independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > FAMLIY NAME: Does Prince Have Real Evidence?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 07/22/02 1:47pm

eos23

divo02 said:

As usual, nobody wants to talk about the FUTURE AND PRESENT, but prefer to dwell in the past. The recognition that black families have no family name because of past injustices does NOTHING to improve their CURRENT condition. What's the outcome we hope to agree on? Are white people going to all of a sudden provide reparations because they recognize the evil of their ways? No. At some point the whole discussion becomes a broken record. Additionally, I don't see how such a revelation is going to directly contribute to the improvement of American blacks either.

I think black Americans have a beautiful American culture that they have carried on thru generations. The lack of being able to identify a direct African connection does not preclude the sub culture that black people have developed in America. With all the mutt white people in this country who have no direct lineage to their European identity, you could almost argue that black people have a stronger identit & culture anyway.


As a black woman and someone who works with youth, I would have to "strongly" disagree with u. In the history books currently in our school system, most black children only learn about the negativity of slavery mixed in with only a few positive contributions by black people. This results in low self esteem.

When the children learn about their ancient heritage and true contributions to humanity (which have been distorted and covered up by European historians) They feel a sense of pride, and it does alot for them. I think that u are treading on dangerous ground when u imply that somehow our African culture should not be important to us. It is.

.To this day I wish I knew my tribal tongue, my culture, my traditions, It's so cool to see how that knowledge is played out in other cultures like the Asians. Personally I don't like alot of the European ways that have been adopted by blacks, I don't dig Western society much at all.

And time is an illusion..past, present, and future are all the same, ever studied Albert Einstein? He can break that down for you.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 07/22/02 2:03pm

JDODSON

In these times, it is best for all people, especially the common people of the world, to not let the past situations affect our quest for unity as one people without race and other barriers that the upper class wants us to stumble over. When we fall, they laugh. The world is the Jerry Springer show to the haters, and until the general public can realize this, those of us who fight for nothing but love will be persecuted and hated for loving unconditionally. The time is almost near for people to choose. It is time to funk or flunk.



Peace,

JD
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 07/22/02 2:29pm

feltbluish

avatar

divo02 said:

While this is all certainly interesting, family name research does nothing or very little to improve the CURRENT status of blacks in America. We'd certainly be better off discussing what we can accomplish together as Americans to improve the quality of life for all our poor, including black Americans.

I do applaud HIGHRISK for having the balls to post an article that was sure to be discarded by some of our prince.org intellectual elite.

I do agree with Wellbeyond in that if blacks were given the slavenames or just simply chose the name...it still doesn't really negate what Prince is saying in general about how "blacks in America have been forcibly separated from their roots, ancestry and culture."

Although, I do think the author of this article addressed other points that nobody on here has addressed. He claims recent policies and practices of blacks are to blame for their current family situation...and economical...rather than a "legacy of slavery." I think he has a valid point there. Additionally, the practice of American blacks choosing Arabic names when converting to Islam and his subsequent discussion of slavery with blacks/Arabs is interesting. I confess to knowing nothing about that though would enjoy hearing some of our PhD scholars in African studies discuss in more depth.
[This message was edited Sun Jul 21 10:29:26 PDT 2002 by divo02]

thank you for getting to the real issue...what can B done NOW? Let's go forward! How can we as humankind unify and make things better for all of our futures? Family name or not. Is that really the only way to examine one's heritage? I know, I know, at least I got my family name...how do I know that? My parents weren't married and Jah knows how many family name changes were gone thru during MY ancestry. As a matter of fact, what family am I a part of, since I am bi-pedal and with a soul, it must be the human family. My family name is the one I make for myself, the one I'm remembered by. Life's 2 short 2 B pissed off because 200 yrs ago people were fucked up. People R doing fucked up things now. How do we change? Having a "family name" doesn't help. 'tis only division. Celebrate diversity...YES! Bicker about who's worse off than who and who did the shittiest things...NO!
just my opinion...
-------------------------------------------------
Something new for your ears and soul.
http://artists.mp3s.com/a...dadli.html

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 07/22/02 6:38pm

eos23

feltbluish said:

divo02 said:

While this is all certainly interesting, family name research does nothing or very little to improve the CURRENT status of blacks in America. We'd certainly be better off discussing what we can accomplish together as Americans to improve the quality of life for all our poor, including black Americans.

I do applaud HIGHRISK for having the balls to post an article that was sure to be discarded by some of our prince.org intellectual elite.

I do agree with Wellbeyond in that if blacks were given the slavenames or just simply chose the name...it still doesn't really negate what Prince is saying in general about how "blacks in America have been forcibly separated from their roots, ancestry and culture."

Although, I do think the author of this article addressed other points that nobody on here has addressed. He claims recent policies and practices of blacks are to blame for their current family situation...and economical...rather than a "legacy of slavery." I think he has a valid point there. Additionally, the practice of American blacks choosing Arabic names when converting to Islam and his subsequent discussion of slavery with blacks/Arabs is interesting. I confess to knowing nothing about that though would enjoy hearing some of our PhD scholars in African studies discuss in more depth.
[This message was edited Sun Jul 21 10:29:26 PDT 2002 by divo02]

thank you for getting to the real issue...what can B done NOW? Let's go forward! How can we as humankind unify and make things better for all of our futures? Family name or not. Is that really the only way to examine one's heritage? I know, I know, at least I got my family name...how do I know that? My parents weren't married and Jah knows how many family name changes were gone thru during MY ancestry. As a matter of fact, what family am I a part of, since I am bi-pedal and with a soul, it must be the human family. My family name is the one I make for myself, the one I'm remembered by. Life's 2 short 2 B pissed off because 200 yrs ago people were fucked up. People R doing fucked up things now. How do we change? Having a "family name" doesn't help. 'tis only division. Celebrate diversity...YES! Bicker about who's worse off than who and who did the shittiest things...NO!
just my opinion...





I think it was Berry who said that if something still keeps coming up it is unresolved. Unfortunately, we cannot move forward until we talk about how we got here in the first place, and no one seems to want to talk about the past, a past that is still very vivid in the minds of people who were subjected to Jim Crow less than 40 years ago.

From a psychology standpoint a psychologist would tell u that if your parent suffers from negative psychological influences they usually pass it on to you, and then u pass it on to your children, therefore the black gen x'ers of today have been affected by the psychological scars passed on to them from their parents.

So yes I agree, Let's move on, but we have to dialogue about the past, we do, there is no getting around it, Because blacks are still being mistreated in this country they have "unresolved" feelings about racism. I would offer that perhaps we have a conference on racism and open up this topic nationwide. Then you'll see that's it's not just the Prince.orgers who feel this way, but an entire world of people of African descent who mistrust and have animosity towards the white man for the mistreatment, injustice and inequality that they endure even today.

I would like to offer up a question? How does it make caucasian people feel that your parents and grandparents subjected our parents and grandparents to the laws of Jim Crow. I was recently at a forum on reparations in Minneapolis which white people attended, and this one lady broke down and cried because she had recently discovered that her grandfather was in the KKK, she herself like many of u, doesn't see color, and has friends of all cultures, so u can imagine how this dirty laundry affected her.

Yes, this was all in the past nearly 40 years ago, but, your parents and grandparents had the freedom to exercise their moral concious, and didn't, they allowed the laws of segregation to thrive. And unless they marched with Dr. King, unless they lobbied the gov't, unless they supported the civil rights legislation. they sat by, and allowed other human beings to be treated like second class citizens.

One memory that sticks clearly in my mind is watching Remember the Titans starring Denzel Washington. It was 1973 and there were angry mobs of white people yelling and screaming and spitting at the black students that were integrating their "white" schools. Being that I was only 5 years old then, U could imagine how horrified I was that even by 73' we still hadn't fully integrated.

People are quick to quote Dr. King, his dream hasn't come true, and the man left us only 34 short years ago, so yes in our lifetime people had to endure aparteid conditions and face dogs, and hoses, and lynchings all in the name of fighting for equality that was given to us by our creator, but taken away by our oppressor.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 07/22/02 10:07pm

HIGHRISK

abucah said:

HIGHRISK said:

DOES PRINCE HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THE CLAIMS IN THIS SONG? OR IS HE BEING A BIT PRESUMPTUOUS? YOU DECIDE!
Do you AGREE with Dr. Sowell, OR Prince?


The truth is probably somewhere in the middle of Dr Sowell's point of view and that of Prince. But you asked the question of whether or not Prince has the evidence to back up his claims. My question is DOES DR. SOWELL HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP HIS CLAIMS??? He's the one that's refuting the status quo and calling anyone who believes otherwise to be "ignorant", so where's his evidence???


$$$ For those WANTING to BITCH at Dr. Thomas Sowell about where he got his facts from, go to this link below. And GOOD LUCK! You'll need it with this guy!

www.creators.com/opinion_...nsname=tso
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 07/22/02 10:39pm

HIGHRISK

jazzy328is said:

Highrisk: what is your point, that one man who goes against what 60 Million People say is right,


$$$ Going against the PRESUMED BELIEFS OF 60 MILLION PEOPLE? Or 60 MILLIION BLOWHARDS? Many times it's that SMALL VOICE,THE WHISPER that bares much truth. Although I don't always agree with him, Dr. Sowell is an unconventional thinker like I am whose not afraid of speaking his mind, even when it goes against the NORM. I admire him for that, and anyone else for that matter.


jazzy328is said:

I read the article that you supplied, but the article does not address why Slaves didn't have African names, Someone gave them a name,


$$$ The purpose of this article wasn't meant to discuss why slaves didn't have African names. Although a point he brought out does answer the question: Why then call blacks in the United States "African American", when not even their great-great-great-grandparents ever laid eyes on Africa? Also, slaves were given first names, but not FAMILY NAMES. Which is the LAST NAME.


jazzy328is said:

If Family names was not given to the Slaves then why does the archives list the name of the Slave Owners as the name of the Slave. Why do Records show that Last names were given, And Slaves could not read or write so how did the names get on the documents?



$$$ What documents? If they exist, did the slave owners put them there, or did some government agency at the time do it as a means to keep track of things?


jazzy328is said:

You read something by someone that perhaps have your opinion, and you make him to be an expert. He's not an expert and neither is you or I. But I know that I have documentation that says my father, GrandFather, Great Grand father, and Great Great GrandFather had a name that was given to them by their Slave Owner. Not opinion but Documentation. Now respond to that HighRisk:



$$$ If you so desire to CONTACT Dr. Sowell about this article or it's VALIDITY, go to the link below. Be sure to ask him questions about his CREDABILITY since you do not view him as being an expert on something he's been doing for close to 50 years.

www.creators.com/opinion_...nsname=tso
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 07/22/02 10:57pm

HIGHRISK

divo02 said:

I do applaud HIGHRISK for having the balls to post an article that was sure to be discarded by some of our prince.org intellectual elite



$$$Thanks for the APPLAUDS! But the truth of the matter is quite simple, but too often overlooked, which is: to truely understand your own POSITION, and to VALIDATE your claims, YOU MUST BE WILLING TO CONSIDER YOUR OPPONENTS.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 07/23/02 2:47am

eos23

HIGHRISK said:

jazzy328is said:

Highrisk: what is your point, that one man who goes against what 60 Million People say is right,


$$$ Going against the PRESUMED BELIEFS OF 60 MILLION PEOPLE? Or 60 MILLIION BLOWHARDS? Many times it's that SMALL VOICE,THE WHISPER that bares much truth. Although I don't always agree with him, Dr. Sowell is an unconventional thinker like I am whose not afraid of speaking his mind, even when it goes against the NORM. I admire him for that, and anyone else for that matter.


jazzy328is said:

I read the article that you supplied, but the article does not address why Slaves didn't have African names, Someone gave them a name,


$$$ The purpose of this article wasn't meant to discuss why slaves didn't have African names. Although a point he brought out does answer the question: Why then call blacks in the United States "African American", when not even their great-great-great-grandparents ever laid eyes on Africa? Also, slaves were given first names, but not FAMILY NAMES. Which is the LAST NAME.


jazzy328is said:

If Family names was not given to the Slaves then why does the archives list the name of the Slave Owners as the name of the Slave. Why do Records show that Last names were given, And Slaves could not read or write so how did the names get on the documents?



$$$ What documents? If they exist, did the slave owners put them there, or did some government agency at the time do it as a means to keep track of things?


jazzy328is said:

You read something by someone that perhaps have your opinion, and you make him to be an expert. He's not an expert and neither is you or I. But I know that I have documentation that says my father, GrandFather, Great Grand father, and Great Great GrandFather had a name that was given to them by their Slave Owner. Not opinion but Documentation. Now respond to that HighRisk:



$$$ If you so desire to CONTACT Dr. Sowell about this article or it's VALIDITY, go to the link below. Be sure to ask him questions about his CREDABILITY since you do not view him as being an expert on something he's been doing for close to 50 years.

www.creators.com/opinion_...nsname=tso



I wouldn't ask Dr. Sowell about his article any more than I would ask Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, or Clarence Thomas a question with their conservative "I got my head up the white man's ass views"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 07/23/02 5:21am

HIGHRISK

eos23 proclaimed:

I wouldn't ask Dr. Sowell about his article any more than I would ask Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, or Clarence Thomas a question with their conservative "I got my head up the white man's ass views"



$$$ Dr. Sowell, as well as many of the people (although I do not like Clarence Thomas) you've mentioned, are intelligent people who have been PERSECUTED for years about this kind of thing. THEY ARE AWARE OF THIS. NEITHER DO THE GIVE A PARTICILAR DAMN. But it comes as no SURPRISE to me that you would say this. It's always easier if you can continue blaming others, rather than focusing on presenting SOLUTIONS. And when that PARADIGM is shot full of holes, we OFTEN BARE OUR FANGS!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > FAMLIY NAME: Does Prince Have Real Evidence?