould brother) ...anyway...the list goes on and on.

As far as Elvis doing qualitive music after the 50's...Sure he had some music that was subpar compared to the standards he established between 54-62, but throughout his career he recorded beautiful and soulful music.

To put it in perspective. Elvis might have had the Clambake soundtrack (many bad soundtracks) but how do Prince's clunkers hold up these days. It is always possible to find a real gem in Princes lesser albums, but how fair do you think it would be to judge his career and impact by oh lets say...New Power Soul?

Someday we will all swing by some website for some musician and someone will post a topic comparing that artist to Prince..I hope when that happens he will be judged by the impact he had, not the color of his skin or the less than stellar parts of his career.

Some interesting omparisons between Elvis and Prince's career...

Elvis: 1954-1962: Biggest Star in the World, no question.
Prince: 1982-91; One of the Biggest and most influential stars, no question. (84-86 the biggest!)

Elvis: 62-67 (Still pretty successful, but quality falters and by '67 career in basement...still charts top 40 hits.

Prince: 92-2003) (Still pretty successful but dramatic falling off in quality and several career lowpoints...disappears from charts.

Elvis: '68 -73 (Return to performance started w/ 68 comeback special and starts performing in Las Vegas. Renewed mainstream popularity. Several top 10 hits. Plays to over a billion people in one live telecast from Hawaii...(tons of success stories during this time, too many to list in fact.)

Prince: 2004- present (Major comeback, RRHOF, Grammys, Musicology tour. No real radio success, but Album does very well (of course there is the selling it with concert tickets issue). 3121 Flop album (not talking about quality, just sales) Starts highly successfull run in Vegas.

Elvis: 73-present One long tour until he dies in 77. Fairly regular appearnces in top 40, but never regains momentum that peaked at beginning of '73 with Aloha tv special (which I never liked by the way...fucking boring). To this day still has occasional top selling single, and even gets hits on the air (A little less conversation...)

Prince...Still knocking them dead live, hasn't had a radio hit in too many years.

Just wanted to make the point that perhaps modern listeners shouldn't be so quick to jump on the bashing bandwagon.

Most young people these days see an old Prince clip and ask why he is dressed like Austin Powers...so keep some perspecitve people.

And really for crying out loud, regardless of your race, stop assuming you have the ability (OR RIGHT) to talk about how audiences 60 years ago "heard" the music of their time. Read. You will discover that Elvis was a hero in the African American Community in the 50's. Too tired to hit y'all with a bunch of quotes right now.

Racism is racism, and no matter who wields it, it is a weapon of hate. Just made that up myself...not bad for a slightly intoxicated and incredibly burned out professor.;..

Peace and lovesexy.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 05/01/07 10:55pm

Amaxx

Graycap23 said:

This arguement is atrting 2 sound like baseball. There all of the records set before Blacks could play are a joke. Some of the BEST players who ever played were in the Negro League.....but know one knows that. Elvis, had he played on a level playing field would have been just another guy back then.

Jerry Lee lewis, Chuck Berry, Lil Richard, Jackie Wilson and other ran rings around Elvis...and I dug Elvis but let's be REAL about it. A lot of his "history" is based on HYPE. That's a FACT.


Jerry Lee Lewis!???? U gotta B fuckin kidding Me! If you want 2 put in a token White guy maybe Johnny Cash might B a better candidate. Oh! Everyone seems 2 B forgetting Roy Orbison! Elvis didn't! Said he was the best singer in the world.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 05/01/07 10:59pm

Amaxx

JonnyApplesauce said:

kalelvisj said:




History is also often based on cold hard facts. You talk about music like baseball. As if Elvis and Little Richard didn't compete on the same charts. As if Chuck Berry wasn't allowed to have records in the top 40. The only thing that stopped either of these performs was their own choices. They sold comparatively to all of the white artist you listed except for Elvis who out sold them all. Elvis adapted his style, for better or worse. He grew as an artist.

I could easily find quotes by all of the people you listed saying how important Elvis was. How his music opened the door for all those who followed.

What I find saddest about your post is that for you it all comes down race. Elvis can't be great because he is white. I find that sad.


Why is it so hard to admit that Elvis was imitating Black music?


If U bothered 2 read this icredibally fuckin long thread. no ones denying it! eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 05/02/07 1:06am

dreamshaman32

avatar

prince pales in only one catagory, "impact" and for obvious reasons. in boxing we have a debate called pound for pound, that means all things equal if these two fighters weighed the same and fought in the same era who would win. had prince been an artist in the 50's with his skillset, theres no way he wouldnt be one of the founding fathers of the genre, too deep, too versitile for guys who only had 2 or three "talents". graded across the board he's the ultimate artist who if you had an accuulated score of all catagories, showmanship, songwriting, musicianship, prolific output, charisma, image, studio aptitiude, etc he would nip elvis by getting points in all catagories. even impact, although never more than elvis prince changed the game when he launched purple rain. even the king of pop (micheal jackson) envied (and could not duplicate)that feet and it opened the door for rappers (black males) who aim for the hat trick of #1 song,# 1movie, #1 album. And as time goes on his influence broadens from Andre 3000 to the whole justin timberlake album. Timberland is biting the use of electronic sounds (bass,drums and keys) that comprise that cold "minneapolis funk" of the 80's. Prince did that, the use of keys for horns when large R&B bands were still doing it live, prince did that. The video gamish minimalist sound pharrell williams employs is an offshoot of prince as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 05/02/07 1:12am

P2daP

Amaxx said:

mozfonky said:



I think in time, perhaps over the centuries his legend will grow. I really don't think even the fans appreciate how remarkable Prince is, I mean just look at all the negative things being said about his music here.


I think that what pisses people off about Princes music here is, how ,for example, on 3121 it's Prince saunding like Destinies Child or any of the current crop chart toppers! Up to Diamonds and Pearls it was Prince being Prince.



But aren't they trying to sound like him? hmmm
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 05/02/07 2:26am

mozfonky

avatar

Amaxx said:

mozfonky said:



I think in time, perhaps over the centuries his legend will grow. I really don't think even the fans appreciate how remarkable Prince is, I mean just look at all the negative things being said about his music here.


I think that what pisses people off about Princes music here is, how ,for example, on 3121 it's Prince saunding like Destinies Child or any of the current crop chart toppers! Up to Diamonds and Pearls it was Prince being Prince.



I didn't know Prince was copying destiny's child, I don't listen to current music. What I mean when I say he's underappreciated is how he has released so much great music and it goes unnoticed just because it's him releasing it. Emancipation, the Symbol album, the gold album, rave etc.., all have plenty of good solid work on them and it's all taken for granted. This music is generally head and shoulders above all the dross out there and I do think it is too early for people to really appreciate this genius in the way that great classical composers were ignored until they died. I think in some ways prince is fated for that kind of treatment.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 05/02/07 12:46pm

Miles

I'm finding the logic of the 'Elvis stole black music and made money he didn't deserve from it' cliche quite amusing. Why is it that when Elvis performed and recorded music influenced by both 'black' and 'white' music (whatever the hell that means in practice, as imo no 'race' can claim full credit for pioneering any music form, particularly in so hybridised a nation as the US - music is dialogue, not a monologue in all societies), he's supposed to be 'stealing', but when Duke Ellington, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles play music influenced by white music, they are not 'stealing', they are 'influenced'?? Ellington and Wonder have both made European 'classical' influenced music, with Ellington's 'suites' of his later career, and Stevie's 'Pastime Paradise' and 'Village Ghetto Land' for starters and Ray did country music albums. Are they, 'racist thieves', out to take credit away from Beethoven, Mozart and co.?? eek

None of the great musicians, be they white, black, native American (oh, and Elvis himself was something like one eighth native American) or any other, want to be 'ghetto-ised' into playing music they're 'expected' to play, because of their race or background - Jimi Hendrix is a classic example. His music embraces blues, rock, jazz, funk, classical, avante garde and flamenco styles among others. Did Jimi 'steal' classical and Spanish flamenco music from the Europeans? Of course not. That would be absurd. So why make Elvis a special case??

Further back in time, did the white country singers like Jimmy Rogers and Hank Williams (taught guitar by an anonymous black bluesman) 'steal' from black bluesmen, when the played 'black' blues or blues-like songs, which were in reality hybridised/ improvised versions of general 'folk' songs that were in the air way back. Were black bluesman like Muddy Waters 'stealing' from whites when they performed general popular tunes of the day back in Mississippi in the 1930s and '40s?? It's a wide misconception that those guys only played blues songs. Audiences wanted the 'radio hits' and traditional/ religious songs as well, not just the 'holy blues'.

From a musical standpoint, blues and country are almost identical, I remember Little Richard once said, country is the 'white man's blues'. They use the same chords, scales and rhythms. The only real difference is some of the lyrics and the attitude. They come from the same sources, and we can argue for the rest of time which bits came from Africa and which came from Irish and British folk music.

In short, everybody's been copying everybody since the beginning of time, so it's gotta cut both ways or not at all. Music is in the air, not in the blood. It's a by-product of the mix of people and the local/ regional/ national environment over a long period of time, and is therefore'owned' by everybody and nobody.

As to whether it was Elvis or Prince who last longest in the cultural memory, much as I love and respect Prince, he is over-rated by Prince fans (not surprisingly smile ), and Elvis' name and image, almost regardless of musical quality, will loom far larger in history. Both were assimilators of what happened in music up to the time they came through, but Elvis came up at a special time in pop culture history, and no matter what Prince may have done or might do in the future, he will never be viewed in quite that way. Whether that is historical accident or injustice in a matter of personal opinion.

Arguably, Prince came in at the end of the cycle that began with r n'b and r n'r. Also, Elvis' used only 'real instruments', which makes for a certain timeless quality to his music, while Prince, with his modish '80s synths and drum machines, however inventive, is sounding more and more dated imo. Prince, among others, was the brilliant full stop to that classic era, that was followed only by more pap pop and hip hop - which is mostly 'talkin' loud and sayin' nothin' imo.

Peace.
[Edited 5/2/07 12:48pm]
[Edited 5/2/07 12:51pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 05/03/07 12:41am

kalelvisj

Miles said:

I'm finding the logic of the 'Elvis stole black music and made money he didn't deserve from it' cliche quite amusing. Why is it that when Elvis performed and recorded music influenced by both 'black' and 'white' music (whatever the hell that means in practice, as imo no 'race' can claim full credit for pioneering any music form, particularly in so hybridised a nation as the US - music is dialogue, not a monologue in all societies), he's supposed to be 'stealing', but when Duke Ellington, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles play music influenced by white music, they are not 'stealing', they are 'influenced'?? Ellington and Wonder have both made European 'classical' influenced music, with Ellington's 'suites' of his later career, and Stevie's 'Pastime Paradise' and 'Village Ghetto Land' for starters and Ray did country music albums. Are they, 'racist thieves', out to take credit away from Beethoven, Mozart and co.?? eek

None of the great musicians, be they white, black, native American (oh, and Elvis himself was something like one eighth native American) or any other, want to be 'ghetto-ised' into playing music they're 'expected' to play, because of their race or background - Jimi Hendrix is a classic example. His music embraces blues, rock, jazz, funk, classical, avante garde and flamenco styles among others. Did Jimi 'steal' classical and Spanish flamenco music from the Europeans? Of course not. That would be absurd. So why make Elvis a special case??

Further back in time, did the white country singers like Jimmy Rogers and Hank Williams (taught guitar by an anonymous black bluesman) 'steal' from black bluesmen, when the played 'black' blues or blues-like songs, which were in reality hybridised/ improvised versions of general 'folk' songs that were in the air way back. Were black bluesman like Muddy Waters 'stealing' from whites when they performed general popular tunes of the day back in Mississippi in the 1930s and '40s?? It's a wide misconception that those guys only played blues songs. Audiences wanted the 'radio hits' and traditional/ religious songs as well, not just the 'holy blues'.

From a musical standpoint, blues and country are almost identical, I remember Little Richard once said, country is the 'white man's blues'. They use the same chords, scales and rhythms. The only real difference is some of the lyrics and the attitude. They come from the same sources, and we can argue for the rest of time which bits came from Africa and which came from Irish and British folk music.

In short, everybody's been copying everybody since the beginning of time, so it's gotta cut both ways or not at all. Music is in the air, not in the blood. It's a by-product of the mix of people and the local/ regional/ national environment over a long period of time, and is therefore'owned' by everybody and nobody.

As to whether it was Elvis or Prince who last longest in the cultural memory, much as I love and respect Prince, he is over-rated by Prince fans (not surprisingly smile ), and Elvis' name and image, almost regardless of musical quality, will loom far larger in history. Both were assimilators of what happened in music up to the time they came through, but Elvis came up at a special time in pop culture history, and no matter what Prince may have done or might do in the future, he will never be viewed in quite that way. Whether that is historical accident or injustice in a matter of personal opinion.

Arguably, Prince came in at the end of the cycle that began with r n'b and r n'r. Also, Elvis' used only 'real instruments', which makes for a certain timeless quality to his music, while Prince, with his modish '80s synths and drum machines, however inventive, is sounding more and more dated imo. Prince, among others, was the brilliant full stop to that classic era, that was followed only by more pap pop and hip hop - which is mostly 'talkin' loud and sayin' nothin' imo.

Peace.
[Edited 5/2/07 12:48pm]
[Edited 5/2/07 12:51pm]



Nice post. I have been keeping the history to the 50's forward. Great job of taking it to the next step and taking it all the way back to Europe and Africa.

I think something that is very important to clarify is that, "defending" Elvis, no way tries to lessen the impact of his peers regardless of their ethnicity. There is no denying that the racial undertones of the time impacted the financial rewards of African American artists. May artists got screwed and it is sad.

But it is also critical to acknowledge that some African American artists continued to have great levels of success, most notably Ray Charles whose music continued to evolve and expand through out his career. As talented as Chuck Berry and Little Richard are and their tremendous impact during the fifties, their music didn't progress with the times at all. Elvis, Ray Charles, Jackie Robinson, James Brown, Roy Orbison all continued to expand their musical horizons.

Race can not be blamed for the downturn of the careers of a few African American performers when there were so many who continued to thrive and expand their audiences.

Race certainly can't be blamed for the disentigration of M.J. career or this missteps that Prince has made. Both of these great artists had the music world in the palms of their hands and fumbled. At the top of their games they ruled the charts, concert sales and in the case of Prince even the box office. HOw is that indicative of them being held back by their race.

In an earlier post I posed the question, if Princes legacy is diminished because of his race, what other white artist from his generation is given more respect now? None that I can think of...

Prince will be remembered as one of the great artists of all time and deservingly so.

Some day we will all achieve the color blind understanding of music that Prince said he aspired to in the 1986 MTV interview. Until then I suppose this argument will never end.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 05/03/07 12:43am

kalelvisj

The lack of responses to my "dare" in my earlier post that contained quotes from African American Musicians about Elvis, speaks volumes....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 05/03/07 12:56am

jasmine69

sad, prince is a wanna be robin thicke, both sound like chix, makes me puke!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 05/03/07 10:32am

dseann

mozfonky said:

dseann said:





Please name a song by Elvis in the 60's and 70's that can be classified as anything but garbage. Viva Las Vegas?


Do your homework son, he did fantastic music in gospel, country, and rock before he checked out. Too many songs to name really, so I won't, if you really want to do something other than badmouth, go check for yerself.


Dude, I'm never going to waste my time looking up anything by Elvis, even worse I'm not looking for anything in gospel or country music(my two least favorite genres). Fucking waste of my time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 05/03/07 12:43pm

mozfonky

avatar

dseann said:

mozfonky said:



Do your homework son, he did fantastic music in gospel, country, and rock before he checked out. Too many songs to name really, so I won't, if you really want to do something other than badmouth, go check for yerself.


Dude, I'm never going to waste my time looking up anything by Elvis, even worse I'm not looking for anything in gospel or country music(my two least favorite genres). Fucking waste of my time.


Dude, if you ain't willing to educate yourself, keep your silence.
[Edited 5/3/07 12:44pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 05/03/07 1:35pm

Makavelli99

Hell yeah Elvis stold our shit
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 05/03/07 3:17pm

kpowers

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

Hell yeah Elvis stold our shit



MMMM even black music has white influence. The lanuage- "English" which is European. Many of the instruments were made by white people.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 05/03/07 3:19pm

Makavelli99

kpowers said:

Makavelli99 said:

Hell yeah Elvis stold our shit



MMMM even black music has white influence. The lanuage- "English" which is European. Many of the instruments were made by white people.


Elvis and Justin stold our shit plain and simple.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 05/03/07 3:28pm

kpowers

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

kpowers said:




MMMM even black music has white influence. The lanuage- "English" which is European. Many of the instruments were made by white people.


Elvis and Justin stold our shit plain and simple.



Once again, it's not 100% black to start off with.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 05/03/07 3:31pm

Makavelli99

kpowers said:

Makavelli99 said:



Elvis and Justin stold our shit plain and simple.



Once again, it's not 100% black to start off with.


100% style, they like our swagger
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 05/03/07 3:34pm

mozfonky

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

kpowers said:




MMMM even black music has white influence. The lanuage- "English" which is European. Many of the instruments were made by white people.


Elvis and Justin stold our shit plain and simple.

thanks for the insightful comments
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 05/03/07 3:38pm

kpowers

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

kpowers said:




Once again, it's not 100% black to start off with.


100% style, they like our swagger



For it to be 100% it must not have any Europeans words in it. Use only instruments which were made by Africans from Africa. Recording it will be difficult since Electcity was not created by Africans.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 05/03/07 3:40pm

Makavelli99

They'll be stealing hip hop soon. In a couple of years i'll be hearing that
Marshall Matters aka mnm invented hip hop. I'm just keeping it real.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 05/03/07 3:49pm

kpowers

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

They'll be stealing hip hop soon. In a couple of years i'll be hearing that
Marshall Matters aka mnm invented hip hop. I'm just keeping it real.




I don't see anything wrong with White people (or Asian and Hispanics) singing hip hop music. Whats wrong with that. As long as they don't claim their ethnic created it (which I really don't seem anyone doing). I'm not into country music but I think Charlie Pride was a great country music star, and as an American he should be able sing what ever type of music. It's like telling the Williams sisters or Authur Ash not to play tennis.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 05/03/07 3:57pm

Makavelli99

I think your taking my comment way out of context. all i'm saying is don't lie about it and say you invented it. i'm not a racist person at all. I dig some doobie brothers, bon jovi is off the hook, santana no doubt, many other musicians that are not black that i really respect and appreciate
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 05/03/07 4:05pm

kalelvisj

Makavelli99 said:

I think your taking my comment way out of context. all i'm saying is don't lie about it and say you invented it. i'm not a racist person at all. I dig some doobie brothers, bon jovi is off the hook, santana no doubt, many other musicians that are not black that i really respect and appreciate


Fine, By your standards Elvis stole music. But please answer this then. What does that say about the genius of Ray Charles, Chuck Berry and Prince who "stole" music from artists who weren't african american?

Make what ever your statment you want, but please explain to me how it isn't a two way street.

Why can't anyone seem to do that.

To me Jimi is a genius, but check out the drawing he made of Elvis and do some research on what he said about Elvis. Is Jimi a thief? He was clearly inspired and influenced by Elvis.

So please just explain to me how whites steal and blacks are influenced.

Peace out and lovesexy!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #148 posted 05/03/07 4:08pm

kpowers

avatar

Makavelli99 said:

I think your taking my comment way out of context. all i'm saying is don't lie about it and say you invented it. i'm not a racist person at all. I dig some doobie brothers, bon jovi is off the hook, santana no doubt, many other musicians that are not black that i really respect and appreciate




It's cool, and I understand your point. When I think of hip hop I do think of Black people who created it. No doubt about that and they are good about it. I don't think any one of today would argue that. When it comes to Elvis I hear nothing but hate, which is wrong. Elivis always said he was influence by black music (as well as his own white influences as well).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #149 posted 05/03/07 4:12pm

Makavelli99

Now you get my point. I didn't want to be misunderstood
And I don't hate Elvis, I hate no one.


Only God can judge me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Is Prince better than Elvis?